Round 24 — BAM Final B
17 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 24 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DABROWKA PO | PRISM FALCONS | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | POLAND KIDS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | CHILE | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | EYE OF THE TIGER | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | JAPAN U21 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | MAN EATING COBRAS | URUGUAY | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | CROATIA U16 | CHILE U26W | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 8 | SERBIA U21 | CROATIA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | SHSLLS1 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | SXTULIP | INDIA-B U26 | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | ITALIA 2 | HONG KONG | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CAPRISUN | SERBIA U26W | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | ZHIHAOLE | DABROWKA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | INDIA U16 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | ITALIA U26W | SXSPARK | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 50 50 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | BELGIUM | INDIA U21 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 24↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 24 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R24 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDIA-B U26 | 66.85 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 2 | ITALIA 2 | 65.85 | 4.00 | 24 |
| 3 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 65.71 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 4 | ITALIA U26W | 65.59 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 5 | CROATIA | 62.40 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 6 | SXSPARK | 61.76 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 7 | SHSLLS1 | 58.67 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 8 | DABROWKA | 58.04 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 9 | JAPAN U21 | 57.94 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 10 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 56.28 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 11 | SERBIA U21 | 55.97 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 12 | HONG KONG | 55.28 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 13 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 54.13 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 14 | POLAND KIDS | 52.92 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 15 | CHILE | 49.76 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 16 | BELGIUM | 46.80 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 17 | CHILE U26W | 46.41 | 2.40 | 24 |
| 18 | DABROWKA PO | 46.10 | 2.40 | 24 |
| 19 | URUGUAY | 45.61 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 20 | ZHIHAOLE | 45.10 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 21 | INDIA U16 | 44.67 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 22 | INDIA U21 | 43.82 | 4.00 | 24 |
| 23 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 42.82 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 24 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 41.64 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 25 | 50 50 | 41.58 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 26 | SERBIA U26W | 40.73 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 27 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 40.39 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 28 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 39.05 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 29 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 37.49 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 30 | SXTULIP | 35.98 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 31 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 29.46 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 32 | CAPRISUN | 26.52 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 33 | CROATIA U16 | 18.15 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 34 | PRISM FALCONS | 0.00 | 0.00 | 24 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 24 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R24 | BAM% |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs PRISM FALCONS 2.4 : 0 VP (match 85337)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | PRISM FALCONS | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT vs POLAND KIDS 3 : 1 VP (match 85338) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | POLAND KIDS | |
| 4♠ | E | ♥5 | -2 | 200 | 93% | 3N | E | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | W | ♠T | -1 | 50 | 72% | 3♠ | W | ♦4 | -1 | 50 | 72% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS+0.7 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 60% | ||||
| 3♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 72% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE vs TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL 1 : 3 VP (match 85339) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | |
| 2♠x | E | ♥3 | = | 670 | 97% | 4♠ | E | ♣8 | -1 | 100 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | W | ♣T | = | 110 | 78% | 1♠ | W | ♥A | +1 | 110 | 78% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS-0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠x | E | = | 670 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 60% | ||||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 78% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1♠ | W | +1 | 110 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
EYE OF THE TIGER vs RDFZ ZHIHAOLE 1 : 3 VP (match 85340) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | EYE OF THE TIGER | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | |
| 3N | E | ♦9 | -1 | 100 | 60% | 3N | E | ♣5 | -1 | 100 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3♥ | N | ♠8 | -1 | 50 | 50% | 3♠ | W | ♠9 | -1 | 50 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 60% | ||||
| 3♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U21 vs CHINA RDFZ HOPE 2 : 2 VP (match 85341) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U21 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | |
| 4♠ | E | ♥5 | -1 | 100 | 60% | 4♠ | E | ♥3 | -1 | 100 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♠ | W | ♣T | = | 110 | 78% | 2♠ | W | ♥A | = | 110 | 78% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 60% | ||||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 78% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAN EATING COBRAS vs URUGUAY 1 : 3 VP (match 85342) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAN EATING COBRAS | URUGUAY | |
| 3N | E | ♥3 | +2 | 660 | 93% | 4♠ | E | ♦6 | -1 | 100 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♣T | -2 | 100 | 93% | 4♠ | W | ♥A | -2 | 100 | 93% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS+1.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | +2 | 660 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 60% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | -2 | 100 | 93% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -2 | 100 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs CHILE U26W 0 : 2.4 VP (match 85343)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | CHILE U26W | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA U21 vs CROATIA 2 : 2 VP (match 85344) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA U21 | CROATIA | |
| 4♠ | E | ♥3 | = | 620 | 88% | 3♠ | E | ♣A | +1 | 170 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | W | ♠T | -1 | 50 | 72% | 3Nx | S | ♠K | -4 | 800 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-1.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | E | +1 | 170 | 66% | ||||
| 3♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 3Nx | S | -4 | 800 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE FUNBRIDGE vs SHSLLS1 3 : 1 VP (match 85345) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | SHSLLS1 | |
| 3N | E | ♥3 | = | 600 | 76% | 3N | E | ♣5 | = | 600 | 76% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3♦ | N | ♠8 | = | 110 | 100% | 3♠ | W | ♠T | -1 | 50 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 76% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 76% | ||||
| 3♦ | N | = | 110 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXTULIP vs INDIA-B U26 1 : 3 VP (match 85346) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXTULIP | INDIA-B U26 | |
| 4♠ | E | ♥5 | -1 | 100 | 60% | 3N | E | ♠8 | -1 | 100 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3♥ | N | ♠8 | -1 | 50 | 50% | 3♠ | W | ♠T | -1 | 50 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 60% | ||||
| 3♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ITALIA 2 vs HONG KONG 4 : 0 VP (match 85347) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ITALIA 2 | HONG KONG | |
| 4♠ | E | ♦6 | -2 | 200 | 93% | 3N | E | ♥3 | = | 600 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | N | ♠8 | -1 | 50 | 50% | 4♦ | S | ♠A | -2 | 100 | 59% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-0.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 76% | ||||
| 3♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 4♦ | S | -2 | 100 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CAPRISUN vs SERBIA U26W 1 : 3 VP (match 85348) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CAPRISUN | SERBIA U26W | |
| 4♠ | E | ♣A | = | 620 | 88% | 3N | E | ♣5 | -1 | 100 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | W | ♥A | = | 110 | 78% | 2♠ | W | ♠9 | = | 110 | 78% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS-0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 60% | ||||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 78% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZHIHAOLE vs DABROWKA 1 : 3 VP (match 85349) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZHIHAOLE | DABROWKA | |
| 4♠ | E | ♦3 | -1 | 100 | 60% | 3N | E | ♣5 | -1 | 100 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1♠ | W | ♣T | +1 | 110 | 78% | 3♠ | W | ♣9 | -1 | 50 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 60% | ||||
| 1♠ | W | +1 | 110 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs AZS WRATISLAVIA 3 : 1 VP (match 85350) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | |
| 4♠ | E | ♥3 | -2 | 200 | 93% | 4♠ | E | ♥3 | -1 | 100 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | W | ♣T | = | 110 | 78% | 2♠ | W | ♣9 | = | 110 | 78% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 60% | ||||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 78% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ITALIA U26W vs SXSPARK 2 : 2 VP (match 85351) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ITALIA U26W | SXSPARK | |
| 3N | E | ♥5 | +3 | 690 | 100% | 4♠ | E | ♥5 | -2 | 200 | 93% | 2 | ||||
| 4♦ | S | ♠A | -1 | 50 | 50% | 2♠ | W | ♣T | = | 110 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | +3 | 690 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 93% | ||||
| 4♦ | S | -1 | 50 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HAPPY BRIDGE vs 50 50 2 : 2 VP (match 85352) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HAPPY BRIDGE | 50 50 | |
| 4♠ | E | ♥3 | -1 | 100 | 60% | 3N | E | ♣5 | = | 600 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 1♥ | W | ♣2 | -1 | 50 | 72% | 3♠x | W | ♠T | -1 | 100 | 93% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 76% | ||||
| 1♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 3♠x | W | -1 | 100 | 93% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELGIUM vs INDIA U21 0 : 4 VP (match 85353) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELGIUM | INDIA U21 | |
| 3N | E | ♣5 | = | 600 | 76% | 4♠ | E | ♦3 | -2 | 200 | 93% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠x | W | ♣9 | +1 | 630 | 97% | 3♠ | W | ♠T | -1 | 50 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS+1.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 93% | ||||
| 3♠x | W | +1 | 630 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ KT75 ♥ T72 ♦ A8 ♣ QJ42 | ||
| ♠ J64 ♥ A84 ♦ QJT74 ♣ T7 | 23 Dlr S Both | ♠ AQ932 ♥ KQ9 ♦ K5 ♣ K63 |
| ♠ 8 ♥ J653 ♦ 9632 ♣ A985 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 5 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 7 |
| S | 5 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 7 |
| E | 8 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 6 |
| W | 8 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 6 |
| ♠ T9 ♥ AJ86 ♦ KJ54 ♣ T92 | ||
| ♠ AKQJ43 ♥ 43 ♦ 63 ♣ AK3 | 24 Dlr W None | ♠ 87 ♥ T972 ♦ T87 ♣ J875 |
| ♠ 652 ♥ KQ5 ♦ AQ92 ♣ Q64 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 5 | 5 | 8 | 9 | 5 |
| S | 5 | 5 | 8 | 9 | 5 |
| E | 5 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 7 |
| W | 5 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 7 |