Round 8 — BAM Final B
17 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 8 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BELGIUM | PRISM FALCONS | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | HAPPY BRIDGE | INDIA U21 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | ITALIA U26W | 50 50 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | SXSPARK | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | ZHIHAOLE | INDIA U16 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | SERBIA U26W | DABROWKA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | HONG KONG | CAPRISUN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | SXTULIP | ITALIA 2 | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | INDIA-B U26 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | SHSLLS1 | CROATIA | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | CHILE U26W | SERBIA U21 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | URUGUAY | CROATIA U16 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | MAN EATING COBRAS | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | EYE OF THE TIGER | JAPAN U21 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | CHILE | POLAND KIDS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | DABROWKA PO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 8↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 8 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R8 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HONG KONG | 24.48 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 2 | ITALIA U26W | 23.79 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 3 | JAPAN U21 | 22.94 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 4 | SHSLLS1 | 22.67 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 5 | INDIA-B U26 | 21.85 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 5 | ITALIA 2 | 21.85 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 7 | CROATIA | 21.00 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 8 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 20.91 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 9 | DABROWKA | 20.04 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 10 | SXSPARK | 19.76 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 11 | BELGIUM | 19.40 | 2.40 | 8 |
| 12 | POLAND KIDS | 18.52 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 13 | URUGUAY | 18.21 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 14 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 17.88 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 15 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 17.73 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 16 | SXTULIP | 17.58 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 17 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 16.82 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 18 | SERBIA U21 | 15.97 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 19 | CHILE | 15.76 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 20 | INDIA U16 | 14.67 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 21 | CHILE U26W | 14.61 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 22 | SERBIA U26W | 14.33 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 23 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 14.09 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 24 | INDIA U21 | 13.82 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 25 | 50 50 | 13.58 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 26 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 13.55 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 27 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 13.39 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 28 | CAPRISUN | 11.52 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 29 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 10.24 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 30 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 10.06 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 31 | DABROWKA PO | 9.70 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 32 | ZHIHAOLE | 8.30 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 33 | CROATIA U16 | 8.15 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 34 | PRISM FALCONS | 0.00 | 0.00 | 8 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 8 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R8 | BAM% |
|---|
BELGIUM vs PRISM FALCONS 2.4 : 0 VP (match 85065)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELGIUM | PRISM FALCONS | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HAPPY BRIDGE vs INDIA U21 0 : 4 VP (match 85066) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HAPPY BRIDGE | INDIA U21 | |
| 2♦ | E | ♣2 | +2 | 130 | 71% | 3N | W | ♥6 | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | W | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 61% | 2♥ | S | ♠T | = | 110 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♦ | E | +2 | 130 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | -1 | 50 | 68% | ||||
| 3♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ITALIA U26W vs 50 50 3 : 1 VP (match 85067) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ITALIA U26W | 50 50 | |
| 3♥x | N | ♠Q | -1 | 200 | 87% | 3N | N | ♦9 | -4 | 400 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥x | S | ♣K | -2 | 300 | 92% | 4♥x | S | ♣A | -2 | 300 | 92% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.6 | NS-1.8 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥x | N | -1 | 200 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | -4 | 400 | 97% | ||||
| 4♥x | S | -2 | 300 | 92% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥x | S | -2 | 300 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSPARK vs AZS WRATISLAVIA 2 : 2 VP (match 85068) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSPARK | AZS WRATISLAVIA | |
| 3♦ | E | ♥2 | = | 110 | 56% | 4♦x | E | ♥T | -2 | 300 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 4♦ | W | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 61% | 4♦ | W | ♥4 | = | 130 | 77% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♦ | E | = | 110 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 4♦x | E | -2 | 300 | 97% | ||||
| 4♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 4♦ | W | = | 130 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZHIHAOLE vs INDIA U16 2 : 2 VP (match 85069) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZHIHAOLE | INDIA U16 | |
| 2♥ | N | ♦9 | = | 110 | 90% | 3N | E | ♥Q | -2 | 100 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥x | S | ♣A | -2 | 300 | 92% | 2N | W | ♥6 | +1 | 150 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.0 | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | N | = | 110 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | -2 | 100 | 82% | ||||
| 4♥x | S | -2 | 300 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 2N | W | +1 | 150 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA U26W vs DABROWKA 0 : 4 VP (match 85070) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA U26W | DABROWKA | |
| 2♦ | E | ♣2 | +2 | 130 | 71% | 2♥ | N | ♦9 | +1 | 140 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥x | S | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 63% | 4♦x | E | ♥A | -1 | 200 | 87% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+1.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♦ | E | +2 | 130 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 94% | ||||
| 3♥x | S | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 4♦x | E | -1 | 200 | 87% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HONG KONG vs CAPRISUN 4 : 0 VP (match 85071) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HONG KONG | CAPRISUN | |
| 2♦ | E | ♥2 | +1 | 110 | 56% | 1N | E | ♣7 | +2 | 150 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| 4♦x | W | ♥6 | -1 | 200 | 87% | 3♦ | W | ♥6 | +1 | 130 | 77% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-1.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♦ | E | +1 | 110 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 1N | E | +2 | 150 | 81% | ||||
| 4♦x | W | -1 | 200 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | W | +1 | 130 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXTULIP vs ITALIA 2 1 : 3 VP (match 85072) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXTULIP | ITALIA 2 | |
| 2♦ | E | ♥2 | +1 | 110 | 56% | 4♦ | E | ♥2 | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | S | ♣A | = | 110 | 74% | 2♥ | S | ♣A | = | 110 | 74% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.8 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♦ | E | +1 | 110 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 4♦ | E | -1 | 50 | 68% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 74% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA-B U26 vs FRANCE FUNBRIDGE 2 : 2 VP (match 85073) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-B U26 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | |
| 3N | E | ♠4 | = | 400 | 97% | 4♦ | E | ♥2 | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥x | S | ♣A | = | 530 | 97% | 3♥ | S | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 50% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | = | 400 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 4♦ | E | -1 | 50 | 68% | ||||
| 3♥x | S | = | 530 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 50% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SHSLLS1 vs CROATIA 4 : 0 VP (match 85074) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SHSLLS1 | CROATIA | |
| 3Nx | E | ♥Q | -1 | 100 | 82% | 4♦ | E | ♥2 | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | S | ♣A | = | 110 | 74% | 3♥ | S | ♠T | -1 | 50 | 50% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+0.4 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3Nx | E | -1 | 100 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 4♦ | E | -1 | 50 | 68% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 50% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE U26W vs SERBIA U21 4 : 0 VP (match 85075) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE U26W | SERBIA U21 | |
| 3♥x | N | ♠Q | +1 | 930 | 100% | 3♦ | E | ♥2 | = | 110 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | S | ♣K | -1 | 50 | 50% | 4♥x | S | ♣A | -2 | 300 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS-1.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥x | N | +1 | 930 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | E | = | 110 | 56% | ||||
| 3♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | S | -2 | 300 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
URUGUAY vs CROATIA U16 2 : 2 VP (match 85076) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | URUGUAY | CROATIA U16 | |
| 4♦ | E | ♥2 | -2 | 100 | 82% | 1N | E | ♣2 | +5 | 240 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♣A | -2 | 100 | 63% | 2♥ | S | ♠T | = | 110 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♦ | E | -2 | 100 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 1N | E | +5 | 240 | 90% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | -2 | 100 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAN EATING COBRAS vs CHINA RDFZ HOPE 2 : 2 VP (match 85077) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAN EATING COBRAS | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | |
| 3♦ | E | ♥2 | = | 110 | 56% | 2N | E | ♠T | +1 | 150 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | W | ♥6 | = | 110 | 71% | 4♦ | W | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♦ | E | = | 110 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 2N | E | +1 | 150 | 81% | ||||
| 3♦ | W | = | 110 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 4♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
EYE OF THE TIGER vs JAPAN U21 2 : 2 VP (match 85078) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | EYE OF THE TIGER | JAPAN U21 | |
| 2N | E | ♣7 | +1 | 150 | 81% | 3N | W | ♥6 | -2 | 100 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | S | ♣Q | -1 | 50 | 50% | 4♦x | W | ♥6 | = | 710 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2N | E | +1 | 150 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | -2 | 100 | 82% | ||||
| 3♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 4♦x | W | = | 710 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ ZHIHAOLE vs TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL 1 : 3 VP (match 85079) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | |
| 2♦ | E | ♣2 | +1 | 110 | 56% | 2♥ | N | ♠Q | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | N | ♦Q | -2 | 100 | 63% | 2♥ | S | ♣A | -2 | 100 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♦ | E | +1 | 110 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 3N | N | -2 | 100 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♥ | S | -2 | 100 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE vs POLAND KIDS 1 : 3 VP (match 85080) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE | POLAND KIDS | |
| 3N | N | ♦9 | -4 | 400 | 97% | 3♦ | E | ♥T | +1 | 130 | 71% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥x | S | ♣A | = | 530 | 97% | 3♥x | S | ♣A | = | 530 | 97% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | N | -4 | 400 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 71% | ||||
| 3♥x | S | = | 530 | 97% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♥x | S | = | 530 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT vs DABROWKA PO 2 : 2 VP (match 85081) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | DABROWKA PO | |
| 3N | W | ♥6 | -1 | 50 | 68% | 4♥ | N | ♦6 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 4♦ | W | ♥6 | = | 130 | 77% | 5♦ | W | ♥4 | -2 | 200 | 87% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | -1 | 50 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 4♦ | W | = | 130 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | W | -2 | 200 | 87% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ J83 ♥ KJ964 ♦ KT4 ♣ J9 | ||
| ♠ A652 ♥ 75 ♦ AJ3 ♣ 6543 | 15 Dlr S N-S | ♠ Q7 ♥ A83 ♦ Q98765 ♣ AQ |
| ♠ KT94 ♥ QT2 ♦ 2 ♣ KT872 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 5 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 7 |
| S | 5 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 7 |
| E | 8 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 5 |
| W | 8 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 4 |
| ♠ KJ85 ♥ 64 ♦ A84 ♣ T874 | ||
| ♠ T ♥ QJ32 ♦ K972 ♣ AKQ3 | 16 Dlr W E-W | ♠ 96432 ♥ 7 ♦ QJT53 ♣ 92 |
| ♠ AQ7 ♥ AKT985 ♦ 6 ♣ J65 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 7 | 7 | 8 | 3 | 8 |
| S | 7 | 7 | 8 | 3 | 8 |
| E | 6 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 5 |
| W | 6 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 5 |