Round 17 — BAM Final B
17 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 17 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CROATIA | PRISM FALCONS | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | CHILE U26W | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | URUGUAY | SXTULIP | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | HONG KONG | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | EYE OF THE TIGER | SERBIA U26W | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | ZHIHAOLE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | POLAND KIDS | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | DABROWKA PO | ITALIA U26W | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | HAPPY BRIDGE | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | BELGIUM | CHILE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | INDIA U21 | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | JAPAN U21 | 50 50 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | SXSPARK | MAN EATING COBRAS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | CROATIA U16 | INDIA U16 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | DABROWKA | SERBIA U21 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | CAPRISUN | SHSLLS1 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | ITALIA 2 | INDIA-B U26 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 17↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 17 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R17 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDIA-B U26 | 49.85 | 4.00 | 17 |
| 2 | ITALIA U26W | 47.19 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 3 | JAPAN U21 | 45.94 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 4 | ITALIA 2 | 45.85 | 0.00 | 17 |
| 5 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 45.31 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 6 | SXSPARK | 44.76 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 7 | SHSLLS1 | 43.67 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 8 | CROATIA | 43.40 | 2.40 | 17 |
| 9 | HONG KONG | 42.88 | 4.00 | 17 |
| 10 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 40.28 | 1.00 | 17 |
| 11 | BELGIUM | 39.40 | 4.00 | 17 |
| 12 | DABROWKA | 39.04 | 0.00 | 17 |
| 13 | SERBIA U21 | 37.97 | 4.00 | 17 |
| 14 | CHILE | 37.76 | 0.00 | 17 |
| 15 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 36.73 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 16 | POLAND KIDS | 36.52 | 3.00 | 17 |
| 17 | INDIA U16 | 35.67 | 4.00 | 17 |
| 18 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 32.82 | 4.00 | 17 |
| 19 | CHILE U26W | 32.61 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 20 | URUGUAY | 31.21 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 21 | INDIA U21 | 30.82 | 3.00 | 17 |
| 22 | ZHIHAOLE | 29.70 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 23 | DABROWKA PO | 28.70 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 24 | 50 50 | 28.58 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 25 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 28.05 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 26 | SERBIA U26W | 27.73 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 27 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 26.64 | 0.00 | 17 |
| 28 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 26.39 | 1.00 | 17 |
| 29 | SXTULIP | 25.98 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 30 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 24.09 | 0.00 | 17 |
| 31 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 21.06 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 32 | CAPRISUN | 20.52 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 33 | CROATIA U16 | 17.15 | 0.00 | 17 |
| 34 | PRISM FALCONS | 0.00 | 0.00 | 17 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 17 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R17 | BAM% |
|---|
CROATIA vs PRISM FALCONS 2.4 : 0 VP (match 85218)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA | PRISM FALCONS | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE U26W vs FRANCE FUNBRIDGE 2 : 2 VP (match 85219) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE U26W | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | |
| 2♥ | W | ♠7 | +3 | 200 | 55% | 3♠ | W | ♠3 | +1 | 170 | 63% | 2 | ||||
| 2♦ | W | ♥K | +1 | 110 | 76% | 3N | S | ♦A | -3 | 300 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | W | +3 | 200 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | W | +1 | 170 | 63% | ||||
| 2♦ | W | +1 | 110 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | -3 | 300 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
URUGUAY vs SXTULIP 2 : 2 VP (match 85220) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | URUGUAY | SXTULIP | |
| 3♠ | W | ♠6 | +2 | 200 | 55% | 1Nx | S | ♥Q | -1 | 100 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♦A | = | 600 | 100% | 3♦ | E | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | W | +2 | 200 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 1Nx | S | -1 | 100 | 81% | ||||
| 3N | S | = | 600 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HONG KONG vs CHINA RDFZ HOPE 4 : 0 VP (match 85221) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HONG KONG | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | |
| 1N | S | ♥6 | -1 | 50 | 89% | 4♠ | E | ♦Q | +1 | 650 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 4♦x | E | ♠K | -2 | 500 | 95% | 5♣x | S | ♦A | -4 | 1100 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.7 | NS-1.9 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | S | -1 | 50 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 95% | ||||
| 4♦x | E | -2 | 500 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 5♣x | S | -4 | 1100 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
EYE OF THE TIGER vs SERBIA U26W 2 : 2 VP (match 85222) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | EYE OF THE TIGER | SERBIA U26W | |
| 2♣ | N | ♦6 | -1 | 50 | 89% | 4♥ | E | ♥9 | = | 620 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 2♦ | E | ♠K | = | 90 | 52% | 2♠ | N | ♦J | = | 110 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♣ | N | -1 | 50 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 79% | ||||
| 2♦ | E | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | N | = | 110 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL vs ZHIHAOLE 2 : 2 VP (match 85223) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | ZHIHAOLE | |
| 4♥ | W | ♠6 | +1 | 650 | 95% | 2♣ | E | ♥9 | -2 | 200 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | E | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 66% | 1N | S | ♥4 | = | 90 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 650 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 2♣ | E | -2 | 200 | 98% | ||||
| 3♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 1N | S | = | 90 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND KIDS vs AZS WRATISLAVIA 3 : 1 VP (match 85224) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND KIDS | AZS WRATISLAVIA | |
| 2♠ | W | ♦9 | +2 | 170 | 63% | 4♥ | W | ♠6 | = | 620 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♥K | -1 | 100 | 66% | 3♦ | E | ♥5 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | W | +2 | 170 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | W | = | 620 | 79% | ||||
| 3N | W | -1 | 100 | 66% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs ITALIA U26W 2 : 2 VP (match 85225) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | ITALIA U26W | |
| 4♥ | W | ♦9 | +1 | 650 | 95% | 2♥ | E | ♦Q | +2 | 170 | 63% | 2 | ||||
| 2♦ | E | ♠K | = | 90 | 52% | 2♦ | E | ♠K | +2 | 130 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 650 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | +2 | 170 | 63% | ||||
| 2♦ | E | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | E | +2 | 130 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HAPPY BRIDGE vs RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT 0 : 4 VP (match 85226) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HAPPY BRIDGE | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | |
| 4♠ | W | ♠3 | +1 | 650 | 95% | 3♥ | E | ♦Q | +1 | 170 | 63% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | E | ♠7 | = | 110 | 76% | 3N | W | ♥K | -3 | 300 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS+1.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | E | +1 | 170 | 63% | ||||
| 3♦ | E | = | 110 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | -3 | 300 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELGIUM vs CHILE 4 : 0 VP (match 85227) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELGIUM | CHILE | |
| 3♣x | N | ♥A | -2 | 300 | 63% | 1Nx | N | ♠J | -3 | 500 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 4♦ | E | ♥5 | -3 | 300 | 89% | 3N | S | ♦A | -4 | 400 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-1.3 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣x | N | -2 | 300 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 1Nx | N | -3 | 500 | 68% | ||||
| 4♦ | E | -3 | 300 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | -4 | 400 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ ZHIHAOLE vs INDIA U21 1 : 3 VP (match 85228) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | INDIA U21 | |
| 4♥ | W | ♦7 | = | 620 | 79% | 4♥ | W | ♠3 | = | 620 | 79% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♦ | E | ♠K | +2 | 130 | 86% | 3♦ | E | ♠K | = | 110 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS-1.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | W | = | 620 | 79% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | W | = | 620 | 79% | ||||
| 2♦ | E | +2 | 130 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | E | = | 110 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U21 vs 50 50 2 : 2 VP (match 85229) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U21 | 50 50 | |
| 4♦x | S | ♥Q | -2 | 300 | 63% | 3N | N | ♣7 | -2 | 100 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| 2Nx | E | ♠K | -2 | 500 | 95% | 3N | S | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♦x | S | -2 | 300 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | -2 | 100 | 81% | ||||
| 2Nx | E | -2 | 500 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | -1 | 100 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSPARK vs MAN EATING COBRAS 2 : 2 VP (match 85230) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSPARK | MAN EATING COBRAS | |
| 3♥ | E | ♦Q | +1 | 170 | 63% | 1N | N | ♠A | -4 | 200 | 55% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♦A | -2 | 200 | 90% | 3N | S | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | E | +1 | 170 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 1N | N | -4 | 200 | 55% | ||||
| 3N | S | -2 | 200 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | -1 | 100 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs INDIA U16 0 : 4 VP (match 85231) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | INDIA U16 | |
| 3♥ | E | ♦Q | +1 | 170 | 63% | 1N | N | ♠J | +3 | 180 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 2♦ | E | ♠K | = | 90 | 52% | 4♦ | E | ♦5 | -2 | 200 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+1.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | E | +1 | 170 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 1N | N | +3 | 180 | 94% | ||||
| 2♦ | E | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 4♦ | E | -2 | 200 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs SERBIA U21 0 : 4 VP (match 85232) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | SERBIA U21 | |
| 4♠ | E | ♥7 | = | 620 | 79% | 3♠ | W | ♦7 | +1 | 170 | 63% | 2 | ||||
| 2♦ | E | ♠K | = | 90 | 52% | 3♦x | E | ♠K | -1 | 200 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.9 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | W | +1 | 170 | 63% | ||||
| 2♦ | E | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 3♦x | E | -1 | 200 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CAPRISUN vs SHSLLS1 2 : 2 VP (match 85233) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CAPRISUN | SHSLLS1 | |
| 2♥ | W | ♦K | +2 | 170 | 63% | 4♥ | W | ♦7 | -2 | 200 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| 1♥ | N | ♣2 | +2 | 140 | 77% | 2♦ | E | ♠K | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | W | +2 | 170 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | W | -2 | 200 | 98% | ||||
| 1♥ | N | +2 | 140 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | E | = | 90 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ITALIA 2 vs INDIA-B U26 0 : 4 VP (match 85234) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ITALIA 2 | INDIA-B U26 | |
| 4♠ | W | ♦7 | = | 620 | 79% | 3♣ | N | ♥A | -2 | 100 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| 2♦ | E | ♠K | +1 | 110 | 76% | 3N | S | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS+0.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | N | -2 | 100 | 81% | ||||
| 2♦ | E | +1 | 110 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | -1 | 100 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ 763 ♥ K54 ♦ K97 ♣ AQ53 | ||
| ♠ Q8542 ♥ QJT63 ♦ A52 ♣ – | 9 Dlr N E-W | ♠ AJT ♥ A82 ♦ 64 ♣ KT876 |
| ♠ K9 ♥ 97 ♦ QJT83 ♣ J942 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 3 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| S | 3 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 6 |
| E | 7 | 11 | 10 | 6 | 6 |
| W | 7 | 11 | 10 | 6 | 6 |
| ♠ A864 ♥ KQJ9 ♦ 4 ♣ J653 | ||
| ♠ 9532 ♥ A864 ♦ A8 ♣ AT9 | 10 Dlr E Both | ♠ JT ♥ 72 ♦ KJT732 ♣ K82 |
| ♠ KQ7 ♥ T53 ♦ Q965 ♣ Q74 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 5 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 7 |
| S | 5 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 7 |
| E | 6 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 |
| W | 6 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 |