| Stage | # | Bds | MP | % | Tops | Bottoms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Final | 5 | 50 | 653.35 | 54.45% | 8 | 6 |
| Session | Bds | MP | % | Tops | Bottoms |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Final · session 1 | 16 | 219.60 | 57.19% | 2 | 0 |
| Final · session 2 | 16 | 198.00 | 51.56% | 2 | 3 |
| Final · session 3 | 18 | 235.75 | 54.57% | 4 | 3 |
| Against par | Boards |
|---|---|
| +3.92% | 50 |
| Player | Leads | n | Declarer | n | Defence | n |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸ROSENBERG Kevin | 76.9% | 13 | 83.3% | 12 | 81.2% | 32 |
| 🇺🇸LIN Amber | 84.2% | 19 | 66.7% | 6 | 81.2% | 32 |
Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts. Leads, declarer play and defence are charged to the player: where a protocol says a pair sat N-S its first name sat North and its second South, E-W the same, and the declarer's seat does the rest. Against par is a pair result, so it stays with the pair.