Round 15 — BAM Final B
17 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 15 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SXTULIP | PRISM FALCONS | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | HONG KONG | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | CROATIA | SERBIA U26W | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | ZHIHAOLE | CHILE U26W | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | URUGUAY | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | ITALIA U26W | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | EYE OF THE TIGER | HAPPY BRIDGE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | BELGIUM | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | INDIA U21 | POLAND KIDS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | 50 50 | DABROWKA PO | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | SXSPARK | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CHILE | INDIA U16 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | DABROWKA | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | JAPAN U21 | CAPRISUN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | ITALIA 2 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 0.50 | protocol → |
| 16 | INDIA-B U26 | CROATIA U16 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | SHSLLS1 | SERBIA U21 | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 15↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 15 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R15 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JAPAN U21 | 43.94 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 2 | INDIA-B U26 | 43.85 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 3 | SXSPARK | 42.76 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 4 | ITALIA 2 | 41.85 | 3.00 | 15 |
| 5 | ITALIA U26W | 41.19 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 6 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 40.91 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 7 | SHSLLS1 | 39.67 | 1.00 | 15 |
| 8 | CROATIA | 39.00 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 9 | DABROWKA | 37.04 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 10 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 36.28 | 3.00 | 15 |
| 11 | HONG KONG | 35.88 | 0.00 | 15 |
| 12 | SERBIA U21 | 33.97 | 3.00 | 15 |
| 13 | CHILE | 33.76 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 14 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 33.73 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 15 | BELGIUM | 33.40 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 16 | POLAND KIDS | 30.52 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 17 | CHILE U26W | 29.61 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 18 | INDIA U16 | 27.67 | 0.00 | 15 |
| 19 | URUGUAY | 27.21 | 1.00 | 15 |
| 20 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 26.82 | 0.00 | 15 |
| 21 | 50 50 | 26.58 | 0.00 | 15 |
| 22 | INDIA U21 | 25.82 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 23 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 25.64 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 24 | DABROWKA PO | 24.70 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 24 | ZHIHAOLE | 24.70 | 0.00 | 15 |
| 26 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 24.05 | 0.50 | 15 |
| 27 | SERBIA U26W | 23.73 | 0.00 | 15 |
| 28 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 23.09 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 29 | SXTULIP | 21.98 | 2.40 | 15 |
| 30 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 21.39 | 0.00 | 15 |
| 31 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 19.06 | 0.00 | 15 |
| 32 | CROATIA U16 | 16.15 | 0.00 | 15 |
| 33 | CAPRISUN | 15.52 | 0.00 | 15 |
| 34 | PRISM FALCONS | 0.00 | 0.00 | 15 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 15 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R15 | BAM% |
|---|
SXTULIP vs PRISM FALCONS 2.4 : 0 VP (match 85184)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXTULIP | PRISM FALCONS | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE FUNBRIDGE vs HONG KONG 4 : 0 VP (match 85185) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | HONG KONG | |
| 2♠ | E | ♣2 | = | 110 | 58% | 3N | S | ♠7 | -3 | 300 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 6♥ | N | ♣K | = | 980 | 94% | 4♣x | E | ♠K | -2 | 500 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | -3 | 300 | 95% | ||||
| 6♥ | N | = | 980 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 4♣x | E | -2 | 500 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA vs SERBIA U26W 4 : 0 VP (match 85186) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA | SERBIA U26W | |
| 1N | N | ♠A | = | 90 | 92% | 2♠ | E | ♥3 | = | 110 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♣K | +2 | 480 | 66% | 4N | N | ♣K | -1 | 50 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS-0.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | N | = | 90 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 58% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | +2 | 480 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 4N | N | -1 | 50 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZHIHAOLE vs CHILE U26W 0 : 4 VP (match 85187) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZHIHAOLE | CHILE U26W | |
| 1N | N | ♠A | -2 | 200 | 79% | 1N | N | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | S | ♣7 | +1 | 450 | 58% | 4♥ | N | ♣K | +2 | 480 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+0.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | N | -2 | 200 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 1N | N | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| 4♠ | S | +1 | 450 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | +2 | 480 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
URUGUAY vs AZS WRATISLAVIA 1 : 3 VP (match 85188) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | URUGUAY | AZS WRATISLAVIA | |
| 1N | N | ♦T | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2N | N | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♠ | S | ♣7 | +2 | 480 | 66% | 6♥ | N | ♣K | = | 980 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+1.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | N | -1 | 100 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2N | N | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| 4♠ | S | +2 | 480 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 6♥ | N | = | 980 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HOPE vs ITALIA U26W 2 : 2 VP (match 85189) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | ITALIA U26W | |
| 2♠ | E | ♣2 | +1 | 140 | 71% | 2♥ | N | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | S | ♣5 | +1 | 450 | 58% | 6N | N | ♣K | -5 | 250 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| 4♠ | S | +1 | 450 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 6N | N | -5 | 250 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
EYE OF THE TIGER vs HAPPY BRIDGE 2 : 2 VP (match 85190) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | EYE OF THE TIGER | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 3♦ | N | ♥T | -3 | 300 | 95% | 2♠ | E | ♥3 | -1 | 50 | 87% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | S | ♦J | +1 | 450 | 58% | 4♣x | E | ♥3 | -1 | 200 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♦ | N | -3 | 300 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 87% | ||||
| 4♠ | S | +1 | 450 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 4♣x | E | -1 | 200 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL vs BELGIUM 0 : 4 VP (match 85191) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | BELGIUM | |
| 2♦ | N | ♠A | -3 | 300 | 95% | 1N | N | ♠A | +1 | 120 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♣K | +2 | 480 | 66% | 6♥ | N | ♠6 | = | 980 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+1.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♦ | N | -3 | 300 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 1N | N | +1 | 120 | 98% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | +2 | 480 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 6♥ | N | = | 980 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U21 vs POLAND KIDS 2 : 2 VP (match 85192) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U21 | POLAND KIDS | |
| 2♠ | E | ♥3 | = | 110 | 58% | 1N | N | ♠8 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♣K | +2 | 480 | 66% | 3N | N | ♣K | -3 | 150 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 1N | N | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | +2 | 480 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | -3 | 150 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs DABROWKA PO 0 : 4 VP (match 85193) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | DABROWKA PO | |
| 2♥ | S | ♠5 | -2 | 200 | 79% | 2♠ | W | ♦8 | = | 110 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| 6N | N | ♣K | -1 | 50 | 76% | 5♥ | N | ♣K | +1 | 480 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS+0.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | S | -2 | 200 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 58% | ||||
| 6N | N | -1 | 50 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 5♥ | N | +1 | 480 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT vs SXSPARK 0 : 4 VP (match 85194) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | SXSPARK | |
| 2♠ | E | ♥3 | = | 110 | 58% | 1N | N | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♣K | +2 | 480 | 66% | 6♥ | N | ♣K | = | 980 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+1.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 1N | N | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | +2 | 480 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 6♥ | N | = | 980 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE vs INDIA U16 4 : 0 VP (match 85195) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE | INDIA U16 | |
| 1N | N | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2♠ | E | ♣2 | = | 110 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♣K | +2 | 480 | 66% | 3N | N | ♣Q | -3 | 150 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-1.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | N | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 58% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | +2 | 480 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | -3 | 150 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs RDFZ ZHIHAOLE 4 : 0 VP (match 85196) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | |
| 1N | N | ♠A | = | 90 | 92% | 1N | S | ♠5 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| 6♥ | N | ♣K | = | 980 | 94% | 3N | N | ♣K | -3 | 150 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.7 | NS-0.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | N | = | 90 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 1N | S | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| 6♥ | N | = | 980 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | -3 | 150 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U21 vs CAPRISUN 4 : 0 VP (match 85197) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U21 | CAPRISUN | |
| 1N | N | ♠A | +1 | 120 | 98% | 3♦ | S | ♠7 | -3 | 300 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | S | ♣2 | +1 | 450 | 58% | 3N | N | ♣K | -3 | 150 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-1.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | N | +1 | 120 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | S | -3 | 300 | 95% | ||||
| 4♠ | S | +1 | 450 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | -3 | 150 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ITALIA 2 vs MAN EATING COBRAS 3 : 0.5 VP (match 85198) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ITALIA 2 | MAN EATING COBRAS | |
| 2♥ | S | ♠7 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2♠ | E | ♥2 | = | 110 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | N | ♣K | -2 | 100 | 82% | 3N | N | — | -2 | 100 | 82% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-0.8 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 58% | ||||
| 3N | N | -2 | 100 | 82% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | N | -2 | 100 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA-B U26 vs CROATIA U16 4 : 0 VP (match 85199) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-B U26 | CROATIA U16 | |
| 1N | N | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2♦ | S | ♥9 | -2 | 200 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♣K | +1 | 450 | 58% | 3♥ | N | ♣K | +2 | 200 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-1.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | N | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | S | -2 | 200 | 79% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 450 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | N | +2 | 200 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SHSLLS1 vs SERBIA U21 1 : 3 VP (match 85200) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SHSLLS1 | SERBIA U21 | |
| 1Nx | W | ♥Q | +1 | 280 | 87% | 2N | S | ♠7 | -2 | 200 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| 5♥ | N | ♣K | +1 | 480 | 66% | 4♥ | N | ♣K | +2 | 480 | 66% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1Nx | W | +1 | 280 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 2N | S | -2 | 200 | 79% | ||||
| 5♥ | N | +1 | 480 | 66% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | N | +2 | 480 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ T63 ♥ AQJ ♦ 9873 ♣ QT5 | ||
| ♠ 75 ♥ 9875 ♦ KJ62 ♣ A73 | 5 Dlr N N-S | ♠ AK984 ♥ T4 ♦ T5 ♣ K964 |
| ♠ QJ2 ♥ K632 ♦ AQ4 ♣ J82 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| S | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| E | 6 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| W | 6 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| ♠ 3 ♥ AQJT9 ♦ AK86 ♣ A94 | ||
| ♠ AT95 ♥ K82 ♦ J9 ♣ T752 | 6 Dlr E E-W | ♠ 62 ♥ 4 ♦ T752 ♣ KQJ863 |
| ♠ KQJ874 ♥ 7653 ♦ Q43 ♣ – |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 7 | 10 | 12 | 11 | 6 |
| S | 7 | 10 | 12 | 11 | 6 |
| E | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| W | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 |