Round 19 — BAM Final B
17 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 19 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | URUGUAY | PRISM FALCONS | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | CHILE U26W | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | EYE OF THE TIGER | CROATIA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | POLAND KIDS | SXTULIP | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | DABROWKA PO | HONG KONG | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | SERBIA U26W | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | CHILE | ZHIHAOLE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | ITALIA U26W | JAPAN U21 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | MAN EATING COBRAS | HAPPY BRIDGE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CROATIA U16 | BELGIUM | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 13 | INDIA U21 | SERBIA U21 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | SHSLLS1 | 50 50 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | SXSPARK | INDIA-B U26 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | INDIA U16 | ITALIA 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | DABROWKA | CAPRISUN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 19↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 19 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R19 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 53.31 | 4.00 | 19 |
| 2 | ITALIA U26W | 53.19 | 4.00 | 19 |
| 3 | INDIA-B U26 | 51.85 | 1.00 | 19 |
| 3 | ITALIA 2 | 51.85 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 5 | JAPAN U21 | 49.94 | 0.00 | 19 |
| 6 | CROATIA | 49.40 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 7 | SHSLLS1 | 48.67 | 3.00 | 19 |
| 8 | HONG KONG | 47.88 | 1.00 | 19 |
| 9 | SXSPARK | 47.76 | 3.00 | 19 |
| 10 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 46.28 | 3.00 | 19 |
| 11 | DABROWKA | 46.04 | 4.00 | 19 |
| 12 | SERBIA U21 | 43.97 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 13 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 42.73 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 14 | BELGIUM | 41.80 | 2.40 | 19 |
| 15 | POLAND KIDS | 41.52 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 16 | CHILE | 40.76 | 1.00 | 19 |
| 17 | INDIA U16 | 39.67 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 18 | CHILE U26W | 37.01 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 19 | ZHIHAOLE | 36.70 | 3.00 | 19 |
| 20 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 35.82 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 21 | INDIA U21 | 33.82 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 22 | URUGUAY | 33.61 | 2.40 | 19 |
| 23 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 33.05 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 24 | 50 50 | 32.58 | 1.00 | 19 |
| 25 | DABROWKA PO | 31.70 | 3.00 | 19 |
| 26 | SERBIA U26W | 30.73 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 27 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 30.39 | 1.00 | 19 |
| 28 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 29.64 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 29 | SXTULIP | 27.98 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 30 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 26.09 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 31 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 21.06 | 0.00 | 19 |
| 32 | CAPRISUN | 20.52 | 0.00 | 19 |
| 33 | CROATIA U16 | 18.15 | 0.00 | 19 |
| 34 | PRISM FALCONS | 0.00 | 0.00 | 19 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 19 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R19 | BAM% |
|---|
URUGUAY vs PRISM FALCONS 2.4 : 0 VP (match 85252)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | URUGUAY | PRISM FALCONS | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HOPE vs CHILE U26W 2 : 2 VP (match 85253) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | CHILE U26W | |
| 6♣ | W | ♦4 | -1 | 100 | 91% | 3N | E | ♥J | = | 600 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | S | ♣7 | +2 | 150 | 59% | 3N | S | ♦J | +1 | 430 | 83% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♣ | W | -1 | 100 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 64% | ||||
| 3♦ | S | +2 | 150 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +1 | 430 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
EYE OF THE TIGER vs CROATIA 2 : 2 VP (match 85254) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | EYE OF THE TIGER | CROATIA | |
| 3N | E | ♦7 | = | 600 | 64% | 3N | W | ♥7 | = | 600 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 5♦ | S | ♠5 | = | 400 | 67% | 5♦ | S | ♠8 | = | 400 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 64% | ||||
| 5♦ | S | = | 400 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 5♦ | S | = | 400 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE FUNBRIDGE vs TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL 4 : 0 VP (match 85255) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | |
| 3N | W | ♥7 | -1 | 100 | 91% | 3N | W | ♦3 | +2 | 660 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠x | E | ♠3 | -3 | 500 | 95% | 3N | S | ♠7 | -1 | 50 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.7 | NS-1.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | -1 | 100 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +2 | 660 | 88% | ||||
| 3♠x | E | -3 | 500 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | -1 | 50 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND KIDS vs SXTULIP 2 : 2 VP (match 85256) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND KIDS | SXTULIP | |
| 3N | W | ♥7 | +1 | 630 | 64% | 3N | W | ♥4 | +1 | 630 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | S | ♠7 | -1 | 50 | 88% | 3N | S | ♠9 | -1 | 50 | 88% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | +1 | 630 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | W | +1 | 630 | 64% | ||||
| 3N | S | -1 | 50 | 88% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | S | -1 | 50 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs HONG KONG 3 : 1 VP (match 85257) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | HONG KONG | |
| 3N | W | ♦3 | +2 | 660 | 88% | 3N | E | ♥J | +2 | 660 | 88% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♠x | W | ♣K | -3 | 500 | 95% | 3N | S | ♠7 | = | 400 | 67% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | +2 | 660 | 88% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | +2 | 660 | 88% | ||||
| 4♠x | W | -3 | 500 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | = | 400 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT vs SERBIA U26W 2 : 2 VP (match 85258) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | SERBIA U26W | |
| 3N | E | ♦6 | = | 600 | 64% | 3N | W | ♦3 | +2 | 660 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♠7 | -1 | 50 | 88% | 4♠x | E | ♣6 | -3 | 500 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +2 | 660 | 88% | ||||
| 3N | S | -1 | 50 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | E | -3 | 500 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE vs ZHIHAOLE 1 : 3 VP (match 85259) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE | ZHIHAOLE | |
| 3N | W | ♥7 | = | 600 | 64% | 4♠ | E | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠x | E | ♣6 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 4♠ | E | ♥4 | -2 | 100 | 76% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 91% | ||||
| 2♠x | E | -1 | 100 | 76% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AZS WRATISLAVIA vs RDFZ ZHIHAOLE 3 : 1 VP (match 85260) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AZS WRATISLAVIA | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | |
| 3N | W | ♥7 | = | 600 | 64% | 4♠ | E | ♦6 | +1 | 650 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| 3♣ | N | ♠Q | +2 | 150 | 59% | 4♦ | S | ♠7 | +1 | 150 | 59% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 72% | ||||
| 3♣ | N | +2 | 150 | 59% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♦ | S | +1 | 150 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ITALIA U26W vs JAPAN U21 4 : 0 VP (match 85261) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ITALIA U26W | JAPAN U21 | |
| 3N | W | ♥7 | = | 600 | 64% | 3N | W | ♦3 | +2 | 660 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♠7 | +1 | 430 | 83% | 3♠x | E | ♥4 | -2 | 300 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-0.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +2 | 660 | 88% | ||||
| 3N | S | +1 | 430 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 3♠x | E | -2 | 300 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAN EATING COBRAS vs HAPPY BRIDGE 2 : 2 VP (match 85262) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAN EATING COBRAS | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 3N | E | ♥J | = | 600 | 64% | 3N | W | ♦3 | +2 | 660 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠x | E | ♥6 | -2 | 300 | 52% | 3N | S | ♥2 | = | 400 | 67% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +2 | 660 | 88% | ||||
| 3♠x | E | -2 | 300 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | = | 400 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs BELGIUM 0 : 2.4 VP (match 85263)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | BELGIUM | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U21 vs SERBIA U21 2 : 2 VP (match 85264) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U21 | SERBIA U21 | |
| 3N | W | ♦3 | +2 | 660 | 88% | 3N | W | ♦3 | +1 | 630 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| 5♦ | S | ♠7 | = | 400 | 67% | 3♠x | E | ♣6 | -2 | 300 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | +2 | 660 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +1 | 630 | 64% | ||||
| 5♦ | S | = | 400 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 3♠x | E | -2 | 300 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SHSLLS1 vs 50 50 3 : 1 VP (match 85265) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SHSLLS1 | 50 50 | |
| 3N | W | ♠J | = | 600 | 64% | 3N | W | ♥7 | = | 600 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 5♦ | S | ♠7 | = | 400 | 67% | 3N | S | ♠7 | -5 | 250 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-0.7 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 64% | ||||
| 5♦ | S | = | 400 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | -5 | 250 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSPARK vs INDIA-B U26 3 : 1 VP (match 85266) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSPARK | INDIA-B U26 | |
| 3N | W | ♥3 | = | 600 | 64% | 3N | W | ♥4 | = | 600 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | S | ♠7 | +1 | 430 | 83% | 3♣ | N | ♠Q | +1 | 130 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 64% | ||||
| 3N | S | +1 | 430 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs ITALIA 2 2 : 2 VP (match 85267) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | ITALIA 2 | |
| 3N | E | ♦J | +2 | 660 | 88% | 4♠ | E | ♦6 | -1 | 100 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | N | ♠Q | = | 140 | 66% | 3N | S | ♠9 | -2 | 100 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | +2 | 660 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 91% | ||||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | -2 | 100 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs CAPRISUN 4 : 0 VP (match 85268) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | CAPRISUN | |
| 6N | E | ♣A | -3 | 300 | 100% | 3N | W | ♥9 | +1 | 630 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠x | E | ♥6 | -3 | 500 | 95% | 3♠ | E | ♣6 | -2 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.9 | NS-0.8 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6N | E | -3 | 300 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +1 | 630 | 64% | ||||
| 4♠x | E | -3 | 500 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.9 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ J ♥ 97643 ♦ K943 ♣ Q82 | ||
| ♠ Q6 ♥ KQ82 ♦ Q82 ♣ KJ74 | 13 Dlr N Both | ♠ AK952 ♥ A ♦ AT5 ♣ T653 |
| ♠ T8743 ♥ JT5 ♦ J76 ♣ A9 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2 |
| S | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2 |
| E | 10 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 11 |
| W | 10 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 11 |
| ♠ – ♥ KJ85 ♦ K962 ♣ AKQT2 | ||
| ♠ K9875 ♥ Q932 ♦ J3 ♣ 73 | 14 Dlr E None | ♠ QJ642 ♥ AT ♦ QT8 ♣ 854 |
| ♠ AT3 ♥ 764 ♦ A754 ♣ J96 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 8 | 6 | 9 | 11 | 10 |
| S | 8 | 6 | 9 | 11 | 10 |
| E | 4 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
| W | 4 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 3 |