Round 13 — BAM Final B
17 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 13 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SERBIA U26W | PRISM FALCONS | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | HONG KONG | ZHIHAOLE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | SXTULIP | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | ITALIA U26W | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | CROATIA | HAPPY BRIDGE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | CHILE U26W | BELGIUM | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | URUGUAY | INDIA U21 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 50 50 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | SXSPARK | EYE OF THE TIGER | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | INDIA U16 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | POLAND KIDS | DABROWKA | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | DABROWKA PO | CAPRISUN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | ITALIA 2 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | CHILE | INDIA-B U26 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | SHSLLS1 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | SERBIA U21 | JAPAN U21 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | CROATIA U16 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 13↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 13 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R13 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JAPAN U21 | 38.94 | 4.00 | 13 |
| 2 | INDIA-B U26 | 36.85 | 4.00 | 13 |
| 3 | SXSPARK | 36.76 | 2.00 | 13 |
| 4 | SHSLLS1 | 36.67 | 4.00 | 13 |
| 5 | ITALIA U26W | 36.19 | 2.00 | 13 |
| 6 | ITALIA 2 | 35.85 | 4.00 | 13 |
| 7 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 34.91 | 2.00 | 13 |
| 8 | CROATIA | 34.00 | 4.00 | 13 |
| 9 | HONG KONG | 33.48 | 2.00 | 13 |
| 10 | DABROWKA | 31.04 | 0.00 | 13 |
| 11 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 30.28 | 4.00 | 13 |
| 12 | SERBIA U21 | 28.97 | 0.00 | 13 |
| 13 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 27.73 | 2.00 | 13 |
| 14 | POLAND KIDS | 26.52 | 4.00 | 13 |
| 15 | URUGUAY | 26.21 | 4.00 | 13 |
| 16 | CHILE | 25.76 | 0.00 | 13 |
| 17 | BELGIUM | 25.40 | 2.00 | 13 |
| 18 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 24.82 | 0.00 | 13 |
| 19 | CHILE U26W | 24.61 | 2.00 | 13 |
| 20 | INDIA U21 | 23.82 | 0.00 | 13 |
| 21 | INDIA U16 | 23.67 | 0.00 | 13 |
| 22 | ZHIHAOLE | 22.70 | 2.00 | 13 |
| 23 | 50 50 | 22.58 | 4.00 | 13 |
| 24 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 21.55 | 2.00 | 13 |
| 25 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 21.09 | 0.00 | 13 |
| 26 | DABROWKA PO | 20.70 | 4.00 | 13 |
| 27 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 20.39 | 0.00 | 13 |
| 28 | SERBIA U26W | 19.73 | 2.40 | 13 |
| 29 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 19.64 | 0.00 | 13 |
| 30 | SXTULIP | 19.58 | 0.00 | 13 |
| 31 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 19.06 | 4.00 | 13 |
| 32 | CAPRISUN | 15.52 | 0.00 | 13 |
| 33 | CROATIA U16 | 14.15 | 2.00 | 13 |
| 34 | PRISM FALCONS | 0.00 | 0.00 | 13 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 13 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R13 | BAM% |
|---|
SERBIA U26W vs PRISM FALCONS 2.4 : 0 VP (match 85150)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA U26W | PRISM FALCONS | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HONG KONG vs ZHIHAOLE 2 : 2 VP (match 85151) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HONG KONG | ZHIHAOLE | |
| 6♣ | W | ♠7 | = | 920 | 79% | 5♣ | W | ♠T | +1 | 420 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♠5 | -2 | 100 | 92% | 3N | E | ♠5 | +1 | 430 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♣ | W | = | 920 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 5♣ | W | +1 | 420 | 58% | ||||
| 3N | E | -2 | 100 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +1 | 430 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXTULIP vs AZS WRATISLAVIA 0 : 4 VP (match 85152) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXTULIP | AZS WRATISLAVIA | |
| 6♣ | W | ♠6 | = | 920 | 79% | 5♣ | W | ♠7 | +1 | 420 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♠8 | +1 | 430 | 84% | 3N | E | ♣6 | = | 400 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS+0.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♣ | W | = | 920 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 5♣ | W | +1 | 420 | 58% | ||||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 400 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ITALIA U26W vs FRANCE FUNBRIDGE 2 : 2 VP (match 85153) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ITALIA U26W | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | |
| 5♣ | W | ♠6 | +1 | 420 | 58% | 6♣ | W | ♠6 | = | 920 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♠Q | +1 | 430 | 84% | 3N | E | ♠Q | -1 | 50 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣ | W | +1 | 420 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | W | = | 920 | 79% | ||||
| 3N | E | +1 | 430 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | -1 | 50 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA vs HAPPY BRIDGE 4 : 0 VP (match 85154) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 3N | E | ♠3 | +4 | 520 | 60% | 6♣ | W | ♠6 | = | 920 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♦8 | +1 | 430 | 84% | 2♠x | S | ♠4 | -3 | 800 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-1.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | +4 | 520 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | W | = | 920 | 79% | ||||
| 3N | E | +1 | 430 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 2♠x | S | -3 | 800 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE U26W vs BELGIUM 2 : 2 VP (match 85155) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE U26W | BELGIUM | |
| 4♣ | W | ♠6 | +2 | 170 | 79% | 6♥ | E | ♠A | -2 | 100 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | E | ♠Q | -3 | 150 | 100% | 3N | E | ♠3 | = | 400 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.6 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♣ | W | +2 | 170 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 6♥ | E | -2 | 100 | 97% | ||||
| 4♥ | E | -3 | 150 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 400 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
URUGUAY vs INDIA U21 4 : 0 VP (match 85156) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | URUGUAY | INDIA U21 | |
| 3N | E | ♠K | +2 | 460 | 52% | 6♣ | W | ♠6 | = | 920 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♠Q | = | 400 | 52% | 3N | E | ♠5 | +1 | 430 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-1.3 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | +2 | 460 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | W | = | 920 | 79% | ||||
| 3N | E | = | 400 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +1 | 430 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HOPE vs 50 50 0 : 4 VP (match 85157) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 50 50 | |
| 6♣ | E | ♠A | = | 920 | 79% | 3♣ | W | ♥J | +3 | 170 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♠Q | +1 | 430 | 84% | 3N | E | ♣6 | = | 400 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS+0.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | W | +3 | 170 | 79% | ||||
| 3N | E | +1 | 430 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 400 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSPARK vs EYE OF THE TIGER 2 : 2 VP (match 85158) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSPARK | EYE OF THE TIGER | |
| 5♥ | E | ♠A | -1 | 50 | 92% | 4♥ | E | ♠K | -3 | 150 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♠Q | = | 400 | 52% | 3N | E | ♠Q | +1 | 430 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | -3 | 150 | 100% | ||||
| 3N | E | = | 400 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +1 | 430 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL 0 : 4 VP (match 85159) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | |
| 4♣ | W | ♣2 | +3 | 190 | 68% | 4♣ | W | ♠7 | +2 | 170 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♠Q | = | 400 | 52% | 4♠ | W | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+1.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♣ | W | +3 | 190 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 4♣ | W | +2 | 170 | 79% | ||||
| 3N | E | = | 400 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND KIDS vs DABROWKA 4 : 0 VP (match 85160) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND KIDS | DABROWKA | |
| 6♣ | W | ♠7 | = | 920 | 79% | 6♣ | W | ♥J | +1 | 940 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♠Q | -2 | 100 | 92% | 3N | E | ♣6 | = | 400 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-1.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♣ | W | = | 920 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | W | +1 | 940 | 97% | ||||
| 3N | E | -2 | 100 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 400 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs CAPRISUN 4 : 0 VP (match 85161) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | CAPRISUN | |
| 3♣ | W | ♠7 | +3 | 170 | 79% | 4N | E | ♠K | +2 | 490 | 55% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♥7 | -1 | 50 | 76% | 3N | E | ♠5 | = | 400 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | W | +3 | 170 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 4N | E | +2 | 490 | 55% | ||||
| 3N | W | -1 | 50 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 400 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ITALIA 2 vs RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT 4 : 0 VP (match 85162) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ITALIA 2 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | |
| 3♣ | W | ♠T | +3 | 170 | 79% | 6♣ | E | ♠A | = | 920 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♠Q | = | 400 | 52% | 3N | E | ♠Q | +1 | 430 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-1.3 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | W | +3 | 170 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | E | = | 920 | 79% | ||||
| 3N | E | = | 400 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +1 | 430 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE vs INDIA-B U26 0 : 4 VP (match 85163) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE | INDIA-B U26 | |
| 4♠x | S | ♣A | -5 | 1100 | 100% | 6♣ | W | ♠6 | = | 920 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♠Q | = | 400 | 52% | 6♥ | E | ♠Q | -2 | 100 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS+0.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠x | S | -5 | 1100 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | W | = | 920 | 79% | ||||
| 3N | E | = | 400 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 6♥ | E | -2 | 100 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SHSLLS1 vs RDFZ ZHIHAOLE 4 : 0 VP (match 85164) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SHSLLS1 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | |
| 4♣ | W | ♠6 | +2 | 170 | 79% | 6♣ | W | ♠T | = | 920 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♠Q | -1 | 50 | 76% | 3N | E | ♠Q | +1 | 430 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-1.3 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♣ | W | +2 | 170 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 6♣ | W | = | 920 | 79% | ||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 50 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +1 | 430 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA U21 vs JAPAN U21 0 : 4 VP (match 85165) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA U21 | JAPAN U21 | |
| 5♣ | W | ♠7 | +1 | 420 | 58% | 6N | E | ♠A | -1 | 50 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♠Q | = | 400 | 52% | 3N | E | ♠Q | -1 | 50 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+1.4 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣ | W | +1 | 420 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 6N | E | -1 | 50 | 92% | ||||
| 3N | E | = | 400 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | -1 | 50 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs MAN EATING COBRAS 2 : 2 VP (match 85166) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | MAN EATING COBRAS | |
| 5♣ | W | ♠7 | +1 | 420 | 58% | 3N | W | ♠7 | +4 | 520 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♦8 | -1 | 50 | 76% | 3N | E | ♠Q | -2 | 100 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣ | W | +1 | 420 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +4 | 520 | 60% | ||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 50 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | -2 | 100 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ T76 ♥ JT96 ♦ J43 ♣ 542 | ||
| ♠ J ♥ AK ♦ AK97 ♣ AKJ973 | 1 Dlr N None | ♠ Q42 ♥ Q542 ♦ Q86 ♣ QT6 |
| ♠ AK9853 ♥ 873 ♦ T52 ♣ 8 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 0 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| S | 0 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| E | 11 | 8 | 10 | 12 | 12 |
| W | 11 | 8 | 10 | 12 | 12 |
| ♠ 8 ♥ T7642 ♦ KJ52 ♣ Q52 | ||
| ♠ T742 ♥ AQJ ♦ Q76 ♣ J74 | 2 Dlr E N-S | ♠ AK6 ♥ K953 ♦ A93 ♣ KT3 |
| ♠ QJ953 ♥ 8 ♦ T84 ♣ A986 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| S | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| E | 9 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 |
| W | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 |