Round 4 — BAM Final B
17 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 4 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDIA U16 | PRISM FALCONS | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | SXSPARK | DABROWKA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | 50 50 | CAPRISUN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | ITALIA 2 | INDIA U21 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | BELGIUM | INDIA-B U26 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | HAPPY BRIDGE | SHSLLS1 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | ITALIA U26W | SERBIA U21 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | CROATIA U16 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | MAN EATING COBRAS | ZHIHAOLE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | JAPAN U21 | SERBIA U26W | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | HONG KONG | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | SXTULIP | CHILE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | CROATIA | DABROWKA PO | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | POLAND KIDS | CHILE U26W | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | URUGUAY | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | EYE OF THE TIGER | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 4↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 4 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R4 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ITALIA U26W | 16.79 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 2 | CROATIA | 14.00 | 3.00 | 4 |
| 3 | INDIA-B U26 | 13.85 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 4 | JAPAN U21 | 12.94 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 5 | SXTULIP | 12.58 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 6 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 11.91 | 0.00 | 4 |
| 7 | ITALIA 2 | 11.85 | 3.00 | 4 |
| 8 | SHSLLS1 | 11.67 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 9 | SXSPARK | 11.36 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 10 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 10.88 | 3.00 | 4 |
| 11 | HONG KONG | 10.48 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 12 | URUGUAY | 10.21 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 13 | SERBIA U21 | 8.97 | 0.00 | 4 |
| 14 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 8.55 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 15 | SERBIA U26W | 8.33 | 0.00 | 4 |
| 16 | 50 50 | 8.18 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 17 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 7.82 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 18 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 7.73 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 19 | POLAND KIDS | 7.52 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 20 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 7.39 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 21 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 7.24 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 22 | CHILE | 6.76 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 23 | CAPRISUN | 6.52 | 0.00 | 4 |
| 24 | BELGIUM | 6.00 | 0.00 | 4 |
| 25 | INDIA U16 | 5.67 | 2.40 | 4 |
| 26 | INDIA U21 | 5.42 | 1.00 | 4 |
| 27 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 5.09 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 28 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 5.06 | 0.00 | 4 |
| 29 | DABROWKA | 5.04 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 30 | DABROWKA PO | 4.70 | 1.00 | 4 |
| 31 | CHILE U26W | 4.61 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 32 | ZHIHAOLE | 3.30 | 0.00 | 4 |
| 33 | CROATIA U16 | 3.15 | 1.00 | 4 |
| 34 | PRISM FALCONS | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 4 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R4 | BAM% |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs PRISM FALCONS 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84997)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | PRISM FALCONS | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSPARK vs DABROWKA 2 : 2 VP (match 84998) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSPARK | DABROWKA | |
| 6♥ | S | ♣J | -1 | 100 | 90% | 5♥ | S | ♣J | = | 650 | 55% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | E | ♣K | -3 | 150 | 90% | 4♣ | S | ♦Q | -1 | 50 | 53% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 5♥ | S | = | 650 | 55% | ||||
| 4♥ | E | -3 | 150 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 4♣ | S | -1 | 50 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs CAPRISUN 4 : 0 VP (match 84999) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | CAPRISUN | |
| 6♥ | S | ♦6 | = | 1430 | 94% | 4♥ | S | ♣J | +2 | 680 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠x | W | ♣3 | -2 | 300 | 97% | 2♠ | W | ♣3 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.8 | NS+0.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♥ | S | = | 1430 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 73% | ||||
| 3♠x | W | -2 | 300 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ITALIA 2 vs INDIA U21 3 : 1 VP (match 85000) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ITALIA 2 | INDIA U21 | |
| 6♥ | N | ♣3 | = | 1430 | 94% | 6♥ | S | ♣J | -1 | 100 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | W | ♦9 | = | 110 | 69% | 2♠ | W | ♠4 | = | 110 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-1.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♥ | N | = | 1430 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 6♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 90% | ||||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELGIUM vs INDIA-B U26 0 : 4 VP (match 85001) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELGIUM | INDIA-B U26 | |
| 6♥ | N | ♠8 | -1 | 100 | 90% | 4♥ | S | ♣J | +1 | 650 | 55% | 2 | ||||
| 4♣x | S | ♦Q | -1 | 100 | 60% | 4♣ | S | ♦Q | -1 | 50 | 53% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-0.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 650 | 55% | ||||
| 4♣x | S | -1 | 100 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 4♣ | S | -1 | 50 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HAPPY BRIDGE vs SHSLLS1 2 : 2 VP (match 85002) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HAPPY BRIDGE | SHSLLS1 | |
| 4♥ | S | ♣J | +2 | 680 | 73% | 4♥ | N | ♠8 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | W | ♦3 | +1 | 140 | 86% | 3♠ | W | ♣3 | -2 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 650 | 55% | ||||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | W | -2 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ITALIA U26W vs SERBIA U21 4 : 0 VP (match 85003) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ITALIA U26W | SERBIA U21 | |
| 4♥ | N | ♠8 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 4♥ | N | ♠8 | = | 620 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | W | ♣3 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 3♠ | W | ♣3 | = | 140 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-1.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 650 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 73% | ||||
| 3♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AZS WRATISLAVIA vs CROATIA U16 3 : 1 VP (match 85004) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AZS WRATISLAVIA | CROATIA U16 | |
| 4♥ | N | ♣3 | +2 | 680 | 73% | 4♥ | N | ♣4 | +2 | 680 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♣ | S | ♦Q | = | 130 | 82% | 2♠ | W | ♠4 | = | 110 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | +2 | 680 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | N | +2 | 680 | 73% | ||||
| 4♣ | S | = | 130 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAN EATING COBRAS vs ZHIHAOLE 4 : 0 VP (match 85005) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAN EATING COBRAS | ZHIHAOLE | |
| 6♥ | S | ♦6 | = | 1430 | 94% | 4♥ | N | ♥6 | +2 | 680 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | W | ♦8 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2♥ | W | ♠4 | = | 110 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+0.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♥ | S | = | 1430 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | +2 | 680 | 73% | ||||
| 3♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | W | = | 110 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U21 vs SERBIA U26W 4 : 0 VP (match 85006) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U21 | SERBIA U26W | |
| 4♥ | S | ♣J | +2 | 680 | 73% | 6♥ | S | ♣J | -1 | 100 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | W | ♣3 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 4♣x | S | ♠A | -3 | 500 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-1.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 6♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 90% | ||||
| 3♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 4♣x | S | -3 | 500 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HONG KONG vs RDFZ ZHIHAOLE 2 : 2 VP (match 85007) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HONG KONG | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | |
| 6♥ | N | ♦3 | -1 | 100 | 90% | 4♥ | N | ♣4 | +2 | 680 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠x | W | ♦8 | -3 | 500 | 100% | 3♥ | E | ♣K | = | 140 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | +2 | 680 | 73% | ||||
| 4♠x | W | -3 | 500 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | E | = | 140 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXTULIP vs CHILE 2 : 2 VP (match 85008) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXTULIP | CHILE | |
| 4♥ | S | ♣J | +1 | 650 | 55% | 6♥ | N | ♥6 | = | 1430 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | W | ♦9 | -2 | 100 | 76% | 3♠ | W | ♣3 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 650 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 6♥ | N | = | 1430 | 94% | ||||
| 3♥ | W | -2 | 100 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT vs FRANCE FUNBRIDGE 4 : 0 VP (match 85009) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | |
| 6♥ | N | ♥6 | = | 1430 | 94% | 2♠ | N | ♥6 | +2 | 170 | 77% | 2 | ||||
| 4♣ | S | ♣4 | -2 | 100 | 60% | 3♠x | W | ♣3 | = | 530 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-1.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♥ | N | = | 1430 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | N | +2 | 170 | 77% | ||||
| 4♣ | S | -2 | 100 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 3♠x | W | = | 530 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA vs DABROWKA PO 3 : 1 VP (match 85010) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA | DABROWKA PO | |
| 4♥ | S | ♣J | +1 | 650 | 55% | 4♥ | S | ♣J | +1 | 650 | 55% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♠ | W | ♦9 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 3♠ | W | ♣6 | = | 140 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.8 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 650 | 55% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 650 | 55% | ||||
| 2♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND KIDS vs CHILE U26W 2 : 2 VP (match 85011) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND KIDS | CHILE U26W | |
| 4♥ | S | ♦6 | +2 | 680 | 73% | 6♥ | S | ♣J | -1 | 100 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | W | ♣6 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 4♠ | W | ♣3 | -3 | 150 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 6♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 90% | ||||
| 2♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | -3 | 150 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL vs URUGUAY 0 : 4 VP (match 85012) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | URUGUAY | |
| 4♥ | N | ♦8 | = | 620 | 73% | 5♥ | N | ♠T | = | 650 | 55% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | W | ♥A | = | 140 | 86% | 2♣ | S | ♥Q | +2 | 130 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS+0.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 5♥ | N | = | 650 | 55% | ||||
| 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 2♣ | S | +2 | 130 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
EYE OF THE TIGER vs CHINA RDFZ HOPE 2 : 2 VP (match 85013) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | EYE OF THE TIGER | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | |
| 6♥ | S | ♣J | -1 | 100 | 90% | 4♥ | N | ♦8 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♦3 | -3 | 150 | 90% | 2♠ | W | ♦8 | +1 | 140 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 650 | 55% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | -3 | 150 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ AJ64 ♥ AJ872 ♦ 97 ♣ A2 | ||
| ♠ K932 ♥ QT5 ♦ 64 ♣ JT95 | 7 Dlr S Both | ♠ QT8 ♥ 6 ♦ T832 ♣ K7643 |
| ♠ 75 ♥ K943 ♦ AKQJ5 ♣ Q8 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 12 | 10 | 12 | 12 | 6 |
| S | 12 | 9 | 12 | 12 | 5 |
| E | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| W | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| ♠ 4 ♥ AJ42 ♦ 98753 ♣ J63 | ||
| ♠ AJ863 ♥ Q9 ♦ QJ2 ♣ A42 | 8 Dlr W None | ♠ Q52 ♥ T87653 ♦ AT4 ♣ T |
| ♠ KT97 ♥ K ♦ K6 ♣ KQ9875 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 7 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 9 |
| S | 7 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 9 |
| E | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 4 |
| W | 5 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 4 |