Round 6 — BAM Final B
17 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 6 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50 50 | PRISM FALCONS | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | INDIA U21 | SXSPARK | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | BELGIUM | INDIA U16 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | DABROWKA | HAPPY BRIDGE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | ITALIA U26W | CAPRISUN | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | ITALIA 2 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | ZHIHAOLE | INDIA-B U26 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | SERBIA U26W | SHSLLS1 | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | SERBIA U21 | HONG KONG | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | CROATIA U16 | SXTULIP | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | MAN EATING COBRAS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CROATIA | JAPAN U21 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | CHILE U26W | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | URUGUAY | CHILE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | DABROWKA PO | EYE OF THE TIGER | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | POLAND KIDS | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 6↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 6 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R6 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ITALIA U26W | 20.79 | 0.00 | 6 |
| 2 | JAPAN U21 | 18.94 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 3 | HONG KONG | 18.48 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 4 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 17.91 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 5 | INDIA-B U26 | 17.85 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 6 | CROATIA | 17.00 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 7 | ITALIA 2 | 16.85 | 1.00 | 6 |
| 8 | SHSLLS1 | 16.67 | 3.00 | 6 |
| 9 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 15.88 | 3.00 | 6 |
| 10 | SXSPARK | 15.76 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 11 | SXTULIP | 14.58 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 12 | URUGUAY | 14.21 | 1.00 | 6 |
| 13 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 13.73 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 14 | POLAND KIDS | 13.52 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 15 | BELGIUM | 13.00 | 3.00 | 6 |
| 16 | SERBIA U21 | 12.97 | 0.00 | 6 |
| 17 | CHILE | 12.76 | 3.00 | 6 |
| 18 | 50 50 | 12.58 | 2.40 | 6 |
| 19 | SERBIA U26W | 12.33 | 1.00 | 6 |
| 20 | DABROWKA | 12.04 | 3.00 | 6 |
| 21 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 11.09 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 22 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 10.82 | 0.00 | 6 |
| 23 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 10.55 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 24 | CAPRISUN | 10.52 | 4.00 | 6 |
| 25 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 9.39 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 26 | INDIA U16 | 8.67 | 1.00 | 6 |
| 27 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 8.24 | 1.00 | 6 |
| 28 | CHILE U26W | 7.61 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 29 | INDIA U21 | 7.42 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 30 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 7.06 | 0.00 | 6 |
| 31 | CROATIA U16 | 6.15 | 2.00 | 6 |
| 32 | DABROWKA PO | 5.70 | 0.00 | 6 |
| 33 | ZHIHAOLE | 3.30 | 0.00 | 6 |
| 34 | PRISM FALCONS | 0.00 | 0.00 | 6 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 6 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R6 | BAM% |
|---|
50 50 vs PRISM FALCONS 2.4 : 0 VP (match 85031)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | PRISM FALCONS | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U21 vs SXSPARK 2 : 2 VP (match 85032) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U21 | SXSPARK | |
| 4♥ | S | ♦J | +1 | 450 | 82% | 4♥ | S | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | S | ♦6 | = | 140 | 84% | 2♥ | S | ♠2 | +2 | 170 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 97% | ||||
| 3♥ | S | = | 140 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | +2 | 170 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELGIUM vs INDIA U16 3 : 1 VP (match 85033) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELGIUM | INDIA U16 | |
| 3♥ | S | ♦J | +1 | 170 | 77% | 3♥ | S | ♣4 | +1 | 170 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♣ | N | ♠A | +1 | 150 | 87% | 3♦ | W | ♣A | +1 | 130 | 50% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | S | +1 | 170 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♥ | S | +1 | 170 | 77% | ||||
| 4♣ | N | +1 | 150 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | W | +1 | 130 | 50% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs HAPPY BRIDGE 3 : 1 VP (match 85034) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 2♥ | N | ♣7 | +2 | 170 | 77% | 2♥ | N | ♣3 | +2 | 170 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3♦ | W | ♣A | +1 | 130 | 50% | 3♠x | E | ♣6 | +1 | 630 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-1.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | N | +2 | 170 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♥ | N | +2 | 170 | 77% | ||||
| 3♦ | W | +1 | 130 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 3♠x | E | +1 | 630 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ITALIA U26W vs CAPRISUN 0 : 4 VP (match 85035) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ITALIA U26W | CAPRISUN | |
| 2♥ | S | ♦6 | +3 | 200 | 61% | 4♥ | S | ♦J | +1 | 450 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | N | ♣5 | -3 | 300 | 74% | 3♦ | W | ♣A | +1 | 130 | 50% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+0.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | S | +3 | 200 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 82% | ||||
| 3♠ | N | -3 | 300 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | W | +1 | 130 | 50% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AZS WRATISLAVIA vs ITALIA 2 3 : 1 VP (match 85036) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AZS WRATISLAVIA | ITALIA 2 | |
| 4♥ | S | ♦J | +1 | 450 | 82% | 3♥ | S | ♦J | +2 | 200 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | E | ♥9 | +1 | 140 | 66% | 2♠ | E | ♥T | +1 | 140 | 66% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | S | +2 | 200 | 61% | ||||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 66% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZHIHAOLE vs INDIA-B U26 0 : 4 VP (match 85037) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZHIHAOLE | INDIA-B U26 | |
| 3♦ | E | ♠K | -2 | 100 | 94% | 2♥ | S | ♦J | +3 | 200 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 4♦ | W | ♣A | = | 130 | 50% | 4♠ | E | ♣6 | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS+0.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♦ | E | -2 | 100 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | +3 | 200 | 61% | ||||
| 4♦ | W | = | 130 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA U26W vs SHSLLS1 1 : 3 VP (match 85038) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA U26W | SHSLLS1 | |
| 4♥ | S | ♦J | +1 | 450 | 82% | 4♥ | S | ♦J | +1 | 450 | 82% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♠ | E | ♣6 | +2 | 170 | 71% | 3N | W | ♥2 | -2 | 100 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+1.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 82% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 82% | ||||
| 2♠ | E | +2 | 170 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | -2 | 100 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA U21 vs HONG KONG 0 : 4 VP (match 85039) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA U21 | HONG KONG | |
| 2♥ | S | ♣5 | +3 | 200 | 61% | 4♥ | S | ♦J | +1 | 450 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♣A | = | 420 | 82% | 5♦x | W | ♠3 | -1 | 100 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | S | +3 | 200 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 82% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 5♦x | W | -1 | 100 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs SXTULIP 2 : 2 VP (match 85040) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | SXTULIP | |
| 4♥ | S | ♦J | = | 420 | 55% | 2♥ | S | ♣5 | +3 | 200 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 4♦ | W | ♣A | = | 130 | 50% | 2♠ | E | ♣9 | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | +3 | 200 | 61% | ||||
| 4♦ | W | = | 130 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE FUNBRIDGE vs MAN EATING COBRAS 2 : 2 VP (match 85041) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | MAN EATING COBRAS | |
| 4♥ | S | ♦J | +1 | 450 | 82% | 4♥ | S | ♦J | +1 | 450 | 82% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♠ | E | ♦2 | -1 | 50 | 69% | 4♠ | E | ♥T | -1 | 50 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 82% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 82% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA vs JAPAN U21 2 : 2 VP (match 85042) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA | JAPAN U21 | |
| 4♥ | S | ♦J | = | 420 | 55% | 4♥ | S | ♦J | +1 | 450 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | W | ♣A | +1 | 130 | 50% | 4♠ | E | ♥T | = | 420 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 82% | ||||
| 3♦ | W | +1 | 130 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ ZHIHAOLE vs CHILE U26W 2 : 2 VP (match 85043) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | CHILE U26W | |
| 2♠ | N | ♣7 | +1 | 140 | 89% | 4♥ | S | ♦J | = | 420 | 55% | 2 | ||||
| 5♣ | N | ♦3 | = | 600 | 100% | 3♥ | S | ♦T | +1 | 170 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 55% | ||||
| 5♣ | N | = | 600 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | S | +1 | 170 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
URUGUAY vs CHILE 1 : 3 VP (match 85044) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | URUGUAY | CHILE | |
| 4♥ | S | ♦J | = | 420 | 55% | 4♥ | S | ♦J | = | 420 | 55% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♦x | W | ♣A | = | 510 | 92% | 4♦ | W | ♣K | = | 130 | 50% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+0.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 55% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 420 | 55% | ||||
| 4♦x | W | = | 510 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 4♦ | W | = | 130 | 50% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT vs CHINA RDFZ HOPE 0 : 4 VP (match 85045) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | |
| 2♥ | S | ♦J | +2 | 170 | 77% | 4♥ | S | ♦J | +1 | 450 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠x | E | ♣6 | = | 530 | 97% | 4♠ | E | ♣9 | = | 420 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS0.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | S | +2 | 170 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 82% | ||||
| 3♠x | E | = | 530 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs EYE OF THE TIGER 0 : 4 VP (match 85046) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | EYE OF THE TIGER | |
| 2♠ | N | ♦7 | +1 | 140 | 89% | 4♥ | S | ♠A | +1 | 450 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 4♦x | W | ♣A | = | 510 | 92% | 3♦ | W | ♣A | +1 | 130 | 50% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.6 | NS+0.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 82% | ||||
| 4♦x | W | = | 510 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | W | +1 | 130 | 50% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND KIDS vs TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL 4 : 0 VP (match 85047) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND KIDS | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | |
| 4♥ | S | ♠A | +1 | 450 | 82% | 3N | S | ♣5 | -4 | 200 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♣K | -4 | 200 | 97% | 4♠ | E | ♦K | = | 420 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.6 | NS-1.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 450 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | -4 | 200 | 100% | ||||
| 3N | W | -4 | 200 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.6 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ 98643 ♥ A95 ♦ A ♣ A982 | ||
| ♠ AJ5 ♥ KT ♦ JT6 ♣ KJ654 | 11 Dlr S None | ♠ T72 ♥ Q3 ♦ Q97432 ♣ 73 |
| ♠ KQ ♥ J87642 ♦ K85 ♣ QT |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 9 | 8 | 10 | 6 | 7 |
| S | 9 | 9 | 11 | 6 | 8 |
| E | 4 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 5 |
| W | 4 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 5 |
| ♠ 8753 ♥ K82 ♦ A ♣ AKT42 | ||
| ♠ KT2 ♥ AJ3 ♦ QT986 ♣ Q3 | 12 Dlr W N-S | ♠ AJ964 ♥ Q6 ♦ J7543 ♣ 5 |
| ♠ Q ♥ T9754 ♦ K2 ♣ J9876 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 7 | 4 | 9 | 3 | 11 |
| S | 7 | 4 | 9 | 3 | 11 |
| E | 6 | 9 | 3 | 9 | 2 |
| W | 6 | 9 | 3 | 10 | 2 |