Round 12 — BAM Teams
21 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 12 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FORMIDABLES | DINKIN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | INDIA TSANGPO | BBC THAILAND | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM | USA 2 MIXED | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | CHINA JUNIORS | CHINA HUOCHETOU | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD | BANGKOK MIND SPORT | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | ENSEMBLE | TAMEWARE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | WARHORSE | SEOUL | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | DONGFENG FENGSHEN | UICC WUHAN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | BEIJINGXUGUANG | SWISS TEAM | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | HUANG HU | REIGNWOOD | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | TEAM 51 | DALIAN AOXIN | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | 2.40 | protocol → |
| 12 | TO WIN | ANIT NEGRA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | XINJIANGYILI | THAILAND Mixed | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | WHIBLEY | CANADA CHINA UNITED | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | WE THE NORTH | WUHAN ENGINEERING | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | HUBEI FUXING | JINSHUO | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | EXCELLENT FOUR | TIANYA BRIDGE FATE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | LATVIA | NEWB | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | INDONESIA Seniors | GUIZHOU ZHENGYE | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | WUHAN | INDONESIA Open | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | HUAXINHUANBAO | POLAND Women | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 12↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 12 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R12 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DINKIN | 33.80 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 2 | SWISS TEAM | 32.40 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 3 | INDONESIA Open | 32.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 3 | JINSHUO | 32.00 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 5 | FORMIDABLES | 30.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 6 | BBC THAILAND | 29.80 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 6 | DALIAN AOXIN | 29.80 | 2.40 | 12 |
| 8 | BANGKOK MIND SPORT | 29.00 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 9 | REIGNWOOD | 28.40 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 10 | CHINA JUNIORS | 28.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 10 | INDIA TSANGPO | 28.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 12 | SEOUL | 27.40 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 13 | EXCELLENT FOUR | 27.00 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 13 | HUAXINHUANBAO | 27.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 13 | TIANYA BRIDGE FATE | 27.00 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 16 | TO WIN | 26.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 17 | INDONESIA Seniors | 25.00 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 17 | THAILAND Mixed | 25.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 19 | USA 2 MIXED | 24.80 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 20 | LATVIA | 24.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 20 | TAMEWARE | 24.00 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 22 | CHINA HUOCHETOU | 23.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 22 | WARHORSE | 23.00 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 24 | DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD | 22.00 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 24 | GUIZHOU ZHENGYE | 22.00 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 24 | WHIBLEY | 22.00 | 4.00 | 12 |
| 27 | CANADA CHINA UNITED | 21.00 | 0.00 | 12 |
| 27 | ENSEMBLE | 21.00 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 27 | HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM | 21.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 27 | WUHAN ENGINEERING | 21.00 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 31 | UICC WUHAN | 20.40 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 32 | ANIT NEGRA | 20.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 32 | BEIJINGXUGUANG | 20.00 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 32 | DONGFENG FENGSHEN | 20.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 32 | NEWB | 20.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 36 | POLAND Women | 19.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 37 | WUHAN | 18.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 38 | HUBEI FUXING | 17.00 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 39 | HUANG HU | 16.00 | 3.00 | 12 |
| 39 | WE THE NORTH | 16.00 | 1.00 | 12 |
| 39 | XINJIANGYILI | 16.00 | 2.00 | 12 |
| 42 | TEAM 31 | 0.00 | · | 8 |
| 42 | TEAM 51 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 12 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R12 | BAM% |
|---|
FORMIDABLES vs DINKIN 2 : 2 VP (match 89437) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FORMIDABLES | DINKIN | |
| 7 | 4♠ | E | ♠6 | +2 | 680 | 64% | 4♠ | E | ♦Q | +1 | 650 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♠ | W | ♥2 | -1 | 50 | 55% | 3NT | E | ♣9 | = | 400 | 95% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 64% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 76% | ||||
| 8 | 3♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA TSANGPO vs BBC THAILAND 2 : 2 VP (match 89438) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA TSANGPO | BBC THAILAND | |
| 7 | 4♠ | E | ♥2 | +2 | 680 | 64% | 4♠ | E | ♦Q | +2 | 680 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 4♠ | E | ♠3 | -2 | 100 | 82% | 4♠ | E | ♥8 | -2 | 100 | 82% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 64% | ||||
| 8 | 4♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 82% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM vs USA 2 MIXED 2 : 2 VP (match 89439) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM | USA 2 MIXED | |
| 7 | 4♠ | E | ♦Q | +3 | 710 | 92% | 4♠ | E | ♦Q | +1 | 650 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♠ | W | ♥6 | -1 | 50 | 55% | 2♠ | W | ♦2 | +1 | 140 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | E | +3 | 710 | 92% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 76% | ||||
| 8 | 3♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA JUNIORS vs CHINA HUOCHETOU 2 : 2 VP (match 89440) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA JUNIORS | CHINA HUOCHETOU | |
| 7 | 4♠ | E | ♦Q | +1 | 650 | 76% | 4♣ | E | ♦Q | -1 | 100 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3NT | E | ♣9 | -2 | 100 | 82% | 2♠ | W | ♥2 | = | 110 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 4♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 100% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | E | -2 | 100 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD vs BANGKOK MIND SPORT 1 : 3 VP (match 89441) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD | BANGKOK MIND SPORT | |
| 7 | 4♠ | E | ♠J | +2 | 680 | 64% | 4♠ | E | ♠7 | +2 | 680 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 3♠ | W | ♥7 | = | 140 | 79% | 3♦ | N | ♠2 | -2 | 100 | 62% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS-0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 64% | ||||
| 8 | 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | N | -2 | 100 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ENSEMBLE vs TAMEWARE 1 : 3 VP (match 89442) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ENSEMBLE | TAMEWARE | |
| 7 | 4♠ | E | ♠7 | +2 | 680 | 64% | 4♠ | E | ♠7 | +2 | 680 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 2♠ | E | ♣A | +2 | 170 | 90% | 3♠ | W | ♥2 | -1 | 50 | 55% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-0.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 64% | ||||
| 8 | 2♠ | E | +2 | 170 | 90% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 55% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WARHORSE vs SEOUL 1 : 3 VP (match 89443) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WARHORSE | SEOUL | |
| 7 | 6♠ | E | ♠6 | +1 | 1460 | 99% | 6♠ | E | ♦Q | +1 | 1460 | 99% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 3♠ | E | ♦A | = | 140 | 79% | 3NT | E | ♣10 | -2 | 100 | 82% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS-0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 6♠ | E | +1 | 1460 | 99% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♠ | E | +1 | 1460 | 99% | ||||
| 8 | 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | -2 | 100 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DONGFENG FENGSHEN vs UICC WUHAN 2 : 2 VP (match 89444) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DONGFENG FENGSHEN | UICC WUHAN | |
| 7 | 4♠ | E | ♦2 | +1 | 650 | 76% | 4♠ | E | ♠J | +3 | 710 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 3♠ | W | ♦2 | -1 | 50 | 55% | 4♠ | W | ♥2 | -2 | 100 | 82% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +3 | 710 | 92% | ||||
| 8 | 3♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -2 | 100 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BEIJINGXUGUANG vs SWISS TEAM 1 : 3 VP (match 89445) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BEIJINGXUGUANG | SWISS TEAM | |
| 7 | 4♥ | E | ♦Q | +1 | 650 | 76% | 4♠ | E | ♠6 | +1 | 650 | 76% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 4♠ | W | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 55% | 4♠ | E | ♥2 | -2 | 100 | 82% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+1.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♥ | E | +1 | 650 | 76% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 76% | ||||
| 8 | 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HUANG HU vs REIGNWOOD 3 : 1 VP (match 89446) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HUANG HU | REIGNWOOD | |
| 7 | 4♠ | W | ♠7 | +2 | 680 | 64% | 4♠ | E | ♠7 | +2 | 680 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 2♠ | E | ♠4 | = | 110 | 68% | 3NT | E | ♠4 | +1 | 430 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-1.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | W | +2 | 680 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 64% | ||||
| 8 | 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 68% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TEAM 51 vs DALIAN AOXIN 0 : 2.4 VP (match 89447) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TEAM 51 | DALIAN AOXIN | |
| 7 | – | — | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 98% | ||||||||
| 8 | – | — | Pass | N | — | 0 | 0 | 57% | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS+0.8 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | – | |||||||
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 98% | ||||
| 8 | – | |||||||
| Pass | N | 0 | 0 | 57% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TO WIN vs ANIT NEGRA 2 : 2 VP (match 89610) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TO WIN | ANIT NEGRA | |
| 7 | 4♠ | E | ♠6 | +2 | 680 | 64% | 4♠ | E | ♠6 | +2 | 680 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 3NT | E | ♣6 | -1 | 50 | 55% | 3NT | E | ♣9 | -1 | 50 | 55% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 64% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | E | -1 | 50 | 55% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | E | -1 | 50 | 55% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
XINJIANGYILI vs THAILAND Mixed 2 : 2 VP (match 89611) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | XINJIANGYILI | THAILAND Mixed | |
| 7 | 4♠ | W | ♦6 | +1 | 650 | 76% | 4♠ | E | ♠6 | +2 | 680 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 2♠ | W | ♦9 | +1 | 140 | 79% | 4♠ | W | ♦3 | -1 | 50 | 55% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.0 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 64% | ||||
| 8 | 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 55% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WHIBLEY vs CANADA CHINA UNITED 4 : 0 VP (match 89612) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WHIBLEY | CANADA CHINA UNITED | |
| 7 | 4♠ | E | ♠6 | +2 | 680 | 64% | 4♠ | E | ♦Q | +3 | 710 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♠ | E | ♠7 | -2 | 100 | 82% | 3♦ | N | ♦2 | -1 | 50 | 60% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-1.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 64% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +3 | 710 | 92% | ||||
| 8 | 4♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | N | -1 | 50 | 60% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WE THE NORTH vs WUHAN ENGINEERING 1 : 3 VP (match 89613) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WE THE NORTH | WUHAN ENGINEERING | |
| 7 | 4♠ | E | ♠6 | +1 | 650 | 76% | 4♠ | W | ♥J | +1 | 650 | 76% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 4♠ | W | ♦3 | -2 | 100 | 82% | 3NT | E | ♣10 | -3 | 150 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS+1.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 76% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 76% | ||||
| 8 | 4♠ | W | -2 | 100 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | -3 | 150 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HUBEI FUXING vs JINSHUO 1 : 3 VP (match 89614) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HUBEI FUXING | JINSHUO | |
| 7 | 4♠ | E | ♠6 | +2 | 680 | 64% | 4♠ | W | ♠3 | +2 | 680 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 8 | 3NT | E | ♣10 | = | 400 | 95% | 4♠ | W | ♦2 | -2 | 100 | 82% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS+0.4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | W | +2 | 680 | 64% | ||||
| 8 | 3NT | E | = | 400 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -2 | 100 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
EXCELLENT FOUR vs TIANYA BRIDGE FATE 0 : 4 VP (match 89615) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | EXCELLENT FOUR | TIANYA BRIDGE FATE | |
| 7 | 3NT | E | ♠7 | +3 | 690 | 88% | 4♠ | E | ♦Q | +1 | 650 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 2♠ | W | ♥6 | +1 | 140 | 79% | 2♠ | W | ♥4 | = | 110 | 68% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS+0.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | E | +3 | 690 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 76% | ||||
| 8 | 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 79% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LATVIA vs NEWB 2 : 2 VP (match 89616) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LATVIA | NEWB | |
| 7 | 4♠ | E | ♠6 | +2 | 680 | 64% | 4♠ | E | ♦Q | +1 | 650 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♠ | E | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 55% | 3NT | E | ♣9 | = | 400 | 95% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 64% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 650 | 76% | ||||
| 8 | 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 55% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | = | 400 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDONESIA Seniors vs GUIZHOU ZHENGYE 1 : 3 VP (match 89617) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDONESIA Seniors | GUIZHOU ZHENGYE | |
| 7 | 4♠ | E | ♥3 | +2 | 680 | 64% | 5♦ | W | ♣3 | = | 600 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♠ | W | ♥7 | -2 | 100 | 82% | 3NT | E | ♣3 | -2 | 100 | 82% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+1.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 64% | 2 | ||
| 5♦ | W | = | 600 | 94% | ||||
| 8 | 4♠ | W | -2 | 100 | 82% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | E | -2 | 100 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WUHAN vs INDONESIA Open 2 : 2 VP (match 89618) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WUHAN | INDONESIA Open | |
| 7 | 3NT | E | ♥2 | = | 600 | 94% | 4♠ | W | ♣3 | +1 | 650 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♣ | S | ♥6 | -3 | 150 | 88% | 3NT | E | ♣9 | -2 | 100 | 82% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+1.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 3NT | E | = | 600 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 76% | ||||
| 8 | 4♣ | S | -3 | 150 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | -2 | 100 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HUAXINHUANBAO vs POLAND Women 2 : 2 VP (match 89619) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HUAXINHUANBAO | POLAND Women | |
| 7 | 4♠ | E | ♠7 | +2 | 680 | 64% | 3NT | E | ♠7 | +2 | 660 | 60% | 2 | |||
| 8 | 4♠ | E | ♣10 | -2 | 100 | 82% | 3♠ | E | ♦7 | = | 140 | 79% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7 | 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 64% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | +2 | 660 | 60% | ||||
| 8 | 4♠ | E | -2 | 100 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|