Round 23 — BAM Final B
17 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 23 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | POLAND KIDS | PRISM FALCONS | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | DABROWKA PO | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | EYE OF THE TIGER | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | CHILE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | URUGUAY | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | JAPAN U21 | CHILE U26W | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | MAN EATING COBRAS | CROATIA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | CROATIA U16 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 9 | SXTULIP | SERBIA U21 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | HONG KONG | SHSLLS1 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | INDIA-B U26 | SERBIA U26W | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | ITALIA 2 | ZHIHAOLE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | CAPRISUN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | DABROWKA | ITALIA U26W | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | HAPPY BRIDGE | INDIA U16 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | BELGIUM | SXSPARK | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | INDIA U21 | 50 50 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 23↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 23 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R23 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDIA-B U26 | 63.85 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 2 | ITALIA U26W | 63.59 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 3 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 62.71 | 2.40 | 23 |
| 4 | ITALIA 2 | 61.85 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 5 | CROATIA | 60.40 | 4.00 | 23 |
| 6 | SXSPARK | 59.76 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 7 | SHSLLS1 | 57.67 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 8 | JAPAN U21 | 55.94 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 9 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 55.28 | 4.00 | 23 |
| 9 | HONG KONG | 55.28 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 11 | DABROWKA | 55.04 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 12 | SERBIA U21 | 53.97 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 13 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 53.13 | 4.00 | 23 |
| 14 | POLAND KIDS | 51.92 | 2.40 | 23 |
| 15 | CHILE | 48.76 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 16 | BELGIUM | 46.80 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 17 | ZHIHAOLE | 44.10 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 18 | CHILE U26W | 44.01 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 19 | DABROWKA PO | 43.70 | 4.00 | 23 |
| 20 | URUGUAY | 42.61 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 21 | INDIA U16 | 41.67 | 0.00 | 23 |
| 22 | INDIA U21 | 39.82 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 22 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 39.82 | 0.00 | 23 |
| 24 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 39.64 | 4.00 | 23 |
| 25 | 50 50 | 39.58 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 26 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 38.05 | 0.00 | 23 |
| 27 | SERBIA U26W | 37.73 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 28 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 37.39 | 1.00 | 23 |
| 29 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 35.49 | 3.00 | 23 |
| 30 | SXTULIP | 34.98 | 2.00 | 23 |
| 31 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 26.46 | 0.00 | 23 |
| 32 | CAPRISUN | 25.52 | 0.00 | 23 |
| 33 | CROATIA U16 | 18.15 | 0.00 | 23 |
| 34 | PRISM FALCONS | 0.00 | 0.00 | 23 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 23 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R23 | BAM% |
|---|
POLAND KIDS vs PRISM FALCONS 2.4 : 0 VP (match 85320)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND KIDS | PRISM FALCONS | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL 4 : 0 VP (match 85321) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | |
| 3N | S | ♥2 | -1 | 100 | 52% | 3N | N | ♥6 | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | S | ♠T | -1 | 50 | 53% | 1N | W | ♣Q | +1 | 120 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS-1.4 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | -1 | 100 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | -2 | 200 | 86% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 1N | W | +1 | 120 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT vs EYE OF THE TIGER 0 : 4 VP (match 85322) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | EYE OF THE TIGER | |
| 3N | N | ♥T | -1 | 100 | 52% | 2N | S | ♠3 | = | 120 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| 1N | W | ♣J | +1 | 120 | 84% | 3♣ | W | ♥A | -2 | 200 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+1.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | N | -1 | 100 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 2N | S | = | 120 | 91% | ||||
| 1N | W | +1 | 120 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | W | -2 | 200 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HOPE vs CHILE 3 : 1 VP (match 85323) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | CHILE | |
| 3♣ | S | ♠3 | = | 110 | 81% | 2♠ | N | ♥T | = | 110 | 81% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | W | ♥2 | -3 | 300 | 98% | 3♠ | N | ♣T | -2 | 100 | 71% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.6 | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | S | = | 110 | 81% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♠ | N | = | 110 | 81% | ||||
| 3N | W | -3 | 300 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | N | -2 | 100 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ ZHIHAOLE vs URUGUAY 1 : 3 VP (match 85324) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | URUGUAY | |
| 3N | S | ♥2 | -1 | 100 | 52% | 3N | S | ♥2 | -1 | 100 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1N | W | ♦6 | +1 | 120 | 84% | 1N | W | ♠5 | = | 90 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | -1 | 100 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | S | -1 | 100 | 52% | ||||
| 1N | W | +1 | 120 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U21 vs CHILE U26W 1 : 3 VP (match 85325) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U21 | CHILE U26W | |
| 2N | S | ♠3 | = | 120 | 91% | 2N | S | ♠3 | = | 120 | 91% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♥ | S | ♣A | = | 110 | 72% | 3♣ | W | ♥A | -3 | 300 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS+1.8 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2N | S | = | 120 | 91% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2N | S | = | 120 | 91% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | W | -3 | 300 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAN EATING COBRAS vs CROATIA 0 : 4 VP (match 85326) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAN EATING COBRAS | CROATIA | |
| 3N | N | ♥T | -1 | 100 | 52% | 3N | S | ♠3 | = | 600 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | S | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 53% | 2N | E | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS+1.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | N | -1 | 100 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | = | 600 | 100% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 2N | E | -1 | 100 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs FRANCE FUNBRIDGE 0 : 2.4 VP (match 85327)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXTULIP vs SERBIA U21 2 : 2 VP (match 85328) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXTULIP | SERBIA U21 | |
| 3N | S | ♥2 | -1 | 100 | 52% | 3N | S | ♥2 | -1 | 100 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1N | W | ♣Q | +1 | 120 | 84% | 1N | W | ♥A | +1 | 120 | 84% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | -1 | 100 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | S | -1 | 100 | 52% | ||||
| 1N | W | +1 | 120 | 84% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1N | W | +1 | 120 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HONG KONG vs SHSLLS1 2 : 2 VP (match 85329) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HONG KONG | SHSLLS1 | |
| 2N | S | ♥2 | = | 120 | 91% | 3N | N | ♥T | -5 | 500 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | S | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 53% | 3♣ | W | ♥A | -2 | 200 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2N | S | = | 120 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | -5 | 500 | 100% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | W | -2 | 200 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA-B U26 vs SERBIA U26W 3 : 1 VP (match 85330) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-B U26 | SERBIA U26W | |
| 3N | S | ♠3 | -1 | 100 | 52% | 3N | S | ♥2 | -1 | 100 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1N | W | ♦T | -1 | 100 | 64% | 1N | W | ♠5 | +2 | 150 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-1.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | -1 | 100 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | S | -1 | 100 | 52% | ||||
| 1N | W | -1 | 100 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 1N | W | +2 | 150 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ITALIA 2 vs ZHIHAOLE 2 : 2 VP (match 85331) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ITALIA 2 | ZHIHAOLE | |
| 3N | S | ♥2 | -1 | 100 | 52% | 3N | S | ♥8 | -1 | 100 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1N | W | ♦T | = | 90 | 60% | 1N | W | ♦5 | = | 90 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | -1 | 100 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | S | -1 | 100 | 52% | ||||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AZS WRATISLAVIA vs CAPRISUN 4 : 0 VP (match 85332) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AZS WRATISLAVIA | CAPRISUN | |
| 3N | S | ♥2 | -1 | 100 | 52% | 3♣ | S | ♥2 | -4 | 400 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | N | ♣2 | = | 110 | 72% | 1N | W | ♣Q | +1 | 120 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-1.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | -1 | 100 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | S | -4 | 400 | 95% | ||||
| 2♠ | N | = | 110 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 1N | W | +1 | 120 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs ITALIA U26W 1 : 3 VP (match 85333) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | ITALIA U26W | |
| 3N | S | ♥2 | -1 | 100 | 52% | 3N | S | ♠3 | -1 | 100 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1N | W | ♣Q | = | 90 | 60% | 1N | W | ♥A | -2 | 200 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | -1 | 100 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | S | -1 | 100 | 52% | ||||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 1N | W | -2 | 200 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HAPPY BRIDGE vs INDIA U16 4 : 0 VP (match 85334) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HAPPY BRIDGE | INDIA U16 | |
| 5♦ | N | ♣T | -1 | 100 | 52% | 3N | S | ♥2 | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | S | ♣A | = | 110 | 72% | 1Nx | W | ♠A | +1 | 380 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-1.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♦ | N | -1 | 100 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | -2 | 200 | 86% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 1Nx | W | +1 | 380 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BELGIUM vs SXSPARK 1 : 3 VP (match 85335) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BELGIUM | SXSPARK | |
| 3N | N | ♥T | -1 | 100 | 52% | 3N | S | ♠8 | -1 | 100 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♥ | S | ♠T | -2 | 100 | 71% | 1N | W | ♦5 | -2 | 200 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | N | -1 | 100 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | S | -1 | 100 | 52% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | -2 | 100 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 1N | W | -2 | 200 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U21 vs 50 50 2 : 2 VP (match 85336) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U21 | 50 50 | |
| 3N | S | ♥2 | -2 | 200 | 86% | 4♠ | S | ♦2 | -4 | 400 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | S | ♣K | -1 | 50 | 53% | 2N | N | ♣2 | +1 | 150 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | S | -4 | 400 | 95% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 2N | N | +1 | 150 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ A952 ♥ 54 ♦ AQJT6 ♣ 74 | ||
| ♠ QT83 ♥ KJ82 ♦ 752 ♣ AJ | 21 Dlr N N-S | ♠ J74 ♥ QT96 ♦ K4 ♣ T963 |
| ♠ K6 ♥ A73 ♦ 983 ♣ KQ852 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 8 | 7 | 6 | 10 | 8 |
| S | 8 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 8 |
| E | 5 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 5 |
| W | 5 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 5 |
| ♠ A765 ♥ A2 ♦ T65 ♣ QJ97 | ||
| ♠ T3 ♥ JT5 ♦ AQ8 ♣ AK643 | 22 Dlr E E-W | ♠ QJ42 ♥ K73 ♦ J74 ♣ T82 |
| ♠ K98 ♥ Q9864 ♦ K932 ♣ 5 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| S | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| E | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| W | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 7 |