Round 21 — BAM Teams
20 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 21 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TIANYA BRIDGE FATE | BBC THAILAND | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | YUNNAN | XINJIANGYILI | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | CCSA | WUHAN ENGINEERING | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | THAILAND Mixed | BEIJINGXUGUANG | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | AUSTRALIA OPEN | SCOTLAND BLUE | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | HUAXINHUANBAO | INDONESIA Open | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | HUANG YU | NEWB | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | ZHEJIANG JINJIANG | MIX DENMARK | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | PIONEERS | JSQX NJZS BRIDGECLUB | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | PD HEART | WARHORSE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | JELLY BELLY | CHINA HUOCHETOU | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | WUHAN | CANADA CHINA UNITED | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | UICC WUHAN | TO WIN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | MONA | HIMOTOR | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM | DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | HUBEI FUXING | GUIZHOU ZHENGYE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | ENSEMBLE | BANGKOK MIND SPORT | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | USA SR 1 | ONE ESSENTIAL OF RED | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | POLAND Women | KBA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | LATVIA | INDIA TSANGPO | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 21↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 21 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R21 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ONE ESSENTIAL OF RED | 58.00 | 4.00 | 21 |
| 2 | PIONEERS | 54.00 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 3 | JSQX NJZS BRIDGECLUB | 53.00 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 3 | LATVIA | 53.00 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 5 | AUSTRALIA OPEN | 51.00 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 5 | HUAXINHUANBAO | 51.00 | 4.00 | 21 |
| 7 | UICC WUHAN | 49.00 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 8 | KBA | 47.40 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 9 | INDONESIA Open | 47.00 | 0.00 | 21 |
| 10 | CHINA HUOCHETOU | 46.00 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 10 | WARHORSE | 46.00 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 10 | WUHAN | 46.00 | 0.00 | 21 |
| 13 | HIMOTOR | 45.00 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 13 | YUNNAN | 45.00 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 15 | BBC THAILAND | 44.00 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 15 | JELLY BELLY | 44.00 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 17 | USA SR 1 | 43.00 | 0.00 | 21 |
| 18 | XINJIANGYILI | 42.00 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 19 | MIX DENMARK | 41.00 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 19 | MONA | 41.00 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 19 | SCOTLAND BLUE | 41.00 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 19 | TO WIN | 41.00 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 23 | CCSA | 40.00 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 23 | GUIZHOU ZHENGYE | 40.00 | 4.00 | 21 |
| 23 | ZHEJIANG JINJIANG | 40.00 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 26 | THAILAND Mixed | 39.00 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 26 | WUHAN ENGINEERING | 39.00 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 28 | BEIJINGXUGUANG | 38.00 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 28 | POLAND Women | 38.00 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 30 | BANGKOK MIND SPORT | 37.00 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 30 | CANADA CHINA UNITED | 37.00 | 4.00 | 21 |
| 30 | HUANG YU | 37.00 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 30 | INDIA TSANGPO | 37.00 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 34 | DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD | 36.00 | 1.00 | 21 |
| 35 | TIANYA BRIDGE FATE | 35.00 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 36 | HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM | 33.60 | 3.00 | 21 |
| 37 | NEWB | 32.00 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 37 | PD HEART | 32.00 | 2.00 | 21 |
| 39 | HUBEI FUXING | 31.00 | 0.00 | 21 |
| 40 | ENSEMBLE | 30.00 | 1.00 | 21 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 21 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R21 | BAM% |
|---|
TIANYA BRIDGE FATE vs BBC THAILAND 3 : 1 VP (match 88713) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TIANYA BRIDGE FATE | BBC THAILAND | |
| 9 | 2♠ | N | ♥K | +1 | 140 | 58% | 2♠ | N | ♥K | +1 | 140 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 10 | 6♣ | S | ♣4 | = | 1370 | 91% | 3NT | N | ♦6 | +1 | 630 | 59% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 58% | ||||
| 10 | 6♣ | S | = | 1370 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | +1 | 630 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
YUNNAN vs XINJIANGYILI 1 : 3 VP (match 88714) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | YUNNAN | XINJIANGYILI | |
| 9 | 2♠ | N | ♥K | +1 | 140 | 58% | 2♠ | N | ♥K | +1 | 140 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 10 | 6♣ | S | ♣2 | -1 | 100 | 88% | 6♣ | S | ♦7 | = | 1370 | 91% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+1.0 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 58% | ||||
| 10 | 6♣ | S | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 6♣ | S | = | 1370 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CCSA vs WUHAN ENGINEERING 1 : 3 VP (match 88715) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CCSA | WUHAN ENGINEERING | |
| 9 | 2♠ | N | ♥K | +1 | 140 | 58% | 2♠ | N | ♠10 | +1 | 140 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 10 | 3NT | S | ♣4 | = | 600 | 73% | 3NT | S | ♦6 | +1 | 630 | 59% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 58% | ||||
| 10 | 3NT | S | = | 600 | 73% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
THAILAND Mixed vs BEIJINGXUGUANG 2 : 2 VP (match 88716) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | THAILAND Mixed | BEIJINGXUGUANG | |
| 9 | 2♠ | N | ♥K | +1 | 140 | 58% | 2♠ | N | ♥K | +1 | 140 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 10 | 6♣ | S | ♠A | = | 1370 | 91% | 6♣ | S | ♦6 | = | 1370 | 91% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 58% | ||||
| 10 | 6♣ | S | = | 1370 | 91% | 1 | 1 | |
| 6♣ | S | = | 1370 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AUSTRALIA OPEN vs SCOTLAND BLUE 3 : 1 VP (match 88717) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AUSTRALIA OPEN | SCOTLAND BLUE | |
| 9 | 3♥x | W | ♥3 | -3 | 800 | 100% | 1NT | N | ♥K | +1 | 120 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 3NT | N | ♦4 | +1 | 630 | 59% | 3NT | N | ♦8 | +1 | 630 | 59% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 3♥x | W | -3 | 800 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | N | +1 | 120 | 76% | ||||
| 10 | 3NT | N | +1 | 630 | 59% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | N | +1 | 630 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HUAXINHUANBAO vs INDONESIA Open 4 : 0 VP (match 88718) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HUAXINHUANBAO | INDONESIA Open | |
| 9 | 3♣ | W | ♠A | -2 | 200 | 95% | 1NT | N | ♥K | = | 90 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 3NT | S | ♦6 | +1 | 630 | 59% | 6♣ | S | ♣2 | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-1.7 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 3♣ | W | -2 | 200 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | N | = | 90 | 97% | ||||
| 10 | 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 6♣ | S | -1 | 100 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HUANG YU vs NEWB 2 : 2 VP (match 88719) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HUANG YU | NEWB | |
| 9 | 2♠ | N | ♥K | +1 | 140 | 58% | 2♠ | N | ♠10 | = | 110 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 5♣ | S | ♦7 | +1 | 620 | 64% | 3NT | S | ♦5 | +1 | 630 | 59% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 58% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | N | = | 110 | 87% | ||||
| 10 | 5♣ | S | +1 | 620 | 64% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZHEJIANG JINJIANG vs MIX DENMARK 3 : 1 VP (match 88720) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZHEJIANG JINJIANG | MIX DENMARK | |
| 9 | 1NT | N | ♥K | +1 | 120 | 76% | 2♠ | N | ♠10 | = | 110 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 3NT | S | ♦7 | +1 | 630 | 59% | 3NT | S | ♦3 | +1 | 630 | 59% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-0.6 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 1NT | N | +1 | 120 | 76% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | N | = | 110 | 87% | ||||
| 10 | 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 59% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PIONEERS vs JSQX NJZS BRIDGECLUB 1 : 3 VP (match 88721) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PIONEERS | JSQX NJZS BRIDGECLUB | |
| 9 | 2♠ | N | ♠10 | +1 | 140 | 58% | 2♠ | N | ♥K | +1 | 140 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 10 | 4NT | N | ♣7 | -1 | 100 | 88% | 3NT | N | ♦8 | +1 | 630 | 59% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 58% | ||||
| 10 | 4NT | N | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | +1 | 630 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PD HEART vs WARHORSE 2 : 2 VP (match 88722) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PD HEART | WARHORSE | |
| 9 | 2♠ | N | ♥K | = | 110 | 87% | 2♠ | N | ♥K | +1 | 140 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 3NT | N | ♦4 | +1 | 630 | 59% | 5♣ | S | ♣6 | +1 | 620 | 64% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 2♠ | N | = | 110 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 58% | ||||
| 10 | 3NT | N | +1 | 630 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | S | +1 | 620 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JELLY BELLY vs CHINA HUOCHETOU 2 : 2 VP (match 88793) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JELLY BELLY | CHINA HUOCHETOU | |
| 9 | 2♠ | N | ♥K | +1 | 140 | 58% | 2♠ | N | ♥K | = | 110 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 6♣ | S | ♣5 | -1 | 100 | 88% | 3NT | N | ♦8 | = | 600 | 73% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-1.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 58% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | N | = | 110 | 87% | ||||
| 10 | 6♣ | S | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | = | 600 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WUHAN vs CANADA CHINA UNITED 0 : 4 VP (match 88794) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WUHAN | CANADA CHINA UNITED | |
| 9 | 2♠ | N | ♥K | = | 110 | 87% | 3♥x | W | ♦A | -2 | 500 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 6♣ | S | ♣3 | -1 | 100 | 88% | 5♣ | S | ♦7 | +1 | 620 | 64% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS+0.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 2♠ | N | = | 110 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 3♥x | W | -2 | 500 | 97% | ||||
| 10 | 6♣ | S | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | S | +1 | 620 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
UICC WUHAN vs TO WIN 2 : 2 VP (match 88795) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | UICC WUHAN | TO WIN | |
| 9 | 3♠ | N | ♠10 | -1 | 50 | 100% | 2♠ | N | ♠10 | = | 110 | 87% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 6♣ | S | ♦7 | = | 1370 | 91% | 3NT | S | ♦6 | +1 | 630 | 59% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 3♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | N | = | 110 | 87% | ||||
| 10 | 6♣ | S | = | 1370 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MONA vs HIMOTOR 1 : 3 VP (match 88796) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MONA | HIMOTOR | |
| 9 | 2♠ | N | ♥Q | +1 | 140 | 58% | 2♠ | N | ♠7 | +1 | 140 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 10 | 3NT | N | ♦4 | +1 | 630 | 59% | 3NT | N | ♣6 | +2 | 660 | 80% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.7 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 58% | ||||
| 10 | 3NT | N | +1 | 630 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | N | +2 | 660 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM vs DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD 3 : 1 VP (match 88797) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM | DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD | |
| 9 | 2♠ | N | ♥K | +2 | 170 | 91% | 2♠ | N | ♠10 | +1 | 140 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 3NT | N | ♦8 | +1 | 630 | 59% | 3NT | S | ♣4 | +1 | 630 | 59% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS+0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 2♠ | N | +2 | 170 | 91% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 58% | ||||
| 10 | 3NT | N | +1 | 630 | 59% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | S | +1 | 630 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HUBEI FUXING vs GUIZHOU ZHENGYE 0 : 4 VP (match 88798) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HUBEI FUXING | GUIZHOU ZHENGYE | |
| 9 | 2♠ | N | ♥K | +1 | 140 | 58% | 2♠ | N | ♥K | +2 | 170 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 6♣ | S | ♠Q | -2 | 200 | 100% | 6♣ | S | ♣6 | = | 1370 | 91% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+1.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 58% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | N | +2 | 170 | 91% | ||||
| 10 | 6♣ | S | -2 | 200 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 6♣ | S | = | 1370 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ENSEMBLE vs BANGKOK MIND SPORT 1 : 3 VP (match 88799) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ENSEMBLE | BANGKOK MIND SPORT | |
| 9 | 2♠ | N | ♥K | +1 | 140 | 58% | 2♠ | N | ♥K | +1 | 140 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 10 | 3NT | S | ♠2 | -1 | 100 | 88% | 5♣ | N | ♣6 | = | 600 | 73% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.3 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 58% | ||||
| 10 | 3NT | S | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | N | = | 600 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
USA SR 1 vs ONE ESSENTIAL OF RED 0 : 4 VP (match 88800) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | USA SR 1 | ONE ESSENTIAL OF RED | |
| 9 | 2♠ | N | ♥K | = | 110 | 87% | 2♠ | N | ♠10 | +1 | 140 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 10 | 3NT | S | ♠2 | -1 | 100 | 88% | 6♣ | S | ♦7 | = | 1370 | 91% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS+1.0 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 2♠ | N | = | 110 | 87% | 2 | ||
| 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 58% | ||||
| 10 | 3NT | S | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 6♣ | S | = | 1370 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND Women vs KBA 1 : 3 VP (match 88801) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND Women | KBA | |
| 9 | 2♠ | N | ♥K | +1 | 140 | 58% | 2♠ | N | ♥K | +1 | 140 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 10 | 6♣ | S | ♣4 | -1 | 100 | 88% | 6♣ | S | ♠A | = | 1370 | 91% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+1.0 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♠ | N | +1 | 140 | 58% | ||||
| 10 | 6♣ | S | -1 | 100 | 88% | 2 | ||
| 6♣ | S | = | 1370 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LATVIA vs INDIA TSANGPO 3 : 1 VP (match 88802) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LATVIA | INDIA TSANGPO | |
| 9 | 3♠ | N | ♥K | = | 140 | 58% | 3♠ | N | ♥K | = | 140 | 58% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 10 | 3NT | N | ♦8 | +1 | 630 | 59% | 3NT | S | ♠4 | = | 600 | 73% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 9 | 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 58% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 58% | ||||
| 10 | 3NT | N | +1 | 630 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | S | = | 600 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|