Round 5 — BAM Final B
17 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 5 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SXSPARK | PRISM FALCONS | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | 50 50 | INDIA U16 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | INDIA U21 | DABROWKA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | CAPRISUN | BELGIUM | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | HAPPY BRIDGE | ITALIA 2 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | ITALIA U26W | INDIA-B U26 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | SHSLLS1 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | ZHIHAOLE | SERBIA U21 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | CROATIA U16 | SERBIA U26W | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | MAN EATING COBRAS | HONG KONG | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | SXTULIP | JAPAN U21 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | CHILE | CROATIA | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | CHILE U26W | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | DABROWKA PO | URUGUAY | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | POLAND KIDS | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | EYE OF THE TIGER | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 5↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 5 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R5 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ITALIA U26W | 20.79 | 4.00 | 5 |
| 2 | JAPAN U21 | 16.94 | 4.00 | 5 |
| 3 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 15.91 | 4.00 | 5 |
| 4 | ITALIA 2 | 15.85 | 4.00 | 5 |
| 5 | CROATIA | 15.00 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 6 | HONG KONG | 14.48 | 4.00 | 5 |
| 7 | INDIA-B U26 | 13.85 | 0.00 | 5 |
| 8 | SXSPARK | 13.76 | 2.40 | 5 |
| 9 | SHSLLS1 | 13.67 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 10 | URUGUAY | 13.21 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 11 | SERBIA U21 | 12.97 | 4.00 | 5 |
| 12 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 12.88 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 13 | SXTULIP | 12.58 | 0.00 | 5 |
| 14 | SERBIA U26W | 11.33 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 15 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 10.82 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 16 | 50 50 | 10.18 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 17 | BELGIUM | 10.00 | 4.00 | 5 |
| 18 | CHILE | 9.76 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 19 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 9.73 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 20 | POLAND KIDS | 9.52 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 21 | DABROWKA | 9.04 | 4.00 | 5 |
| 22 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 8.55 | 0.00 | 5 |
| 23 | INDIA U16 | 7.67 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 24 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 7.39 | 0.00 | 5 |
| 25 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 7.24 | 0.00 | 5 |
| 26 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 7.09 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 27 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 7.06 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 28 | CAPRISUN | 6.52 | 0.00 | 5 |
| 29 | DABROWKA PO | 5.70 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 30 | CHILE U26W | 5.61 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 31 | INDIA U21 | 5.42 | 0.00 | 5 |
| 32 | CROATIA U16 | 4.15 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 33 | ZHIHAOLE | 3.30 | 0.00 | 5 |
| 34 | PRISM FALCONS | 0.00 | 0.00 | 5 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 5 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R5 | BAM% |
|---|
SXSPARK vs PRISM FALCONS 2.4 : 0 VP (match 85014)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSPARK | PRISM FALCONS | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs INDIA U16 2 : 2 VP (match 85015) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | INDIA U16 | |
| 5♦ | S | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 3Nxx | N | ♣K | -2 | 600 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♦5 | = | 620 | 66% | 6♦xx | E | ♥A | -4 | 2200 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♦ | S | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 3Nxx | N | -2 | 600 | 92% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 6♦xx | E | -4 | 2200 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U21 vs DABROWKA 0 : 4 VP (match 85016) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U21 | DABROWKA | |
| 3♦ | S | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 3♦ | S | ♥A | = | 110 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | N | ♦K | = | 600 | 52% | 4♥ | N | ♣5 | = | 620 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♦ | S | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | S | = | 110 | 69% | ||||
| 3N | N | = | 600 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CAPRISUN vs BELGIUM 0 : 4 VP (match 85017) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CAPRISUN | BELGIUM | |
| 2♠x | E | ♦Q | = | 670 | 98% | 3♦ | S | ♥A | +1 | 130 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | E | ♥Q | -1 | 100 | 74% | 4♥ | S | ♦5 | = | 620 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS+0.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠x | E | = | 670 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | S | +1 | 130 | 74% | ||||
| 3♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HAPPY BRIDGE vs ITALIA 2 0 : 4 VP (match 85018) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HAPPY BRIDGE | ITALIA 2 | |
| 3♦ | S | ♥A | = | 110 | 69% | 3♣xx | W | ♦K | -1 | 400 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | E | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 74% | 4♦x | E | ♣A | -2 | 500 | 55% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♦ | S | = | 110 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 3♣xx | W | -1 | 400 | 94% | ||||
| 3♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 4♦x | E | -2 | 500 | 55% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ITALIA U26W vs INDIA-B U26 4 : 0 VP (match 85019) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ITALIA U26W | INDIA-B U26 | |
| 4♣x | W | ♠7 | -1 | 200 | 86% | 3♠ | S | ♥K | -2 | 100 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♦K | = | 620 | 66% | 3♦ | E | ♠J | -1 | 100 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS-0.9 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♣x | W | -1 | 200 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | S | -2 | 100 | 73% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AZS WRATISLAVIA vs SHSLLS1 2 : 2 VP (match 85020) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AZS WRATISLAVIA | SHSLLS1 | |
| 3♦ | S | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 3♦x | S | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♣5 | = | 620 | 66% | 3N | N | ♥2 | +1 | 630 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♦ | S | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 3♦x | S | -1 | 100 | 73% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | +1 | 630 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZHIHAOLE vs SERBIA U21 0 : 4 VP (match 85021) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZHIHAOLE | SERBIA U21 | |
| 2♥ | W | ♠7 | = | 110 | 79% | 4♦x | S | ♥A | = | 510 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | S | ♦5 | +1 | 170 | 60% | 4♥ | N | ♣5 | +1 | 650 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+1.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | W | = | 110 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 4♦x | S | = | 510 | 100% | ||||
| 3♥ | S | +1 | 170 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 650 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs SERBIA U26W 1 : 3 VP (match 85022) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | SERBIA U26W | |
| 3N | E | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 61% | 4♣ | W | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♥ | N | ♦K | -3 | 300 | 97% | 3N | N | ♦K | +1 | 630 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+0.9 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♣ | W | -1 | 100 | 61% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | -3 | 300 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | +1 | 630 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAN EATING COBRAS vs HONG KONG 0 : 4 VP (match 85023) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAN EATING COBRAS | HONG KONG | |
| 3♠x | S | ♥A | -2 | 300 | 86% | 3♠ | S | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 5♣x | N | ♦K | -1 | 200 | 94% | 4♥ | N | ♣5 | = | 620 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.6 | NS+0.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠x | S | -2 | 300 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| 5♣x | N | -1 | 200 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXTULIP vs JAPAN U21 0 : 4 VP (match 85024) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXTULIP | JAPAN U21 | |
| 2♠ | S | ♥K | -1 | 50 | 56% | 4♣ | W | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | N | ♦K | -4 | 400 | 100% | 4♥ | N | ♣5 | -1 | 100 | 87% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-0.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 4♣ | W | -1 | 100 | 61% | ||||
| 3N | N | -4 | 400 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 87% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE FUNBRIDGE vs RDFZ ZHIHAOLE 4 : 0 VP (match 85025) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | |
| 4♣x | W | ♠7 | -1 | 200 | 86% | 4♦x | S | ♥A | -2 | 300 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | E | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 74% | 3♦ | E | ♠J | +1 | 130 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-1.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♣x | W | -1 | 200 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 4♦x | S | -2 | 300 | 86% | ||||
| 3♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE vs CROATIA 3 : 1 VP (match 85026) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE | CROATIA | |
| 4♣x | W | ♦K | -1 | 200 | 86% | 3N | E | ♥5 | -2 | 200 | 86% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♥ | N | ♦K | = | 620 | 66% | 3♦ | E | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♣x | W | -1 | 200 | 86% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | -2 | 200 | 86% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE U26W vs RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT 1 : 3 VP (match 85027) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE U26W | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | |
| 3♣x | W | ♦K | = | 670 | 98% | 3♣ | W | ♦K | = | 110 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♦K | = | 620 | 66% | 4♥ | S | ♦5 | = | 620 | 66% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣x | W | = | 670 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | W | = | 110 | 79% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 66% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs URUGUAY 1 : 3 VP (match 85028) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | URUGUAY | |
| 3♦ | S | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 5♦ | S | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♥ | N | ♣5 | +1 | 650 | 92% | 5♦x | E | ♥A | -3 | 800 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.8 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♦ | S | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 5♦ | S | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 650 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 5♦x | E | -3 | 800 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND KIDS vs CHINA RDFZ HOPE 2 : 2 VP (match 85029) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND KIDS | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | |
| 4♠ | S | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 3N | E | ♦A | = | 600 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | E | ♠T | -1 | 100 | 74% | 3♥ | S | ♦3 | +1 | 170 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 92% | ||||
| 3♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | S | +1 | 170 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL vs EYE OF THE TIGER 2 : 2 VP (match 85030) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | EYE OF THE TIGER | |
| 3N | E | ♦Q | -5 | 500 | 97% | 2♠ | S | ♦T | +1 | 140 | 77% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | E | ♥Q | -1 | 100 | 74% | 4♥ | S | ♦5 | = | 620 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | -5 | 500 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 77% | ||||
| 3♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ 72 ♥ Q987 ♦ K4 ♣ T8742 | ||
| ♠ T3 ♥ AK64 ♦ T ♣ AQJ963 | 9 Dlr N E-W | ♠ AJ54 ♥ JT3 ♦ 8752 ♣ K5 |
| ♠ KQ986 ♥ 52 ♦ AQJ963 ♣ – |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 6 | 8 | 4 | 9 | 4 |
| S | 6 | 8 | 4 | 9 | 4 |
| E | 7 | 5 | 9 | 4 | 9 |
| W | 7 | 4 | 9 | 4 | 9 |
| ♠ K2 ♥ KT75 ♦ AT ♣ Q7643 | ||
| ♠ AQ653 ♥ 963 ♦ 53 ♣ KT2 | 10 Dlr E Both | ♠ 984 ♥ 82 ♦ KQJ9762 ♣ 5 |
| ♠ JT7 ♥ AQJ4 ♦ 84 ♣ AJ98 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 8 | 6 | 10 | 5 | 10 |
| S | 8 | 6 | 10 | 5 | 10 |
| E | 3 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 3 |
| W | 3 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 3 |