| Stage | # | Bds | MP | % | Tops | Bottoms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qualification | 15 | 96 | 7671.70 | 55.50% | 17 | 8 |
| Semifinal A | 8 | 96 | 3948.78 | 53.85% | 10 | 8 |
| Final | 3 | 50 | 655.65 | 54.64% | 8 | 3 |
| Session | Bds | MP | % | Tops | Bottoms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qualification · session 1 | 16 | 1224.68 | 56.28% | 3 | 2 |
| Qualification · session 2 | 16 | 1235.78 | 56.79% | 2 | 1 |
| Qualification · session 3 | 16 | 1269.21 | 58.33% | 4 | 2 |
| Qualification · session 4 | 16 | 1148.25 | 47.21% | 1 | 2 |
| Qualification · session 5 | 16 | 1327.90 | 54.60% | 3 | 1 |
| Qualification · session 6 | 16 | 1465.88 | 60.27% | 4 | 0 |
| Semifinal A · session 1 | 16 | 562.80 | 45.10% | 0 | 3 |
| Semifinal A · session 2 | 16 | 717.97 | 57.53% | 3 | 0 |
| Semifinal A · session 3 | 16 | 706.00 | 56.57% | 2 | 1 |
| Semifinal A · session 4 | 16 | 513.21 | 41.12% | 0 | 2 |
| Semifinal A · session 5 | 16 | 773.00 | 61.94% | 3 | 1 |
| Semifinal A · session 6 | 16 | 675.80 | 54.15% | 2 | 1 |
| Final · session 1 | 16 | 244.40 | 63.65% | 4 | 1 |
| Final · session 2 | 16 | 149.00 | 38.80% | 1 | 2 |
| Final · session 3 | 18 | 262.25 | 60.71% | 3 | 0 |
| Against par | Boards |
|---|---|
| +4.35% | 237 |
| Player | Leads | n | Declarer | n | Defence | n |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇱GORSKA Aleksandra | 84.4% | 45 | 73.8% | 65 | 93.4% | 106 |
| 🇵🇱TUCZYNSKI Piotr | 86.9% | 61 | 83.3% | 66 | 93.4% | 106 |
Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts. Leads, declarer play and defence are charged to the player: where a protocol says a pair sat N-S its first name sat North and its second South, E-W the same, and the declarer's seat does the rest. Against par is a pair result, so it stays with the pair.