Round 8 — BAM Teams
21 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 8 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TO WIN | UICC WUHAN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | XINJIANGYILI | SWISS TEAM | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | WHIBLEY | REIGNWOOD | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | WE THE NORTH | DALIAN AOXIN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | HUBEI FUXING | DINKIN | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | EXCELLENT FOUR | BBC THAILAND | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | LATVIA | USA 2 MIXED | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | INDONESIA Seniors | CHINA HUOCHETOU | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | WUHAN | BANGKOK MIND SPORT | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | HUAXINHUANBAO | TAMEWARE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | TEAM 31 | SEOUL | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 12 | WUHAN ENGINEERING | CHINA JUNIORS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | JINSHUO | DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | TIANYA BRIDGE FATE | ENSEMBLE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | NEWB | WARHORSE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | GUIZHOU ZHENGYE | DONGFENG FENGSHEN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | INDONESIA Open | BEIJINGXUGUANG | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | POLAND Women | HUANG HU | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | ANIT NEGRA | FORMIDABLES | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | THAILAND Mixed | INDIA TSANGPO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | CANADA CHINA UNITED | HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 8↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 8 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R8 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDONESIA Open | 23.00 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 2 | BANGKOK MIND SPORT | 22.00 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 3 | BBC THAILAND | 21.40 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 3 | DINKIN | 21.40 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 5 | FORMIDABLES | 21.00 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 6 | CHINA JUNIORS | 20.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 7 | DALIAN AOXIN | 19.40 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 7 | SWISS TEAM | 19.40 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 9 | EXCELLENT FOUR | 19.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 9 | JINSHUO | 19.00 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 11 | REIGNWOOD | 18.40 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 12 | INDIA TSANGPO | 18.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 12 | TAMEWARE | 18.00 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 12 | THAILAND Mixed | 18.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 15 | SEOUL | 17.40 | 2.40 | 8 |
| 15 | USA 2 MIXED | 17.40 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 17 | CANADA CHINA UNITED | 17.00 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 17 | INDONESIA Seniors | 17.00 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 17 | TIANYA BRIDGE FATE | 17.00 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 20 | BEIJINGXUGUANG | 16.00 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 20 | CHINA HUOCHETOU | 16.00 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 20 | HUAXINHUANBAO | 16.00 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 20 | WARHORSE | 16.00 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 24 | DONGFENG FENGSHEN | 15.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 24 | LATVIA | 15.00 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 24 | POLAND Women | 15.00 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 24 | TO WIN | 15.00 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 24 | WUHAN ENGINEERING | 15.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 29 | UICC WUHAN | 14.40 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 30 | ANIT NEGRA | 14.00 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 30 | DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD | 14.00 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 30 | ENSEMBLE | 14.00 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 33 | GUIZHOU ZHENGYE | 13.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 33 | HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM | 13.00 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 35 | NEWB | 12.00 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 36 | WE THE NORTH | 11.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 36 | WHIBLEY | 11.00 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 38 | HUANG HU | 10.00 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 38 | HUBEI FUXING | 10.00 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 38 | WUHAN | 10.00 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 38 | XINJIANGYILI | 10.00 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 42 | TEAM 31 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 8 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 8 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R8 | BAM% |
|---|
TO WIN vs UICC WUHAN 4 : 0 VP (match 89313) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TO WIN | UICC WUHAN | |
| 31 | 4♥ | N | ♦K | = | 620 | 79% | 3♥ | N | ♦K | = | 140 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 6♥ | W | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 91% | 4♠ | E | ♠2 | +2 | 680 | 90% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.4 | NS-0.8 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 51% | ||||
| 32 | 6♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.4 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
XINJIANGYILI vs SWISS TEAM 0 : 4 VP (match 89314) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | XINJIANGYILI | SWISS TEAM | |
| 31 | 4♥ | N | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 79% | 4♥ | N | ♦K | = | 620 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 4♥ | W | ♠9 | +1 | 650 | 51% | 6♥ | W | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 91% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+1.4 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 79% | ||||
| 32 | 4♥ | W | +1 | 650 | 51% | 2 | ||
| 6♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WHIBLEY vs REIGNWOOD 3 : 1 VP (match 89315) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WHIBLEY | REIGNWOOD | |
| 31 | 3NT | N | ♦K | = | 600 | 60% | 4♥ | N | ♥5 | -1 | 100 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 5♥ | W | ♣A | = | 650 | 51% | 5♥ | W | ♦Q | = | 650 | 51% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 3NT | N | = | 600 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 79% | ||||
| 32 | 5♥ | W | = | 650 | 51% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♥ | W | = | 650 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WE THE NORTH vs DALIAN AOXIN 2 : 2 VP (match 89316) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WE THE NORTH | DALIAN AOXIN | |
| 31 | 4♥ | N | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 79% | 3NT | S | ♦9 | = | 600 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 5♥ | W | ♣A | = | 650 | 51% | 7♣x | N | ♥K | -6 | 1400 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | = | 600 | 60% | ||||
| 32 | 5♥ | W | = | 650 | 51% | 2 | ||
| 7♣x | N | -6 | 1400 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HUBEI FUXING vs DINKIN 0 : 4 VP (match 89317) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HUBEI FUXING | DINKIN | |
| 31 | 4♥ | N | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 79% | 5♣x | E | ♥7 | -2 | 300 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 4♥ | W | ♠4 | +2 | 680 | 90% | 4♠ | E | ♣5 | +1 | 650 | 51% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS+0.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 5♣x | E | -2 | 300 | 52% | ||||
| 32 | 4♥ | W | +2 | 680 | 90% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
EXCELLENT FOUR vs BBC THAILAND 2 : 2 VP (match 89318) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | EXCELLENT FOUR | BBC THAILAND | |
| 31 | 3NT | N | ♣10 | +1 | 630 | 95% | 4♥ | N | ♦7 | = | 620 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 5♥ | W | ♣A | = | 650 | 51% | 6♠ | E | ♣3 | -1 | 100 | 91% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS+1.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 3NT | N | +1 | 630 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 79% | ||||
| 32 | 5♥ | W | = | 650 | 51% | 2 | ||
| 6♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LATVIA vs USA 2 MIXED 1 : 3 VP (match 89319) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LATVIA | USA 2 MIXED | |
| 31 | 4♥ | N | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 79% | 4♥ | N | ♦K | = | 620 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 4♥ | W | ♠9 | +1 | 650 | 51% | 5♥ | W | ♣A | = | 650 | 51% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 79% | ||||
| 32 | 4♥ | W | +1 | 650 | 51% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♥ | W | = | 650 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDONESIA Seniors vs CHINA HUOCHETOU 3 : 1 VP (match 89320) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDONESIA Seniors | CHINA HUOCHETOU | |
| 31 | 4♥ | N | ♦K | = | 620 | 79% | 4♥ | N | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 4♠ | E | ♣3 | +1 | 650 | 51% | 5♥ | W | ♠K | = | 650 | 51% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 79% | ||||
| 32 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 51% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♥ | W | = | 650 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WUHAN vs BANGKOK MIND SPORT 0 : 4 VP (match 89321) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WUHAN | BANGKOK MIND SPORT | |
| 31 | 3NT | S | ♦9 | = | 600 | 60% | 4♥x | N | ♦K | = | 790 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 5♠ | E | ♣5 | = | 650 | 51% | 6♥ | W | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 91% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+1.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 3NT | S | = | 600 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 4♥x | N | = | 790 | 100% | ||||
| 32 | 5♠ | E | = | 650 | 51% | 2 | ||
| 6♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HUAXINHUANBAO vs TAMEWARE 3 : 1 VP (match 89322) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HUAXINHUANBAO | TAMEWARE | |
| 31 | 4♥ | N | ♦K | = | 620 | 79% | 4♥ | N | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 4♥ | W | ♣A | +1 | 650 | 51% | 5♥ | W | ♣A | = | 650 | 51% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 79% | ||||
| 32 | 4♥ | W | +1 | 650 | 51% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♥ | W | = | 650 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TEAM 31 vs SEOUL 0 : 2.4 VP (match 89323) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TEAM 31 | SEOUL | |
| 31 | – | — | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 55% | ||||||||
| 32 | – | — | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 80% | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS+0.5 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | – | |||||||
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 55% | ||||
| 32 | – | |||||||
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WUHAN ENGINEERING vs CHINA JUNIORS 2 : 2 VP (match 89394) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WUHAN ENGINEERING | CHINA JUNIORS | |
| 31 | 4♥ | N | ♦K | = | 620 | 79% | 3NT | N | ♦K | +1 | 630 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 6♥ | W | ♥2 | -1 | 100 | 91% | 5♥ | W | ♣A | = | 650 | 51% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.4 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | +1 | 630 | 95% | ||||
| 32 | 6♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 5♥ | W | = | 650 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JINSHUO vs DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD 3 : 1 VP (match 89395) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JINSHUO | DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD | |
| 31 | 4♥ | N | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 79% | 4♥ | N | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 79% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 32 | 6♥ | W | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 91% | 4♥ | W | ♣A | +1 | 650 | 51% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 79% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 79% | ||||
| 32 | 6♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 650 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TIANYA BRIDGE FATE vs ENSEMBLE 3 : 1 VP (match 89396) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TIANYA BRIDGE FATE | ENSEMBLE | |
| 31 | 3♥ | N | ♦K | = | 140 | 51% | 4♥ | N | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 5♠ | E | ♠2 | +1 | 680 | 90% | 4♥ | W | ♥2 | +2 | 680 | 90% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS-1.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 51% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 79% | ||||
| 32 | 5♠ | E | +1 | 680 | 90% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | W | +2 | 680 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NEWB vs WARHORSE 1 : 3 VP (match 89397) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NEWB | WARHORSE | |
| 31 | 4♥ | N | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 79% | 4♥ | N | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 79% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 32 | 4♠ | W | ♥A | +2 | 680 | 90% | 4♥ | W | ♥3 | +1 | 650 | 51% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 79% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 79% | ||||
| 32 | 4♠ | W | +2 | 680 | 90% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 650 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GUIZHOU ZHENGYE vs DONGFENG FENGSHEN 2 : 2 VP (match 89398) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GUIZHOU ZHENGYE | DONGFENG FENGSHEN | |
| 31 | 4♥ | N | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 79% | 4♥ | N | ♦K | = | 620 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 6♥ | W | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 91% | 5♥ | W | ♣A | = | 650 | 51% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 79% | ||||
| 32 | 6♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 5♥ | W | = | 650 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDONESIA Open vs BEIJINGXUGUANG 3 : 1 VP (match 89399) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDONESIA Open | BEIJINGXUGUANG | |
| 31 | 4♥ | N | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 79% | 4♥ | N | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 79% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 32 | 4♠ | E | ♣5 | +1 | 650 | 51% | 5♥ | W | ♥7 | +1 | 680 | 90% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-1.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 79% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 79% | ||||
| 32 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 51% | 2 | ||
| 5♥ | W | +1 | 680 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND Women vs HUANG HU 3 : 1 VP (match 89400) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND Women | HUANG HU | |
| 31 | 4♥ | N | ♦K | = | 620 | 79% | 4♥ | S | ♦K | = | 620 | 79% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 32 | 4♥ | W | ♣A | +1 | 650 | 51% | 4♠ | E | ♠2 | +2 | 680 | 90% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 79% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 79% | ||||
| 32 | 4♥ | W | +1 | 650 | 51% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ANIT NEGRA vs FORMIDABLES 0 : 4 VP (match 89401) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ANIT NEGRA | FORMIDABLES | |
| 31 | 4♥ | N | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 79% | 3NT | N | ♦K | = | 600 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 4♥ | W | ♦Q | +1 | 650 | 51% | 6♥ | W | ♥3 | -1 | 100 | 91% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+1.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | = | 600 | 60% | ||||
| 32 | 4♥ | W | +1 | 650 | 51% | 2 | ||
| 6♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
THAILAND Mixed vs INDIA TSANGPO 2 : 2 VP (match 89402) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | THAILAND Mixed | INDIA TSANGPO | |
| 31 | 4♥ | N | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 79% | 4♥ | N | ♦K | -1 | 100 | 79% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 32 | 5♥ | W | ♣A | = | 650 | 51% | 5♥ | W | ♣A | = | 650 | 51% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 79% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 79% | ||||
| 32 | 5♥ | W | = | 650 | 51% | 1 | 1 | |
| 5♥ | W | = | 650 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CANADA CHINA UNITED vs HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM 1 : 3 VP (match 89403) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CANADA CHINA UNITED | HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM | |
| 31 | 3NT | N | ♦K | = | 600 | 60% | 3NT | S | ♠3 | +1 | 630 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 5♥ | W | ♣A | = | 650 | 51% | 4♥ | E | ♥6 | +1 | 650 | 51% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.9 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 3NT | N | = | 600 | 60% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 95% | ||||
| 32 | 5♥ | W | = | 650 | 51% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 650 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|