| Stage | # | Bds | MP | % | Tops | Bottoms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Final | 8 | 50 | 641.10 | 53.42% | 8 | 7 |
| Session | Bds | MP | % | Tops | Bottoms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Final · session 1 | 16 | 200.60 | 52.24% | 3 | 2 |
| Final · session 2 | 16 | 210.00 | 54.69% | 3 | 3 |
| Final · session 3 | 18 | 230.50 | 53.36% | 2 | 2 |
| Against par | Boards |
|---|---|
| +2.58% | 50 |
| Player | Leads | n | Declarer | n | Defence | n |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳HU Linlin | 75.0% | 8 | 70.6% | 17 | 91.3% | 23 |
| 🇨🇳DING Junfeng | 66.7% | 15 | 60.0% | 10 | 91.3% | 23 |
Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts. Leads, declarer play and defence are charged to the player: where a protocol says a pair sat N-S its first name sat North and its second South, E-W the same, and the declarer's seat does the rest. Against par is a pair result, so it stays with the pair.