Round 3 — BAM Final B
17 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 3 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DABROWKA | PRISM FALCONS | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | INDIA U16 | CAPRISUN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | SXSPARK | ITALIA 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | INDIA-B U26 | 50 50 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | INDIA U21 | SHSLLS1 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | BELGIUM | SERBIA U21 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | HAPPY BRIDGE | CROATIA U16 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | ITALIA U26W | MAN EATING COBRAS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | JAPAN U21 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | ZHIHAOLE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | SERBIA U26W | CHILE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | HONG KONG | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | DABROWKA PO | SXTULIP | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | POLAND KIDS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | CROATIA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | EYE OF THE TIGER | CHILE U26W | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | URUGUAY | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 3↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 3 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R3 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ITALIA U26W | 12.79 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 2 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 11.91 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 3 | CROATIA | 11.00 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 4 | SXTULIP | 10.58 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 5 | INDIA-B U26 | 9.85 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 6 | SHSLLS1 | 9.67 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 7 | SXSPARK | 9.36 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 8 | SERBIA U21 | 8.97 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 9 | JAPAN U21 | 8.94 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 10 | ITALIA 2 | 8.85 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 11 | HONG KONG | 8.48 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 12 | SERBIA U26W | 8.33 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 13 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 7.88 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 14 | CAPRISUN | 6.52 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 15 | URUGUAY | 6.21 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 16 | BELGIUM | 6.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 17 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 5.73 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 18 | POLAND KIDS | 5.52 | 0.00 | 3 |
| 19 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 5.39 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 20 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 5.24 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 21 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 5.06 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 22 | CHILE | 4.76 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 23 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 4.55 | 0.00 | 3 |
| 24 | INDIA U21 | 4.42 | 0.00 | 3 |
| 25 | 50 50 | 4.18 | 0.00 | 3 |
| 26 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 3.82 | 0.00 | 3 |
| 27 | DABROWKA PO | 3.70 | 0.00 | 3 |
| 28 | ZHIHAOLE | 3.30 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 29 | INDIA U16 | 3.27 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 30 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 3.09 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 31 | DABROWKA | 3.04 | 2.40 | 3 |
| 32 | CHILE U26W | 2.61 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 33 | CROATIA U16 | 2.15 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 34 | PRISM FALCONS | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 3 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R3 | BAM% |
|---|
DABROWKA vs PRISM FALCONS 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84980)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | PRISM FALCONS | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs CAPRISUN 2 : 2 VP (match 84981) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | CAPRISUN | |
| 4♥ | W | ♣2 | = | 420 | 53% | 4♥ | E | ♠2 | +1 | 450 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | N | ♦Q | +1 | 140 | 52% | 2♠ | N | ♦Q | +2 | 170 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | W | = | 420 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 86% | ||||
| 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | N | +2 | 170 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSPARK vs ITALIA 2 2 : 2 VP (match 84982) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSPARK | ITALIA 2 | |
| 4♥ | E | ♦A | = | 420 | 53% | 4♥ | E | ♥T | +1 | 450 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♦Q | -1 | 50 | 84% | 3♠ | N | ♦Q | +1 | 170 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 86% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | N | +1 | 170 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA-B U26 vs 50 50 4 : 0 VP (match 84983) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-B U26 | 50 50 | |
| 4♥ | W | ♠5 | = | 420 | 53% | 4♠x | N | ♥5 | -4 | 1100 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | N | ♦Q | = | 140 | 52% | 4♠ | N | ♦Q | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS-1.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | W | = | 420 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | N | -4 | 1100 | 100% | ||||
| 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U21 vs SHSLLS1 0 : 4 VP (match 84984) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U21 | SHSLLS1 | |
| 4♥ | E | ♥T | = | 420 | 53% | 4♥ | E | ♠3 | -1 | 50 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | N | ♦Q | = | 140 | 52% | 2♠ | N | ♦Q | +2 | 170 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS+1.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 90% | ||||
| 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | N | +2 | 170 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELGIUM vs SERBIA U21 2 : 2 VP (match 84985) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELGIUM | SERBIA U21 | |
| 4♥ | E | ♥T | = | 420 | 53% | 4♥ | E | ♦A | = | 420 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♠ | N | ♦Q | -1 | 50 | 84% | 4♠ | N | ♦Q | -1 | 50 | 84% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 53% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 84% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HAPPY BRIDGE vs CROATIA U16 2 : 2 VP (match 84986) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HAPPY BRIDGE | CROATIA U16 | |
| 3N | E | ♠2 | = | 400 | 81% | 4♥ | E | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♦7 | = | 420 | 89% | 3♠ | N | ♦Q | +1 | 170 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.4 | NS+1.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | = | 400 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 90% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | N | +1 | 170 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ITALIA U26W vs MAN EATING COBRAS 4 : 0 VP (match 84987) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ITALIA U26W | MAN EATING COBRAS | |
| 4♥ | W | ♥9 | = | 420 | 53% | 4♥ | E | ♣4 | +1 | 450 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | N | ♦Q | +1 | 170 | 73% | 4♠ | N | ♦Q | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-1.4 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | W | = | 420 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 86% | ||||
| 3♠ | N | +1 | 170 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U21 vs AZS WRATISLAVIA 3 : 1 VP (match 84988) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U21 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | |
| 4♥ | E | ♦A | = | 420 | 53% | 4♥ | E | ♥T | = | 420 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3♠ | N | ♦Q | +1 | 170 | 73% | 3♠ | N | ♦Q | = | 140 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+0.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 53% | ||||
| 3♠ | N | +1 | 170 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ ZHIHAOLE vs ZHIHAOLE 3 : 1 VP (match 84989) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | ZHIHAOLE | |
| 4♥ | W | ♦5 | -1 | 50 | 90% | 4♥ | E | ♦A | = | 420 | 53% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♦Q | -1 | 50 | 84% | 4♠ | N | ♦Q | -1 | 50 | 84% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 53% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 84% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA U26W vs CHILE 3 : 1 VP (match 84990) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA U26W | CHILE | |
| 4♥ | E | ♦A | = | 420 | 53% | 4♥ | E | ♥T | = | 420 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♠ | N | ♦Q | = | 420 | 89% | 2♠ | N | ♦Q | +1 | 140 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS+0.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 53% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HONG KONG vs RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT 4 : 0 VP (match 84991) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HONG KONG | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | |
| 4♥ | E | ♥T | = | 420 | 53% | 4♥ | E | ♥T | +1 | 450 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | N | ♦Q | = | 140 | 52% | 4♦x | W | ♠A | = | 710 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS-1.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 86% | ||||
| 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 4♦x | W | = | 710 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs SXTULIP 0 : 4 VP (match 84992) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | SXTULIP | |
| 4♥ | E | ♠2 | -1 | 50 | 90% | 2♦ | W | ♥9 | -3 | 150 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♦Q | -1 | 50 | 84% | 4♠ | N | ♦Q | = | 420 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+1.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | W | -3 | 150 | 100% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE FUNBRIDGE vs POLAND KIDS 4 : 0 VP (match 84993) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | POLAND KIDS | |
| 4♥ | E | ♥T | = | 420 | 53% | 4♥ | E | ♠2 | +1 | 450 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠x | N | ♥5 | +1 | 630 | 97% | 4♠ | N | ♦Q | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS-1.4 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 86% | ||||
| 3♠x | N | +1 | 630 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL vs CROATIA 1 : 3 VP (match 84994) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | CROATIA | |
| 4♥ | E | ♣9 | +1 | 450 | 86% | 4♥ | W | ♦5 | -1 | 50 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | N | ♦Q | +1 | 140 | 52% | 2♠ | N | ♦Q | +1 | 140 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+0.8 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 90% | ||||
| 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
EYE OF THE TIGER vs CHILE U26W 2 : 2 VP (match 84995) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | EYE OF THE TIGER | CHILE U26W | |
| 4♥ | E | ♣4 | +1 | 450 | 86% | 4♥ | E | ♥T | = | 420 | 53% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | N | ♦Q | = | 140 | 52% | 4♦ | W | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 53% | ||||
| 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 4♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HOPE vs URUGUAY 2 : 2 VP (match 84996) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | URUGUAY | |
| 4♥ | E | ♥T | = | 420 | 53% | 4♥ | E | ♣4 | +1 | 450 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♦Q | = | 420 | 89% | 4♦x | W | ♠A | -3 | 800 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 86% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | = | 420 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 4♦x | W | -3 | 800 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ QT85 ♥ 98 ♦ K95 ♣ T852 | ||
| ♠ 64 ♥ AQ7643 ♦ QT2 ♣ 63 | 5 Dlr N N-S | ♠ AJ9 ♥ KJ52 ♦ J7 ♣ AQJ7 |
| ♠ K732 ♥ T ♦ A8643 ♣ K94 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 4 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 5 |
| S | 4 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 5 |
| E | 9 | 6 | 10 | 6 | 8 |
| W | 9 | 6 | 10 | 6 | 8 |
| ♠ AKJ742 ♥ 987 ♦ 2 ♣ KQ4 | ||
| ♠ T3 ♥ KJ ♦ AKJ854 ♣ J83 | 6 Dlr E E-W | ♠ 6 ♥ 65432 ♦ Q7 ♣ AT972 |
| ♠ Q985 ♥ AQT ♦ T963 ♣ 65 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 6 | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
| S | 6 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
| E | 6 | 3 | 7 | 9 | 9 |
| W | 6 | 3 | 7 | 9 | 9 |