Round 21 — U26 BAM Qualification
25 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 21 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDIA-B U26 | CAPRISUN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | HONG KONG | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | DABROWKA PO | ITALIA U26W | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | SXSTARLORD | BYE | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | PRISM FALCONS | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | GERMANY | SXNEBULA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | JAPAN U26 | GREISNOR | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | SERBALICIOUS | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | ITALIA U21 | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | SERBIA U26W | INDIA U21 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | DABROWKA | HAPPY BRIDGE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CHINA RDFZ | SXTULIP | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | INDIA U16 | INDIA-A U26 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | ISRAEL | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | ZHIHAOLE | AUSTRIA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | CS21MSCHOOL | MAN EATING COBRAS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | SXSPARK | EYE OF THE TIGER | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | CHILE U26W | CHINA RDFZ HU | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | 50 50 | SHSLLS1 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 20 | JAPAN U21 | SERBIA U21 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | SXDAISY | ITALIA U26 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | CHILE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | CROATIA | ITALIA 2 | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | URUGUAY | BELGIUM | 3 | 1 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | CROATIA U16 | POLAND KIDS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 21↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 21 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R21 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GREISNOR | 96.60 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 2 | ITALIA U26 | 95.60 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 3 | ITALIA U21 | 94.20 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 4 | ISRAEL | 92.60 | 4.00 | 21 |
| 5 | SXNEBULA | 90.20 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 6 | CHINA RDFZ HU | 89.40 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 7 | JAPAN U26 | 88.60 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 8 | AUSTRIA | 88.00 | 4.00 | 21 |
| 9 | SERBALICIOUS | 86.40 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 10 | INDIA-A U26 | 85.80 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 11 | CHINA RDFZ | 82.20 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 12 | CROATIA | 81.00 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 12 | SXSTARLORD | 81.00 | 2.40 | 21 |
| 14 | JAPAN U21 | 80.40 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 15 | SERBIA U21 | 80.20 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 16 | GERMANY | 79.80 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 17 | SXDAISY | 79.40 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 18 | ITALIA U26W | 77.60 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 19 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 77.00 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 20 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 76.80 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 21 | CHILE U26W | 76.40 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 22 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 76.20 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 23 | INDIA-B U26 | 74.40 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 24 | SHSLLS1 | 73.60 | 2.40 | 21 |
| 25 | POLAND KIDS | 73.20 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 26 | CHILE | 72.20 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 26 | DABROWKA PO | 72.20 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 26 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 72.20 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 29 | DABROWKA | 71.80 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 30 | SXTULIP | 71.20 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 31 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 70.80 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 32 | INDIA U21 | 70.00 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 33 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 68.40 | 0.00 | 21 |
| 34 | HONG KONG | 67.60 | 4.00 | 21 |
| 35 | ITALIA 2 | 66.40 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 36 | SXSPARK | 63.20 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 37 | SERBIA U26W | 60.00 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 38 | PRISM FALCONS | 59.40 | 4.00 | 21 |
| 39 | INDIA U16 | 57.60 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 40 | ZHIHAOLE | 56.00 | 0.00 | 21 |
| 41 | URUGUAY | 53.80 | 2.40 | 21 |
| 42 | 50 50 | 50.80 | 0.00 | 21 |
| 43 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 50.00 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 44 | CROATIA U16 | 46.20 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 45 | CS21MSCHOOL | 39.40 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 46 | CAPRISUN | 38.40 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 47 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 36.20 | 0.00 | 21 |
| 48 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 34.40 | 0.00 | 21 |
| 49 | BELGIUM | 0.00 | 0.00 | 21 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 21 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R21 | BAM% |
|---|
INDIA-B U26 vs CAPRISUN 2 : 2 VP (match 84636) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-B U26 | CAPRISUN | |
| 4♠ | W | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1N | E | ♠5 | +2 | 150 | 58% | 2N | W | ♦9 | +1 | 150 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| 1N | E | +2 | 150 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2N | W | +1 | 150 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HOPE vs HONG KONG 0 : 4 VP (match 84637) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | HONG KONG | |
| 2♠ | W | ♦A | +1 | 140 | 92% | 2♣ | N | ♠A | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| 1N | E | ♣T | +2 | 150 | 58% | 2♦ | W | ♦4 | +1 | 110 | 96% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+0.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 2♣ | N | -1 | 50 | 84% | ||||
| 1N | E | +2 | 150 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | W | +1 | 110 | 96% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs ITALIA U26W 3 : 1 VP (match 84638) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | ITALIA U26W | |
| 4♠ | E | ♦4 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3♦ | W | ♠K | +1 | 130 | 86% | 1N | E | ♠5 | +3 | 180 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| 3♦ | W | +1 | 130 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 1N | E | +3 | 180 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSTARLORD vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84639)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSTARLORD | BYE | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PRISM FALCONS vs TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL 4 : 0 VP (match 84640) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PRISM FALCONS | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | |
| 3N | E | ♣3 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 3N | W | ♦A | = | 400 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 2♦ | W | ♠K | = | 90 | 100% | 3N | W | ♠K | +1 | 430 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-2.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 100% | ||||
| 2♦ | W | = | 90 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-2.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY vs SXNEBULA 2 : 2 VP (match 84641) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY | SXNEBULA | |
| 4♠ | W | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 4♠ | W | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2N | W | ♠K | +1 | 150 | 58% | 1N | E | ♠2 | +2 | 150 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| 2N | W | +1 | 150 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1N | E | +2 | 150 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U26 vs GREISNOR 1 : 3 VP (match 84642) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U26 | GREISNOR | |
| 4♠ | E | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | W | ♠K | = | 400 | 89% | 2N | W | ♠K | +1 | 150 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 2N | W | +1 | 150 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBALICIOUS vs FRANCE FUNBRIDGE 2 : 2 VP (match 84643) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBALICIOUS | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | |
| 2♠ | W | ♦A | +1 | 140 | 92% | 2♠ | W | ♦A | +1 | 140 | 92% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1N | E | ♣T | +3 | 180 | 74% | 1N | W | ♦9 | +3 | 180 | 74% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS-1.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 92% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 92% | ||||
| 1N | E | +3 | 180 | 74% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1N | W | +3 | 180 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AZS WRATISLAVIA vs ITALIA U21 1 : 3 VP (match 84644) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AZS WRATISLAVIA | ITALIA U21 | |
| 4♠ | W | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1N | W | ♠6 | +3 | 180 | 74% | 1N | E | ♠4 | +2 | 150 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| 1N | W | +3 | 180 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 1N | E | +2 | 150 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA U26W vs INDIA U21 3 : 1 VP (match 84645) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA U26W | INDIA U21 | |
| 4♠ | W | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1N | E | ♠5 | +3 | 180 | 74% | 3N | E | ♣T | = | 400 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.7 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| 1N | E | +3 | 180 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 400 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs HAPPY BRIDGE 1 : 3 VP (match 84646) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 4♠ | W | ♠2 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | E | ♠4 | = | 400 | 89% | 1N | E | ♣T | +2 | 150 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| 3N | E | = | 400 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 1N | E | +2 | 150 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ vs SXTULIP 2 : 2 VP (match 84647) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ | SXTULIP | |
| 4♠ | W | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 4♠ | E | ♣J | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1N | E | ♠4 | +2 | 150 | 58% | 1N | E | ♣T | +2 | 150 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| 1N | E | +2 | 150 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1N | E | +2 | 150 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs INDIA-A U26 3 : 1 VP (match 84648) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | INDIA-A U26 | |
| 4♠ | W | ♥6 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3♦ | W | ♣A | +1 | 130 | 86% | 1N | E | ♠5 | +3 | 180 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| 3♦ | W | +1 | 130 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 1N | E | +3 | 180 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISRAEL vs RDFZ ZHIHAOLE 4 : 0 VP (match 84649) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISRAEL | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | |
| 1N | N | ♥K | +1 | 120 | 100% | 3N | E | ♣J | -2 | 100 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 1N | E | ♣9 | +1 | 120 | 91% | 3N | W | ♠6 | +1 | 430 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.8 | NS-0.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | N | +1 | 120 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | -2 | 100 | 97% | ||||
| 1N | E | +1 | 120 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZHIHAOLE vs AUSTRIA 0 : 4 VP (match 84650) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZHIHAOLE | AUSTRIA | |
| 2♠ | W | ♦A | +1 | 140 | 92% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 1N | E | ♣T | +2 | 150 | 58% | 3♦ | W | ♠K | +1 | 130 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+0.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| 1N | E | +2 | 150 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | W | +1 | 130 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CS21MSCHOOL vs MAN EATING COBRAS 1 : 3 VP (match 84651) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CS21MSCHOOL | MAN EATING COBRAS | |
| 4♠ | E | ♥4 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 3N | E | ♥8 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | W | ♠6 | +1 | 430 | 98% | 1N | W | ♠6 | +2 | 150 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 1N | W | +2 | 150 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSPARK vs EYE OF THE TIGER 3 : 1 VP (match 84652) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSPARK | EYE OF THE TIGER | |
| 4♠ | W | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 56% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1N | E | ♠5 | +2 | 150 | 58% | 1N | E | ♠5 | +3 | 180 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| 1N | E | +2 | 150 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 1N | E | +3 | 180 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE U26W vs CHINA RDFZ HU 1 : 3 VP (match 84653) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE U26W | CHINA RDFZ HU | |
| 4♠ | E | ♣5 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2N | W | ♠K | +1 | 150 | 58% | 3♦ | W | ♠K | +1 | 130 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.8 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| 2N | W | +1 | 150 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | W | +1 | 130 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs SHSLLS1 0 : 2.4 VP (match 84654)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | SHSLLS1 | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U21 vs SERBIA U21 2 : 2 VP (match 84655) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U21 | SERBIA U21 | |
| 4♠ | W | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1N | E | ♠5 | +2 | 150 | 58% | 2N | W | ♠K | +1 | 150 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| 1N | E | +2 | 150 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2N | W | +1 | 150 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXDAISY vs ITALIA U26 2 : 2 VP (match 84656) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXDAISY | ITALIA U26 | |
| 3N | E | ♣J | -2 | 100 | 97% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 1N | E | ♣T | +2 | 150 | 58% | 2♦ | W | ♠K | +1 | 110 | 96% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | -2 | 100 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| 1N | E | +2 | 150 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | W | +1 | 110 | 96% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT vs CHILE 2 : 2 VP (match 84657) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | CHILE | |
| 4♠ | W | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 3♠ | W | ♦K | = | 140 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 1N | E | ♠2 | +2 | 150 | 58% | 2♦ | W | ♠Q | +1 | 110 | 96% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 92% | ||||
| 1N | E | +2 | 150 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | W | +1 | 110 | 96% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA vs ITALIA 2 1 : 3 VP (match 84658) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA | ITALIA 2 | |
| 4♠ | E | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1N | E | ♠5 | +3 | 180 | 74% | 2N | W | ♦4 | +1 | 150 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| 1N | E | +3 | 180 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 2N | W | +1 | 150 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
URUGUAY vs BELGIUM 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84659) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | URUGUAY | BELGIUM | |
| 4♠ | E | ♥8 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 4♠ | E | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1N | E | ♠4 | +2 | 150 | 58% | 3N | E | ♥6 | = | 400 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.7 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| 1N | E | +2 | 150 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 400 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs POLAND KIDS 2 : 2 VP (match 84660) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | POLAND KIDS | |
| 4♠ | W | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 56% | 3♠ | W | ♦A | = | 140 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♠K | = | 400 | 89% | 1N | E | ♣T | +2 | 150 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 92% | ||||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 1N | E | +2 | 150 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ 82 ♥ 965 ♦ AK82 ♣ A972 | ||
| ♠ Q9764 ♥ AJ2 ♦ JT7 ♣ K4 | 17 Dlr N None | ♠ AJT3 ♥ KQ7 ♦ Q65 ♣ Q86 |
| ♠ K5 ♥ T843 ♦ 943 ♣ JT53 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 5 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| S | 5 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| E | 7 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| W | 8 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| ♠ KQ76 ♥ Q85 ♦ 974 ♣ A53 | ||
| ♠ J9 ♥ KT72 ♦ AKT82 ♣ K6 | 18 Dlr E N-S | ♠ AT8 ♥ 943 ♦ Q65 ♣ QJ74 |
| ♠ 5432 ♥ AJ6 ♦ J3 ♣ T982 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| S | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| E | 9 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 8 |
| W | 9 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 8 |