| Stage | # | Bds | MP | % | Tops | Bottoms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qualification | 23 | 96 | 7570.99 | 54.77% | 7 | 5 |
| Semifinal A | 14 | 96 | 4013.92 | 53.60% | 6 | 8 |
| Final | 9 | 50 | 640.60 | 53.38% | 8 | 5 |
| Session | Bds | MP | % | Tops | Bottoms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qualification · session 1 | 16 | 1332.58 | 61.24% | 3 | 0 |
| Qualification · session 2 | 16 | 1143.54 | 52.55% | 0 | 1 |
| Qualification · session 3 | 16 | 1305.19 | 59.98% | 0 | 2 |
| Qualification · session 4 | 16 | 1134.70 | 46.66% | 1 | 0 |
| Qualification · session 5 | 16 | 1401.12 | 57.61% | 1 | 0 |
| Qualification · session 6 | 16 | 1253.86 | 51.56% | 2 | 2 |
| Semifinal A · session 1 | 16 | 631.40 | 50.59% | 0 | 2 |
| Semifinal A · session 2 | 16 | 790.67 | 63.35% | 2 | 0 |
| Semifinal A · session 3 | 16 | 691.00 | 55.37% | 1 | 1 |
| Semifinal A · session 4 | 16 | 637.46 | 51.08% | 1 | 1 |
| Semifinal A · session 5 | 16 | 654.00 | 52.40% | 1 | 2 |
| Semifinal A · session 6 | 16 | 609.39 | 48.83% | 1 | 2 |
| Final · session 1 | 16 | 198.60 | 51.72% | 2 | 2 |
| Final · session 2 | 16 | 223.00 | 58.07% | 4 | 1 |
| Final · session 3 | 18 | 219.00 | 50.69% | 2 | 2 |
| Against par | Boards |
|---|---|
| +4.79% | 242 |
| Player | Leads | n | Declarer | n | Defence | n |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇱BESTRZYNSKI Olech | 86.0% | 57 | 77.9% | 68 | 84.0% | 119 |
| 🇵🇱STACHOWIAK-KLUZ Justyna | 79.0% | 62 | 74.5% | 55 | 84.0% | 119 |
Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts. Leads, declarer play and defence are charged to the player: where a protocol says a pair sat N-S its first name sat North and its second South, E-W the same, and the declarer's seat does the rest. Against par is a pair result, so it stays with the pair.