Round 11 — U26 BAM Qualification
25 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 11 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | INDIA-B U26 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | SXTULIP | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | DABROWKA PO | INDIA-A U26 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | SXSTARLORD | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 4 | 0 | 2.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | PRISM FALCONS | AUSTRIA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | GERMANY | MAN EATING COBRAS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | JAPAN U26 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | SERBALICIOUS | CHINA RDFZ HU | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | SHSLLS1 | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | SERBIA U26W | SERBIA U21 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | DABROWKA | ITALIA U26 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CHINA RDFZ | CHILE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | INDIA U16 | ITALIA 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | ISRAEL | BELGIUM | 1 | 3 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | ZHIHAOLE | POLAND KIDS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | CS21MSCHOOL | CAPRISUN | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | SXSPARK | HONG KONG | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | CHILE U26W | ITALIA U26W | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | 50 50 | BYE | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | JAPAN U21 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 0 | 0 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | SXDAISY | SXNEBULA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | GREISNOR | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | CROATIA | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | URUGUAY | ITALIA U21 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | CROATIA U16 | INDIA U21 | 2 | 2 | 0.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 11↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 11 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R11 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ITALIA U21 | 68.20 | 4.00 | 11 |
| 2 | INDIA-A U26 | 67.80 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 3 | GREISNOR | 66.60 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 3 | JAPAN U26 | 66.60 | 3.00 | 11 |
| 5 | CHINA RDFZ | 66.20 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 6 | ISRAEL | 64.60 | 2.40 | 11 |
| 7 | SERBALICIOUS | 63.40 | 3.00 | 11 |
| 8 | ITALIA U26 | 63.20 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 8 | SXNEBULA | 63.20 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 10 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 60.80 | 1.00 | 11 |
| 11 | JAPAN U21 | 59.60 | 2.40 | 11 |
| 12 | AUSTRIA | 59.00 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 13 | GERMANY | 56.80 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 14 | SXSTARLORD | 56.60 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 15 | CHINA RDFZ HU | 56.40 | 1.00 | 11 |
| 16 | SERBIA U21 | 55.80 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 17 | ITALIA U26W | 55.60 | 1.00 | 11 |
| 18 | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | 55.20 | 1.00 | 11 |
| 19 | CHILE U26W | 55.00 | 3.00 | 11 |
| 19 | INDIA-B U26 | 55.00 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 21 | SXDAISY | 54.20 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 22 | INDIA U21 | 54.00 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 23 | CROATIA | 53.20 | 3.00 | 11 |
| 23 | EYE OF THE TIGER | 53.20 | 1.00 | 11 |
| 23 | SHSLLS1 | 53.20 | 1.00 | 11 |
| 23 | SXTULIP | 53.20 | 3.00 | 11 |
| 27 | POLAND KIDS | 52.80 | 0.00 | 11 |
| 28 | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | 52.20 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 29 | 50 50 | 50.80 | 2.40 | 11 |
| 29 | CHILE | 50.80 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 29 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 50.80 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 32 | DABROWKA | 49.80 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 33 | ITALIA 2 | 49.00 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 34 | DABROWKA PO | 48.80 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 35 | ZHIHAOLE | 48.60 | 4.00 | 11 |
| 36 | SERBIA U26W | 46.00 | 0.00 | 11 |
| 37 | INDIA U16 | 45.60 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 38 | SXSPARK | 44.80 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 39 | PRISM FALCONS | 43.40 | 0.00 | 11 |
| 39 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 43.40 | 0.00 | 11 |
| 41 | HONG KONG | 43.20 | 0.00 | 11 |
| 42 | URUGUAY | 43.00 | 0.00 | 11 |
| 43 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 36.00 | 0.00 | 11 |
| 44 | CROATIA U16 | 33.80 | 0.00 | 11 |
| 45 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 27.80 | 1.00 | 11 |
| 46 | CS21MSCHOOL | 27.00 | 0.00 | 11 |
| 47 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 26.40 | 0.00 | 11 |
| 48 | CAPRISUN | 23.00 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 49 | BELGIUM | 0.00 | 0.00 | 11 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 11 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R11 | BAM% |
|---|
INDIA-B U26 vs HAPPY BRIDGE 2 : 0 VP (match 84386) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-B U26 | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 4♥ | E | ♣8 | +1 | 450 | 53% | 4♥ | E | ♣8 | +2 | 480 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| – | N | — | 120 | 68% | – | N | — | 450 | 96% | 2 | ||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | +2 | 480 | 88% | ||||
| – | N | 120 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| – | N | 450 | 96% | |||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HOPE vs SXTULIP 1 : 3 VP (match 84387) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | SXTULIP | |
| 4♥ | E | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 53% | 3♥ | E | ♣8 | +2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| 2N | S | ♠3 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2N | S | ♥3 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | E | +2 | 200 | 91% | ||||
| 2N | S | -1 | 50 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2N | S | -1 | 50 | 65% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs INDIA-A U26 2 : 2 VP (match 84388) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | INDIA-A U26 | |
| 3♥ | E | ♣5 | +2 | 200 | 91% | 4♥ | E | ♣8 | +1 | 450 | 53% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | W | ♣7 | = | 110 | 80% | 3N | N | ♥6 | = | 400 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | E | +2 | 200 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 53% | ||||
| 2♥ | W | = | 110 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | = | 400 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSTARLORD vs RDFZ ZHIHAOLE 2 : 0 VP (match 84389) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSTARLORD | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | |
| 4♥ | E | ♣8 | = | 420 | 86% | 4♥ | E | ♥7 | +1 | 450 | 53% | 2 | ||||
| 1N | N | ♥6 | +1 | 120 | 68% | – | N | — | 0 | 0 | 54% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 53% | ||||
| 1N | N | +1 | 120 | 68% | 2 | |||
| – | N | 0 | 0 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PRISM FALCONS vs AUSTRIA 0 : 2 VP (match 84390) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PRISM FALCONS | AUSTRIA | |
| 4N | W | ♦5 | +1 | 460 | 78% | 4♥ | E | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 53% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | N | ♥6 | -1 | 50 | 65% | – | N | — | 120 | 68% | 2 | |||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS+0.4 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4N | W | +1 | 460 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 53% | ||||
| 3N | N | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | |||
| – | N | 120 | 68% | |||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY vs MAN EATING COBRAS 2 : 2 VP (match 84391) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY | MAN EATING COBRAS | |
| 3N | W | ♣4 | +2 | 460 | 78% | 4♥ | E | ♣8 | +2 | 480 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| 3♣x | S | ♣4 | -2 | 300 | 99% | 2♥ | E | ♠7 | +1 | 140 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS-1.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | +2 | 460 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | +2 | 480 | 88% | ||||
| 3♣x | S | -2 | 300 | 99% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | +1 | 140 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U26 vs EYE OF THE TIGER 3 : 1 VP (match 84392) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U26 | EYE OF THE TIGER | |
| 4♥ | E | ♣8 | +1 | 450 | 53% | 4♥ | E | ♠5 | +1 | 450 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1N | S | ♠3 | = | 90 | 50% | 2♥ | W | ♣3 | = | 110 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 53% | ||||
| 1N | S | = | 90 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | W | = | 110 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBALICIOUS vs CHINA RDFZ HU 3 : 1 VP (match 84393) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBALICIOUS | CHINA RDFZ HU | |
| 4♥ | E | ♣8 | +1 | 450 | 53% | 4♥ | E | ♣8 | +1 | 450 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3♥ | W | ♣7 | -1 | 100 | 55% | 3♣x | S | ♦Q | -2 | 300 | 99% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.9 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 53% | ||||
| 3♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 3♣x | S | -2 | 300 | 99% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AZS WRATISLAVIA vs SHSLLS1 1 : 1 VP (match 84394) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AZS WRATISLAVIA | SHSLLS1 | |
| 4♥ | E | ♣5 | +1 | 450 | 53% | 4♥ | E | ♣8 | +1 | 450 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1N | S | ♠3 | +1 | 120 | 68% | – | N | — | 450 | 96% | 2 | |||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+1.0 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 53% | ||||
| 1N | S | +1 | 120 | 68% | 2 | |||
| – | N | 450 | 96% | |||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA U26W vs SERBIA U21 0 : 2 VP (match 84395) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA U26W | SERBIA U21 | |
| 4♥ | E | ♣8 | +2 | 480 | 88% | 4♥ | E | ♣8 | = | 420 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | W | ♥4 | -1 | 100 | 55% | – | N | — | 450 | 96% | 2 | |||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+1.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | +2 | 480 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | = | 420 | 86% | ||||
| 2♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2 | |||
| – | N | 450 | 96% | |||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs ITALIA U26 2 : 2 VP (match 84396) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | ITALIA U26 | |
| 4♥xx | E | ♦A | +1 | 1080 | 100% | 4♥ | E | ♠5 | +1 | 450 | 53% | 2 | ||||
| 2N | N | ♥6 | = | 120 | 68% | 1N | S | ♠3 | -3 | 150 | 96% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥xx | E | +1 | 1080 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 53% | ||||
| 2N | N | = | 120 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 1N | S | -3 | 150 | 96% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ vs CHILE 2 : 2 VP (match 84397) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ | CHILE | |
| 3N | E | ♦J | +2 | 460 | 78% | 5♥x | E | ♣8 | = | 650 | 96% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | W | ♦3 | +1 | 140 | 89% | 1N | S | ♠3 | +2 | 150 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | +2 | 460 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 5♥x | E | = | 650 | 96% | ||||
| 2♥ | W | +1 | 140 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 1N | S | +2 | 150 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs ITALIA 2 2 : 2 VP (match 84398) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | ITALIA 2 | |
| 3N | W | ♣4 | +1 | 430 | 83% | 4♥ | E | ♣8 | +2 | 480 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | W | ♠4 | +1 | 140 | 89% | 2N | S | ♠3 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-1.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | +2 | 480 | 88% | ||||
| 2♥ | W | +1 | 140 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 2N | S | -1 | 50 | 65% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISRAEL vs BELGIUM 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84399) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISRAEL | BELGIUM | |
| 4♥ | E | ♣8 | +1 | 450 | 53% | 4♥ | E | ♠5 | +1 | 450 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1N | S | ♠3 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 1N | S | ♠3 | = | 90 | 50% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 53% | ||||
| 1N | S | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 1N | S | = | 90 | 50% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZHIHAOLE vs POLAND KIDS 4 : 0 VP (match 84400) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZHIHAOLE | POLAND KIDS | |
| 6♥ | E | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 98% | 4♥ | E | ♣5 | +1 | 450 | 53% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | W | ♣3 | -3 | 300 | 85% | 2N | N | ♥6 | = | 120 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.7 | NS+0.4 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 53% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | -3 | 300 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 2N | N | = | 120 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CS21MSCHOOL vs CAPRISUN 0 : 2 VP (match 84401) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CS21MSCHOOL | CAPRISUN | |
| 4♥ | E | ♣8 | +2 | 480 | 88% | 4♥ | E | ♦8 | +1 | 450 | 53% | 2 | ||||
| 1♥ | W | ♣3 | +2 | 140 | 89% | – | N | — | 110 | 59% | 2 | |||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS+0.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | +2 | 480 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 53% | ||||
| 1♥ | W | +2 | 140 | 89% | 2 | |||
| – | N | 110 | 59% | |||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXSPARK vs HONG KONG 2 : 0 VP (match 84402) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXSPARK | HONG KONG | |
| 4♥ | E | ♣8 | +1 | 450 | 53% | 4♥ | E | ♣8 | +2 | 480 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| – | N | — | 50 | 65% | 1N | N | ♥6 | +1 | 120 | 68% | 2 | |||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | +2 | 480 | 88% | ||||
| – | N | 50 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| 1N | N | +1 | 120 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE U26W vs ITALIA U26W 3 : 1 VP (match 84403) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE U26W | ITALIA U26W | |
| 4♥ | E | ♣8 | +1 | 450 | 53% | 4♥ | E | ♠5 | +1 | 450 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1N | N | ♥6 | +1 | 120 | 68% | 2N | S | ♠3 | -2 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 53% | ||||
| 1N | N | +1 | 120 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 2N | S | -2 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs BYE 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84404) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | BYE | |
| 1♥ | N | ♥8 | -7 | 700 | 98% | – | — | |||||||||
| – | N | — | 450 | 96% | – | — | ||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1♥ | N | -7 | 700 | 98% | ||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | N | 450 | 96% | |||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JAPAN U21 vs TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL 2.4 : 0 VP (match 84405)↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JAPAN U21 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | |
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| – | — | – | — | |||||||||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| – | ||||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SXDAISY vs SXNEBULA 2 : 2 VP (match 84406) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SXDAISY | SXNEBULA | |
| 4♥ | E | ♥7 | +1 | 450 | 53% | 4♥ | E | ♣8 | +1 | 450 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♣ | S | ♥T | -1 | 50 | 65% | 3N | S | ♠3 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 53% | ||||
| 2♣ | S | -1 | 50 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | S | -1 | 50 | 65% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT vs GREISNOR 2 : 2 VP (match 84407) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ BRIDGE STRAIT | GREISNOR | |
| 6Nx | E | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 100% | 4♥ | E | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 53% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | W | ♦3 | +1 | 140 | 89% | 1N | N | ♥6 | +2 | 150 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6Nx | E | -1 | 100 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 53% | ||||
| 2♥ | W | +1 | 140 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 1N | N | +2 | 150 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA vs FRANCE FUNBRIDGE 3 : 1 VP (match 84408) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA | FRANCE FUNBRIDGE | |
| 4♥ | E | ♥7 | +1 | 450 | 53% | 4♥ | E | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1N | N | ♦6 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2♥ | W | ♣3 | = | 110 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 53% | ||||
| 1N | N | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | W | = | 110 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
URUGUAY vs ITALIA U21 0 : 4 VP (match 84409) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | URUGUAY | ITALIA U21 | |
| 4♥ | E | ♦A | +1 | 450 | 53% | 3♦x | S | ♥2 | -1 | 200 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| 1N | S | ♥T | = | 90 | 50% | 4♥ | W | ♣3 | -2 | 200 | 83% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+1.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 3♦x | S | -1 | 200 | 91% | ||||
| 1N | S | = | 90 | 50% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | W | -2 | 200 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs INDIA U21 0 : 2 VP (match 84410) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | INDIA U21 | |
| 4♥ | E | ♥7 | +1 | 450 | 53% | 2♥ | E | ♠5 | +1 | 140 | 96% | 2 | ||||
| – | N | — | 450 | 96% | 3N | S | ♠3 | = | 400 | 88% | 2 | |||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+1.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | E | +1 | 450 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | +1 | 140 | 96% | ||||
| – | N | 450 | 96% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | = | 400 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ J92 ♥ A954 ♦ 75 ♣ K964 | ||
| ♠ A764 ♥ 2 ♦ Q42 ♣ QJT32 | 21 Dlr N N-S | ♠ K8 ♥ KQJT863 ♦ K6 ♣ A7 |
| ♠ QT53 ♥ 7 ♦ AJT983 ♣ 85 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 2 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 3 |
| S | 2 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 3 |
| E | 10 | 7 | 11 | 6 | 9 |
| W | 10 | 7 | 11 | 6 | 9 |
| ♠ A54 ♥ AQ4 ♦ T932 ♣ 973 | ||
| ♠ Q983 ♥ T953 ♦ Q4 ♣ AT4 | 22 Dlr E E-W | ♠ J62 ♥ KJ76 ♦ KJ86 ♣ Q5 |
| ♠ KT7 ♥ 82 ♦ A75 ♣ KJ862 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| S | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| E | 6 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 6 |
| W | 6 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 6 |