Round 12 — U26 BAM Qualification
25 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 12 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDIA-B U26 | INDIA U21 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | HAPPY BRIDGE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | DABROWKA PO | SXTULIP | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | SXSTARLORD | INDIA-A U26 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | PRISM FALCONS | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | GERMANY | AUSTRIA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | JAPAN U26 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | SERBALICIOUS | EYE OF THE TIGER | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | CHINA RDFZ HU | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | SERBIA U26W | SHSLLS1 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | DABROWKA | SERBIA U21 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CHINA RDFZ | ITALIA U26 | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | INDIA U16 | CHILE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | ISRAEL | ITALIA 2 | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | ZHIHAOLE | BELGIUM | 0 | 4 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | CS21MSCHOOL | POLAND KIDS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | SXSPARK | CAPRISUN | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | CHILE U26W | HONG KONG | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | 50 50 | ITALIA U26W | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | JAPAN U21 | BYE | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | SXDAISY | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | SXNEBULA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | CROATIA | GREISNOR | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | URUGUAY | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | CROATIA U16 | ITALIA U21 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 12↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 12 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R12 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ITALIA U21 | 72.20 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 2 | GREISNOR | 70.60 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 3 | INDIA-A U26 | 68.80 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 4 | ISRAEL | 68.60 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 4 | JAPAN U26 | 68.60 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 6 | CHINA RDFZ | 67.20 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 7 | SERBALICIOUS | 66.40 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 8 | ITALIA U26 | 66.20 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 9 | SXNEBULA | 65.20 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 10 | AUSTRIA | 63.00 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 11 | JAPAN U21 | 62.00 | 2.40 | 12 |
| 12 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 60.80 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 13 | CHINA RDFZ HU | 60.40 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 14 | ITALIA U26W | 59.60 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 14 | SXSTARLORD | 59.60 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 16 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 59.20 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 17 | CHILE U26W | 58.00 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 17 | INDIA-B U26 | 58.00 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 19 | SERBIA U21 | 57.80 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 20 | GERMANY | 56.80 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 21 | SXDAISY | 56.60 | 2.40 | 12 |
| 22 | SXTULIP | 56.20 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 23 | SHSLLS1 | 55.20 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 24 | INDIA U21 | 55.00 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 25 | CHILE | 54.80 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 25 | POLAND KIDS | 54.80 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 27 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 54.20 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 27 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 54.20 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 29 | CROATIA | 53.20 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 30 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 52.80 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 31 | DABROWKA | 51.80 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 32 | ZHIHAOLE | 51.00 | 2.40 | 12 |
| 33 | 50 50 | 50.80 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 34 | DABROWKA PO | 49.80 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 35 | ITALIA 2 | 49.00 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 36 | SERBIA U26W | 48.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 37 | SXSPARK | 47.80 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 38 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 47.40 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 39 | INDIA U16 | 45.60 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 40 | HONG KONG | 44.20 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 41 | PRISM FALCONS | 43.40 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 42 | URUGUAY | 43.00 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 43 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 40.00 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 44 | CROATIA U16 | 33.80 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 45 | CS21MSCHOOL | 29.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 46 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 27.80 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 47 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 26.40 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 48 | CAPRISUN | 24.00 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 49 | BELGIUM | 0.00 | 0.00 | 12 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 12 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R12 | BAM% |
|---|
INDIA-B U26 vs INDIA U21 3 : 1 VP (match 84411) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-B U26 | INDIA U21 | |
| 1N | W | ♦5 | = | 90 | 52% | 1N | W | ♦5 | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | W | ♠6 | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2♠x | N | ♥K | -2 | 300 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 52% | ||||
| 3N | W | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 2♠x | N | -2 | 300 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HOPE vs HAPPY BRIDGE 0 : 4 VP (match 84412) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 1N | W | ♥Q | = | 90 | 52% | 2N | W | ♥Q | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 2♣ | W | ♠A | +2 | 130 | 72% | 4♣ | W | ♦3 | -2 | 100 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+1.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 2N | W | -1 | 100 | 86% | ||||
| 2♣ | W | +2 | 130 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 4♣ | W | -2 | 100 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs SXTULIP 1 : 3 VP (match 84413) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | SXTULIP | |
| 1N | W | ♥7 | = | 90 | 52% | 1N | W | ♥7 | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♥ | E | ♠9 | = | 420 | 68% | 3N | W | ♥3 | = | 400 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+0.0 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 52% | ||||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSTARLORD vs INDIA-A U26 3 : 1 VP (match 84414) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSTARLORD | INDIA-A U26 | |
| 1N | W | ♥Q | = | 90 | 52% | 1N | W | ♥Q | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | W | ♠6 | = | 400 | 51% | 2♠x | N | ♠7 | -3 | 500 | 96% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS-0.9 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 52% | ||||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 2♠x | N | -3 | 500 | 96% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PRISM FALCONS vs RDFZ ZHIHAOLE 0 : 4 VP (match 84415) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PRISM FALCONS | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | |
| 2♠ | S | ♥A | -2 | 200 | 98% | 3N | W | ♥7 | -2 | 200 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♦2 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 3N | W | ♥3 | = | 400 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS+0.9 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | -2 | 200 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | -2 | 200 | 94% | ||||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY vs AUSTRIA 0 : 4 VP (match 84416) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY | AUSTRIA | |
| 2♣ | W | ♣3 | +1 | 110 | 83% | 1N | W | ♥7 | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠x | N | ♠7 | -3 | 500 | 96% | 3N | W | ♠6 | = | 400 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.6 | NS+0.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♣ | W | +1 | 110 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 52% | ||||
| 2♠x | N | -3 | 500 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U26 vs MAN EATING COBRAS 2 : 2 VP (match 84417) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U26 | MAN EATING COBRAS | |
| 1N | W | ♥Q | = | 90 | 52% | 1N | W | ♥7 | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | W | ♠6 | = | 400 | 51% | 3N | W | ♠6 | = | 400 | 51% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS+0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 52% | ||||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 51% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBALICIOUS vs EYE OF THE TIGER 3 : 1 VP (match 84418) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBALICIOUS | EYE OF THE TIGER | |
| 1N | W | ♥Q | = | 90 | 52% | 1N | W | ♥Q | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2N | W | ♠2 | -2 | 100 | 92% | 3N | W | ♠6 | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+0.7 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 52% | ||||
| 2N | W | -2 | 100 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | -1 | 50 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AZS WRATISLAVIA vs CHINA RDFZ HU 0 : 4 VP (match 84419) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AZS WRATISLAVIA | CHINA RDFZ HU | |
| 2♣ | W | ♣3 | +1 | 110 | 83% | 1N | W | ♥Q | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♠6 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 2♠x | N | ♠7 | -2 | 300 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS+0.4 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♣ | W | +1 | 110 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 52% | ||||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 2♠x | N | -2 | 300 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA U26W vs SHSLLS1 2 : 2 VP (match 84420) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA U26W | SHSLLS1 | |
| 1N | W | ♦5 | = | 90 | 52% | 2♣ | W | ♥Q | +1 | 110 | 83% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♠6 | +2 | 460 | 89% | 3N | W | ♠6 | -2 | 100 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 2♣ | W | +1 | 110 | 83% | ||||
| 3N | W | +2 | 460 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | -2 | 100 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs SERBIA U21 2 : 2 VP (match 84421) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | SERBIA U21 | |
| 1N | W | ♥Q | = | 90 | 52% | 1N | W | ♥Q | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | E | ♠Q | = | 420 | 68% | 3N | W | ♥3 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 1N | W | -1 | 100 | 86% | ||||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ vs ITALIA U26 1 : 3 VP (match 84422) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ | ITALIA U26 | |
| 1N | W | ♥Q | = | 90 | 52% | 1N | W | ♥Q | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | W | ♠6 | = | 400 | 51% | 2N | W | ♠2 | +2 | 180 | 69% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.0 | NS+0.4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 52% | ||||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 2N | W | +2 | 180 | 69% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs CHILE 0 : 4 VP (match 84423) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | CHILE | |
| 1N | W | ♥Q | +1 | 120 | 92% | 3♣ | E | ♥T | = | 110 | 83% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♠6 | = | 400 | 51% | 4♣ | E | ♥8 | = | 130 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | +1 | 120 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | E | = | 110 | 83% | ||||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 4♣ | E | = | 130 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISRAEL vs ITALIA 2 4 : 0 VP (match 84424) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISRAEL | ITALIA 2 | |
| 1N | W | ♥Q | -1 | 100 | 86% | 1N | W | ♥Q | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♠6 | = | 400 | 51% | 2♠x | N | ♠7 | -3 | 500 | 96% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.9 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 52% | ||||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 2♠x | N | -3 | 500 | 96% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZHIHAOLE vs BELGIUM 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84425) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZHIHAOLE | BELGIUM | |
| 1N | W | ♥Q | = | 90 | 52% | 3N | E | ♦3 | -3 | 300 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♠6 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 2♠ | N | ♣6 | -1 | 50 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+1.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | -3 | 300 | 100% | ||||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CS21MSCHOOL vs POLAND KIDS 2 : 2 VP (match 84426) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CS21MSCHOOL | POLAND KIDS | |
| 1N | W | ♥7 | = | 90 | 52% | 2♠ | S | ♥A | -3 | 300 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥x | N | ♦A | -4 | 800 | 100% | 2♠ | N | ♣3 | -1 | 50 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | S | -3 | 300 | 100% | ||||
| 2♥x | N | -4 | 800 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSPARK vs CAPRISUN 3 : 1 VP (match 84427) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSPARK | CAPRISUN | |
| 1N | W | ♥Q | = | 90 | 52% | 1N | W | ♥Q | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | W | ♠6 | -1 | 50 | 84% | 3N | W | ♠6 | +2 | 460 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.7 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 52% | ||||
| 3N | W | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +2 | 460 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE U26W vs HONG KONG 3 : 1 VP (match 84428) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE U26W | HONG KONG | |
| 5♣ | W | ♥Q | -2 | 200 | 94% | 3N | W | ♠T | -2 | 200 | 94% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♠x | N | ♥K | = | 470 | 100% | 3N | W | ♠6 | = | 400 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.9 | NS+0.9 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣ | W | -2 | 200 | 94% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | W | -2 | 200 | 94% | ||||
| 2♠x | N | = | 470 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.9 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs ITALIA U26W 0 : 4 VP (match 84429) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | ITALIA U26W | |
| 1N | W | ♥Q | = | 90 | 52% | 3N | W | ♦5 | -2 | 200 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♠6 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 3N | E | ♠4 | = | 400 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.9 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | -2 | 200 | 94% | ||||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | = | 400 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U21 vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84430)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U21 | BYE | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXDAISY vs TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84431)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXDAISY | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT vs SXNEBULA 2 : 2 VP (match 84432) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | SXNEBULA | |
| 1N | W | ♥7 | -1 | 100 | 86% | 1N | W | ♥7 | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♠6 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 3N | W | ♦3 | = | 400 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 52% | ||||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA vs GREISNOR 0 : 4 VP (match 84433) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA | GREISNOR | |
| 1N | W | ♥Q | +1 | 120 | 92% | 2♣ | W | ♥Q | +1 | 110 | 83% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♠2 | = | 400 | 51% | 3N | W | ♠6 | -2 | 100 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS+0.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | +1 | 120 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 2♣ | W | +1 | 110 | 83% | ||||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | -2 | 100 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
URUGUAY vs FRANCE FUNBRIDGE 0 : 4 VP (match 84434) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | URUGUAY | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | |
| 3♣ | W | ♥J | = | 110 | 83% | 1N | W | ♥Q | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥8 | +1 | 430 | 78% | 3N | W | ♠6 | -3 | 150 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS+1.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | W | = | 110 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 52% | ||||
| 3N | E | +1 | 430 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | -3 | 150 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs ITALIA U21 0 : 4 VP (match 84435) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | ITALIA U21 | |
| 1N | W | ♥7 | +2 | 150 | 96% | 1N | W | ♥Q | = | 90 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♠A | +2 | 460 | 89% | 2♠ | N | ♥K | -1 | 50 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.7 | NS+0.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | +2 | 150 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 52% | ||||
| 3N | W | +2 | 460 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ T95 ♥ QJ97 ♦ AJ95 ♣ T3 | ||
| ♠ 8 ♥ AK53 ♦ T862 ♣ AK52 | 23 Dlr S Both | ♠ AJ62 ♥ 862 ♦ K4 ♣ 9874 |
| ♠ KQ743 ♥ T4 ♦ Q73 ♣ QJ6 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 6 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| S | 6 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| E | 7 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 9 |
| W | 7 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 9 |
| ♠ AT862 ♥ AJ73 ♦ 32 ♣ Q4 | ||
| ♠ KJ53 ♥ T65 ♦ K7 ♣ AT87 | 24 Dlr W None | ♠ 7 ♥ KQ94 ♦ AQ94 ♣ K963 |
| ♠ Q94 ♥ 82 ♦ JT865 ♣ J52 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
| S | 3 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
| E | 8 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 10 |
| W | 10 | 7 | 10 | 8 | 10 |