Round 12 — BAM Final B
17 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 12 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ZHIHAOLE | PRISM FALCONS | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | SERBIA U26W | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | HONG KONG | ITALIA U26W | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | HAPPY BRIDGE | SXTULIP | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | BELGIUM | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | CROATIA | INDIA U21 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | CHILE U26W | 50 50 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | URUGUAY | SXSPARK | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | INDIA U16 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | DABROWKA | EYE OF THE TIGER | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | CAPRISUN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | POLAND KIDS | ITALIA 2 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | INDIA-B U26 | DABROWKA PO | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | SHSLLS1 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | SERBIA U21 | CHILE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | CROATIA U16 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | MAN EATING COBRAS | JAPAN U21 | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 12↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 12 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R12 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | JAPAN U21 | 34.94 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 2 | SXSPARK | 34.76 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 3 | ITALIA U26W | 34.19 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 4 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 32.91 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 5 | INDIA-B U26 | 32.85 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 6 | SHSLLS1 | 32.67 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 7 | ITALIA 2 | 31.85 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 8 | HONG KONG | 31.48 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 9 | DABROWKA | 31.04 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 10 | CROATIA | 30.00 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 11 | SERBIA U21 | 28.97 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 12 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 26.28 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 13 | CHILE | 25.76 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 14 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 25.73 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 15 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 24.82 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 16 | INDIA U21 | 23.82 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 17 | INDIA U16 | 23.67 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 18 | BELGIUM | 23.40 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 19 | CHILE U26W | 22.61 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 20 | POLAND KIDS | 22.52 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 21 | URUGUAY | 22.21 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 22 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 21.09 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 23 | ZHIHAOLE | 20.70 | 2.40 | 12 |
| 24 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 20.39 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 25 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 19.64 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 26 | SXTULIP | 19.58 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 27 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 19.55 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 28 | 50 50 | 18.58 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 29 | SERBIA U26W | 17.33 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 30 | DABROWKA PO | 16.70 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 31 | CAPRISUN | 15.52 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 32 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 15.06 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 33 | CROATIA U16 | 12.15 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 34 | PRISM FALCONS | 0.00 | 0.00 | 12 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 12 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R12 | BAM% |
|---|
ZHIHAOLE vs PRISM FALCONS 2.4 : 0 VP (match 85133)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZHIHAOLE | PRISM FALCONS | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA U26W vs AZS WRATISLAVIA 0 : 4 VP (match 85134) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA U26W | AZS WRATISLAVIA | |
| 3N | W | ♦T | = | 600 | 89% | 2♠ | E | ♥8 | = | 110 | 63% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | W | ♦3 | +1 | 140 | 60% | 2N | E | ♣6 | = | 120 | 71% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 63% | ||||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 2N | E | = | 120 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HONG KONG vs ITALIA U26W 0 : 4 VP (match 85135) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HONG KONG | ITALIA U26W | |
| 3N | W | ♥K | = | 600 | 89% | 3N | E | ♥8 | -1 | 100 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| 2N | E | ♣J | +1 | 150 | 50% | 2N | E | ♣J | = | 120 | 71% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+0.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 64% | ||||
| 2N | E | +1 | 150 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 2N | E | = | 120 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HAPPY BRIDGE vs SXTULIP 2 : 2 VP (match 85136) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HAPPY BRIDGE | SXTULIP | |
| 3N | E | ♥4 | -1 | 100 | 64% | 3N | W | ♥A | -2 | 200 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♣6 | -1 | 50 | 90% | 3N | E | ♣J | = | 400 | 77% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | -2 | 200 | 92% | ||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 50 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 400 | 77% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE FUNBRIDGE vs BELGIUM 4 : 0 VP (match 85137) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | BELGIUM | |
| 2♠ | E | ♥3 | = | 110 | 63% | 1N | E | ♠A | +2 | 150 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♣6 | = | 400 | 77% | 3N | E | ♣7 | +1 | 430 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS-1.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 1N | E | +2 | 150 | 68% | ||||
| 3N | E | = | 400 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +1 | 430 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA vs INDIA U21 4 : 0 VP (match 85138) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA | INDIA U21 | |
| 3N | W | ♥K | -1 | 100 | 64% | 1N | E | ♠A | = | 90 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 2N | E | ♥Q | = | 120 | 71% | 2N | E | ♣6 | +2 | 180 | 63% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.4 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | -1 | 100 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 1N | E | = | 90 | 56% | ||||
| 2N | E | = | 120 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 2N | E | +2 | 180 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE U26W vs 50 50 3 : 1 VP (match 85139) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE U26W | 50 50 | |
| 3N | W | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 64% | 3N | W | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♥ | S | ♣2 | -3 | 150 | 50% | 2♠x | W | ♥J | +1 | 570 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | -1 | 100 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | W | -1 | 100 | 64% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | -3 | 150 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 2♠x | W | +1 | 570 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
URUGUAY vs SXSPARK 0 : 4 VP (match 85140) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | URUGUAY | SXSPARK | |
| 3♥x | S | ♣A | -2 | 500 | 77% | 3N | W | ♥K | -2 | 200 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥x | S | ♣2 | -3 | 500 | 94% | 3N | W | ♥J | -1 | 50 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS+1.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥x | S | -2 | 500 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | -2 | 200 | 92% | ||||
| 3♥x | S | -3 | 500 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | -1 | 50 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs CHINA RDFZ HOPE 4 : 0 VP (match 85141) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | |
| 3N | W | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 64% | 2♦ | W | ♥A | = | 90 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 2N | E | ♣6 | +1 | 150 | 50% | 2♠ | W | ♥J | +2 | 170 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.3 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | -1 | 100 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | W | = | 90 | 56% | ||||
| 2N | E | +1 | 150 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | W | +2 | 170 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs EYE OF THE TIGER 3 : 1 VP (match 85142) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | EYE OF THE TIGER | |
| 3N | W | ♥A | -2 | 200 | 92% | 3N | W | ♠6 | -2 | 200 | 92% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♠ | W | ♦3 | +1 | 140 | 60% | 2N | E | ♥5 | +1 | 150 | 50% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+0.8 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | -2 | 200 | 92% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | W | -2 | 200 | 92% | ||||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 2N | E | +1 | 150 | 50% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL vs CAPRISUN 2 : 2 VP (match 85143) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | CAPRISUN | |
| 3N | W | ♥A | = | 600 | 89% | 3N | W | ♠9 | +1 | 630 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♣J | = | 400 | 77% | 3♦ | W | ♣A | -2 | 100 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +1 | 630 | 100% | ||||
| 3N | E | = | 400 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | W | -2 | 100 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND KIDS vs ITALIA 2 0 : 4 VP (match 85144) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND KIDS | ITALIA 2 | |
| 3N | W | ♠6 | = | 600 | 89% | 3N | W | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♠4 | = | 400 | 77% | 2N | E | ♣7 | = | 120 | 71% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS+0.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | -1 | 100 | 64% | ||||
| 3N | E | = | 400 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 2N | E | = | 120 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA-B U26 vs DABROWKA PO 4 : 0 VP (match 85145) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-B U26 | DABROWKA PO | |
| 2N | W | ♦T | +2 | 180 | 71% | 2♥x | S | ♠K | -1 | 200 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| 2N | E | ♥5 | = | 120 | 71% | 3Nx | N | ♠Q | -5 | 1100 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS-1.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2N | W | +2 | 180 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 2♥x | S | -1 | 200 | 74% | ||||
| 2N | E | = | 120 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 3Nx | N | -5 | 1100 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT vs SHSLLS1 2 : 2 VP (match 85146) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | SHSLLS1 | |
| 3N | W | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 64% | 3N | E | ♠A | = | 600 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| 2N | E | ♣6 | +2 | 180 | 63% | 3N | E | ♣6 | -1 | 50 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS+0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | -1 | 100 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 89% | ||||
| 2N | E | +2 | 180 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | -1 | 50 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA U21 vs CHILE 4 : 0 VP (match 85147) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA U21 | CHILE | |
| 3N | W | ♥A | -2 | 200 | 92% | 3N | E | ♥8 | -1 | 100 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥5 | = | 400 | 77% | 4♠ | W | ♦6 | = | 420 | 87% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | -2 | 200 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 64% | ||||
| 3N | E | = | 400 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 87% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs RDFZ ZHIHAOLE 1 : 3 VP (match 85148) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | |
| 3N | W | ♥A | = | 600 | 89% | 3♣ | W | ♥A | -2 | 200 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♣J | -1 | 50 | 90% | 2♥ | W | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 90% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS+1.6 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | W | -2 | 200 | 92% | ||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 50 | 90% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAN EATING COBRAS vs JAPAN U21 1 : 3 VP (match 85149) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAN EATING COBRAS | JAPAN U21 | |
| 3N | W | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 64% | 3N | E | ♥9 | -1 | 100 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♠ | W | ♦3 | +3 | 200 | 68% | 2♠ | W | ♦3 | = | 110 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.9 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | -1 | 100 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 64% | ||||
| 2♠ | W | +3 | 200 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 81% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ 96542 ♥ AK6 ♦ T3 ♣ J93 | ||
| ♠ KQ7 ♥ 52 ♦ Q654 ♣ AK72 | 23 Dlr S Both | ♠ JT83 ♥ QJT ♦ AJ7 ♣ Q64 |
| ♠ A ♥ 98743 ♦ K982 ♣ T85 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 4 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
| S | 4 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
| E | 8 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| W | 8 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| ♠ AT32 ♥ J7 ♦ Q763 ♣ A84 | ||
| ♠ KJ876 ♥ AT63 ♦ AJ8 ♣ 2 | 24 Dlr W None | ♠ Q9 ♥ 92 ♦ KT95 ♣ KQ953 |
| ♠ 54 ♥ KQ854 ♦ 42 ♣ JT76 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 4 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| S | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
| E | 9 | 10 | 7 | 9 | 8 |
| W | 9 | 10 | 7 | 9 | 8 |