Round 1 — BAM Final B
17 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 1 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ITALIA 2 | PRISM FALCONS | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | CAPRISUN | INDIA-B U26 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | DABROWKA | SHSLLS1 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | SERBIA U21 | INDIA U16 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | SXSPARK | CROATIA U16 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | 50 50 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | INDIA U21 | JAPAN U21 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | BELGIUM | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | CHILE | HAPPY BRIDGE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | ITALIA U26W | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | DABROWKA PO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | ZHIHAOLE | POLAND KIDS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | SERBIA U26W | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | HONG KONG | EYE OF THE TIGER | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | SXTULIP | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | URUGUAY | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | CHILE U26W | CROATIA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 1↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 1 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R1 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CROATIA | 5.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 2 | SERBIA U21 | 4.97 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 3 | JAPAN U21 | 4.94 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 4 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 4.91 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 5 | ITALIA U26W | 4.79 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 6 | SHSLLS1 | 4.67 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 7 | SXTULIP | 4.58 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 8 | SXSPARK | 4.36 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 9 | CHILE | 3.76 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 10 | POLAND KIDS | 3.52 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 11 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 2.88 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 12 | INDIA-B U26 | 2.85 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 12 | ITALIA 2 | 2.85 | 2.40 | 1 |
| 14 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 2.73 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 15 | DABROWKA PO | 2.70 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 16 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 2.55 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 17 | HONG KONG | 2.48 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 18 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 2.39 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 19 | SERBIA U26W | 2.33 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 20 | 50 50 | 2.18 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 21 | CAPRISUN | 2.12 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 22 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 2.06 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 23 | BELGIUM | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 24 | ZHIHAOLE | 1.30 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 25 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 0.82 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 26 | DABROWKA | 0.64 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 27 | CHILE U26W | 0.61 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 28 | INDIA U21 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 29 | INDIA U16 | 0.27 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 30 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 0.24 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 31 | URUGUAY | 0.21 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 32 | CROATIA U16 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 33 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 0.09 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 34 | PRISM FALCONS | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 1 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R1 | BAM% |
|---|
ITALIA 2 vs PRISM FALCONS 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84946)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ITALIA 2 | PRISM FALCONS | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CAPRISUN vs INDIA-B U26 2 : 2 VP (match 84947) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CAPRISUN | INDIA-B U26 | |
| 4♥ | E | ♣2 | = | 420 | 77% | 4♥x | E | ♦3 | = | 590 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥x | N | ♦A | -3 | 800 | 98% | 3♦ | E | ♠7 | +1 | 130 | 87% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | E | = | 590 | 94% | ||||
| 3♥x | N | -3 | 800 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 87% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs SHSLLS1 0 : 4 VP (match 84948) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | SHSLLS1 | |
| 6♣ | N | ♥Q | -1 | 50 | 53% | 3N | N | ♥Q | +2 | 460 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♥7 | +1 | 430 | 66% | 3N | W | ♥7 | = | 400 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+1.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♣ | N | -1 | 50 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | +2 | 460 | 92% | ||||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA U21 vs INDIA U16 4 : 0 VP (match 84949) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA U21 | INDIA U16 | |
| 3N | N | ♥Q | +1 | 430 | 81% | 4♥x | E | ♣2 | = | 590 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 5♦ | E | ♥9 | = | 400 | 64% | 3N | W | ♠T | +1 | 430 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-1.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | N | +1 | 430 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | E | = | 590 | 94% | ||||
| 5♦ | E | = | 400 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSPARK vs CROATIA U16 4 : 0 VP (match 84950) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSPARK | CROATIA U16 | |
| 3N | N | ♥Q | +2 | 460 | 92% | 4♥ | E | ♦6 | = | 420 | 77% | 2 | ||||
| 4♦ | E | ♥9 | -1 | 50 | 97% | 3N | W | ♥4 | +2 | 460 | 87% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.8 | NS-1.3 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | N | +2 | 460 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 77% | ||||
| 4♦ | E | -1 | 50 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +2 | 460 | 87% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs MAN EATING COBRAS 2 : 2 VP (match 84951) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | MAN EATING COBRAS | |
| 6Nx | N | ♦4 | -1 | 100 | 63% | 5♣x | N | ♥Q | = | 550 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | E | ♥9 | +1 | 130 | 87% | 3♥x | N | ♠A | -3 | 800 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6Nx | N | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 5♣x | N | = | 550 | 98% | ||||
| 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 3♥x | N | -3 | 800 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U21 vs JAPAN U21 0 : 4 VP (match 84952) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U21 | JAPAN U21 | |
| 5♦ | N | ♥Q | -1 | 50 | 53% | 4♥x | E | ♣2 | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♥7 | +1 | 430 | 66% | 5♦ | E | ♥9 | -1 | 50 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+1.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♦ | N | -1 | 50 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | E | -1 | 100 | 55% | ||||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | E | -1 | 50 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELGIUM vs RDFZ ZHIHAOLE 2 : 2 VP (match 84953) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELGIUM | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | |
| 6♣x | N | ♥Q | -1 | 100 | 63% | 4♥x | W | ♣A | = | 590 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♥4 | +1 | 430 | 66% | 3N | W | ♥7 | = | 400 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♣x | N | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | W | = | 590 | 94% | ||||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE vs HAPPY BRIDGE 3 : 0 VP (match 84954) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 4♥x | E | ♣6 | = | 590 | 94% | 4♥x | E | ♣6 | = | 590 | 94% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3♦ | E | ♥9 | +2 | 150 | 81% | 4N | W | ♠T | +1 | 460 | 87% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-1.6 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥x | E | = | 590 | 94% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥x | E | = | 590 | 94% | ||||
| 3♦ | E | +2 | 150 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 4N | W | +1 | 460 | 87% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT vs ITALIA U26W 0 : 4 VP (match 84955) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | ITALIA U26W | |
| 5♣ | N | ♥Q | = | 400 | 68% | 4♠ | S | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 87% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♠T | +1 | 430 | 66% | 3N | W | ♠T | = | 400 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS+1.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣ | N | = | 400 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | S | +1 | 450 | 87% | ||||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AZS WRATISLAVIA vs DABROWKA PO 2 : 2 VP (match 84956) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AZS WRATISLAVIA | DABROWKA PO | |
| 5♣ | N | ♥Q | = | 400 | 68% | 4♥ | E | ♣4 | = | 420 | 77% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♣2 | +1 | 430 | 66% | 3N | W | ♣7 | = | 400 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣ | N | = | 400 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 77% | ||||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZHIHAOLE vs POLAND KIDS 1 : 3 VP (match 84957) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZHIHAOLE | POLAND KIDS | |
| 5♣ | N | ♥Q | -1 | 50 | 53% | 3♦ | N | ♥Q | +1 | 130 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♥7 | +1 | 430 | 66% | 3N | W | ♠T | +1 | 430 | 66% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣ | N | -1 | 50 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | N | +1 | 130 | 58% | ||||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 66% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL vs SERBIA U26W 2 : 2 VP (match 84958) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | SERBIA U26W | |
| 4♥ | W | ♣A | +1 | 450 | 84% | 3N | N | ♥Q | +1 | 430 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♠T | = | 400 | 64% | 3N | W | ♥7 | +1 | 430 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | +1 | 430 | 81% | ||||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HONG KONG vs EYE OF THE TIGER 2 : 2 VP (match 84959) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HONG KONG | EYE OF THE TIGER | |
| 3N | N | ♥Q | +1 | 430 | 81% | 5♣x | N | ♥Q | = | 550 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♥7 | = | 400 | 64% | 3N | W | ♠T | +1 | 430 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | N | +1 | 430 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 5♣x | N | = | 550 | 98% | ||||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HOPE vs SXTULIP 0 : 4 VP (match 84960) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | SXTULIP | |
| 3♥ | E | ♣6 | +1 | 170 | 68% | 5♦ | N | ♠9 | = | 400 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 5♦ | E | ♥9 | = | 400 | 64% | 5♦ | E | ♥9 | -1 | 50 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+1.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | E | +1 | 170 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | N | = | 400 | 68% | ||||
| 5♦ | E | = | 400 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | E | -1 | 50 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
URUGUAY vs FRANCE FUNBRIDGE 0 : 4 VP (match 84961) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | URUGUAY | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | |
| 6♣x | N | ♥Q | -2 | 300 | 71% | 5♣ | N | ♥Q | = | 400 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 3Nx | W | ♠T | +1 | 650 | 94% | 3♦ | E | ♥9 | +1 | 130 | 87% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS+1.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♣x | N | -2 | 300 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 5♣ | N | = | 400 | 68% | ||||
| 3Nx | W | +1 | 650 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 87% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE U26W vs CROATIA 0 : 4 VP (match 84962) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE U26W | CROATIA | |
| 3N | N | ♥Q | -1 | 50 | 53% | 5♦ | S | ♥A | = | 400 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♠T | +2 | 460 | 87% | 3N | W | ♠T | = | 400 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+0.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | N | -1 | 50 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | S | = | 400 | 68% | ||||
| 3N | W | +2 | 460 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ KT6 ♥ K2 ♦ KT ♣ AKJT95 | ||
| ♠ J43 ♥ A9854 ♦ A ♣ Q873 | 1 Dlr N None | ♠ 982 ♥ QJT763 ♦ Q854 ♣ – |
| ♠ AQ75 ♥ – ♦ J97632 ♣ 642 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 11 | 9 | 3 | 10 | 12 |
| S | 11 | 8 | 3 | 10 | 12 |
| E | 2 | 2 | 9 | 3 | 1 |
| W | 2 | 2 | 9 | 3 | 1 |
| ♠ T4 ♥ KJ8764 ♦ Q4 ♣ 872 | ||
| ♠ Q6532 ♥ AQT ♦ K87 ♣ T4 | 2 Dlr E N-S | ♠ A ♥ 53 ♦ AJT963 ♣ AQ65 |
| ♠ KJ987 ♥ 92 ♦ 52 ♣ KJ93 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 3 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
| S | 3 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 4 |
| E | 10 | 7 | 7 | 11 | 8 |
| W | 10 | 7 | 7 | 11 | 8 |