Round 24 — BAM Teams
20 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 24 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WUHAN ENGINEERING | SEOUL | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.28 | protocol → |
| 2 | JINSHUO | UICC WUHAN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | TIANYA BRIDGE FATE | SWISS TEAM | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.20 | protocol → |
| 4 | NEWB | REIGNWOOD | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | GUIZHOU ZHENGYE | DALIAN AOXIN | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.60 | protocol → |
| 6 | INDONESIA Open | DINKIN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.76 | protocol → |
| 7 | POLAND Women | BBC THAILAND | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | ANIT NEGRA | CHINA HUOCHETOU | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | THAILAND Mixed | BANGKOK MIND SPORT | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | CANADA CHINA UNITED | TAMEWARE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | FORMIDABLES | WE THE NORTH | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | INDIA TSANGPO | HUBEI FUXING | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM | EXCELLENT FOUR | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | CHINA JUNIORS | LATVIA | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD | INDONESIA Seniors | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | ENSEMBLE | WUHAN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | WARHORSE | HUAXINHUANBAO | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | DONGFENG FENGSHEN | TO WIN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | BEIJINGXUGUANG | XINJIANGYILI | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | HUANG HU | WHIBLEY | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 24↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 24 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R24 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DINKIN | 66.56 | 2.76 | 24 |
| 2 | DALIAN AOXIN | 62.40 | 4.60 | 24 |
| 3 | SEOUL | 61.08 | 3.28 | 24 |
| 4 | SWISS TEAM | 60.00 | 4.20 | 24 |
| 4 | TO WIN | 60.00 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 6 | JINSHUO | 59.00 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 7 | EXCELLENT FOUR | 58.00 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 8 | BANGKOK MIND SPORT | 57.00 | 3.00 | 24 |
| 9 | REIGNWOOD | 55.80 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 10 | CHINA JUNIORS | 54.00 | 4.00 | 24 |
| 11 | HUAXINHUANBAO | 53.00 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 12 | FORMIDABLES | 51.20 | 4.00 | 24 |
| 13 | WHIBLEY | 51.00 | 4.00 | 24 |
| 14 | INDONESIA Open | 50.00 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 14 | WUHAN | 50.00 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 16 | LATVIA | 49.00 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 16 | UICC WUHAN | 49.00 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 18 | BBC THAILAND | 48.80 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 19 | DONGFENG FENGSHEN | 48.00 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 19 | GUIZHOU ZHENGYE | 48.00 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 21 | ANIT NEGRA | 47.00 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 21 | INDONESIA Seniors | 47.00 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 23 | CHINA HUOCHETOU | 46.00 | 4.00 | 24 |
| 23 | INDIA TSANGPO | 46.00 | 4.00 | 24 |
| 23 | TAMEWARE | 46.00 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 23 | THAILAND Mixed | 46.00 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 27 | TIANYA BRIDGE FATE | 45.00 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 28 | CANADA CHINA UNITED | 43.00 | 4.00 | 24 |
| 28 | WE THE NORTH | 43.00 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 28 | WUHAN ENGINEERING | 43.00 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 31 | BEIJINGXUGUANG | 42.00 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 32 | POLAND Women | 41.00 | 4.00 | 24 |
| 32 | WARHORSE | 41.00 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 34 | DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD | 40.00 | 4.00 | 24 |
| 34 | HUANG HU | 40.00 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 36 | HUBEI FUXING | 39.00 | 0.00 | 24 |
| 37 | HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM | 38.00 | 1.00 | 24 |
| 38 | XINJIANGYILI | 37.00 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 39 | USA 2 MIXED | 36.80 | · | 16 |
| 40 | ENSEMBLE | 32.00 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 41 | NEWB | 30.00 | 2.00 | 24 |
| 42 | TEAM 31 | 0.00 | · | 8 |
| 42 | TEAM 51 | 0.00 | · | 8 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 24 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R24 | BAM% |
|---|
WUHAN ENGINEERING vs SEOUL 1 : 3.28 VP (match 90150) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WUHAN ENGINEERING | SEOUL | |
| 31 | 4♠ | W | ♥A | = | 420 | 86% | 4♠ | W | ♦4 | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 3♥ | S | ♠Q | = | 140 | 67% | 3♥ | N | ♥3 | = | 140 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 69% | ||||
| 32 | 3♥ | S | = | 140 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JINSHUO vs UICC WUHAN 2 : 2 VP (match 90151) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JINSHUO | UICC WUHAN | |
| 31 | 3♠ | W | ♦4 | = | 140 | 63% | 3♠ | E | ♥A | +2 | 200 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 3♥ | S | ♠Q | = | 140 | 67% | 5♦x | E | ♥Q | -1 | 200 | 86% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | E | +2 | 200 | 76% | ||||
| 32 | 3♥ | S | = | 140 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 5♦x | E | -1 | 200 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TIANYA BRIDGE FATE vs SWISS TEAM 0 : 4.2 VP (match 90152) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TIANYA BRIDGE FATE | SWISS TEAM | |
| 31 | 2♠ | E | ♦6 | +1 | 140 | 63% | 3♣ | E | ♦4 | = | 110 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 1♠ | E | ♦A | = | 80 | 77% | 5♦x | E | ♦2 | -1 | 200 | 86% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+0.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | E | = | 110 | 53% | ||||
| 32 | 1♠ | E | = | 80 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 5♦x | E | -1 | 200 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NEWB vs REIGNWOOD 2 : 2 VP (match 90153) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NEWB | REIGNWOOD | |
| 31 | 3♠ | W | ♥A | +1 | 170 | 72% | 4♠x | W | ♦4 | -1 | 100 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 3♥ | S | ♠Q | = | 140 | 67% | 4♥ | N | ♣4 | -1 | 50 | 67% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 3♠ | W | +1 | 170 | 72% | 2 | ||
| 4♠x | W | -1 | 100 | 85% | ||||
| 32 | 3♥ | S | = | 140 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GUIZHOU ZHENGYE vs DALIAN AOXIN 0 : 4.6 VP (match 90154) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GUIZHOU ZHENGYE | DALIAN AOXIN | |
| 31 | 4♠ | W | ♦4 | = | 420 | 86% | 2♠ | W | ♦4 | = | 110 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 4♦ | W | ♥Q | = | 130 | 94% | 5♦x | W | ♥Q | -4 | 1100 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.6 | NS+1.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 53% | ||||
| 32 | 4♦ | W | = | 130 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 5♦x | W | -4 | 1100 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDONESIA Open vs DINKIN 2 : 2.76 VP (match 90155) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDONESIA Open | DINKIN | |
| 31 | 4♠x | W | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 85% | 2♠ | E | ♦7 | = | 110 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 3♦ | E | ♠3 | = | 110 | 85% | 4♥x | N | ♠2 | -1 | 100 | 80% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♠x | W | -1 | 100 | 85% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 53% | ||||
| 32 | 3♦ | E | = | 110 | 85% | 2 | ||
| 4♥x | N | -1 | 100 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND Women vs BBC THAILAND 4 : 0 VP (match 90156) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND Women | BBC THAILAND | |
| 31 | 4♠ | W | ♣J | -1 | 50 | 69% | 3♣ | W | ♦4 | +1 | 130 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 2♠ | E | ♦A | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2NT | N | ♠7 | = | 120 | 51% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | W | +1 | 130 | 54% | ||||
| 32 | 2♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | N | = | 120 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ANIT NEGRA vs CHINA HUOCHETOU 0 : 4 VP (match 90157) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ANIT NEGRA | CHINA HUOCHETOU | |
| 31 | 4♠ | E | ♦6 | +1 | 450 | 100% | 4♠ | E | ♥7 | = | 420 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 4♦ | W | ♥Q | -1 | 100 | 54% | 2♥ | S | ♠Q | +1 | 140 | 67% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-0.4 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 86% | ||||
| 32 | 4♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | S | +1 | 140 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
THAILAND Mixed vs BANGKOK MIND SPORT 1 : 3 VP (match 90158) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | THAILAND Mixed | BANGKOK MIND SPORT | |
| 31 | 4♠ | W | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 69% | 4♠ | W | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 69% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 32 | 4♥ | N | ♠7 | -1 | 50 | 67% | 3♥ | S | ♠Q | = | 140 | 67% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 69% | 1 | 1 | |
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 69% | ||||
| 32 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | S | = | 140 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CANADA CHINA UNITED vs TAMEWARE 4 : 0 VP (match 90159) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CANADA CHINA UNITED | TAMEWARE | |
| 31 | 3NT | E | ♥2 | -5 | 250 | 97% | 3NT | E | ♥2 | -2 | 100 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 3♥ | S | ♠Q | = | 140 | 67% | 4♦ | W | ♥Q | = | 130 | 94% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS-0.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 3NT | E | -5 | 250 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | -2 | 100 | 85% | ||||
| 32 | 3♥ | S | = | 140 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 4♦ | W | = | 130 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FORMIDABLES vs WE THE NORTH 4 : 0 VP (match 90230) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FORMIDABLES | WE THE NORTH | |
| 31 | 3♠ | W | ♥A | +2 | 200 | 76% | 4♠ | W | ♥6 | = | 420 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 3♥ | N | ♠7 | = | 140 | 67% | 4♦ | W | ♥3 | = | 130 | 94% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-1.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 3♠ | W | +2 | 200 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 86% | ||||
| 32 | 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 4♦ | W | = | 130 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA TSANGPO vs HUBEI FUXING 4 : 0 VP (match 90231) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA TSANGPO | HUBEI FUXING | |
| 31 | 4♠ | E | ♥3 | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2♠ | W | ♥3 | +1 | 140 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 3NT | E | ♥10 | -4 | 400 | 95% | 3♦ | E | ♠3 | = | 110 | 85% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS-0.9 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 63% | ||||
| 32 | 3NT | E | -4 | 400 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | E | = | 110 | 85% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM vs EXCELLENT FOUR 1 : 3 VP (match 90232) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM | EXCELLENT FOUR | |
| 31 | 2♠ | W | ♦4 | +1 | 140 | 63% | 4♠ | W | ♦4 | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 3♥ | N | ♦K | = | 140 | 67% | 3♥ | S | ♠Q | = | 140 | 67% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 2♠ | W | +1 | 140 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 69% | ||||
| 32 | 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 67% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♥ | S | = | 140 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA JUNIORS vs LATVIA 4 : 0 VP (match 90233) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA JUNIORS | LATVIA | |
| 31 | 4♠x | W | ♠2 | -1 | 100 | 85% | 4♠ | W | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 69% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 3♠ | E | ♠6 | -2 | 200 | 86% | 4♥ | S | ♠Q | -1 | 50 | 67% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.4 | NS+0.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♠x | W | -1 | 100 | 85% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 69% | ||||
| 32 | 3♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.4 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD vs INDONESIA Seniors 4 : 0 VP (match 90234) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD | INDONESIA Seniors | |
| 31 | 2♥ | S | ♣A | = | 110 | 94% | 3NT | E | ♠5 | +1 | 430 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 4♥ | N | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 67% | 2♠ | E | ♣8 | = | 110 | 85% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-1.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 96% | ||||
| 32 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 85% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ENSEMBLE vs WUHAN 2 : 2 VP (match 90235) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ENSEMBLE | WUHAN | |
| 31 | 3NT | E | ♠5 | +1 | 430 | 96% | 3♠ | W | ♦4 | = | 140 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 3♦ | W | ♥Q | +1 | 130 | 94% | 3♦ | E | ♦A | +2 | 150 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.8 | NS-1.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 96% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 63% | ||||
| 32 | 3♦ | W | +1 | 130 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 3♦ | E | +2 | 150 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WARHORSE vs HUAXINHUANBAO 2 : 2 VP (match 90236) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WARHORSE | HUAXINHUANBAO | |
| 31 | 4♠ | W | ♦4 | -2 | 100 | 85% | 4♠ | W | ♥A | = | 420 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 4♥ | N | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 67% | 2♠ | E | ♠4 | -1 | 100 | 54% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♠ | W | -2 | 100 | 85% | 2 | ||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 86% | ||||
| 32 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DONGFENG FENGSHEN vs TO WIN 2 : 2 VP (match 90237) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DONGFENG FENGSHEN | TO WIN | |
| 31 | 3♥x | N | ♣10 | = | 730 | 100% | 2♣ | W | ♦4 | = | 90 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 4♥ | S | ♠Q | -1 | 50 | 67% | 5♦ | W | ♥Q | -3 | 300 | 92% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 3♥x | N | = | 730 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 2♣ | W | = | 90 | 59% | ||||
| 32 | 4♥ | S | -1 | 50 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 5♦ | W | -3 | 300 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BEIJINGXUGUANG vs XINJIANGYILI 2 : 2 VP (match 90238) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BEIJINGXUGUANG | XINJIANGYILI | |
| 31 | 3♦ | W | ♣J | = | 110 | 53% | 3♠ | W | ♦4 | = | 140 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 4♦ | W | ♥Q | -1 | 100 | 54% | 5♦x | W | ♥Q | -2 | 500 | 97% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.0 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 3♦ | W | = | 110 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 63% | ||||
| 32 | 4♦ | W | -1 | 100 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 5♦x | W | -2 | 500 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HUANG HU vs WHIBLEY 0 : 4 VP (match 90239) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HUANG HU | WHIBLEY | |
| 31 | 4♠ | W | ♥A | = | 420 | 86% | 2♥ | S | ♣A | = | 110 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 32 | 4♥ | N | ♠2 | -1 | 50 | 67% | 3♥ | S | ♠Q | = | 140 | 67% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 31 | 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 86% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 94% | ||||
| 32 | 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 67% | 2 | ||
| 3♥ | S | = | 140 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|