Round 24 — BAM Teams
13 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 24 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SMILE | CHILE SENIORS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | HOLLANDS | ALLEYCATS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | GO HABS GO JETS | TU MAM | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | DRINTEAM | INDIA MEN | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | TAMEWARE | VITAMINA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | PAKISTAN | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | KIWI JAMR | LAS VELITAS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | INDIAN WOMEN | CON SUERTE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | GAUSS | PAME | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | GUADELOUPE | CARACCI | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | TUTTIFRUTTI | SHOURIE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | BLACK | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | AUSTRIA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 24↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 24 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R24 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GAUSS | 66.00 | 4.00 | 24 |
| 2 | TU MAM | 62.00 | 4.00 | 24 |
| 3 | AUSTRIA | 60.00 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 3 | BLACK | 60.00 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 5 | HOLLANDS | 58.00 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 6 | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | 56.00 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 7 | VITAMINA | 55.00 | 4.00 | 24 |
| 8 | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | 52.00 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 8 | SHOURIE | 52.00 | 4.00 | 24 |
| 10 | GO HABS GO JETS | 51.00 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 11 | DRINTEAM | 50.00 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 11 | PAKISTAN | 50.00 | 4.00 | 24 |
| 13 | TAMEWARE | 49.00 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 13 | TUTTIFRUTTI | 49.00 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 15 | INDIAN WOMEN | 48.00 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 15 | KIWI JAMR | 48.00 | 4.00 | 24 |
| 17 | PAME | 47.20 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 18 | ALLEYCATS | 47.00 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 19 | INDIA MEN | 45.00 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 20 | CARACCI | 44.00 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 21 | GUADELOUPE | 39.00 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 22 | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | 38.00 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 22 | CON SUERTE | 38.00 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 24 | LAS VELITAS | 35.00 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 25 | CHILE SENIORS | 27.00 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 26 | SMILE | 19.00 | 4.00 | 24 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 24 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R24 | BAM% |
|---|
SMILE vs CHILE SENIORS 4 : 0 VP (match 126618) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SMILE | CHILE SENIORS | |
| 3♥ | S | ♣9 | +2 | 200 | 98% | 2♥ | S | ♣10 | = | 110 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 2NT | N | ♥6 | +1 | 150 | 88% | 1♥ | N | ♦8 | +1 | 110 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.7 | NS+0.9 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | S | +2 | 200 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 76% | ||||
| 2NT | N | +1 | 150 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 1♥ | N | +1 | 110 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HOLLANDS vs ALLEYCATS 2 : 2 VP (match 126619) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HOLLANDS | ALLEYCATS | |
| 4♥x | S | ♠A | -2 | 500 | 100% | 2♠ | W | ♥5 | +1 | 140 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♣K | -2 | 100 | 80% | 4♥x | N | ♦8 | -3 | 500 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.6 | NS-1.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥x | S | -2 | 500 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 72% | ||||
| 3NT | S | -2 | 100 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | N | -3 | 500 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GO HABS GO JETS vs TU MAM 0 : 4 VP (match 126620) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GO HABS GO JETS | TU MAM | |
| 2♠ | W | ♥5 | = | 110 | 58% | 4♠ | W | ♥5 | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 60% | 2NT | S | ♣A | = | 120 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.0 | NS+1.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 70% | ||||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 2NT | S | = | 120 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DRINTEAM vs INDIA MEN 3 : 1 VP (match 126621) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DRINTEAM | INDIA MEN | |
| 2♠ | W | ♥5 | +1 | 140 | 72% | 2♠ | W | ♣K | +1 | 140 | 72% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♠x | W | ♣10 | -1 | 200 | 96% | 2NT | S | ♦J | = | 120 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 72% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 72% | ||||
| 2♠x | W | -1 | 200 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 2NT | S | = | 120 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TAMEWARE vs VITAMINA 0 : 4 VP (match 126622) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TAMEWARE | VITAMINA | |
| 2♠ | E | ♥A | +1 | 140 | 72% | 3♥ | S | ♣10 | +1 | 170 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♦J | -2 | 100 | 80% | 2♦x | W | ♥A | -1 | 200 | 96% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS+1.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | S | +1 | 170 | 86% | ||||
| 3NT | S | -2 | 100 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 2♦x | W | -1 | 200 | 96% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PAKISTAN vs BRIDGE UNLEASHED 4 : 0 VP (match 126623) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PAKISTAN | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | |
| 3♥ | S | ♠A | +1 | 170 | 86% | 2♠ | W | ♥5 | = | 110 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| 2♦ | W | ♣10 | -1 | 100 | 58% | 3NT | S | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-0.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | S | +1 | 170 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 58% | ||||
| 2♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KIWI JAMR vs LAS VELITAS 4 : 0 VP (match 126624) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KIWI JAMR | LAS VELITAS | |
| 2♠ | W | ♥5 | = | 110 | 58% | 3♠ | E | ♥A | = | 140 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| 2♣ | W | ♠3 | = | 90 | 72% | 2♠ | W | ♥A | +1 | 140 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-1.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 72% | ||||
| 2♣ | W | = | 90 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIAN WOMEN vs CON SUERTE 1 : 3 VP (match 126625) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIAN WOMEN | CON SUERTE | |
| 2♠ | W | ♥5 | = | 110 | 58% | 2♥ | S | ♣10 | +2 | 170 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 2♦ | W | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 58% | 2♦ | W | ♣10 | -1 | 100 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.9 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | +2 | 170 | 86% | ||||
| 2♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GAUSS vs PAME 4 : 0 VP (match 126626) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GAUSS | PAME | |
| 2♥ | S | ♠A | +2 | 170 | 86% | 4♥ | S | ♣10 | -2 | 200 | 96% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♣A | -2 | 100 | 80% | 4♥x | N | ♦8 | -2 | 300 | 96% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-1.8 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | S | +2 | 170 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | -2 | 200 | 96% | ||||
| 3NT | S | -2 | 100 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | N | -2 | 300 | 96% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GUADELOUPE vs CARACCI 1 : 3 VP (match 126627) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GUADELOUPE | CARACCI | |
| 3♠ | E | ♥A | = | 140 | 72% | 2♠ | E | ♥K | +1 | 140 | 72% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♥ | N | ♦8 | -4 | 200 | 92% | 4♠ | E | ♥Q | -2 | 200 | 96% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 72% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 72% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | -4 | 200 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 96% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TUTTIFRUTTI vs SHOURIE 0 : 4 VP (match 126628) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TUTTIFRUTTI | SHOURIE | |
| 2♠ | W | ♣K | +1 | 140 | 72% | 2♥ | S | ♣10 | +3 | 200 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| 2♣ | W | ♣10 | -1 | 100 | 58% | 2♥ | N | ♦8 | = | 110 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+1.4 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | +3 | 200 | 98% | ||||
| 2♣ | W | -1 | 100 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | N | = | 110 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HONG KONG CHINA OPEN vs BLACK 2 : 2 VP (match 126629) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | BLACK | |
| 2♠ | W | ♥5 | +1 | 140 | 72% | 4♠ | E | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 2NT | S | ♦J | = | 120 | 80% | 2♥ | S | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 72% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 70% | ||||
| 2NT | S | = | 120 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN vs AUSTRIA 2 : 2 VP (match 126630) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | AUSTRIA | |
| 2♠ | W | ♥5 | +1 | 140 | 72% | 3♠ | E | ♥A | = | 140 | 72% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2NT | S | ♦J | -1 | 50 | 60% | 3♥ | N | ♦8 | -1 | 50 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 72% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 72% | ||||
| 2NT | S | -1 | 50 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ Q53 ♥ 5 ♦ T63 ♣ KQ8762 | ||
| ♠ AT87 ♥ T82 ♦ AQ95 ♣ T9 | 15 Dlr S N-S | ♠ KJ96 ♥ 943 ♦ KJ72 ♣ A5 |
| ♠ 42 ♥ AKQJ76 ♦ 84 ♣ J43 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 4 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 8 |
| S | 4 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 8 |
| E | 7 | 9 | 5 | 9 | 4 |
| W | 7 | 9 | 5 | 9 | 4 |
| ♠ J63 ♥ AK93 ♦ K4 ♣ T985 | ||
| ♠ Q54 ♥ – ♦ JT9652 ♣ AKJ3 | 16 Dlr W E-W | ♠ AT97 ♥ T8762 ♦ 8 ♣ Q76 |
| ♠ K82 ♥ QJ54 ♦ AQ73 ♣ 42 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 8 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| S | 8 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| E | 5 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 7 |
| W | 5 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 7 |