Round 2 — BAM Final B
17 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 2 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CAPRISUN | PRISM FALCONS | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | DABROWKA | ITALIA 2 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | INDIA U16 | INDIA-B U26 | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | SHSLLS1 | SXSPARK | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | 50 50 | SERBIA U21 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | INDIA U21 | CROATIA U16 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | BELGIUM | MAN EATING COBRAS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | HAPPY BRIDGE | JAPAN U21 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | ITALIA U26W | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | CHILE | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | ZHIHAOLE | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | SERBIA U26W | DABROWKA PO | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | POLAND KIDS | HONG KONG | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | SXTULIP | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | EYE OF THE TIGER | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | CROATIA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | URUGUAY | CHILE U26W | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 2↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 2 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R2 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ITALIA U26W | 8.79 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 2 | CROATIA | 8.00 | 3.00 | 2 |
| 3 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 7.91 | 3.00 | 2 |
| 4 | SXSPARK | 7.36 | 3.00 | 2 |
| 5 | SERBIA U21 | 6.97 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 6 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 6.88 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 7 | ITALIA 2 | 6.85 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 8 | SXTULIP | 6.58 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 9 | JAPAN U21 | 5.94 | 1.00 | 2 |
| 10 | INDIA-B U26 | 5.85 | 3.00 | 2 |
| 11 | SHSLLS1 | 5.67 | 1.00 | 2 |
| 12 | POLAND KIDS | 5.52 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 13 | SERBIA U26W | 5.33 | 3.00 | 2 |
| 14 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 4.55 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 15 | CAPRISUN | 4.52 | 2.40 | 2 |
| 16 | HONG KONG | 4.48 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 17 | INDIA U21 | 4.42 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 18 | URUGUAY | 4.21 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 19 | 50 50 | 4.18 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 20 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 4.06 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 21 | BELGIUM | 4.00 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 22 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 3.82 | 3.00 | 2 |
| 23 | CHILE | 3.76 | 0.00 | 2 |
| 24 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 3.73 | 1.00 | 2 |
| 25 | DABROWKA PO | 3.70 | 1.00 | 2 |
| 26 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 3.24 | 3.00 | 2 |
| 27 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 2.39 | 0.00 | 2 |
| 28 | ZHIHAOLE | 2.30 | 1.00 | 2 |
| 29 | INDIA U16 | 1.27 | 1.00 | 2 |
| 30 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 1.09 | 1.00 | 2 |
| 31 | DABROWKA | 0.64 | 0.00 | 2 |
| 32 | CHILE U26W | 0.61 | 0.00 | 2 |
| 33 | CROATIA U16 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 2 |
| 34 | PRISM FALCONS | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 2 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R2 | BAM% |
|---|
CAPRISUN vs PRISM FALCONS 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84963)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CAPRISUN | PRISM FALCONS | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs ITALIA 2 0 : 4 VP (match 84964) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | ITALIA 2 | |
| 4♠ | N | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 58% | 4♠ | N | ♣K | +2 | 480 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♦9 | +2 | 680 | 64% | 3N | N | ♦4 | +3 | 690 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | +2 | 480 | 74% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | +3 | 690 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs INDIA-B U26 1 : 3 VP (match 84965) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | INDIA-B U26 | |
| 4♠ | N | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 58% | 4♠ | N | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | S | ♣7 | +2 | 660 | 60% | 3N | N | ♣J | +3 | 690 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 58% | ||||
| 3N | S | +2 | 660 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | +3 | 690 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SHSLLS1 vs SXSPARK 1 : 3 VP (match 84966) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SHSLLS1 | SXSPARK | |
| 4♠ | N | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 58% | 4♠ | N | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | N | ♦4 | +3 | 690 | 86% | 3N | N | ♥4 | +4 | 720 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+0.8 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 58% | ||||
| 3N | N | +3 | 690 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | +4 | 720 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs SERBIA U21 2 : 2 VP (match 84967) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | SERBIA U21 | |
| 4♠ | N | ♣K | +3 | 510 | 84% | 2♥x | W | ♦A | -3 | 800 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | N | ♥4 | +2 | 660 | 60% | 6Nx | S | ♠A | -2 | 500 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | N | +3 | 510 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 2♥x | W | -3 | 800 | 94% | ||||
| 3N | N | +2 | 660 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 6Nx | S | -2 | 500 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U21 vs CROATIA U16 4 : 0 VP (match 84968) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U21 | CROATIA U16 | |
| 4♠ | N | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 58% | 2♠ | N | ♣K | +3 | 200 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♣6 | +2 | 660 | 60% | 4♥ | S | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-1.8 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | N | +3 | 200 | 95% | ||||
| 3N | S | +2 | 660 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELGIUM vs MAN EATING COBRAS 2 : 2 VP (match 84969) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELGIUM | MAN EATING COBRAS | |
| 4♠ | N | ♣K | +3 | 510 | 84% | 4♠ | S | ♣T | +1 | 450 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | N | ♠4 | +2 | 660 | 60% | 4♥ | N | ♥2 | +2 | 680 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | N | +3 | 510 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | S | +1 | 450 | 58% | ||||
| 3N | N | +2 | 660 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | +2 | 680 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HAPPY BRIDGE vs JAPAN U21 3 : 1 VP (match 84970) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HAPPY BRIDGE | JAPAN U21 | |
| 4♠ | N | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 58% | 4♠ | N | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♥ | N | ♦A | +1 | 650 | 82% | 6♣x | S | ♠A | -1 | 200 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS-1.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 58% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 650 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 6♣x | S | -1 | 200 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ ZHIHAOLE vs ITALIA U26W 0 : 4 VP (match 84971) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | ITALIA U26W | |
| 4♠ | N | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 58% | 4♠ | N | ♣K | +3 | 510 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| 5♥ | S | ♠A | = | 650 | 82% | 4♥ | S | ♣6 | +2 | 680 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+1.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | +3 | 510 | 84% | ||||
| 5♥ | S | = | 650 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE vs AZS WRATISLAVIA 0 : 4 VP (match 84972) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE | AZS WRATISLAVIA | |
| 5♠ | S | ♣T | = | 450 | 58% | 4♠ | N | ♣Q | +3 | 510 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♠4 | +1 | 650 | 82% | 3N | N | ♣J | +2 | 660 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+0.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♠ | S | = | 450 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | +3 | 510 | 84% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 650 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | +2 | 660 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZHIHAOLE vs RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT 1 : 3 VP (match 84973) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZHIHAOLE | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | |
| 4♠ | N | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 58% | 4♠ | N | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | N | ♣J | +2 | 660 | 60% | 3N | S | ♣6 | +3 | 690 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 58% | ||||
| 3N | N | +2 | 660 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +3 | 690 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA U26W vs DABROWKA PO 3 : 1 VP (match 84974) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA U26W | DABROWKA PO | |
| 4♠ | N | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 58% | 4♠ | N | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 5♥ | S | ♦2 | +1 | 680 | 64% | 5♣ | S | ♠A | +1 | 620 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-1.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 58% | ||||
| 5♥ | S | +1 | 680 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 5♣ | S | +1 | 620 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND KIDS vs HONG KONG 2 : 2 VP (match 84975) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND KIDS | HONG KONG | |
| 6♠ | N | ♣K | -2 | 100 | 100% | 6♠ | S | ♥Q | = | 980 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | N | ♣J | +3 | 690 | 86% | 4♥ | S | ♠A | +1 | 650 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♠ | N | -2 | 100 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 6♠ | S | = | 980 | 97% | ||||
| 3N | N | +3 | 690 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 650 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXTULIP vs TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL 2 : 2 VP (match 84976) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXTULIP | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | |
| 4♠ | N | ♥9 | +3 | 510 | 84% | 3♠ | N | ♣K | +2 | 200 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♦A | +2 | 680 | 64% | 3N | N | ♦4 | +3 | 690 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | N | +3 | 510 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | N | +2 | 200 | 95% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | +2 | 680 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | +3 | 690 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
EYE OF THE TIGER vs FRANCE FUNBRIDGE 1 : 3 VP (match 84977) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | EYE OF THE TIGER | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | |
| 4♠ | N | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 58% | 4♠ | N | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | S | ♣9 | +2 | 660 | 60% | 3N | N | ♦4 | +3 | 690 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 58% | ||||
| 3N | S | +2 | 660 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | +3 | 690 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HOPE vs CROATIA 1 : 3 VP (match 84978) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | CROATIA | |
| 4♠ | N | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 58% | 6♠ | N | ♣K | +1 | 1010 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | N | ♥4 | +2 | 660 | 60% | 3N | N | ♣J | +2 | 660 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.8 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 6♠ | N | +1 | 1010 | 100% | ||||
| 3N | N | +2 | 660 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | N | +2 | 660 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
URUGUAY vs CHILE U26W 4 : 0 VP (match 84979) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | URUGUAY | CHILE U26W | |
| 4♠ | N | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 58% | 4N | S | ♥Q | = | 430 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | N | ♦4 | +3 | 690 | 86% | 3N | N | ♠4 | +2 | 660 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-1.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 450 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 4N | S | = | 430 | 90% | ||||
| 3N | N | +3 | 690 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | +2 | 660 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ QT764 ♥ AK84 ♦ A ♣ 754 | ||
| ♠ J2 ♥ QJT32 ♦ T652 ♣ T8 | 3 Dlr S E-W | ♠ 95 ♥ 96 ♦ K94 ♣ KQJ963 |
| ♠ AK83 ♥ 75 ♦ QJ873 ♣ A2 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 9 | 13 | 9 | 10 | 8 |
| S | 9 | 13 | 9 | 10 | 8 |
| E | 3 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 5 |
| W | 3 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 5 |
| ♠ QJ975 ♥ A6 ♦ KQT3 ♣ K5 | ||
| ♠ A3 ♥ T873 ♦ J952 ♣ 976 | 4 Dlr W Both | ♠ KT642 ♥ 42 ♦ A864 ♣ J3 |
| ♠ 8 ♥ KQJ95 ♦ 7 ♣ AQT842 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 10 | 8 | 11 | 8 | 11 |
| S | 10 | 8 | 11 | 8 | 11 |
| E | 2 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 2 |
| W | 2 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 2 |