Round 2 — U26 BAM Qualification
17 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 2 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | SXSPARK | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | 50 50 | URUGUAY | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | CHINA RDFZ HU | BELGIUM | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | GREISNOR | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | CHINA RDFZ | HONG KONG | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | MAN EATING COBRAS | CS21MSCHOOL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | POLAND KIDS | CONGO | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.80 | protocol → |
| 8 | INDIA U16 | ITALIA 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | INDIA-A U26 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | DABROWKA | AUSTRIA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | SERBIA | INDIA-B U26 | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CROATIA U16 | PRISM FALCONS | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | CHILE | INDIA U21 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | ISRAEL | HAPPY BRIDGE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | DABROWKA PO | CAPRISUN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | SERBALICIOUS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | GERMANY | SXNEBULA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 2↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 2 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R2 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GREISNOR | 7.20 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 2 | CHINA RDFZ | 7.00 | 3.00 | 2 |
| 2 | DABROWKA PO | 7.00 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 2 | ISRAEL | 7.00 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 2 | PRISM FALCONS | 7.00 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 6 | CHINA RDFZ HU | 6.40 | 2.40 | 2 |
| 7 | CHILE | 6.00 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 7 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 6.00 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 7 | SXNEBULA | 6.00 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 10 | 50 50 | 5.40 | 3.00 | 2 |
| 11 | AUSTRIA | 5.00 | 3.00 | 2 |
| 11 | INDIA U21 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 11 | INDIA-A U26 | 5.00 | 3.00 | 2 |
| 11 | INDIA-B U26 | 5.00 | 3.00 | 2 |
| 11 | URUGUAY | 5.00 | 1.00 | 2 |
| 16 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 4.40 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 16 | POLAND KIDS | 4.40 | 2.40 | 2 |
| 18 | INDIA U16 | 4.00 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 18 | ITALIA 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 18 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 4.00 | 4.00 | 2 |
| 21 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 3.00 | 1.00 | 2 |
| 21 | DABROWKA | 3.00 | 1.00 | 2 |
| 23 | HONG KONG | 2.20 | 1.00 | 2 |
| 24 | CS21MSCHOOL | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2 |
| 24 | GERMANY | 2.00 | 0.00 | 2 |
| 24 | SERBIA | 2.00 | 1.00 | 2 |
| 24 | SXSPARK | 2.00 | 0.00 | 2 |
| 28 | CONGO | 1.60 | 0.80 | 2 |
| 29 | CAPRISUN | 1.00 | 0.00 | 2 |
| 29 | CROATIA U16 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 2 |
| 29 | SERBALICIOUS | 1.00 | 0.00 | 2 |
| 32 | BELGIUM | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2 |
| 32 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2 |
| 32 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 2 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R2 | BAM% |
|---|
TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL vs SXSPARK 4 : 0 VP (match 83209) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | SXSPARK | |
| 2♠ | S | ♦3 | = | 110 | 80% | 4♠ | S | ♣Q | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 97% | 3♥ | N | ♠A | -2 | 200 | 67% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.5 | NS+0.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 100 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | N | -2 | 200 | 67% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs URUGUAY 3 : 1 VP (match 83210) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | URUGUAY | |
| 2♠ | S | ♣Q | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2♠ | S | ♠6 | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | E | ♥6 | +1 | 630 | 55% | 3N | E | ♣2 | +2 | 660 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| 3N | E | +1 | 630 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +2 | 660 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HU vs BELGIUM 2.4 : 0 VP (match 83211) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HU | BELGIUM | |
| 3♠ | S | ♣Q | -2 | 100 | 80% | 2♠ | S | ♣Q | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥5 | +2 | 660 | 70% | 3N | E | ♥5 | +3 | 690 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | S | -2 | 100 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| 3N | E | +2 | 660 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +3 | 690 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GREISNOR vs CHINA RDFZ HOPE 4 : 0 VP (match 83212) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GREISNOR | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | |
| 2♠ | S | ♥A | = | 110 | 80% | 2♠ | S | ♣Q | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 2N | E | ♥5 | +2 | 180 | 71% | 3N | E | ♣2 | +3 | 690 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS-0.9 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| 2N | E | +2 | 180 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +3 | 690 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ vs HONG KONG 3 : 1 VP (match 83213) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ | HONG KONG | |
| 3♠x | S | ♣Q | -1 | 100 | 80% | 3♠ | S | ♣Q | -2 | 100 | 80% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | E | ♥6 | +1 | 630 | 55% | 3N | E | ♠4 | +2 | 660 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-1.0 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠x | S | -1 | 100 | 80% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♠ | S | -2 | 100 | 80% | ||||
| 3N | E | +1 | 630 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +2 | 660 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAN EATING COBRAS vs CS21MSCHOOL 2 : 2 VP (match 83214) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAN EATING COBRAS | CS21MSCHOOL | |
| 3♥ | W | ♠Q | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2♠ | S | ♣Q | = | 110 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥6 | +1 | 630 | 55% | 3N | E | ♣2 | +3 | 690 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | W | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 80% | ||||
| 3N | E | +1 | 630 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +3 | 690 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND KIDS vs CONGO 2.4 : 0.8 VP (match 83215) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND KIDS | CONGO | |
| Pass | — | 0 | 0 | 62% | Pass | — | 0 | 0 | 62% | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Pass | — | 0 | 0 | 89% | Pass | — | 0 | 0 | 89% | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| Pass | 0 | 0 | 62% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Pass | 0 | 0 | 62% | |||||
| Pass | 0 | 0 | 89% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Pass | 0 | 0 | 89% | |||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs ITALIA 2 2 : 2 VP (match 83216) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | ITALIA 2 | |
| 2♠ | S | ♣Q | = | 110 | 80% | 2♠ | S | ♣Q | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♣8 | +3 | 690 | 89% | 3♠ | E | ♥7 | = | 140 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| 3N | W | +3 | 690 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA-A U26 vs AZS WRATISLAVIA 3 : 1 VP (match 83217) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-A U26 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | |
| 2♠ | S | ♣Q | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2♠ | S | ♣Q | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♠ | E | ♥7 | -1 | 100 | 97% | 2♠ | E | ♥6 | +1 | 140 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | +1 | 140 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs AUSTRIA 1 : 3 VP (match 83218) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | AUSTRIA | |
| 2♠ | S | ♣Q | -1 | 50 | 56% | 2♠ | S | ♣Q | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 6♦ | E | ♦J | = | 1370 | 100% | 4♦ | E | ♥5 | +2 | 170 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS+0.4 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 56% | ||||
| 6♦ | E | = | 1370 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 4♦ | E | +2 | 170 | 76% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA vs INDIA-B U26 1 : 3 VP (match 83219) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA | INDIA-B U26 | |
| 2♠ | S | ♦3 | = | 110 | 80% | 2♠ | S | ♣Q | = | 110 | 80% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | W | ♥4 | +2 | 660 | 70% | 3N | E | ♥7 | +1 | 630 | 55% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 80% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 80% | ||||
| 3N | W | +2 | 660 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +1 | 630 | 55% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs PRISM FALCONS 0 : 4 VP (match 83220) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | PRISM FALCONS | |
| 1N | N | ♦4 | -3 | 150 | 98% | 2♠ | S | ♣Q | = | 110 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♠4 | +2 | 680 | 79% | 2N | E | ♣6 | +2 | 180 | 71% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS+1.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | N | -3 | 150 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 80% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | +2 | 680 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 2N | E | +2 | 180 | 71% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE vs INDIA U21 2 : 2 VP (match 83221) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE | INDIA U21 | |
| 4♠ | S | ♥A | -2 | 100 | 80% | 3♥ | W | ♠Q | = | 140 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♣7 | = | 620 | 55% | 3♣ | W | ♦3 | -1 | 100 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | S | -2 | 100 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | W | = | 140 | 92% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | W | -1 | 100 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISRAEL vs HAPPY BRIDGE 4 : 0 VP (match 83222) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISRAEL | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 2♠ | S | ♥A | +2 | 170 | 100% | 1N | E | ♠A | +2 | 150 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥6 | = | 600 | 59% | 3N | E | ♣2 | +3 | 690 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS-1.8 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | +2 | 170 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 1N | E | +2 | 150 | 98% | ||||
| 3N | E | = | 600 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +3 | 690 | 89% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs CAPRISUN 4 : 0 VP (match 83223) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | CAPRISUN | |
| 2♠ | S | ♥A | +1 | 140 | 95% | 3♥ | W | ♠Q | = | 140 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | N | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 85% | 5♦ | E | ♣2 | = | 600 | 59% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.6 | NS-0.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | W | = | 140 | 92% | ||||
| 3♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | E | = | 600 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.6 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ ZHIHAOLE vs SERBALICIOUS 4 : 0 VP (match 83224) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | SERBALICIOUS | |
| 2♠ | S | ♣Q | = | 110 | 80% | 3♠ | S | ♣Q | -2 | 100 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♣2 | +1 | 630 | 55% | 3N | E | ♥7 | +2 | 660 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-1.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | S | -2 | 100 | 80% | ||||
| 3N | E | +1 | 630 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +2 | 660 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY vs SXNEBULA 0 : 4 VP (match 83225) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY | SXNEBULA | |
| 3♠ | S | ♣Q | -2 | 100 | 80% | 2♠ | S | ♥A | +1 | 140 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥2 | +3 | 690 | 89% | 2N | E | ♥2 | +4 | 240 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | S | -2 | 100 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 95% | ||||
| 3N | E | +3 | 690 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 2N | E | +4 | 240 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ QJ ♥ 752 ♦ J976 ♣ AT95 | ||
| ♠ 86 ♥ AT963 ♦ A53 ♣ QJ2 | 3 Dlr S E-W | ♠ T93 ♥ QJ8 ♦ QT84 ♣ K43 |
| ♠ AK7542 ♥ K4 ♦ K2 ♣ 876 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 7 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| S | 7 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| E | 6 | 5 | 9 | 8 | 6 |
| W | 6 | 5 | 9 | 8 | 6 |
| ♠ K9 ♥ AQ943 ♦ T63 ♣ 875 | ||
| ♠ JT863 ♥ J ♦ 872 ♣ AQ93 | 4 Dlr W Both | ♠ A2 ♥ KT8 ♦ AKQ954 ♣ T4 |
| ♠ Q754 ♥ 7652 ♦ J ♣ KJ62 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 2 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 2 |
| S | 2 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 3 |
| E | 11 | 10 | 7 | 12 | 10 |
| W | 11 | 10 | 7 | 12 | 10 |