Round 2 — BAM Teams
13 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 2 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDIA MEN | CHILE SENIORS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | TU MAM | VITAMINA | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | ALLEYCATS | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | SMILE | LAS VELITAS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | HOLLANDS | CON SUERTE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | GO HABS GO JETS | PAME | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | DRINTEAM | CARACCI | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | TAMEWARE | SHOURIE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | PAKISTAN | BLACK | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | KIWI JAMR | AUSTRIA | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | INDIAN WOMEN | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | GAUSS | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | GUADELOUPE | TUTTIFRUTTI | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 2↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 2 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R2 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ALLEYCATS | 8.00 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 1 | GO HABS GO JETS | 8.00 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 1 | TU MAM | 8.00 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 4 | DRINTEAM | 7.00 | 3.00 | 2 |
| 4 | TAMEWARE | 7.00 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 6 | KIWI JAMR | 6.00 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 6 | PAKISTAN | 6.00 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 6 | TUTTIFRUTTI | 6.00 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 9 | BLACK | 5.00 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 9 | HOLLANDS | 5.00 | 3.00 | 2 |
| 9 | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | 5.00 | 3.00 | 2 |
| 9 | INDIAN WOMEN | 5.00 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 13 | GAUSS | 4.00 | 1.00 | 2 |
| 13 | INDIA MEN | 4.00 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 13 | VITAMINA | 4.00 | 0.00 | 2 |
| 16 | GUADELOUPE | 3.00 | 0.00 | 2 |
| 17 | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | 2.00 | 0.00 | 2 |
| 17 | LAS VELITAS | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 17 | SHOURIE | 2.00 | 0.00 | 2 |
| 17 | SMILE | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 21 | AUSTRIA | 1.00 | 0.00 | 2 |
| 21 | CARACCI | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2 |
| 21 | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | 1.00 | 0.00 | 2 |
| 21 | CON SUERTE | 1.00 | 1.00 | 2 |
| 21 | PAME | 1.00 | 0.00 | 2 |
| 26 | CHILE SENIORS | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 2 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R2 | BAM% |
|---|
INDIA MEN vs CHILE SENIORS 4 : 0 VP (match 126332) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA MEN | CHILE SENIORS | |
| 2♠ | W | ♥A | -2 | 200 | 88% | 2♥ | N | ♥J | -1 | 50 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 6♠x | W | ♥A | -1 | 200 | 76% | 7♠ | W | ♠J | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS-0.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | W | -2 | 200 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 82% | ||||
| 6♠x | W | -1 | 200 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 7♠ | W | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TU MAM vs VITAMINA 4 : 0 VP (match 126333) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TU MAM | VITAMINA | |
| 1NT | W | ♠9 | -4 | 400 | 94% | 2♥ | N | ♣A | +2 | 170 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 5♥ | E | ♣6 | +1 | 680 | 52% | 7♦x | S | ♠A | -4 | 1100 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS+0.3 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | W | -4 | 400 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | N | +2 | 170 | 82% | ||||
| 5♥ | E | +1 | 680 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 7♦x | S | -4 | 1100 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ALLEYCATS vs BRIDGE UNLEASHED 4 : 0 VP (match 126334) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ALLEYCATS | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | |
| 3♥ | N | ♣A | = | 140 | 60% | 2♥ | N | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 7♥x | E | ♦A | -1 | 200 | 76% | 6♥ | E | ♦A | = | 1430 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-1.4 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 82% | ||||
| 7♥x | E | -1 | 200 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 6♥ | E | = | 1430 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SMILE vs LAS VELITAS 2 : 2 VP (match 126335) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SMILE | LAS VELITAS | |
| 2♥ | N | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 82% | 1NT | W | ♥A | -4 | 400 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♦10 | = | 620 | 52% | 6♥ | E | ♦A | = | 1430 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | W | -4 | 400 | 94% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 6♥ | E | = | 1430 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HOLLANDS vs CON SUERTE 3 : 1 VP (match 126336) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HOLLANDS | CON SUERTE | |
| 3♥ | N | ♣A | +1 | 170 | 82% | 2♥ | N | ♣A | = | 110 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| 6♠x | W | ♥A | -1 | 200 | 76% | 6♠x | W | ♦10 | -1 | 200 | 76% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | N | +1 | 170 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | N | = | 110 | 66% | ||||
| 6♠x | W | -1 | 200 | 76% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6♠x | W | -1 | 200 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GO HABS GO JETS vs PAME 4 : 0 VP (match 126337) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GO HABS GO JETS | PAME | |
| 2♥ | N | ♣A | = | 110 | 66% | 4♠ | S | ♣4 | -4 | 200 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 7♥x | E | ♠7 | -1 | 200 | 76% | 7♦x | N | ♠2 | -4 | 1100 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-1.3 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | N | = | 110 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | S | -4 | 200 | 100% | ||||
| 7♥x | E | -1 | 200 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 7♦x | N | -4 | 1100 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DRINTEAM vs CARACCI 3 : 1 VP (match 126338) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DRINTEAM | CARACCI | |
| 2♥ | N | ♣A | +1 | 140 | 60% | 2♥ | N | ♣A | +1 | 140 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 7♠x | W | ♥A | -2 | 500 | 98% | 6♥ | E | ♦K | = | 1430 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 60% | ||||
| 7♠x | W | -2 | 500 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 6♥ | E | = | 1430 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TAMEWARE vs SHOURIE 4 : 0 VP (match 126339) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TAMEWARE | SHOURIE | |
| 2♥ | N | ♣K | +1 | 140 | 60% | 2♥ | N | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 7♥x | E | ♦A | -1 | 200 | 76% | 6♥ | E | ♦K | = | 1430 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-1.4 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 82% | ||||
| 7♥x | E | -1 | 200 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 6♥ | E | = | 1430 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PAKISTAN vs BLACK 2 : 2 VP (match 126340) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PAKISTAN | BLACK | |
| 1NTx | W | ♥8 | -2 | 500 | 100% | 2♥ | N | ♣A | = | 110 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| 6♥ | E | ♦A | = | 1430 | 86% | 7♦x | S | ♠A | -4 | 1100 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NTx | W | -2 | 500 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | N | = | 110 | 66% | ||||
| 6♥ | E | = | 1430 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 7♦x | S | -4 | 1100 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KIWI JAMR vs AUSTRIA 4 : 0 VP (match 126341) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KIWI JAMR | AUSTRIA | |
| 3♥ | N | ♣A | = | 140 | 60% | 3♥ | N | ♣A | -2 | 100 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 6♠x | W | ♥A | -1 | 200 | 76% | 7♦x | N | ♠2 | -3 | 800 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-1.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | N | -2 | 100 | 94% | ||||
| 6♠x | W | -1 | 200 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 7♦x | N | -3 | 800 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIAN WOMEN vs CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN 4 : 0 VP (match 126342) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIAN WOMEN | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | |
| 2♥ | N | ♣A | +1 | 140 | 60% | 3♥ | S | ♣6 | -2 | 100 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 6♥ | E | ♦A | = | 1430 | 86% | 6♥x | E | ♣6 | = | 1660 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-1.9 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | S | -2 | 100 | 94% | ||||
| 6♥ | E | = | 1430 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 6♥x | E | = | 1660 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GAUSS vs HONG KONG CHINA OPEN 1 : 3 VP (match 126343) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GAUSS | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | |
| 3♥ | N | ♣A | = | 140 | 60% | 2♥ | N | ♣K | +1 | 140 | 60% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 7♦x | N | ♠Q | -4 | 1100 | 66% | 7♥x | E | ♠7 | -1 | 200 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 60% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 60% | ||||
| 7♦x | N | -4 | 1100 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 7♥x | E | -1 | 200 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GUADELOUPE vs TUTTIFRUTTI 0 : 4 VP (match 126344) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GUADELOUPE | TUTTIFRUTTI | |
| 2♥ | N | ♣A | = | 110 | 66% | 3♥ | N | ♣A | = | 140 | 60% | 2 | ||||
| 6♠x | W | ♥A | -1 | 200 | 76% | 7♠x | W | ♥A | -2 | 500 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | N | = | 110 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 60% | ||||
| 6♠x | W | -1 | 200 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 7♠x | W | -2 | 500 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ 93 ♥ AKT86 ♦ K985 ♣ T2 | ||
| ♠ AQ2 ♥ Q972 ♦ 632 ♣ 864 | 3 Dlr S E-W | ♠ J854 ♥ J ♦ QT74 ♣ AKJ5 |
| ♠ KT76 ♥ 543 ♦ AJ ♣ Q973 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 8 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 6 |
| S | 8 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 6 |
| E | 4 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 6 |
| W | 4 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 6 |
| ♠ J ♥ A3 ♦ T97543 ♣ 8543 | ||
| ♠ AKT9843 ♥ T5 ♦ Q ♣ AQT | 4 Dlr W All | ♠ Q62 ♥ KQJ987642 ♦ – ♣ 2 |
| ♠ 75 ♥ – ♦ AKJ862 ♣ KJ976 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 8 |
| S | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 8 |
| E | 6 | 12 | 12 | 4 | 4 |
| W | 6 | 11 | 12 | 4 | 4 |