Round 8 — U26 BAM Qualification
17 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 8 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | PRISM FALCONS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | 50 50 | INDIA U21 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | CHINA RDFZ HU | HAPPY BRIDGE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | GREISNOR | CAPRISUN | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | CHINA RDFZ | SERBALICIOUS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | MAN EATING COBRAS | SXNEBULA | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | POLAND KIDS | SXSPARK | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | INDIA U16 | URUGUAY | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | INDIA-A U26 | BELGIUM | 3 | 1 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | DABROWKA | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 3 | 1 | 3.20 | 0.80 | protocol → |
| 11 | SERBIA | HONG KONG | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CROATIA U16 | CS21MSCHOOL | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | CHILE | CONGO | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | ISRAEL | ITALIA 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | DABROWKA PO | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | AUSTRIA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | GERMANY | INDIA-B U26 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 8↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 8 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R8 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AUSTRIA | 24.00 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 2 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 23.00 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 3 | CHINA RDFZ | 22.40 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 4 | SXNEBULA | 22.20 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 5 | INDIA-A U26 | 21.80 | 2.40 | 8 |
| 6 | PRISM FALCONS | 21.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 7 | INDIA-B U26 | 20.00 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 7 | ITALIA 2 | 20.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 7 | URUGUAY | 20.00 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 10 | GREISNOR | 19.60 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 11 | ISRAEL | 19.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 11 | SERBALICIOUS | 19.00 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 13 | CHINA RDFZ HU | 17.40 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 14 | HONG KONG | 17.20 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 15 | INDIA U21 | 17.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 16 | POLAND KIDS | 16.80 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 17 | 50 50 | 16.60 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 18 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 16.00 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 19 | DABROWKA | 15.60 | 3.20 | 8 |
| 20 | SERBIA | 15.40 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 21 | INDIA U16 | 14.80 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 21 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 14.80 | 3.00 | 8 |
| 23 | CHILE | 14.40 | 2.40 | 8 |
| 24 | GERMANY | 14.00 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 25 | CAPRISUN | 11.00 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 25 | DABROWKA PO | 11.00 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 25 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 11.00 | 1.00 | 8 |
| 25 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 11.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 29 | CS21MSCHOOL | 9.00 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 30 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 8.80 | 0.80 | 8 |
| 31 | SXSPARK | 8.00 | 2.00 | 8 |
| 32 | CROATIA U16 | 7.40 | 4.00 | 8 |
| 33 | CONGO | 5.60 | 0.00 | 8 |
| 34 | BELGIUM | 0.00 | 0.00 | 8 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 8 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R8 | BAM% |
|---|
TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL vs PRISM FALCONS 2 : 2 VP (match 83311) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | PRISM FALCONS | |
| 3N | N | ♠4 | +1 | 630 | 76% | 4♥ | N | ♦J | = | 620 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♥Q | +2 | 680 | 80% | 4♥ | E | ♣A | = | 620 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | N | +1 | 630 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 52% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | +2 | 680 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | = | 620 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs INDIA U21 2 : 2 VP (match 83312) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | INDIA U21 | |
| 3N | N | ♣5 | +1 | 630 | 76% | 4♣ | N | ♠7 | -1 | 100 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♥Q | +2 | 680 | 80% | 4♠ | W | ♣4 | = | 620 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | N | +1 | 630 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 4♣ | N | -1 | 100 | 91% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | +2 | 680 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HU vs HAPPY BRIDGE 3 : 1 VP (match 83313) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HU | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 3N | S | ♠2 | +1 | 630 | 76% | 3N | N | ♠7 | = | 600 | 59% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♠J | +2 | 680 | 80% | 4♠ | W | ♥Q | +2 | 680 | 80% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.8 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | = | 600 | 59% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | +2 | 680 | 80% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | +2 | 680 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GREISNOR vs CAPRISUN 3 : 1 VP (match 83314) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GREISNOR | CAPRISUN | |
| 3N | S | ♠2 | +1 | 630 | 76% | 5♣ | N | ♠6 | -1 | 100 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♠J | +1 | 650 | 53% | 4♠ | W | ♦2 | +1 | 650 | 53% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-0.8 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 5♣ | N | -1 | 100 | 91% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 53% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ vs SERBALICIOUS 3 : 1 VP (match 83315) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ | SERBALICIOUS | |
| 3N | N | ♠7 | +1 | 630 | 76% | 3N | S | ♠2 | = | 600 | 59% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♦2 | +2 | 680 | 80% | 5♠ | W | ♦2 | +1 | 680 | 80% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.8 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | N | +1 | 630 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | = | 600 | 59% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | +2 | 680 | 80% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 5♠ | W | +1 | 680 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAN EATING COBRAS vs SXNEBULA 3 : 1 VP (match 83316) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAN EATING COBRAS | SXNEBULA | |
| 3N | S | ♠2 | +1 | 630 | 76% | 3N | S | ♠2 | +1 | 630 | 76% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♥ | W | ♦2 | +1 | 650 | 53% | 4♠ | W | ♥Q | +2 | 680 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 76% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 76% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 650 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | +2 | 680 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND KIDS vs SXSPARK 2 : 2 VP (match 83317) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND KIDS | SXSPARK | |
| 3N | N | ♠4 | +2 | 660 | 100% | 3N | S | ♠2 | +1 | 630 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♠J | +2 | 680 | 80% | 5♦x | S | ♠A | -3 | 500 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | N | +2 | 660 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 76% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | +2 | 680 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 5♦x | S | -3 | 500 | 74% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs URUGUAY 0 : 4 VP (match 83318) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | URUGUAY | |
| 3N | N | ♠7 | -1 | 100 | 91% | 3N | S | ♠2 | +1 | 630 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♦2 | +2 | 680 | 80% | 5♦ | S | ♠A | -3 | 150 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | N | -1 | 100 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 76% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | +2 | 680 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | S | -3 | 150 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA-A U26 vs BELGIUM 2.4 : 0 VP (match 83319) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-A U26 | BELGIUM | |
| 3N | S | ♣T | +1 | 630 | 76% | 3N | S | ♠2 | +1 | 630 | 76% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 5♦x | S | ♠K | -3 | 500 | 74% | 5♠ | W | ♦2 | +1 | 680 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS-0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 76% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 76% | ||||
| 5♦x | S | -3 | 500 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 5♠ | W | +1 | 680 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs CHINA RDFZ HOPE 3.2 : 0.8 VP (match 83320) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | |
| 3N | S | ♠2 | = | 600 | 59% | 3N | N | ♠7 | -1 | 100 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| Pass | N | — | 0 | 94% | Pass | W | ♣6 | 0 | 94% | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | = | 600 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | -1 | 100 | 91% | ||||
| Pass | N | 0 | 94% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Pass | W | 0 | 94% | |||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA vs HONG KONG 2 : 2 VP (match 83321) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA | HONG KONG | |
| 3N | S | ♣T | +1 | 630 | 76% | 3N | S | ♠2 | = | 600 | 59% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♠J | +2 | 680 | 80% | 5♠ | W | ♦K | = | 650 | 53% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | = | 600 | 59% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | +2 | 680 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 5♠ | W | = | 650 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs CS21MSCHOOL 4 : 0 VP (match 83322) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | CS21MSCHOOL | |
| 3N | N | ♠4 | = | 600 | 59% | 2♥ | N | ♥7 | = | 110 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♣6 | +1 | 650 | 53% | 4♠ | W | ♥6 | +2 | 680 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-1.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | N | = | 600 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | N | = | 110 | 70% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | +2 | 680 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE vs CONGO 2.4 : 0 VP (match 83323) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE | CONGO | |
| Pass | — | 0 | 76% | Pass | — | 0 | 76% | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Pass | — | 0 | 94% | Pass | — | 0 | 94% | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| Pass | 0 | 76% | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Pass | 0 | 76% | ||||||
| Pass | 0 | 94% | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Pass | 0 | 94% | ||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISRAEL vs ITALIA 2 2 : 2 VP (match 83324) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISRAEL | ITALIA 2 | |
| 3N | S | ♠3 | +1 | 630 | 76% | Pass | — | 0 | 0 | 76% | 2 | |||||
| 5♠ | W | ♦2 | = | 650 | 53% | Pass | — | 0 | 0 | 94% | 2 | |||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 76% | 2 | |||
| Pass | 0 | 0 | 76% | |||||
| 5♠ | W | = | 650 | 53% | 2 | |||
| Pass | 0 | 0 | 94% | |||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs AZS WRATISLAVIA 0 : 4 VP (match 83325) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | AZS WRATISLAVIA | |
| 3N | S | ♠2 | -1 | 100 | 91% | 3N | S | ♠2 | +1 | 630 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♠J | +2 | 680 | 80% | 5♣ | N | ♠7 | -4 | 200 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS+1.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | -1 | 100 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +1 | 630 | 76% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | +2 | 680 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 5♣ | N | -4 | 200 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ ZHIHAOLE vs AUSTRIA 0 : 4 VP (match 83326) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | AUSTRIA | |
| 4♥ | N | ♠6 | -1 | 100 | 91% | 3N | N | ♣5 | +1 | 630 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♣6 | +1 | 650 | 53% | 5♦ | S | ♠A | -1 | 50 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | +1 | 630 | 76% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | S | -1 | 50 | 85% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY vs INDIA-B U26 0 : 4 VP (match 83327) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY | INDIA-B U26 | |
| 3N | S | ♠2 | -1 | 100 | 91% | 3N | S | ♣T | = | 600 | 59% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♦2 | +2 | 680 | 80% | 5♥ | E | ♦Q | = | 650 | 53% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS-0.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | -1 | 100 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | = | 600 | 59% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | +2 | 680 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 5♥ | E | = | 650 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ AJ5 ♥ AK943 ♦ 4 ♣ Q743 | ||
| ♠ Q832 ♥ T865 ♦ KQ6 ♣ T9 | 15 Dlr S N-S | ♠ 9764 ♥ Q7 ♦ JT9 ♣ A865 |
| ♠ KT ♥ J2 ♦ A87532 ♣ KJ2 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | 11 |
| S | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9 | 11 |
| E | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| W | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
| ♠ JT ♥ Q6 ♦ K52 ♣ KT9642 | ||
| ♠ AKQ62 ♥ AJ97 ♦ 43 ♣ 85 | 16 Dlr W E-W | ♠ 9754 ♥ KT432 ♦ A ♣ QJ7 |
| ♠ 83 ♥ 85 ♦ QJT9876 ♣ A3 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 7 |
| S | 2 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 7 |
| E | 11 | 11 | 11 | 5 | 6 |
| W | 11 | 11 | 11 | 5 | 6 |