Round 15 — BAM Teams
13 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 15 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GUADELOUPE | CHILE SENIORS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | TUTTIFRUTTI | GAUSS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | INDIAN WOMEN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | KIWI JAMR | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | AUSTRIA | PAKISTAN | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | BLACK | TAMEWARE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | SHOURIE | DRINTEAM | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | CARACCI | GO HABS GO JETS | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | PAME | HOLLANDS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | CON SUERTE | SMILE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | LAS VELITAS | ALLEYCATS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | TU MAM | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | VITAMINA | INDIA MEN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 15↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 15 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R15 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TU MAM | 43.00 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 2 | GAUSS | 42.00 | 3.00 | 15 |
| 3 | HOLLANDS | 37.00 | 1.00 | 15 |
| 4 | AUSTRIA | 36.00 | 3.00 | 15 |
| 4 | BLACK | 36.00 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 6 | TUTTIFRUTTI | 35.00 | 1.00 | 15 |
| 6 | VITAMINA | 35.00 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 8 | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | 34.00 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 9 | ALLEYCATS | 33.00 | 1.00 | 15 |
| 9 | PAME | 33.00 | 3.00 | 15 |
| 11 | INDIAN WOMEN | 32.00 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 12 | DRINTEAM | 31.00 | 0.00 | 15 |
| 12 | TAMEWARE | 31.00 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 14 | KIWI JAMR | 30.00 | 3.00 | 15 |
| 14 | PAKISTAN | 30.00 | 1.00 | 15 |
| 16 | SHOURIE | 29.00 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 17 | INDIA MEN | 28.00 | 0.00 | 15 |
| 18 | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | 27.00 | 1.00 | 15 |
| 18 | CON SUERTE | 27.00 | 2.00 | 15 |
| 20 | GO HABS GO JETS | 25.00 | 4.00 | 15 |
| 20 | GUADELOUPE | 25.00 | 1.00 | 15 |
| 20 | LAS VELITAS | 25.00 | 3.00 | 15 |
| 23 | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | 24.00 | 0.00 | 15 |
| 24 | CARACCI | 23.00 | 0.00 | 15 |
| 25 | CHILE SENIORS | 20.00 | 3.00 | 15 |
| 26 | SMILE | 9.00 | 2.00 | 15 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 15 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R15 | BAM% |
|---|
GUADELOUPE vs CHILE SENIORS 1 : 3 VP (match 126501) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GUADELOUPE | CHILE SENIORS | |
| 4♠ | W | ♥A | +1 | 650 | 86% | 4♠ | W | ♠6 | = | 620 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♥Q | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2NT | S | ♠8 | -1 | 50 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS+0.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 62% | ||||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2NT | S | -1 | 50 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TUTTIFRUTTI vs GAUSS 1 : 3 VP (match 126502) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TUTTIFRUTTI | GAUSS | |
| 4♠ | W | ♥A | = | 620 | 62% | 4♠ | W | ♥A | = | 620 | 62% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3NT | S | ♥Q | -1 | 50 | 58% | 3♦ | N | ♦4 | +1 | 130 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+0.9 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 62% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 62% | ||||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | N | +1 | 130 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HONG KONG CHINA OPEN vs INDIAN WOMEN 2 : 2 VP (match 126503) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | INDIAN WOMEN | |
| 4♥ | W | ♥A | = | 620 | 62% | 4♠ | W | ♦7 | = | 620 | 62% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3♣ | S | ♠8 | -1 | 50 | 58% | 3NT | S | ♠7 | -1 | 50 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | W | = | 620 | 62% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 62% | ||||
| 3♣ | S | -1 | 50 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN vs KIWI JAMR 1 : 3 VP (match 126504) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | KIWI JAMR | |
| 4♠ | W | ♥A | = | 620 | 62% | 4♠ | W | ♦7 | = | 620 | 62% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3NT | S | ♠8 | -1 | 50 | 58% | 3NT | S | ♥Q | +1 | 430 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+1.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 62% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 62% | ||||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 430 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AUSTRIA vs PAKISTAN 3 : 1 VP (match 126505) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AUSTRIA | PAKISTAN | |
| 4♠ | W | ♦7 | = | 620 | 62% | 4♠ | W | ♦7 | = | 620 | 62% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♦ | N | ♥7 | -1 | 50 | 58% | 3NT | S | ♠7 | -2 | 100 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 62% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 62% | ||||
| 4♦ | N | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | -2 | 100 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BLACK vs TAMEWARE 2 : 2 VP (match 126506) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BLACK | TAMEWARE | |
| 4♠ | W | ♥A | = | 620 | 62% | 4♠ | E | ♣2 | +1 | 650 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♠7 | -2 | 100 | 90% | 2NT | S | ♠6 | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 86% | ||||
| 3NT | S | -2 | 100 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 2NT | S | -1 | 50 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SHOURIE vs DRINTEAM 4 : 0 VP (match 126507) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SHOURIE | DRINTEAM | |
| 4♠ | W | ♥A | = | 620 | 62% | 3NT | E | ♥10 | +1 | 630 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♥Q | = | 400 | 92% | 5♦ | N | ♥9 | -2 | 100 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-1.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 72% | ||||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | N | -2 | 100 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CARACCI vs GO HABS GO JETS 0 : 4 VP (match 126508) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CARACCI | GO HABS GO JETS | |
| 4♠ | W | ♦7 | = | 620 | 62% | 1NT | S | ♠A | -3 | 300 | 96% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♠7 | -2 | 100 | 90% | 3♦ | N | ♠Q | = | 110 | 72% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+1.4 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | S | -3 | 300 | 96% | ||||
| 3NT | S | -2 | 100 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | N | = | 110 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PAME vs HOLLANDS 3 : 1 VP (match 126509) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PAME | HOLLANDS | |
| 4♠ | W | ♥A | = | 620 | 62% | 4♠ | W | ♥A | = | 620 | 62% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1NT | S | ♥Q | = | 90 | 64% | 3NT | S | ♣9 | -2 | 100 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 62% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 62% | ||||
| 1NT | S | = | 90 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | -2 | 100 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CON SUERTE vs SMILE 2 : 2 VP (match 126510) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CON SUERTE | SMILE | |
| 4♠ | W | ♦7 | +3 | 710 | 100% | 4♠ | W | ♥A | +1 | 650 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 2♦ | N | ♠Q | +2 | 130 | 82% | 3NT | N | ♥7 | -2 | 100 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-1.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | +3 | 710 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 86% | ||||
| 2♦ | N | +2 | 130 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | N | -2 | 100 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LAS VELITAS vs ALLEYCATS 3 : 1 VP (match 126511) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LAS VELITAS | ALLEYCATS | |
| 4♠ | W | ♥A | +1 | 650 | 86% | 4♠ | W | ♥A | +1 | 650 | 86% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3♥ | W | ♠A | -2 | 100 | 68% | 3NT | S | ♥Q | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.9 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 86% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 86% | ||||
| 3♥ | W | -2 | 100 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | -1 | 50 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRIDGE UNLEASHED vs TU MAM 0 : 4 VP (match 126512) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | TU MAM | |
| 4♠ | W | ♥A | = | 620 | 62% | 6♠ | W | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | S | ♠6 | +1 | 120 | 76% | 3NT | S | ♥8 | = | 400 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS+1.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 6♠ | W | -1 | 100 | 100% | ||||
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VITAMINA vs INDIA MEN 4 : 0 VP (match 126513) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VITAMINA | INDIA MEN | |
| 4♠ | W | ♥A | = | 620 | 62% | 4♠ | W | ♥A | +1 | 650 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | S | ♠7 | = | 400 | 92% | 5♦ | S | ♠8 | -1 | 50 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.9 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 86% | ||||
| 3NT | S | = | 400 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | S | -1 | 50 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ 63 ♥ AQJ865 ♦ 76 ♣ A87 | ||
| ♠ AKQT9872 ♥ 7 ♦ AT ♣ T6 | 29 Dlr N All | ♠ J ♥ K932 ♦ KJ932 ♣ QJ3 |
| ♠ 54 ♥ T4 ♦ Q854 ♣ K9542 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 3 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 6 |
| S | 3 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| E | 10 | 10 | 6 | 8 | 6 |
| W | 10 | 10 | 6 | 8 | 6 |
| ♠ AK43 ♥ 65 ♦ QJT8 ♣ A83 | ||
| ♠ 8762 ♥ AQJ8 ♦ 92 ♣ K92 | 30 Dlr E None | ♠ QJ9 ♥ 9732 ♦ 764 ♣ Q64 |
| ♠ T5 ♥ KT4 ♦ AK53 ♣ JT75 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 8 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 8 |
| S | 8 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 9 |
| E | 5 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 4 |
| W | 5 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 4 |