Round 19 — BAM Teams
20 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 19 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TIANYA BRIDGE FATE | WUHAN ENGINEERING | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | YUNNAN | BEIJINGXUGUANG | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | CCSA | SCOTLAND BLUE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | THAILAND Mixed | INDONESIA Open | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | AUSTRALIA OPEN | NEWB | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | HUAXINHUANBAO | MIX DENMARK | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | HUANG YU | JSQX NJZS BRIDGECLUB | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | ZHEJIANG JINJIANG | WARHORSE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | PIONEERS | BBC THAILAND | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | PD HEART | XINJIANGYILI | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | JELLY BELLY | TO WIN | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | WUHAN | HIMOTOR | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | UICC WUHAN | DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | MONA | GUIZHOU ZHENGYE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM | BANGKOK MIND SPORT | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | HUBEI FUXING | ONE ESSENTIAL OF RED | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | ENSEMBLE | KBA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | USA SR 1 | INDIA TSANGPO | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | POLAND Women | CHINA HUOCHETOU | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | LATVIA | CANADA CHINA UNITED | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 19↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 19 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R19 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ONE ESSENTIAL OF RED | 52.00 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 1 | PIONEERS | 52.00 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 3 | JSQX NJZS BRIDGECLUB | 48.00 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 3 | LATVIA | 48.00 | 4.00 | 19 |
| 5 | AUSTRALIA OPEN | 46.00 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 6 | INDONESIA Open | 45.00 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 6 | UICC WUHAN | 45.00 | 4.00 | 19 |
| 8 | HUAXINHUANBAO | 44.00 | 3.00 | 19 |
| 9 | WUHAN | 43.00 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 10 | CHINA HUOCHETOU | 42.00 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 10 | USA SR 1 | 42.00 | 4.00 | 19 |
| 12 | KBA | 41.40 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 13 | BBC THAILAND | 41.00 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 13 | WARHORSE | 41.00 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 13 | YUNNAN | 41.00 | 4.00 | 19 |
| 16 | HIMOTOR | 40.00 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 16 | JELLY BELLY | 40.00 | 3.00 | 19 |
| 18 | MIX DENMARK | 38.00 | 1.00 | 19 |
| 18 | SCOTLAND BLUE | 38.00 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 18 | TO WIN | 38.00 | 1.00 | 19 |
| 21 | CCSA | 37.00 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 21 | MONA | 37.00 | 0.00 | 19 |
| 23 | XINJIANGYILI | 36.00 | 4.00 | 19 |
| 24 | GUIZHOU ZHENGYE | 35.00 | 4.00 | 19 |
| 24 | INDIA TSANGPO | 35.00 | 0.00 | 19 |
| 24 | THAILAND Mixed | 35.00 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 24 | WUHAN ENGINEERING | 35.00 | 0.00 | 19 |
| 24 | ZHEJIANG JINJIANG | 35.00 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 29 | BEIJINGXUGUANG | 34.00 | 0.00 | 19 |
| 29 | DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD | 34.00 | 0.00 | 19 |
| 29 | POLAND Women | 34.00 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 32 | HUANG YU | 33.00 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 33 | BANGKOK MIND SPORT | 32.00 | 3.00 | 19 |
| 34 | CANADA CHINA UNITED | 31.00 | 0.00 | 19 |
| 34 | TIANYA BRIDGE FATE | 31.00 | 4.00 | 19 |
| 36 | HUBEI FUXING | 29.00 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 36 | NEWB | 29.00 | 2.00 | 19 |
| 38 | PD HEART | 28.00 | 0.00 | 19 |
| 39 | HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM | 27.60 | 1.00 | 19 |
| 40 | ENSEMBLE | 27.00 | 2.00 | 19 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 19 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R19 | BAM% |
|---|
TIANYA BRIDGE FATE vs WUHAN ENGINEERING 4 : 0 VP (match 88693) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TIANYA BRIDGE FATE | WUHAN ENGINEERING | |
| 5 | 2NT | E | ♣A | -2 | 100 | 77% | 3♣ | E | ♠8 | = | 110 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 5♣ | E | ♦A | = | 600 | 63% | 3NT | W | ♠2 | +2 | 660 | 95% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-1.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 2NT | E | -2 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 3♣ | E | = | 110 | 83% | ||||
| 6 | 5♣ | E | = | 600 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | +2 | 660 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
YUNNAN vs BEIJINGXUGUANG 4 : 0 VP (match 88694) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | YUNNAN | BEIJINGXUGUANG | |
| 5 | 2NT | E | ♥5 | -2 | 100 | 77% | 2♥ | W | ♣6 | -1 | 50 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 5♣ | E | ♦A | = | 600 | 63% | 3NT | W | ♥6 | +1 | 630 | 82% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 2NT | E | -2 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 54% | ||||
| 6 | 5♣ | E | = | 600 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CCSA vs SCOTLAND BLUE 2 : 2 VP (match 88695) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CCSA | SCOTLAND BLUE | |
| 5 | 2♥ | W | ♣6 | -2 | 100 | 77% | 1♠ | N | ♠Q | = | 80 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 5♦x | N | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 53% | 6♣ | E | ♥K | -2 | 200 | 82% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 2♥ | W | -2 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 1♠ | N | = | 80 | 62% | ||||
| 6 | 5♦x | N | -1 | 100 | 53% | 2 | ||
| 6♣ | E | -2 | 200 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
THAILAND Mixed vs INDONESIA Open 2 : 2 VP (match 88696) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | THAILAND Mixed | INDONESIA Open | |
| 5 | 3NT | E | ♥5 | -3 | 150 | 94% | 2♦ | E | ♥10 | = | 90 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 3NT | W | ♥6 | +1 | 630 | 82% | 5♣ | E | ♥K | = | 600 | 63% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 3NT | E | -3 | 150 | 94% | 2 | ||
| 2♦ | E | = | 90 | 63% | ||||
| 6 | 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | E | = | 600 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AUSTRALIA OPEN vs NEWB 2 : 2 VP (match 88697) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AUSTRALIA OPEN | NEWB | |
| 5 | 1NT | W | ♠3 | -1 | 50 | 54% | 1NT | S | ♦10 | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 3NT | W | ♥8 | +1 | 630 | 82% | 3NT | W | ♦10 | -2 | 200 | 82% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 1NT | W | -1 | 50 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | S | -1 | 100 | 77% | ||||
| 6 | 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 200 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HUAXINHUANBAO vs MIX DENMARK 3 : 1 VP (match 88698) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HUAXINHUANBAO | MIX DENMARK | |
| 5 | 2♦ | E | ♦9 | -2 | 100 | 77% | 2♣ | E | ♥10 | = | 90 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 6♣ | E | ♥K | -2 | 200 | 82% | 3NT | W | ♦10 | -2 | 200 | 82% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS+0.4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 2♦ | E | -2 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 2♣ | E | = | 90 | 63% | ||||
| 6 | 6♣ | E | -2 | 200 | 82% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | W | -2 | 200 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HUANG YU vs JSQX NJZS BRIDGECLUB 2 : 2 VP (match 88699) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HUANG YU | JSQX NJZS BRIDGECLUB | |
| 5 | 2♥ | W | ♣6 | -2 | 100 | 77% | 2♥ | W | ♣6 | -2 | 100 | 77% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6 | 6♣ | E | ♥K | -2 | 200 | 82% | 3NT | W | ♦6 | -2 | 200 | 82% | 1 | 1 | ||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS+1.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 2♥ | W | -2 | 100 | 77% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2♥ | W | -2 | 100 | 77% | ||||
| 6 | 6♣ | E | -2 | 200 | 82% | 1 | 1 | |
| 3NT | W | -2 | 200 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ZHEJIANG JINJIANG vs WARHORSE 2 : 2 VP (match 88700) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ZHEJIANG JINJIANG | WARHORSE | |
| 5 | 2♠ | N | ♠Q | -2 | 200 | 97% | 2♥ | W | ♠4 | -2 | 100 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 4♣ | E | ♥K | +1 | 150 | 51% | 5♣ | E | ♥K | = | 600 | 63% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 2♠ | N | -2 | 200 | 97% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | W | -2 | 100 | 77% | ||||
| 6 | 4♣ | E | +1 | 150 | 51% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | E | = | 600 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PIONEERS vs BBC THAILAND 2 : 2 VP (match 88701) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PIONEERS | BBC THAILAND | |
| 5 | 2♥ | W | ♣6 | -1 | 50 | 54% | 1NT | W | ♣7 | = | 90 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 3NT | E | ♥K | +1 | 630 | 82% | 3NT | W | ♦J | -2 | 200 | 82% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 2♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 63% | ||||
| 6 | 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 200 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PD HEART vs XINJIANGYILI 0 : 4 VP (match 88702) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PD HEART | XINJIANGYILI | |
| 5 | 1NT | N | ♠Q | -1 | 100 | 77% | 1NT | W | ♣7 | = | 90 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 3NT | W | ♦6 | +2 | 660 | 95% | 4♦x | N | ♠J | -1 | 100 | 53% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.4 | NS-0.2 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 1NT | N | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 63% | ||||
| 6 | 3NT | W | +2 | 660 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 4♦x | N | -1 | 100 | 53% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.4 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
JELLY BELLY vs TO WIN 3 : 1 VP (match 88773) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | JELLY BELLY | TO WIN | |
| 5 | 1NT | W | ♣7 | = | 90 | 63% | 1NT | W | ♥A | = | 90 | 63% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6 | 6♣ | E | ♥K | -2 | 200 | 82% | 3NT | W | ♥8 | +1 | 630 | 82% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-0.9 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 1NT | W | = | 90 | 63% | 1 | 1 | |
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 63% | ||||
| 6 | 6♣ | E | -2 | 200 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
WUHAN vs HIMOTOR 2 : 2 VP (match 88774) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | WUHAN | HIMOTOR | |
| 5 | 2♥ | W | ♠4 | -2 | 100 | 77% | 1NT | W | ♥A | = | 90 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 3NT | W | ♥5 | +1 | 630 | 82% | 3NT | W | ♦J | -2 | 200 | 82% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 2♥ | W | -2 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 63% | ||||
| 6 | 3NT | W | +1 | 630 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | W | -2 | 200 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
UICC WUHAN vs DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD 4 : 0 VP (match 88775) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | UICC WUHAN | DONGFENG AUTO CO LTD | |
| 5 | 2♥ | W | ♣6 | -1 | 50 | 54% | 2NT | E | ♥5 | = | 120 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 3NT | W | ♦J | -2 | 200 | 82% | 5♣ | E | ♥K | = | 600 | 63% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-1.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 2♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 54% | 2 | ||
| 2NT | E | = | 120 | 91% | ||||
| 6 | 3NT | W | -2 | 200 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | E | = | 600 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MONA vs GUIZHOU ZHENGYE 0 : 4 VP (match 88776) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MONA | GUIZHOU ZHENGYE | |
| 5 | 2NT | W | ♠4 | -2 | 100 | 77% | 2♥ | W | ♦3 | -3 | 150 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 5♣ | E | ♥Q | = | 600 | 63% | 5♣ | E | ♦A | -1 | 100 | 59% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+1.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 2NT | W | -2 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | W | -3 | 150 | 94% | ||||
| 6 | 5♣ | E | = | 600 | 63% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM vs BANGKOK MIND SPORT 1 : 3 VP (match 88777) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HUBEI BRIDGE TEAM | BANGKOK MIND SPORT | |
| 5 | 1NT | W | ♣6 | +1 | 120 | 91% | 2NT | E | ♥3 | = | 120 | 91% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6 | 5♣ | E | ♦J | -1 | 100 | 59% | 6♣ | E | ♦A | -2 | 200 | 82% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS-0.2 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 1NT | W | +1 | 120 | 91% | 1 | 1 | |
| 2NT | E | = | 120 | 91% | ||||
| 6 | 5♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 59% | 2 | ||
| 6♣ | E | -2 | 200 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
HUBEI FUXING vs ONE ESSENTIAL OF RED 2 : 2 VP (match 88778) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | HUBEI FUXING | ONE ESSENTIAL OF RED | |
| 5 | 2♥ | W | ♣6 | -2 | 100 | 77% | 4♣x | E | ♠8 | -2 | 300 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 3NT | W | ♦J | -2 | 200 | 82% | 3NT | E | ♥5 | +1 | 630 | 82% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 2♥ | W | -2 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 4♣x | E | -2 | 300 | 97% | ||||
| 6 | 3NT | W | -2 | 200 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 3NT | E | +1 | 630 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ENSEMBLE vs KBA 2 : 2 VP (match 88779) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ENSEMBLE | KBA | |
| 5 | 2♥x | S | ♣5 | -2 | 500 | 100% | 1NT | W | ♣7 | = | 90 | 63% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 3NT | W | ♦J | -2 | 200 | 82% | 6♦x | N | ♥A | -4 | 800 | 100% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-1.3 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 2♥x | S | -2 | 500 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | W | = | 90 | 63% | ||||
| 6 | 3NT | W | -2 | 200 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 6♦x | N | -4 | 800 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
USA SR 1 vs INDIA TSANGPO 4 : 0 VP (match 88780) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | USA SR 1 | INDIA TSANGPO | |
| 5 | 2♠x | N | ♣K | = | 670 | 100% | 1NT | W | ♦2 | +1 | 120 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 3NT | W | ♦10 | -2 | 200 | 82% | 5♣ | E | ♥K | +1 | 620 | 72% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.6 | NS-1.3 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 2♠x | N | = | 670 | 100% | 2 | ||
| 1NT | W | +1 | 120 | 91% | ||||
| 6 | 3NT | W | -2 | 200 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 5♣ | E | +1 | 620 | 72% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.6 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND Women vs CHINA HUOCHETOU 2 : 2 VP (match 88781) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND Women | CHINA HUOCHETOU | |
| 5 | 2♥ | W | ♣7 | -2 | 100 | 77% | 2♥ | E | ♣6 | -1 | 50 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 3NT | W | ♠2 | +2 | 660 | 95% | 5♦x | N | ♣A | -2 | 300 | 54% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 2♥ | W | -2 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 54% | ||||
| 6 | 3NT | W | +2 | 660 | 95% | 2 | ||
| 5♦x | N | -2 | 300 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LATVIA vs CANADA CHINA UNITED 4 : 0 VP (match 88782) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LATVIA | CANADA CHINA UNITED | |
| 5 | 1♠ | N | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2♥ | W | ♥A | = | 110 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 6 | 3NT | W | ♦10 | -2 | 200 | 82% | 6♣ | E | ♥K | -1 | 100 | 59% | 2 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5 | 1♠ | N | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||
| 2♥ | W | = | 110 | 83% | ||||
| 6 | 3NT | W | -2 | 200 | 82% | 2 | ||
| 6♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|