Round 3 — BAM Teams
13 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 3 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VITAMINA | CHILE SENIORS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | INDIA MEN | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | TU MAM | LAS VELITAS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | ALLEYCATS | CON SUERTE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | SMILE | PAME | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | HOLLANDS | CARACCI | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | GO HABS GO JETS | SHOURIE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | DRINTEAM | BLACK | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | TAMEWARE | AUSTRIA | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | PAKISTAN | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | KIWI JAMR | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | INDIAN WOMEN | TUTTIFRUTTI | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | GAUSS | GUADELOUPE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 3↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 3 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R3 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TU MAM | 11.00 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 2 | ALLEYCATS | 10.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 2 | TAMEWARE | 10.00 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 4 | BLACK | 9.00 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 4 | GO HABS GO JETS | 9.00 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 4 | TUTTIFRUTTI | 9.00 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 7 | HOLLANDS | 8.00 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 7 | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | 8.00 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 7 | INDIA MEN | 8.00 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 10 | DRINTEAM | 7.00 | 0.00 | 3 |
| 10 | GAUSS | 7.00 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 10 | KIWI JAMR | 7.00 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 13 | INDIAN WOMEN | 6.00 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 13 | PAKISTAN | 6.00 | 0.00 | 3 |
| 13 | VITAMINA | 6.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 16 | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | 5.00 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 16 | PAME | 5.00 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 16 | SHOURIE | 5.00 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 19 | GUADELOUPE | 4.00 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 20 | CON SUERTE | 3.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 20 | LAS VELITAS | 3.00 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 22 | AUSTRIA | 2.00 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 22 | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | 2.00 | 0.00 | 3 |
| 22 | CARACCI | 2.00 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 22 | CHILE SENIORS | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 22 | SMILE | 2.00 | 0.00 | 3 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 3 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R3 | BAM% |
|---|
VITAMINA vs CHILE SENIORS 2 : 2 VP (match 126345) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VITAMINA | CHILE SENIORS | |
| 4♠ | W | ♣6 | -1 | 50 | 96% | 4♠ | E | ♥6 | = | 420 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | W | ♠Q | +1 | 630 | 68% | 3NT | W | ♠Q | -1 | 100 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 60% | ||||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 100 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA MEN vs BRIDGE UNLEASHED 4 : 0 VP (match 126346) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA MEN | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | |
| 4♠ | E | ♥4 | = | 420 | 60% | 4♠ | E | ♣4 | +1 | 450 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | W | ♠J | -2 | 200 | 94% | 3NT | W | ♠Q | -1 | 100 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 98% | ||||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 200 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 100 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TU MAM vs LAS VELITAS 3 : 1 VP (match 126347) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TU MAM | LAS VELITAS | |
| 4♠ | E | ♠4 | = | 420 | 60% | 4♠ | E | ♣2 | = | 420 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2NT | W | ♠J | -1 | 100 | 70% | 4♥ | E | ♦9 | +1 | 650 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.9 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 60% | ||||
| 2NT | W | -1 | 100 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 650 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ALLEYCATS vs CON SUERTE 2 : 2 VP (match 126348) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ALLEYCATS | CON SUERTE | |
| 4♠ | W | ♣6 | +1 | 450 | 98% | 4♠ | E | ♥6 | = | 420 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | W | ♠Q | -2 | 200 | 94% | 3NT | W | ♠Q | +1 | 630 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 60% | ||||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 200 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SMILE vs PAME 0 : 4 VP (match 126349) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SMILE | PAME | |
| 3♠ | E | ♦5 | +2 | 200 | 76% | 4♠ | W | ♥J | -1 | 50 | 96% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | W | ♠9 | -1 | 100 | 70% | 3NT | W | ♠Q | -2 | 200 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+1.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | E | +2 | 200 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 96% | ||||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 100 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 200 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HOLLANDS vs CARACCI 3 : 1 VP (match 126350) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HOLLANDS | CARACCI | |
| 4♠ | E | ♥6 | = | 420 | 60% | 4♠ | E | ♦K | = | 420 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3NT | W | ♠Q | -1 | 100 | 70% | 3NT | E | ♦8 | +2 | 660 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-1.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 60% | ||||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 100 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | +2 | 660 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GO HABS GO JETS vs SHOURIE 1 : 3 VP (match 126351) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GO HABS GO JETS | SHOURIE | |
| 4♠ | E | ♥6 | = | 420 | 60% | 4♠ | E | ♥4 | = | 420 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♥ | E | ♠4 | +1 | 650 | 84% | 4♥ | E | ♥2 | = | 620 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 60% | ||||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 650 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DRINTEAM vs BLACK 0 : 4 VP (match 126352) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DRINTEAM | BLACK | |
| 3♠ | W | ♣3 | = | 140 | 88% | 4♠ | W | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 96% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | E | ♠4 | +1 | 650 | 84% | 3♠x | N | ♦A | -3 | 500 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+1.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 96% | ||||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 650 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 3♠x | N | -3 | 500 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TAMEWARE vs AUSTRIA 3 : 1 VP (match 126353) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TAMEWARE | AUSTRIA | |
| 4♠ | W | ♣6 | = | 420 | 60% | 4♠ | E | ♥4 | = | 420 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3NT | E | ♥2 | +1 | 630 | 68% | 3NT | W | ♠Q | +2 | 660 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-1.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 60% | ||||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | +2 | 660 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PAKISTAN vs CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN 0 : 4 VP (match 126354) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PAKISTAN | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | |
| 4♠ | W | ♦A | = | 420 | 60% | 2♠ | W | ♥J | +2 | 170 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | E | ♠10 | = | 620 | 58% | 3NT | W | ♠Q | -1 | 100 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+1.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | W | +2 | 170 | 82% | ||||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 100 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KIWI JAMR vs HONG KONG CHINA OPEN 1 : 3 VP (match 126355) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KIWI JAMR | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | |
| 4♠ | E | ♥4 | = | 420 | 60% | 4♠ | E | ♦K | = | 420 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♥ | E | ♠4 | +1 | 650 | 84% | 3NT | W | ♠Q | = | 600 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 60% | ||||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 650 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | = | 600 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIAN WOMEN vs TUTTIFRUTTI 1 : 3 VP (match 126356) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIAN WOMEN | TUTTIFRUTTI | |
| 4♠ | E | ♥4 | = | 420 | 60% | 4♠ | E | ♥4 | = | 420 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♥ | E | ♣2 | +1 | 650 | 84% | 3NT | W | ♠Q | -2 | 200 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 60% | ||||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 650 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 200 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GAUSS vs GUADELOUPE 3 : 1 VP (match 126357) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GAUSS | GUADELOUPE | |
| 3♠ | W | ♣6 | +1 | 170 | 82% | 4♠ | E | ♠4 | = | 420 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | W | ♠Q | -1 | 100 | 70% | 3NT | W | ♠Q | -1 | 100 | 70% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | W | +1 | 170 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 60% | ||||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 100 | 70% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | W | -1 | 100 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ – ♥ KJT5 ♦ A7643 ♣ J763 | ||
| ♠ AQ532 ♥ Q93 ♦ T982 ♣ A | 5 Dlr N N-S | ♠ JT876 ♥ A7 ♦ QJ ♣ KT95 |
| ♠ K94 ♥ 8642 ♦ K5 ♣ Q842 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 3 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| S | 3 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 7 |
| E | 8 | 10 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| W | 9 | 10 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| ♠ QJ982 ♥ J4 ♦ QT43 ♣ Q3 | ||
| ♠ AK73 ♥ 96 ♦ J ♣ AT8764 | 6 Dlr E E-W | ♠ 6 ♥ KQT73 ♦ AK752 ♣ J9 |
| ♠ T54 ♥ A852 ♦ 986 ♣ K52 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 3 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| S | 3 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| E | 9 | 7 | 10 | 9 | 10 |
| W | 9 | 7 | 10 | 9 | 10 |