Round 21 — BAM Teams
13 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 21 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DRINTEAM | CHILE SENIORS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | TAMEWARE | GO HABS GO JETS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | PAKISTAN | HOLLANDS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | KIWI JAMR | SMILE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | INDIAN WOMEN | ALLEYCATS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | GAUSS | TU MAM | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | GUADELOUPE | INDIA MEN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | TUTTIFRUTTI | VITAMINA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | LAS VELITAS | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | AUSTRIA | CON SUERTE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | BLACK | PAME | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | SHOURIE | CARACCI | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 21↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 21 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R21 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GAUSS | 57.00 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 2 | AUSTRIA | 54.00 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 3 | TU MAM | 53.00 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 4 | BLACK | 52.00 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 5 | HOLLANDS | 50.00 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 5 | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | 50.00 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 7 | VITAMINA | 49.00 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 8 | DRINTEAM | 46.00 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 9 | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | 45.00 | 4.00 | 21 |
| 9 | TUTTIFRUTTI | 45.00 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 11 | GO HABS GO JETS | 44.00 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 12 | PAME | 43.20 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 13 | SHOURIE | 43.00 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 13 | TAMEWARE | 43.00 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 15 | INDIAN WOMEN | 42.00 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 15 | PAKISTAN | 42.00 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 17 | KIWI JAMR | 41.00 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 18 | ALLEYCATS | 39.00 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 18 | CARACCI | 39.00 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 18 | INDIA MEN | 39.00 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 21 | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | 34.00 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 21 | GUADELOUPE | 34.00 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 23 | CON SUERTE | 33.00 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 24 | LAS VELITAS | 32.00 | 0.00 | 21 |
| 25 | CHILE SENIORS | 26.00 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 26 | SMILE | 14.00 | 2.00 | 21 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 21 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R21 | BAM% |
|---|
DRINTEAM vs CHILE SENIORS 3 : 1 VP (match 126579) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DRINTEAM | CHILE SENIORS | |
| 3NT | N | ♥7 | +3 | 490 | 62% | 3NT | S | ♣10 | +1 | 430 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♣Q | +1 | 650 | 54% | 4♥ | N | ♦4 | +1 | 650 | 54% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | N | +3 | 490 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 430 | 74% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 650 | 54% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 650 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TAMEWARE vs GO HABS GO JETS 1 : 3 VP (match 126580) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TAMEWARE | GO HABS GO JETS | |
| 5♣ | N | ♣4 | -2 | 100 | 100% | 3NT | N | ♣6 | +3 | 490 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♦4 | +1 | 650 | 54% | 4♥ | S | ♣Q | +1 | 650 | 54% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS+0.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣ | N | -2 | 100 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | N | +3 | 490 | 62% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 650 | 54% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 650 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PAKISTAN vs HOLLANDS 2 : 2 VP (match 126581) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PAKISTAN | HOLLANDS | |
| 6♦ | S | ♣A | +1 | 940 | 94% | 3NT | N | ♠10 | +2 | 460 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♦2 | +1 | 650 | 54% | 3NT | S | ♥4 | +2 | 660 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♦ | S | +1 | 940 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | N | +2 | 460 | 56% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 650 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +2 | 660 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
KIWI JAMR vs SMILE 2 : 2 VP (match 126582) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | KIWI JAMR | SMILE | |
| 2♦ | S | ♠4 | +3 | 150 | 92% | 5♦ | S | ♠4 | -1 | 50 | 96% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | N | ♠8 | +4 | 230 | 96% | 4♠ | N | ♥9 | +1 | 650 | 54% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.8 | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♦ | S | +3 | 150 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | S | -1 | 50 | 96% | ||||
| 2♥ | N | +4 | 230 | 96% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 650 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIAN WOMEN vs ALLEYCATS 3 : 1 VP (match 126583) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIAN WOMEN | ALLEYCATS | |
| 6♦ | N | ♣4 | = | 920 | 80% | 3NT | N | ♥7 | +3 | 490 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| 5♠ | N | ♣A | = | 650 | 54% | 4♥ | S | ♥4 | +1 | 650 | 54% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♦ | N | = | 920 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | N | +3 | 490 | 62% | ||||
| 5♠ | N | = | 650 | 54% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 650 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GAUSS vs TU MAM 3 : 1 VP (match 126584) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GAUSS | TU MAM | |
| 3NT | N | ♠10 | +1 | 430 | 74% | 5♦ | N | ♣6 | +1 | 420 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♦4 | +1 | 650 | 54% | 4♥ | S | ♣Q | +1 | 650 | 54% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.8 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | N | +1 | 430 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | N | +1 | 420 | 86% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 650 | 54% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 650 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GUADELOUPE vs INDIA MEN 2 : 2 VP (match 126585) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GUADELOUPE | INDIA MEN | |
| 5♦ | S | ♣A | +2 | 440 | 64% | 3NT | S | ♣10 | +1 | 430 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | N | ♥9 | +3 | 200 | 100% | 5♠ | N | ♦5 | = | 650 | 54% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♦ | S | +2 | 440 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 430 | 74% | ||||
| 2♥ | N | +3 | 200 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 5♠ | N | = | 650 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TUTTIFRUTTI vs VITAMINA 1 : 3 VP (match 126586) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TUTTIFRUTTI | VITAMINA | |
| 3NT | N | ♠10 | +1 | 430 | 74% | 6♦ | S | ♣A | +1 | 940 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♥9 | +1 | 650 | 54% | 4♥ | S | ♣Q | +1 | 650 | 54% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.8 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | N | +1 | 430 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 6♦ | S | +1 | 940 | 94% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 650 | 54% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 650 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HONG KONG CHINA OPEN vs BRIDGE UNLEASHED 3 : 1 VP (match 126587) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HONG KONG CHINA OPEN | BRIDGE UNLEASHED | |
| 3NT | S | ♥9 | +3 | 490 | 62% | 3NT | N | ♣6 | +3 | 490 | 62% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♥ | N | ♠2 | +2 | 680 | 98% | 4♥ | S | ♦8 | +1 | 650 | 54% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | S | +3 | 490 | 62% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | N | +3 | 490 | 62% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | +2 | 680 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 650 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN vs LAS VELITAS 4 : 0 VP (match 126588) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINESE TAIPEI OPEN | LAS VELITAS | |
| 6♦ | S | ♣A | +1 | 940 | 94% | 5♦ | S | ♣A | +1 | 420 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♣Q | +2 | 680 | 98% | 5♠ | N | ♦4 | = | 650 | 54% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.8 | NS-0.8 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♦ | S | +1 | 940 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | S | +1 | 420 | 86% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 5♠ | N | = | 650 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AUSTRIA vs CON SUERTE 3 : 1 VP (match 126589) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AUSTRIA | CON SUERTE | |
| 3NT | S | ♣7 | +3 | 490 | 62% | 3NT | N | ♦8 | +2 | 460 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♣Q | +1 | 650 | 54% | 4♠ | N | ♥9 | +1 | 650 | 54% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | S | +3 | 490 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | N | +2 | 460 | 56% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 650 | 54% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 650 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BLACK vs PAME 2 : 2 VP (match 126590) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BLACK | PAME | |
| 6♦ | S | ♣A | +1 | 940 | 94% | 6♦ | S | ♣10 | = | 920 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♣Q | +1 | 650 | 54% | 3NT | N | ♣A | +2 | 660 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS+1.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♦ | S | +1 | 940 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 6♦ | S | = | 920 | 80% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | +1 | 650 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 3NT | N | +2 | 660 | 90% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SHOURIE vs CARACCI 1 : 3 VP (match 126591) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SHOURIE | CARACCI | |
| 3NT | N | ♦8 | +2 | 460 | 56% | 6♦ | S | ♦4 | = | 920 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♦4 | +1 | 650 | 54% | 4♠ | N | ♦4 | +1 | 650 | 54% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3NT | N | +2 | 460 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 6♦ | S | = | 920 | 80% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 650 | 54% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | N | +1 | 650 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ 7652 ♥ 42 ♦ AK3 ♣ KQJ2 | ||
| ♠ KJ4 ♥ 963 ♦ 94 ♣ AT975 | 9 Dlr N E-W | ♠ QT9 ♥ KJ87 ♦ 82 ♣ 8643 |
| ♠ A83 ♥ AQT5 ♦ QJT765 ♣ – |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 10 | 10 | 10 | 11 | 9 |
| S | 10 | 10 | 10 | 11 | 9 |
| E | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| W | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| ♠ K9754 ♥ AK63 ♦ A73 ♣ 2 | ||
| ♠ Q6 ♥ J74 ♦ QT8 ♣ QJ953 | 10 Dlr E All | ♠ J82 ♥ 92 ♦ J542 ♣ A876 |
| ♠ AT3 ♥ QT85 ♦ K96 ♣ KT4 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 9 | 11 | 11 | 9 | 7 |
| S | 9 | 11 | 11 | 9 | 7 |
| E | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| W | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 6 |