| Stage | # | Bds | MP | % | Tops | Bottoms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qualification | 12 | 96 | 7733.23 | 55.94% | 7 | 5 |
| Semifinal A | 11 | 96 | 4023.93 | 53.74% | 9 | 4 |
| Final | 21 | 50 | 558.40 | 46.53% | 6 | 7 |
| Session | Bds | MP | % | Tops | Bottoms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qualification · session 1 | 16 | 1286.71 | 59.13% | 4 | 2 |
| Qualification · session 2 | 16 | 1120.67 | 51.50% | 0 | 0 |
| Qualification · session 3 | 16 | 1220.46 | 56.09% | 0 | 0 |
| Qualification · session 4 | 16 | 1240.50 | 51.01% | 0 | 2 |
| Qualification · session 5 | 16 | 1481.03 | 60.90% | 2 | 1 |
| Qualification · session 6 | 16 | 1383.86 | 56.90% | 1 | 0 |
| Semifinal A · session 1 | 16 | 605.40 | 48.51% | 0 | 2 |
| Semifinal A · session 2 | 16 | 749.90 | 60.09% | 2 | 0 |
| Semifinal A · session 3 | 16 | 683.00 | 54.73% | 1 | 1 |
| Semifinal A · session 4 | 16 | 668.54 | 53.57% | 1 | 0 |
| Semifinal A · session 5 | 16 | 668.00 | 53.53% | 3 | 0 |
| Semifinal A · session 6 | 16 | 649.09 | 52.01% | 2 | 1 |
| Final · session 1 | 16 | 178.40 | 46.46% | 2 | 1 |
| Final · session 2 | 16 | 147.00 | 38.28% | 0 | 4 |
| Final · session 3 | 18 | 233.00 | 53.94% | 4 | 2 |
| Against par | Boards |
|---|---|
| +1.67% | 242 |
| Player | Leads | n | Declarer | n | Defence | n |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇱WASIAK Artur | 84.9% | 53 | 72.4% | 58 | 89.9% | 119 |
| 🇵🇱MOSZCZYNSKA Zuzanna | 92.4% | 66 | 81.5% | 65 | 89.9% | 119 |
Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts. Leads, declarer play and defence are charged to the player: where a protocol says a pair sat N-S its first name sat North and its second South, E-W the same, and the declarer's seat does the rest. Against par is a pair result, so it stays with the pair.