Round 10 — U26 BAM Qualification
25 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 10 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDIA-B U26 | SXTULIP | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | INDIA-A U26 | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | DABROWKA PO | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | SXSTARLORD | AUSTRIA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | PRISM FALCONS | MAN EATING COBRAS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | GERMANY | EYE OF THE TIGER | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | JAPAN U26 | CHINA RDFZ HU | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | SERBALICIOUS | SHSLLS1 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | SERBIA U21 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | SERBIA U26W | ITALIA U26 | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | DABROWKA | CHILE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CHINA RDFZ | ITALIA 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | INDIA U16 | BELGIUM | 3 | 1 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | ISRAEL | POLAND KIDS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | ZHIHAOLE | CAPRISUN | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | CS21MSCHOOL | HONG KONG | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | SXSPARK | ITALIA U26W | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | CHILE U26W | BYE | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | 50 50 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | JAPAN U21 | SXNEBULA | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | SXDAISY | GREISNOR | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | CROATIA | ITALIA U21 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | URUGUAY | INDIA U21 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | CROATIA U16 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 10↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 10 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R10 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDIA-A U26 | 65.80 | 3.00 | 10 |
| 2 | GREISNOR | 64.60 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 3 | CHINA RDFZ | 64.20 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 3 | ITALIA U21 | 64.20 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 5 | JAPAN U26 | 63.60 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 6 | ISRAEL | 62.20 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 7 | ITALIA U26 | 61.20 | 3.00 | 10 |
| 7 | SXNEBULA | 61.20 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 9 | SERBALICIOUS | 60.40 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 10 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 59.80 | 3.00 | 10 |
| 11 | JAPAN U21 | 57.20 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 12 | AUSTRIA | 57.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 13 | CHINA RDFZ HU | 55.40 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 14 | GERMANY | 54.80 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 15 | ITALIA U26W | 54.60 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 15 | SXSTARLORD | 54.60 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 17 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 54.20 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 18 | SERBIA U21 | 53.80 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 19 | INDIA-B U26 | 53.00 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 20 | POLAND KIDS | 52.80 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 21 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 52.20 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 21 | SHSLLS1 | 52.20 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 21 | SXDAISY | 52.20 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 24 | CHILE U26W | 52.00 | 2.40 | 10 |
| 24 | INDIA U21 | 52.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 26 | CROATIA | 50.20 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 26 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 50.20 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 26 | SXTULIP | 50.20 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 29 | CHILE | 48.80 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 29 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 48.80 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 31 | 50 50 | 48.40 | 2.40 | 10 |
| 32 | DABROWKA | 47.80 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 33 | ITALIA 2 | 47.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 34 | DABROWKA PO | 46.80 | 3.00 | 10 |
| 35 | SERBIA U26W | 46.00 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 36 | ZHIHAOLE | 44.60 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 37 | INDIA U16 | 43.60 | 2.40 | 10 |
| 38 | PRISM FALCONS | 43.40 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 38 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 43.40 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 40 | HONG KONG | 43.20 | 4.00 | 10 |
| 41 | URUGUAY | 43.00 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 42 | SXSPARK | 42.80 | 2.00 | 10 |
| 43 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 36.00 | 3.00 | 10 |
| 44 | CROATIA U16 | 33.80 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 45 | CS21MSCHOOL | 27.00 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 46 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 26.80 | 1.00 | 10 |
| 47 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 26.40 | 0.00 | 10 |
| 48 | CAPRISUN | 21.00 | 3.00 | 10 |
| 49 | BELGIUM | 0.00 | 0.00 | 10 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 10 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R10 | BAM% |
|---|
INDIA-B U26 vs SXTULIP 4 : 0 VP (match 84361) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-B U26 | SXTULIP | |
| 4♠ | E | ♠Q | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3N | W | ♦3 | +1 | 630 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠x | S | ♥3 | -2 | 500 | 60% | 4♥ | E | ♣T | +1 | 650 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-1.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +1 | 630 | 92% | ||||
| 4♠x | S | -2 | 500 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 650 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HOPE vs INDIA-A U26 1 : 3 VP (match 84362) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | INDIA-A U26 | |
| 4♠ | E | ♣J | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3N | W | ♠4 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♥ | E | ♠Q | +2 | 680 | 99% | 4♥ | E | ♥J | = | 620 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | W | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| 4♥ | E | +2 | 680 | 99% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs RDFZ ZHIHAOLE 3 : 1 VP (match 84363) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | |
| 3N | W | ♠8 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3N | W | ♥3 | = | 600 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | E | ♣9 | = | 620 | 60% | 4♥ | E | ♣T | = | 620 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSTARLORD vs AUSTRIA 2 : 2 VP (match 84364) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSTARLORD | AUSTRIA | |
| 3N | W | ♠8 | -2 | 200 | 91% | 3N | W | ♠8 | -3 | 300 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| 5♥xx | E | ♣T | -1 | 400 | 96% | 3N | E | ♠J | = | 600 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.7 | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | -3 | 300 | 98% | ||||
| 5♥xx | E | -1 | 400 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PRISM FALCONS vs MAN EATING COBRAS 2 : 2 VP (match 84365) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PRISM FALCONS | MAN EATING COBRAS | |
| 3N | W | ♦3 | +1 | 630 | 92% | 2♦ | W | ♠8 | +1 | 110 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | E | ♠A | = | 620 | 60% | 4♥ | E | ♠A | +1 | 650 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | +1 | 630 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | W | +1 | 110 | 51% | ||||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 650 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY vs EYE OF THE TIGER 4 : 0 VP (match 84366) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY | EYE OF THE TIGER | |
| 3N | W | ♠8 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3N | W | ♦7 | +1 | 630 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠x | S | ♥3 | -2 | 500 | 60% | 4♥ | E | ♠A | = | 620 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-1.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +1 | 630 | 92% | ||||
| 4♠x | S | -2 | 500 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U26 vs CHINA RDFZ HU 4 : 0 VP (match 84367) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U26 | CHINA RDFZ HU | |
| 3N | W | ♠8 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3N | W | ♠T | = | 600 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | E | ♣T | = | 620 | 60% | 4♥ | E | ♥J | +1 | 650 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-1.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 650 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBALICIOUS vs SHSLLS1 2 : 2 VP (match 84368) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBALICIOUS | SHSLLS1 | |
| 3N | E | ♠J | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3N | W | ♥3 | = | 600 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | E | ♥T | +1 | 650 | 82% | 4♠x | S | ♥3 | -2 | 500 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 650 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | S | -2 | 500 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AZS WRATISLAVIA vs SERBIA U21 3 : 1 VP (match 84369) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AZS WRATISLAVIA | SERBIA U21 | |
| 3N | W | ♠8 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3N | E | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♠x | S | ♥3 | -1 | 200 | 76% | 4♥ | E | ♠A | +1 | 650 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | -1 | 100 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| 4♠x | S | -1 | 200 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 650 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA U26W vs ITALIA U26 1 : 3 VP (match 84370) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA U26W | ITALIA U26 | |
| 3N | W | ♥3 | +1 | 630 | 92% | 3N | W | ♥3 | +1 | 630 | 92% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | E | ♣T | +2 | 660 | 96% | 3♠x | S | ♥Q | = | 730 | 99% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.8 | NS+0.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | +1 | 630 | 92% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | W | +1 | 630 | 92% | ||||
| 3N | E | +2 | 660 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 3♠x | S | = | 730 | 99% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.8 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs CHILE 2 : 2 VP (match 84371) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | CHILE | |
| 3N | W | ♠8 | -2 | 200 | 91% | 5♦ | W | ♣5 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠x | S | ♥3 | -2 | 500 | 60% | 4♥ | E | ♣9 | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+1.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| 4♠x | S | -2 | 500 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ vs ITALIA 2 2 : 2 VP (match 84372) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ | ITALIA 2 | |
| 3N | W | ♦7 | +1 | 630 | 92% | 3N | W | ♠4 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠x | S | ♥3 | -2 | 500 | 60% | 4♥ | E | ♥J | +1 | 650 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | +1 | 630 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| 4♠x | S | -2 | 500 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 650 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs BELGIUM 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84373) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | BELGIUM | |
| 3N | W | ♥3 | +1 | 630 | 92% | 3N | E | ♣6 | +1 | 630 | 92% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♥ | E | ♣7 | = | 620 | 60% | 4♥ | E | ♥J | +2 | 680 | 99% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-1.8 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | +1 | 630 | 92% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | +1 | 630 | 92% | ||||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | +2 | 680 | 99% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISRAEL vs POLAND KIDS 2 : 2 VP (match 84374) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISRAEL | POLAND KIDS | |
| 3♠ | E | ♥6 | = | 140 | 53% | 3N | W | ♥3 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠x | S | ♥5 | -1 | 200 | 76% | 4♥ | E | ♥J | +1 | 650 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | -1 | 100 | 69% | ||||
| 4♠x | S | -1 | 200 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 650 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZHIHAOLE vs CAPRISUN 1 : 3 VP (match 84375) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZHIHAOLE | CAPRISUN | |
| 3N | W | ♥3 | = | 600 | 68% | 5♣ | E | ♦K | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♠x | S | ♦4 | -1 | 200 | 76% | 5♥ | E | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 5♣ | E | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| 4♠x | S | -1 | 200 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 5♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CS21MSCHOOL vs HONG KONG 0 : 4 VP (match 84376) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CS21MSCHOOL | HONG KONG | |
| 3N | W | ♥3 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3N | E | ♠Q | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | E | ♠A | +1 | 650 | 82% | 3♥ | E | ♣T | +1 | 170 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+1.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | -2 | 200 | 91% | ||||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 650 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | E | +1 | 170 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSPARK vs ITALIA U26W 2 : 2 VP (match 84377) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSPARK | ITALIA U26W | |
| 3N | E | ♣J | = | 600 | 68% | 4♠ | E | ♣J | = | 620 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | E | ♥T | +1 | 650 | 82% | 5♥ | E | ♣T | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | = | 620 | 82% | ||||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 650 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 5♥ | E | -1 | 100 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE U26W vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84378)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE U26W | BYE | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84379)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U21 vs SXNEBULA 4 : 0 VP (match 84380) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U21 | SXNEBULA | |
| 3N | E | ♠Q | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3N | W | ♥3 | = | 600 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♠A | -2 | 200 | 93% | 4♠x | S | ♥3 | -2 | 500 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS-0.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| 3N | E | -2 | 200 | 93% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | S | -2 | 500 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXDAISY vs GREISNOR 0 : 4 VP (match 84381) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXDAISY | GREISNOR | |
| 3N | W | ♥3 | = | 600 | 68% | 6Nx | W | ♠8 | -4 | 1100 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | E | ♠A | +1 | 650 | 82% | 3♠x | S | ♥3 | = | 730 | 99% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS+2.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 6Nx | W | -4 | 1100 | 100% | ||||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 650 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3♠x | S | = | 730 | 99% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+2.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT vs FRANCE FUNBRIDGE 4 : 0 VP (match 84382) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | |
| 3N | W | ♠8 | -2 | 200 | 91% | 3N | W | ♥3 | = | 600 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠x | S | ♥3 | -1 | 200 | 76% | 4♥ | E | ♣T | = | 620 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS-0.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| 4♠x | S | -1 | 200 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA vs ITALIA U21 2 : 2 VP (match 84383) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA | ITALIA U21 | |
| 4♠ | E | ♥4 | -1 | 100 | 69% | 3N | W | ♠8 | = | 600 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠x | S | ♥3 | -2 | 500 | 60% | 4♠x | S | ♥3 | -1 | 200 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 68% | ||||
| 4♠x | S | -2 | 500 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | S | -1 | 200 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
URUGUAY vs INDIA U21 2 : 2 VP (match 84384) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | URUGUAY | INDIA U21 | |
| 3N | W | ♥3 | = | 600 | 68% | 3N | E | ♣2 | -2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | E | ♠A | = | 620 | 60% | 4♥ | E | ♠A | +1 | 650 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | -2 | 200 | 91% | ||||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 650 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs HAPPY BRIDGE 1 : 3 VP (match 84385) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 3N | W | ♠4 | = | 600 | 68% | 2♦ | W | ♠4 | +2 | 130 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | E | ♦T | +2 | 200 | 76% | 4♠ | S | ♥3 | -2 | 200 | 76% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | = | 600 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | W | +2 | 130 | 51% | ||||
| 3♥ | E | +2 | 200 | 76% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | S | -2 | 200 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ T84 ♥ AQ83 ♦ 9743 ♣ K5 | ||
| ♠ A53 ♥ KJT9 ♦ QJ862 ♣ 7 | 19 Dlr S E-W | ♠ K762 ♥ 7 ♦ A5 ♣ AQ9843 |
| ♠ QJ9 ♥ 6542 ♦ KT ♣ JT62 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 4 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 5 |
| S | 4 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 5 |
| E | 8 | 9 | 7 | 10 | 8 |
| W | 8 | 9 | 7 | 10 | 8 |
| ♠ T542 ♥ 97 ♦ 983 ♣ KQ53 | ||
| ♠ 3 ♥ Q53 ♦ Q7542 ♣ J862 | 20 Dlr W Both | ♠ K6 ♥ AK8642 ♦ AJ6 ♣ A4 |
| ♠ AQJ987 ♥ JT ♦ KT ♣ T97 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 2 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| S | 2 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| E | 8 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 6 |
| W | 7 | 4 | 10 | 10 | 6 |