Round 17 — U26 BAM Qualification
25 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 17 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDIA-B U26 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | SXNEBULA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | DABROWKA PO | GREISNOR | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | SXSTARLORD | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | PRISM FALCONS | ITALIA U21 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | GERMANY | INDIA U21 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | JAPAN U26 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | SERBALICIOUS | SXTULIP | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | INDIA-A U26 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | SERBIA U26W | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | DABROWKA | AUSTRIA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CHINA RDFZ | MAN EATING COBRAS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | INDIA U16 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | ISRAEL | CHINA RDFZ HU | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | ZHIHAOLE | SHSLLS1 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | CS21MSCHOOL | SERBIA U21 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | SXSPARK | ITALIA U26 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | CHILE U26W | CHILE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | 50 50 | ITALIA 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 20 | JAPAN U21 | BELGIUM | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | SXDAISY | POLAND KIDS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | CAPRISUN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | CROATIA | HONG KONG | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | URUGUAY | ITALIA U26W | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | CROATIA U16 | BYE | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 17↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 17 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R17 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ITALIA U21 | 88.20 | 4.00 | 17 |
| 2 | ITALIA U26 | 86.20 | 4.00 | 17 |
| 3 | GREISNOR | 85.60 | 3.00 | 17 |
| 4 | JAPAN U26 | 79.60 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 5 | INDIA-A U26 | 78.80 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 6 | ISRAEL | 78.60 | 0.00 | 17 |
| 7 | SXNEBULA | 78.20 | 4.00 | 17 |
| 8 | AUSTRIA | 77.00 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 9 | SERBALICIOUS | 75.40 | 3.00 | 17 |
| 10 | CHINA RDFZ HU | 74.40 | 4.00 | 17 |
| 11 | CHINA RDFZ | 74.20 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 12 | SXSTARLORD | 71.60 | 3.00 | 17 |
| 13 | GERMANY | 70.80 | 3.00 | 17 |
| 13 | SERBIA U21 | 70.80 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 15 | CHILE U26W | 70.40 | 3.00 | 17 |
| 15 | JAPAN U21 | 70.40 | 2.40 | 17 |
| 17 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 70.20 | 1.00 | 17 |
| 18 | CROATIA | 69.60 | 3.00 | 17 |
| 19 | SXDAISY | 69.00 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 20 | ITALIA U26W | 68.60 | 3.00 | 17 |
| 20 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 68.60 | 4.00 | 17 |
| 22 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 67.80 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 23 | CHILE | 65.80 | 1.00 | 17 |
| 24 | INDIA-B U26 | 65.00 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 25 | DABROWKA | 64.80 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 26 | INDIA U21 | 64.00 | 1.00 | 17 |
| 27 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 63.20 | 1.00 | 17 |
| 27 | POLAND KIDS | 63.20 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 27 | SHSLLS1 | 63.20 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 27 | SXTULIP | 63.20 | 1.00 | 17 |
| 31 | DABROWKA PO | 62.80 | 1.00 | 17 |
| 31 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 62.80 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 33 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 61.40 | 3.00 | 17 |
| 34 | ITALIA 2 | 60.40 | 2.40 | 17 |
| 35 | SXSPARK | 58.20 | 0.00 | 17 |
| 36 | HONG KONG | 54.60 | 1.00 | 17 |
| 37 | SERBIA U26W | 54.00 | 1.00 | 17 |
| 37 | ZHIHAOLE | 54.00 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 39 | INDIA U16 | 51.60 | 3.00 | 17 |
| 40 | PRISM FALCONS | 51.40 | 0.00 | 17 |
| 41 | 50 50 | 50.80 | 0.00 | 17 |
| 42 | URUGUAY | 50.40 | 1.00 | 17 |
| 43 | CROATIA U16 | 42.20 | 2.40 | 17 |
| 44 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 42.00 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 45 | CS21MSCHOOL | 37.40 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 46 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 32.40 | 2.00 | 17 |
| 47 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 30.80 | 0.00 | 17 |
| 48 | CAPRISUN | 30.40 | 0.00 | 17 |
| 49 | BELGIUM | 0.00 | 0.00 | 17 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 17 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R17 | BAM% |
|---|
INDIA-B U26 vs TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL 2 : 2 VP (match 84536) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-B U26 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | |
| 2N | W | ♠3 | = | 120 | 52% | 3N | E | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♠T | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3N | E | ♦5 | = | 600 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2N | W | = | 120 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 77% | ||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HOPE vs SXNEBULA 0 : 4 VP (match 84537) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | SXNEBULA | |
| 2N | E | ♠4 | +1 | 150 | 65% | 3♠ | S | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♦5 | = | 600 | 78% | 3N | E | ♦5 | -2 | 200 | 99% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS+1.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2N | E | +1 | 150 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 64% | ||||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | -2 | 200 | 99% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs GREISNOR 1 : 3 VP (match 84538) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | GREISNOR | |
| 4♦ | E | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 77% | 3Nx | E | ♠4 | -1 | 200 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3N | E | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+1.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 3Nx | E | -1 | 200 | 92% | ||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSTARLORD vs FRANCE FUNBRIDGE 3 : 1 VP (match 84539) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSTARLORD | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | |
| 4♠x | S | ♠8 | -2 | 300 | 77% | 4♠x | S | ♠8 | -2 | 300 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | E | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3N | E | ♦5 | = | 600 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-1.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠x | S | -2 | 300 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠x | S | -2 | 300 | 77% | ||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PRISM FALCONS vs ITALIA U21 0 : 4 VP (match 84540) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PRISM FALCONS | ITALIA U21 | |
| 3♦ | E | ♣A | +1 | 130 | 57% | 4♥x | E | ♣A | -3 | 800 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♦6 | = | 600 | 78% | 3N | E | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+1.4 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 57% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | E | -3 | 800 | 100% | ||||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY vs INDIA U21 3 : 1 VP (match 84541) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY | INDIA U21 | |
| 5♦x | E | ♣K | -1 | 200 | 92% | 4♠x | S | ♦A | -3 | 500 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥6 | = | 600 | 78% | 3N | E | ♦5 | = | 600 | 78% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-1.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♦x | E | -1 | 200 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | S | -3 | 500 | 81% | ||||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 78% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U26 vs HAPPY BRIDGE 2 : 2 VP (match 84542) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U26 | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 3♠ | S | ♣5 | -2 | 100 | 56% | 2N | E | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3N | E | ♣A | +2 | 660 | 99% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | S | -2 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 2N | E | -1 | 100 | 77% | ||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +2 | 660 | 99% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBALICIOUS vs SXTULIP 3 : 1 VP (match 84543) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBALICIOUS | SXTULIP | |
| 2N | E | ♠2 | = | 120 | 52% | 3♠x | N | ♦K | -2 | 300 | 77% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♦5 | = | 600 | 78% | 3N | E | ♦5 | = | 600 | 78% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-1.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2N | E | = | 120 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 3♠x | N | -2 | 300 | 77% | ||||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 78% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AZS WRATISLAVIA vs INDIA-A U26 2 : 2 VP (match 84544) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AZS WRATISLAVIA | INDIA-A U26 | |
| 3N | E | ♠4 | = | 600 | 87% | 3Nx | E | ♠4 | = | 750 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥5 | +2 | 660 | 99% | 3N | E | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.7 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 3Nx | E | = | 750 | 100% | ||||
| 3N | E | +2 | 660 | 99% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA U26W vs RDFZ ZHIHAOLE 1 : 3 VP (match 84545) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA U26W | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | |
| 3N | E | ♠A | +1 | 630 | 95% | 3♦ | E | ♣A | +2 | 150 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥5 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3N | E | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | +1 | 630 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | E | +2 | 150 | 65% | ||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs AUSTRIA 2 : 2 VP (match 84546) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | AUSTRIA | |
| 3N | E | ♠4 | = | 600 | 87% | 4♦x | E | ♣A | -1 | 200 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3N | E | ♣2 | = | 600 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 4♦x | E | -1 | 200 | 92% | ||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ vs MAN EATING COBRAS 2 : 2 VP (match 84547) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ | MAN EATING COBRAS | |
| 2♠x | S | ♣4 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 3N | E | ♠4 | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♠T | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3N | E | ♦5 | = | 600 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠x | S | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 77% | ||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs EYE OF THE TIGER 3 : 1 VP (match 84548) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | EYE OF THE TIGER | |
| 3♠x | S | ♦4 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2N | E | ♠4 | +2 | 180 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥4 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3N | E | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠x | S | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 2N | E | +2 | 180 | 72% | ||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISRAEL vs CHINA RDFZ HU 0 : 4 VP (match 84549) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISRAEL | CHINA RDFZ HU | |
| 3♠ | S | ♣5 | -1 | 50 | 64% | 4♦ | E | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♦5 | = | 600 | 78% | 3N | E | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+0.9 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 4♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 77% | ||||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZHIHAOLE vs SHSLLS1 2 : 2 VP (match 84550) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZHIHAOLE | SHSLLS1 | |
| 2N | E | ♠4 | +1 | 150 | 65% | 3♠ | S | ♦A | -3 | 150 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | E | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3N | W | ♥J | -1 | 100 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2N | E | +1 | 150 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♠ | S | -3 | 150 | 65% | ||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | W | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CS21MSCHOOL vs SERBIA U21 2 : 2 VP (match 84551) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CS21MSCHOOL | SERBIA U21 | |
| 3N | E | ♣A | = | 600 | 87% | 5♦ | E | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♠T | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3N | E | ♠T | = | 600 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 77% | ||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSPARK vs ITALIA U26 0 : 4 VP (match 84552) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSPARK | ITALIA U26 | |
| 3N | E | ♠4 | +1 | 630 | 95% | 3N | E | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♣2 | +1 | 630 | 95% | 3N | E | ♦5 | = | 600 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.8 | NS-0.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | +1 | 630 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 77% | ||||
| 3N | E | +1 | 630 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE U26W vs CHILE 3 : 1 VP (match 84553) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE U26W | CHILE | |
| 4♥x | E | ♣A | -2 | 500 | 98% | 4♦x | E | ♣A | -1 | 200 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3N | E | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS+1.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥x | E | -2 | 500 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 4♦x | E | -1 | 200 | 92% | ||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs ITALIA 2 0 : 2.4 VP (match 84554)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | ITALIA 2 | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U21 vs BELGIUM 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84555)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U21 | BELGIUM | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXDAISY vs POLAND KIDS 2 : 2 VP (match 84556) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXDAISY | POLAND KIDS | |
| 3♠ | S | ♣6 | -2 | 100 | 56% | 5♦ | E | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♦5 | -2 | 200 | 99% | 2N | E | ♦5 | +1 | 150 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | S | -2 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 77% | ||||
| 3N | E | -2 | 200 | 99% | 2 | |||
| 2N | E | +1 | 150 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT vs CAPRISUN 4 : 0 VP (match 84557) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | CAPRISUN | |
| 3♠ | S | ♦A | -2 | 100 | 56% | 3♦ | E | ♣K | +1 | 130 | 57% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥4 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3N | E | ♦5 | = | 600 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | S | -2 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | E | +1 | 130 | 57% | ||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA vs HONG KONG 3 : 1 VP (match 84558) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA | HONG KONG | |
| 3N | E | ♠2 | -1 | 100 | 77% | 3N | E | ♥2 | = | 600 | 87% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3N | E | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 87% | ||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
URUGUAY vs ITALIA U26W 1 : 3 VP (match 84559) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | URUGUAY | ITALIA U26W | |
| 3N | E | ♣A | +1 | 630 | 95% | 4♠ | S | ♣6 | -3 | 150 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3N | E | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | +1 | 630 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | S | -3 | 150 | 65% | ||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84560)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | BYE | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ T653 ♥ T75 ♦ 96 ♣ Q832 | ||
| ♠ 8 ♥ AJ84 ♦ AJ84 ♣ J654 | 9 Dlr N E-W | ♠ KQ9 ♥ Q63 ♦ KQT32 ♣ T9 |
| ♠ AJ742 ♥ K92 ♦ 75 ♣ AK7 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 5 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| S | 5 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| E | 8 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 7 |
| W | 8 | 5 | 9 | 9 | 6 |
| ♠ AQ97 ♥ JT92 ♦ JT72 ♣ 9 | ||
| ♠ J642 ♥ K73 ♦ 94 ♣ K854 | 10 Dlr E Both | ♠ K53 ♥ AQ8 ♦ AK3 ♣ QJ63 |
| ♠ T8 ♥ 654 ♦ Q865 ♣ AT72 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 4 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 3 |
| S | 4 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 3 |
| E | 9 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 10 |
| W | 9 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 10 |