Round 5 — U26 BAM Qualification
17 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 5 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | CAPRISUN | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | 50 50 | SERBALICIOUS | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | CHINA RDFZ HU | SXNEBULA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | GREISNOR | SXSPARK | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | CHINA RDFZ | URUGUAY | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | MAN EATING COBRAS | BELGIUM | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | POLAND KIDS | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | INDIA U16 | HONG KONG | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | INDIA-A U26 | CS21MSCHOOL | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | DABROWKA | CONGO | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.80 | protocol → |
| 11 | SERBIA | ITALIA 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CROATIA U16 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | CHILE | AUSTRIA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | ISRAEL | INDIA-B U26 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | DABROWKA PO | PRISM FALCONS | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | INDIA U21 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | GERMANY | HAPPY BRIDGE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 5↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 5 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R5 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SXNEBULA | 15.20 | 4.00 | 5 |
| 2 | AUSTRIA | 15.00 | 4.00 | 5 |
| 2 | ISRAEL | 15.00 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 2 | PRISM FALCONS | 15.00 | 4.00 | 5 |
| 5 | GREISNOR | 13.60 | 4.00 | 5 |
| 6 | CHINA RDFZ | 13.40 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 7 | SERBALICIOUS | 13.00 | 4.00 | 5 |
| 7 | URUGUAY | 13.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 9 | CHINA RDFZ HU | 12.40 | 0.00 | 5 |
| 10 | INDIA-B U26 | 12.00 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 10 | ITALIA 2 | 12.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 12 | INDIA-A U26 | 11.40 | 4.00 | 5 |
| 13 | HONG KONG | 11.20 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 14 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 11.00 | 4.00 | 5 |
| 14 | INDIA U21 | 11.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 16 | DABROWKA | 10.40 | 2.40 | 5 |
| 17 | CHILE | 10.00 | 0.00 | 5 |
| 17 | GERMANY | 10.00 | 4.00 | 5 |
| 17 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 10.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 20 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 8.80 | 2.40 | 5 |
| 21 | 50 50 | 8.60 | 0.00 | 5 |
| 22 | INDIA U16 | 8.40 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 22 | POLAND KIDS | 8.40 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 24 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 8.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 24 | DABROWKA PO | 8.00 | 0.00 | 5 |
| 24 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 8.00 | 0.00 | 5 |
| 27 | CS21MSCHOOL | 7.00 | 0.00 | 5 |
| 27 | SERBIA | 7.00 | 2.00 | 5 |
| 27 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 7.00 | 1.00 | 5 |
| 30 | CAPRISUN | 6.00 | 3.00 | 5 |
| 31 | CONGO | 4.00 | 0.80 | 5 |
| 31 | SXSPARK | 4.00 | 0.00 | 5 |
| 33 | CROATIA U16 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 5 |
| 34 | BELGIUM | 0.00 | 0.00 | 5 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 5 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R5 | BAM% |
|---|
TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL vs CAPRISUN 1 : 3 VP (match 83260) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | CAPRISUN | |
| 6♦ | E | ♣8 | +1 | 1390 | 76% | 4♠ | W | ♦6 | = | 620 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| 4♦ | S | ♥8 | -2 | 200 | 65% | 3♥ | N | ♠4 | -2 | 200 | 65% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♦ | E | +1 | 1390 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 73% | ||||
| 4♦ | S | -2 | 200 | 65% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♥ | N | -2 | 200 | 65% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs SERBALICIOUS 0 : 4 VP (match 83261) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | SERBALICIOUS | |
| 7♦xx | E | ♠7 | = | 2660 | 100% | 6♠ | W | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠x | E | ♥2 | = | 790 | 91% | 4♥ | N | ♠5 | -1 | 100 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.8 | NS+1.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7♦xx | E | = | 2660 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 6♠ | W | -1 | 100 | 89% | ||||
| 4♠x | E | = | 790 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HU vs SXNEBULA 0 : 4 VP (match 83262) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HU | SXNEBULA | |
| 6♦ | E | ♥3 | = | 1370 | 56% | 6♠ | W | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠x | E | ♣9 | = | 730 | 85% | 3N | N | ♠5 | -2 | 200 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+0.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♦ | E | = | 1370 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 6♠ | W | -1 | 100 | 89% | ||||
| 3♠x | E | = | 730 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | -2 | 200 | 65% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GREISNOR vs SXSPARK 4 : 0 VP (match 83263) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GREISNOR | SXSPARK | |
| 6♦ | E | ♥2 | = | 1370 | 56% | 6N | E | ♥T | = | 1440 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | E | ♥2 | = | 140 | 61% | 3♠ | E | ♣9 | +1 | 170 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.8 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♦ | E | = | 1370 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 6N | E | = | 1440 | 89% | ||||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | E | +1 | 170 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ vs URUGUAY 2 : 2 VP (match 83264) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ | URUGUAY | |
| 6♦ | E | ♥3 | = | 1370 | 56% | 6N | E | ♥2 | = | 1440 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠x | E | ♣9 | +1 | 930 | 97% | 5♥ | N | ♠4 | -3 | 300 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-1.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♦ | E | = | 1370 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 6N | E | = | 1440 | 89% | ||||
| 3♠x | E | +1 | 930 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 5♥ | N | -3 | 300 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAN EATING COBRAS vs BELGIUM 2.4 : 0 VP (match 83265) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAN EATING COBRAS | BELGIUM | |
| 4♠ | W | ♣6 | +2 | 680 | 61% | 6N | W | ♥A | = | 1440 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♠6 | = | 620 | 82% | 3♠ | E | ♥2 | +1 | 170 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | +2 | 680 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 6N | W | = | 1440 | 89% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 620 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | E | +1 | 170 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND KIDS vs CHINA RDFZ HOPE 2 : 2 VP (match 83266) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND KIDS | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | |
| 6N | E | ♥8 | = | 1440 | 89% | 6♦ | E | ♣T | +1 | 1390 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 1N | N | ♠5 | +1 | 120 | 82% | 3♠ | E | ♣9 | +1 | 170 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6N | E | = | 1440 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 6♦ | E | +1 | 1390 | 76% | ||||
| 1N | N | +1 | 120 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | E | +1 | 170 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs HONG KONG 1 : 3 VP (match 83267) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | HONG KONG | |
| 6♦ | E | ♥8 | = | 1370 | 56% | 6♦ | E | ♥2 | = | 1370 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | N | ♠5 | -2 | 200 | 65% | 4♥ | N | ♦J | +1 | 650 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS+0.8 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♦ | E | = | 1370 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6♦ | E | = | 1370 | 56% | ||||
| 3N | N | -2 | 200 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 650 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA-A U26 vs CS21MSCHOOL 4 : 0 VP (match 83268) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-A U26 | CS21MSCHOOL | |
| 7♦ | E | ♥3 | -1 | 100 | 89% | 6♦ | E | ♥8 | = | 1370 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♠4 | +1 | 650 | 98% | 5♥ | N | ♠4 | -2 | 200 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.8 | NS-0.4 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 6♦ | E | = | 1370 | 56% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 650 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 5♥ | N | -2 | 200 | 65% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs CONGO 2.4 : 0.8 VP (match 83269) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | CONGO | |
| Pass | N | — | 0 | 80% | Pass | E | ♥T | 0 | 80% | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Pass | N | ♠T | 0 | 77% | Pass | N | — | 0 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS+1.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| Pass | N | 0 | 80% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Pass | E | 0 | 80% | |||||
| Pass | N | 0 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Pass | N | 0 | 77% | |||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA vs ITALIA 2 2 : 2 VP (match 83270) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA | ITALIA 2 | |
| 7Nx | W | ♥A | -1 | 200 | 98% | 6♦ | E | ♥8 | = | 1370 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | N | ♠4 | -1 | 100 | 70% | 4♦ | S | ♥8 | = | 130 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.4 | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7Nx | W | -1 | 200 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 6♦ | E | = | 1370 | 56% | ||||
| 3♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 4♦ | S | = | 130 | 85% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs AZS WRATISLAVIA 0 : 4 VP (match 83271) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | |
| 6♦ | E | ♠7 | +1 | 1390 | 76% | 5♦ | E | ♣8 | +1 | 620 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♠5 | -2 | 200 | 65% | 4♥ | N | ♠5 | -1 | 100 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+0.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♦ | E | +1 | 1390 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | E | +1 | 620 | 73% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | -2 | 200 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE vs AUSTRIA 0 : 4 VP (match 83272) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE | AUSTRIA | |
| 6N | E | ♥8 | = | 1440 | 89% | 7Nx | W | ♥A | -1 | 200 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | N | ♠5 | -2 | 200 | 65% | 3♥ | N | ♠4 | = | 140 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS+1.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6N | E | = | 1440 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 7Nx | W | -1 | 200 | 98% | ||||
| 3N | N | -2 | 200 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISRAEL vs INDIA-B U26 3 : 1 VP (match 83273) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISRAEL | INDIA-B U26 | |
| 6♦ | E | ♥3 | = | 1370 | 56% | 6N | W | ♥A | = | 1440 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠x | E | ♥2 | = | 790 | 91% | 4♠x | E | ♥2 | = | 790 | 91% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-1.6 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♦ | E | = | 1370 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 6N | W | = | 1440 | 89% | ||||
| 4♠x | E | = | 790 | 91% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠x | E | = | 790 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs PRISM FALCONS 0 : 4 VP (match 83274) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | PRISM FALCONS | |
| 4♠ | W | ♥A | +1 | 650 | 65% | 7♦ | E | ♥3 | -1 | 100 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠x | E | ♣7 | +1 | 990 | 100% | 4♥x | N | ♠5 | -1 | 200 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+0.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 7♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 89% | ||||
| 4♠x | E | +1 | 990 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | N | -1 | 200 | 65% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ ZHIHAOLE vs INDIA U21 2 : 2 VP (match 83275) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | INDIA U21 | |
| 6♦ | E | ♥2 | = | 1370 | 56% | 4♠ | W | ♠9 | +1 | 650 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | S | ♥8 | +2 | 150 | 91% | 3♠ | E | ♥2 | = | 140 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♦ | E | = | 1370 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 650 | 65% | ||||
| 3♦ | S | +2 | 150 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY vs HAPPY BRIDGE 4 : 0 VP (match 83276) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 5♦ | E | ♥3 | +1 | 620 | 73% | 6♦ | E | ♥3 | = | 1370 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♠4 | = | 620 | 94% | 3♠ | E | ♥2 | = | 140 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS+0.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♦ | E | +1 | 620 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 6♦ | E | = | 1370 | 56% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | E | = | 140 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ 96 ♥ AJ965 ♦ 65 ♣ 9653 | ||
| ♠ AKQJ53 ♥ Q ♦ QJ82 ♣ J2 | 9 Dlr N E-W | ♠ – ♥ K74 ♦ AKT743 ♣ AKQ4 |
| ♠ T8742 ♥ T832 ♦ 9 ♣ T87 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| S | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| E | 12 | 11 | 8 | 12 | 12 |
| W | 12 | 11 | 8 | 12 | 12 |
| ♠ 96 ♥ AQJ93 ♦ AQ ♣ KT63 | ||
| ♠ AQJ3 ♥ 8 ♦ 984 ♣ J8542 | 10 Dlr E Both | ♠ KT854 ♥ 7654 ♦ J5 ♣ AQ |
| ♠ 72 ♥ KT2 ♦ KT7632 ♣ 97 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 6 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 6 |
| S | 6 | 3 | 9 | 9 | 6 |
| E | 2 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| W | 2 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 7 |