Round 10 — BAM Final B
17 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 10 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ITALIA U26W | PRISM FALCONS | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | HAPPY BRIDGE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | ZHIHAOLE | BELGIUM | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | INDIA U21 | SERBIA U26W | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | HONG KONG | 50 50 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | SXTULIP | SXSPARK | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | INDIA U16 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | CROATIA | DABROWKA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | CAPRISUN | CHILE U26W | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | ITALIA 2 | URUGUAY | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | INDIA-B U26 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | EYE OF THE TIGER | SHSLLS1 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | SERBIA U21 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | POLAND KIDS | CROATIA U16 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | MAN EATING COBRAS | DABROWKA PO | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | JAPAN U21 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | CHILE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 10↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 10 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R10 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HONG KONG | 29.48 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 2 | ITALIA U26W | 29.19 | 2.40 | 10 |
| 3 | JAPAN U21 | 28.94 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 4 | SHSLLS1 | 28.67 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 5 | DABROWKA | 28.04 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 6 | SXSPARK | 27.76 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 7 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 26.91 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 8 | INDIA-B U26 | 26.85 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 9 | ITALIA 2 | 25.85 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 10 | CROATIA | 25.00 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 11 | SERBIA U21 | 22.97 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 12 | CHILE | 22.76 | 3.00 | 10 |
| 13 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 22.73 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 14 | BELGIUM | 21.40 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 15 | POLAND KIDS | 20.52 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 16 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 19.88 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 17 | INDIA U21 | 19.82 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 18 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 18.82 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 19 | URUGUAY | 18.21 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 20 | INDIA U16 | 17.67 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 21 | CHILE U26W | 17.61 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 22 | SXTULIP | 17.58 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 23 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 17.55 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 24 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 17.09 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 25 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 16.39 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 26 | SERBIA U26W | 16.33 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 27 | 50 50 | 15.58 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 28 | ZHIHAOLE | 15.30 | 3.00 | 10 |
| 29 | DABROWKA PO | 14.70 | 3.00 | 10 |
| 30 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 14.64 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 31 | CAPRISUN | 13.52 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 32 | CROATIA U16 | 11.15 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 33 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 11.06 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 34 | PRISM FALCONS | 0.00 | 0.00 | 10 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 10 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R10 | BAM% |
|---|
ITALIA U26W vs PRISM FALCONS 2.4 : 0 VP (match 85099)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ITALIA U26W | PRISM FALCONS | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AZS WRATISLAVIA vs HAPPY BRIDGE 2 : 2 VP (match 85100) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AZS WRATISLAVIA | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 1N | N | ♥4 | +2 | 150 | 73% | 2♣ | S | ♣8 | +1 | 110 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | W | ♣A | = | 110 | 55% | 4♥x | W | ♦Q | -1 | 200 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | N | +2 | 150 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 2♣ | S | +1 | 110 | 64% | ||||
| 2♥ | W | = | 110 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | W | -1 | 200 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZHIHAOLE vs BELGIUM 3 : 1 VP (match 85101) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZHIHAOLE | BELGIUM | |
| 2♠ | S | ♦6 | = | 110 | 64% | 2♠ | S | ♥5 | = | 110 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 5♥x | W | ♦Q | -2 | 500 | 100% | 5♥ | W | ♣A | -2 | 200 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 64% | ||||
| 5♥x | W | -2 | 500 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 5♥ | W | -2 | 200 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U21 vs SERBIA U26W 2 : 2 VP (match 85102) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U21 | SERBIA U26W | |
| 2N | N | ♦4 | = | 120 | 53% | 1♥ | E | ♠4 | = | 80 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | W | ♣A | = | 620 | 92% | 4♥ | W | ♦Q | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2N | N | = | 120 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 1♥ | E | = | 80 | 90% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | = | 620 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HONG KONG vs 50 50 2 : 2 VP (match 85103) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HONG KONG | 50 50 | |
| 1N | N | ♥4 | +2 | 150 | 73% | 3N | N | ♦4 | -2 | 100 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 5♦x | S | ♥A | -6 | 1700 | 100% | 5♣x | S | ♥A | -2 | 500 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-1.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | N | +2 | 150 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | -2 | 100 | 97% | ||||
| 5♦x | S | -6 | 1700 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 5♣x | S | -2 | 500 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXTULIP vs SXSPARK 0 : 4 VP (match 85104) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXTULIP | SXSPARK | |
| 1Nx | N | ♥4 | +2 | 380 | 97% | 3♥ | W | ♠5 | -5 | 500 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 5♣x | N | ♥6 | -2 | 500 | 84% | 4♥ | W | ♣A | -2 | 200 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+1.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1Nx | N | +2 | 380 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | W | -5 | 500 | 100% | ||||
| 5♣x | N | -2 | 500 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | W | -2 | 200 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE FUNBRIDGE vs INDIA U16 2 : 2 VP (match 85105) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | INDIA U16 | |
| 2N | N | ♦2 | +1 | 150 | 73% | 3♣ | S | ♦8 | -2 | 100 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 5♣ | S | ♠T | -2 | 200 | 66% | 4♥ | W | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2N | N | +1 | 150 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | S | -2 | 100 | 97% | ||||
| 5♣ | S | -2 | 200 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA vs DABROWKA 0 : 4 VP (match 85106) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA | DABROWKA | |
| 2♠ | S | ♦8 | = | 110 | 64% | 2N | N | ♥4 | +1 | 150 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥x | W | ♣A | +1 | 930 | 97% | 5♥x | W | ♦Q | -1 | 200 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 2N | N | +1 | 150 | 73% | ||||
| 3♥x | W | +1 | 930 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 5♥x | W | -1 | 200 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CAPRISUN vs CHILE U26W 2 : 2 VP (match 85107) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CAPRISUN | CHILE U26W | |
| 1N | N | ♥4 | = | 90 | 81% | 2N | N | ♥4 | +1 | 150 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | W | ♦Q | = | 140 | 58% | 3N | N | ♥T | -3 | 300 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | N | = | 90 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 2N | N | +1 | 150 | 73% | ||||
| 3♥ | W | = | 140 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | -3 | 300 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ITALIA 2 vs URUGUAY 4 : 0 VP (match 85108) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ITALIA 2 | URUGUAY | |
| 2♠ | S | ♦8 | = | 110 | 64% | 2♥ | E | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | W | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 63% | 4♣ | S | ♥A | -2 | 200 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.0 | NS-0.8 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 4♣ | S | -2 | 200 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.0 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HOPE vs INDIA-B U26 2 : 2 VP (match 85109) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | INDIA-B U26 | |
| 2N | N | ♥4 | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2♠ | S | ♦8 | +1 | 140 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| 4♣ | N | ♥T | -1 | 100 | 52% | 5♣ | N | ♥T | -2 | 200 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2N | N | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 52% | ||||
| 4♣ | N | -1 | 100 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 5♣ | N | -2 | 200 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
EYE OF THE TIGER vs SHSLLS1 2 : 2 VP (match 85110) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | EYE OF THE TIGER | SHSLLS1 | |
| 1N | N | ♥4 | +2 | 150 | 73% | 2N | N | ♥4 | +1 | 150 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♥ | W | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 63% | 4♥ | W | ♦Q | -1 | 100 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | N | +2 | 150 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2N | N | +1 | 150 | 73% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA U21 vs TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL 4 : 0 VP (match 85111) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA U21 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | |
| 2N | N | ♠A | +2 | 180 | 94% | 2♠ | S | ♦8 | -2 | 100 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 1N | N | ♠3 | +1 | 120 | 77% | 4♥ | W | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.4 | NS-0.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2N | N | +2 | 180 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | S | -2 | 100 | 97% | ||||
| 1N | N | +1 | 120 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.4 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND KIDS vs CROATIA U16 2 : 2 VP (match 85112) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND KIDS | CROATIA U16 | |
| 1N | N | ♠A | +2 | 150 | 73% | 1N | S | ♦8 | +1 | 120 | 53% | 2 | ||||
| 2N | N | ♥9 | -4 | 400 | 77% | 4♥ | W | ♠4 | -2 | 200 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | N | +2 | 150 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 1N | S | +1 | 120 | 53% | ||||
| 2N | N | -4 | 400 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | W | -2 | 200 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAN EATING COBRAS vs DABROWKA PO 1 : 3 VP (match 85113) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAN EATING COBRAS | DABROWKA PO | |
| 1N | N | ♥4 | +2 | 150 | 73% | 1N | N | ♥4 | +2 | 150 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♥ | W | ♦Q | = | 620 | 92% | 4♥ | W | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | N | +2 | 150 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1N | N | +2 | 150 | 73% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | = | 620 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U21 vs RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT 2 : 2 VP (match 85114) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U21 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | |
| 2♠ | S | ♦6 | -1 | 50 | 86% | 1♥ | W | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥x | W | ♦Q | -1 | 200 | 89% | 5♣x | S | ♥A | -2 | 500 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-1.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 1♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| 4♥x | W | -1 | 200 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 5♣x | S | -2 | 500 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ ZHIHAOLE vs CHILE 1 : 3 VP (match 85115) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | CHILE | |
| 2N | N | ♥4 | +1 | 150 | 73% | 2N | N | ♠A | +1 | 150 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 5♣x | N | ♥T | -1 | 200 | 66% | 4♥ | W | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 63% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2N | N | +1 | 150 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2N | N | +1 | 150 | 73% | ||||
| 5♣x | N | -1 | 200 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ 53 ♥ QJ72 ♦ KQ97 ♣ QT4 | ||
| ♠ Q7 ♥ K653 ♦ T865 ♣ 832 | 19 Dlr S E-W | ♠ AKT6 ♥ AT84 ♦ 42 ♣ K97 |
| ♠ J9842 ♥ 9 ♦ AJ3 ♣ AJ65 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 8 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 8 |
| S | 8 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 8 |
| E | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| W | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| ♠ K842 ♥ K72 ♦ Q ♣ AKJ83 | ||
| ♠ T7 ♥ AQ8543 ♦ AJ865 ♣ – | 20 Dlr W Both | ♠ AJ93 ♥ T96 ♦ 943 ♣ Q74 |
| ♠ Q65 ♥ J ♦ KT72 ♣ T9652 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 5 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| S | 5 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| E | 7 | 6 | 9 | 8 | 4 |
| W | 7 | 6 | 9 | 8 | 4 |