Round 4 — U26 BAM Qualification
17 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 4 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | SERBALICIOUS | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | 50 50 | SXNEBULA | 1 | 3 | 1.20 | 3.20 | protocol → |
| 3 | CHINA RDFZ HU | SXSPARK | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | GREISNOR | URUGUAY | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | CHINA RDFZ | BELGIUM | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | MAN EATING COBRAS | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | POLAND KIDS | HONG KONG | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | INDIA U16 | CS21MSCHOOL | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | INDIA-A U26 | CONGO | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.80 | protocol → |
| 10 | DABROWKA | ITALIA 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | SERBIA | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CROATIA U16 | AUSTRIA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | CHILE | INDIA-B U26 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | ISRAEL | PRISM FALCONS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | DABROWKA PO | INDIA U21 | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | HAPPY BRIDGE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | GERMANY | CAPRISUN | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 4↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 4 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R4 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CHINA RDFZ HU | 12.40 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 2 | ISRAEL | 12.00 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 3 | CHINA RDFZ | 11.40 | 2.40 | 4 |
| 4 | SXNEBULA | 11.20 | 3.20 | 4 |
| 5 | AUSTRIA | 11.00 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 5 | INDIA-B U26 | 11.00 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 5 | PRISM FALCONS | 11.00 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 5 | URUGUAY | 11.00 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 9 | CHILE | 10.00 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 9 | ITALIA 2 | 10.00 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 11 | GREISNOR | 9.60 | 0.00 | 4 |
| 12 | INDIA U21 | 9.00 | 3.00 | 4 |
| 12 | SERBALICIOUS | 9.00 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 14 | 50 50 | 8.60 | 1.20 | 4 |
| 15 | HONG KONG | 8.20 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 16 | DABROWKA | 8.00 | 2.00 | 4 |
| 16 | DABROWKA PO | 8.00 | 1.00 | 4 |
| 16 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 8.00 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 16 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 8.00 | 0.00 | 4 |
| 20 | INDIA U16 | 7.40 | 1.00 | 4 |
| 20 | INDIA-A U26 | 7.40 | 2.40 | 4 |
| 22 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 7.00 | 3.00 | 4 |
| 22 | CS21MSCHOOL | 7.00 | 3.00 | 4 |
| 24 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 6.40 | 0.00 | 4 |
| 24 | POLAND KIDS | 6.40 | 0.00 | 4 |
| 26 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 6.00 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 26 | GERMANY | 6.00 | 4.00 | 4 |
| 26 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 6.00 | 0.00 | 4 |
| 29 | SERBIA | 5.00 | 1.00 | 4 |
| 30 | SXSPARK | 4.00 | 0.00 | 4 |
| 31 | CONGO | 3.20 | 0.80 | 4 |
| 32 | CAPRISUN | 3.00 | 0.00 | 4 |
| 33 | CROATIA U16 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 4 |
| 34 | BELGIUM | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 4 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R4 | BAM% |
|---|
TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL vs SERBALICIOUS 0 : 4 VP (match 83243) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | SERBALICIOUS | |
| 3Nx | N | ♠2 | -1 | 200 | 100% | 4♥ | N | ♣A | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥2 | +2 | 460 | 85% | 3♦ | W | ♥9 | +1 | 130 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.7 | NS-0.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3Nx | N | -1 | 200 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 88% | ||||
| 3N | E | +2 | 460 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | W | +1 | 130 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs SXNEBULA 1.2 : 3.2 VP (match 83244) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | SXNEBULA | |
| 4♥ | S | ♠T | -1 | 100 | 88% | Pass | — | 0 | 0 | 73% | 2 | |||||
| 3N | E | ♠6 | +1 | 430 | 62% | 3NT | E | — | +1 | 430 | 62% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | |||
| Pass | 0 | 0 | 73% | |||||
| 3N | E | +1 | 430 | 62% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 430 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HU vs SXSPARK 4 : 0 VP (match 83245) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HU | SXSPARK | |
| 3N | N | ♠2 | +2 | 660 | 97% | 3N | N | ♣4 | = | 600 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♠6 | = | 400 | 64% | 3N | E | ♠3 | +2 | 460 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS-0.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | N | +2 | 660 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 3N | N | = | 600 | 61% | ||||
| 3N | E | = | 400 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +2 | 460 | 85% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GREISNOR vs URUGUAY 0 : 4 VP (match 83246) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GREISNOR | URUGUAY | |
| 4♥ | S | ♠T | -1 | 100 | 88% | 3♥ | N | ♥5 | +1 | 170 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♥9 | +1 | 430 | 62% | 3N | E | ♠3 | -1 | 50 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS+0.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | N | +1 | 170 | 52% | ||||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | -1 | 50 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ vs BELGIUM 2.4 : 0 VP (match 83247) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ | BELGIUM | |
| 3♥ | N | ♥5 | +1 | 170 | 52% | 3♥ | S | ♣T | +1 | 170 | 52% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | E | ♥4 | +2 | 460 | 85% | 3N | E | ♥2 | +2 | 460 | 85% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | N | +1 | 170 | 52% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♥ | S | +1 | 170 | 52% | ||||
| 3N | E | +2 | 460 | 85% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | +2 | 460 | 85% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAN EATING COBRAS vs CHINA RDFZ HOPE 0 : 4 VP (match 83248) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAN EATING COBRAS | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | |
| 4♥ | S | ♠T | -1 | 100 | 88% | 4♥ | N | ♠2 | = | 620 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥4 | = | 400 | 64% | 3N | W | ♠K | -1 | 50 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+1.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 74% | ||||
| 3N | E | = | 400 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | -1 | 50 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND KIDS vs HONG KONG 0 : 4 VP (match 83249) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND KIDS | HONG KONG | |
| 4♥ | N | ♥5 | = | 620 | 74% | 4♥ | N | ♠2 | +1 | 650 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥x | N | ♥A | -3 | 500 | 100% | 3N | E | ♣Q | +1 | 430 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 650 | 91% | ||||
| 2♥x | N | -3 | 500 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +1 | 430 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs CS21MSCHOOL 1 : 3 VP (match 83250) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | CS21MSCHOOL | |
| 4♥ | S | ♠5 | -1 | 100 | 88% | 4♥ | N | ♣A | = | 620 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♥9 | = | 400 | 64% | 3N | E | ♥5 | = | 400 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.8 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 74% | ||||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | = | 400 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA-A U26 vs CONGO 2.4 : 0.8 VP (match 83251) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-A U26 | CONGO | |
| Pass | W | ♥A | 0 | 73% | Pass | N | ♣A | 0 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Pass | N | — | 0 | 86% | Pass | N | ♦Q | 0 | 86% | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| Pass | W | 0 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Pass | N | 0 | 73% | |||||
| Pass | N | 0 | 86% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Pass | N | 0 | 86% | |||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs ITALIA 2 2 : 2 VP (match 83252) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | ITALIA 2 | |
| 3♥ | S | ♠T | = | 140 | 64% | 2♣ | W | ♥A | -2 | 200 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥4 | = | 400 | 64% | 3N | E | ♥5 | +2 | 460 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS0.0 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♥ | S | = | 140 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 2♣ | W | -2 | 200 | 58% | ||||
| 3N | E | = | 400 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +2 | 460 | 85% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA vs AZS WRATISLAVIA 1 : 3 VP (match 83253) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA | AZS WRATISLAVIA | |
| 4♥ | N | ♠2 | = | 620 | 74% | 4♥ | S | ♣T | = | 620 | 74% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3N | E | ♥4 | +1 | 430 | 62% | 3N | E | ♥4 | -2 | 100 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+1.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 74% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 74% | ||||
| 3N | E | +1 | 430 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | -2 | 100 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs AUSTRIA 0 : 4 VP (match 83254) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | AUSTRIA | |
| 3N | N | ♣4 | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2♥ | S | ♣3 | +2 | 170 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♦3 | +3 | 490 | 97% | 3N | E | ♥4 | -2 | 100 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.7 | NS+0.9 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | N | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | +2 | 170 | 52% | ||||
| 3N | E | +3 | 490 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | -2 | 100 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE vs INDIA-B U26 2 : 2 VP (match 83255) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE | INDIA-B U26 | |
| 4♥ | N | ♣4 | +1 | 650 | 91% | 4♥ | N | ♣2 | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♥9 | = | 400 | 64% | 2♠x | N | ♦Q | -2 | 300 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 650 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 88% | ||||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 2♠x | N | -2 | 300 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISRAEL vs PRISM FALCONS 2 : 2 VP (match 83256) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISRAEL | PRISM FALCONS | |
| 4♥ | N | ♠2 | +1 | 650 | 91% | 3Nx | N | ♥5 | = | 750 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♣J | = | 400 | 64% | 3N | W | ♣J | +1 | 430 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 650 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 3Nx | N | = | 750 | 100% | ||||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs INDIA U21 1 : 3 VP (match 83257) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | INDIA U21 | |
| 3♠ | E | ♦4 | -1 | 100 | 67% | 4♥ | N | ♠2 | = | 620 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥4 | +1 | 430 | 62% | 3N | W | ♣J | +1 | 430 | 62% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 74% | ||||
| 3N | E | +1 | 430 | 62% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | W | +1 | 430 | 62% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ ZHIHAOLE vs HAPPY BRIDGE 0 : 4 VP (match 83258) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 2♥ | S | ♦A | +2 | 170 | 52% | 4♥ | S | ♣T | = | 620 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♠K | +2 | 460 | 85% | 3N | W | ♣J | = | 400 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+0.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | S | +2 | 170 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 74% | ||||
| 3N | W | +2 | 460 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY vs CAPRISUN 4 : 0 VP (match 83259) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY | CAPRISUN | |
| 4♥ | N | ♠2 | = | 620 | 74% | 2N | N | ♣4 | +1 | 150 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♣J | = | 400 | 64% | 3N | E | ♥4 | +2 | 460 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-0.9 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 2N | N | +1 | 150 | 61% | ||||
| 3N | W | = | 400 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +2 | 460 | 85% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ AJ ♥ AKQT ♦ 98 ♣ QJ865 | ||
| ♠ T9865 ♥ J97 ♦ A62 ♣ T3 | 7 Dlr S Both | ♠ K732 ♥ 5 ♦ KJ5 ♣ A9742 |
| ♠ Q4 ♥ 86432 ♦ QT743 ♣ K |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 6 | 4 | 9 | 9 | 7 |
| S | 6 | 4 | 9 | 8 | 7 |
| E | 6 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| W | 6 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| ♠ KQ94 ♥ 96 ♦ J65 ♣ JT98 | ||
| ♠ 8 ♥ QT3 ♦ AT872 ♣ AK53 | 8 Dlr W None | ♠ AJ52 ♥ AK8 ♦ Q9 ♣ 7642 |
| ♠ T763 ♥ J7542 ♦ K43 ♣ Q |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 2 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
| S | 2 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
| E | 10 | 8 | 9 | 11 | 10 |
| W | 10 | 8 | 9 | 11 | 10 |