Round 7 — U26 BAM Qualification
17 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 7 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | INDIA U21 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | 50 50 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | CHINA RDFZ HU | CAPRISUN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | GREISNOR | SERBALICIOUS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | CHINA RDFZ | SXNEBULA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | MAN EATING COBRAS | SXSPARK | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | POLAND KIDS | URUGUAY | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | INDIA U16 | BELGIUM | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | INDIA-A U26 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | DABROWKA | HONG KONG | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | SERBIA | CS21MSCHOOL | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CROATIA U16 | CONGO | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.80 | protocol → |
| 13 | CHILE | ITALIA 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | ISRAEL | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | DABROWKA PO | AUSTRIA | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | INDIA-B U26 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | GERMANY | PRISM FALCONS | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 7↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 7 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R7 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SXNEBULA | 21.20 | 2.00 | 7 |
| 2 | AUSTRIA | 20.00 | 3.00 | 7 |
| 3 | CHINA RDFZ | 19.40 | 2.00 | 7 |
| 3 | INDIA-A U26 | 19.40 | 4.00 | 7 |
| 5 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 19.00 | 4.00 | 7 |
| 5 | PRISM FALCONS | 19.00 | 4.00 | 7 |
| 7 | ITALIA 2 | 18.00 | 2.00 | 7 |
| 7 | SERBALICIOUS | 18.00 | 1.00 | 7 |
| 9 | ISRAEL | 17.00 | 0.00 | 7 |
| 10 | GREISNOR | 16.60 | 3.00 | 7 |
| 11 | INDIA-B U26 | 16.00 | 2.00 | 7 |
| 11 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 16.00 | 2.00 | 7 |
| 11 | URUGUAY | 16.00 | 0.00 | 7 |
| 14 | HONG KONG | 15.20 | 4.00 | 7 |
| 15 | INDIA U21 | 15.00 | 4.00 | 7 |
| 16 | INDIA U16 | 14.80 | 2.40 | 7 |
| 16 | POLAND KIDS | 14.80 | 4.00 | 7 |
| 18 | 50 50 | 14.60 | 4.00 | 7 |
| 19 | CHINA RDFZ HU | 14.40 | 2.00 | 7 |
| 20 | GERMANY | 14.00 | 0.00 | 7 |
| 21 | SERBIA | 13.40 | 4.00 | 7 |
| 22 | DABROWKA | 12.40 | 0.00 | 7 |
| 23 | CHILE | 12.00 | 2.00 | 7 |
| 24 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 11.80 | 2.00 | 7 |
| 25 | DABROWKA PO | 11.00 | 1.00 | 7 |
| 26 | CAPRISUN | 10.00 | 2.00 | 7 |
| 26 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 10.00 | 0.00 | 7 |
| 28 | CS21MSCHOOL | 9.00 | 0.00 | 7 |
| 28 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 9.00 | 0.00 | 7 |
| 30 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 8.00 | 0.00 | 7 |
| 31 | SXSPARK | 6.00 | 2.00 | 7 |
| 32 | CONGO | 5.60 | 0.80 | 7 |
| 33 | CROATIA U16 | 3.40 | 2.40 | 7 |
| 34 | BELGIUM | 0.00 | 0.00 | 7 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 7 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R7 | BAM% |
|---|
TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL vs INDIA U21 0 : 4 VP (match 83294) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | INDIA U21 | |
| 3♣ | W | ♥A | +1 | 130 | 95% | 3N | W | ♥9 | -2 | 200 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♥7 | = | 420 | 52% | 3♣ | N | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 79% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS+1.4 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | W | +1 | 130 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | -2 | 200 | 92% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | = | 420 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | N | -1 | 50 | 79% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs HAPPY BRIDGE 4 : 0 VP (match 83295) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 2♥ | N | ♠Q | +1 | 140 | 85% | 3♣ | W | ♠K | = | 110 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠x | W | ♥7 | = | 590 | 94% | 4♠x | E | ♣8 | +1 | 690 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-1.6 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | W | = | 110 | 85% | ||||
| 4♠x | W | = | 590 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | E | +1 | 690 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HU vs CAPRISUN 2 : 2 VP (match 83296) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HU | CAPRISUN | |
| 1N | N | ♠Q | -1 | 100 | 74% | 2N | E | ♦2 | = | 120 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| 5♦x | E | ♣8 | = | 550 | 91% | 4♠ | E | ♥K | +1 | 450 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | N | -1 | 100 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 2N | E | = | 120 | 91% | ||||
| 5♦x | E | = | 550 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GREISNOR vs SERBALICIOUS 3 : 1 VP (match 83297) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GREISNOR | SERBALICIOUS | |
| 3N | W | ♥7 | -3 | 300 | 100% | 2N | W | ♥4 | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2 | ||||
| 5♣x | N | ♥A | -3 | 500 | 80% | 5♣x | N | ♥A | -3 | 500 | 80% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-0.5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | -3 | 300 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 2N | W | -1 | 100 | 55% | ||||
| 5♣x | N | -3 | 500 | 80% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 5♣x | N | -3 | 500 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ vs SXNEBULA 2 : 2 VP (match 83298) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ | SXNEBULA | |
| 2N | W | ♥7 | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2♥ | N | ♠Q | -1 | 100 | 74% | 2 | ||||
| 4♣x | N | ♦Q | -2 | 300 | 59% | 5♠x | E | ♥K | -1 | 100 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2N | W | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 74% | ||||
| 4♣x | N | -2 | 300 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 5♠x | E | -1 | 100 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAN EATING COBRAS vs SXSPARK 2 : 2 VP (match 83299) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAN EATING COBRAS | SXSPARK | |
| 3♠ | E | ♥T | -1 | 100 | 55% | 3N | W | ♥7 | -2 | 200 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 5♠x | E | ♥K | -1 | 100 | 98% | 4♠ | E | ♥K | = | 420 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | -2 | 200 | 92% | ||||
| 5♠x | E | -1 | 100 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND KIDS vs URUGUAY 4 : 0 VP (match 83300) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND KIDS | URUGUAY | |
| 4♠ | E | ♥T | -2 | 200 | 92% | 2♥ | N | ♠Q | = | 110 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥x | S | ♠A | -2 | 300 | 59% | 6♣x | N | ♦Q | -3 | 500 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS-0.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 92% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | N | = | 110 | 76% | ||||
| 4♥x | S | -2 | 300 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 6♣x | N | -3 | 500 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs BELGIUM 2.4 : 0 VP (match 83301) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | BELGIUM | |
| 2♥ | N | ♠Q | = | 110 | 76% | 3♣ | W | ♥A | = | 110 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | W | ♥7 | +1 | 450 | 61% | 5♣x | N | ♥A | -2 | 300 | 59% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | N | = | 110 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | W | = | 110 | 85% | ||||
| 4♠ | W | +1 | 450 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 5♣x | N | -2 | 300 | 59% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA-A U26 vs CHINA RDFZ HOPE 4 : 0 VP (match 83302) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-A U26 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | |
| 2♥ | N | ♠Q | = | 110 | 76% | 3N | W | ♥7 | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2 | ||||
| 5♣ | N | ♥A | -4 | 200 | 67% | 4♠ | E | ♣8 | +1 | 450 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-0.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | N | = | 110 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 3N | W | -1 | 100 | 55% | ||||
| 5♣ | N | -4 | 200 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | +1 | 450 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs HONG KONG 0 : 4 VP (match 83303) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | HONG KONG | |
| 2♠ | E | ♥T | = | 110 | 85% | 2N | W | ♦3 | -2 | 200 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| 5♣x | N | ♥A | -3 | 500 | 80% | 4♠ | W | ♥7 | -1 | 50 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS+1.7 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 2N | W | -2 | 200 | 92% | ||||
| 5♣x | N | -3 | 500 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 50 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA vs CS21MSCHOOL 4 : 0 VP (match 83304) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA | CS21MSCHOOL | |
| 2♥ | N | ♣6 | = | 110 | 76% | 3♥ | N | ♠Q | -2 | 200 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 5♦ | E | ♣8 | -1 | 50 | 91% | 3Nxx | W | ♥6 | +1 | 1000 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS-2.0 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | N | = | 110 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | N | -2 | 200 | 100% | ||||
| 5♦ | E | -1 | 50 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 3Nxx | W | +1 | 1000 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-2.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs CONGO 2.4 : 0.8 VP (match 83305) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | CONGO | |
| Pass | N | ♣J | 0 | 62% | Pass | N | ♠Q | 0 | 62% | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Pass | W | ♠2 | 0 | 83% | Pass | N | ♥A | 0 | 83% | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| Pass | N | 0 | 62% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Pass | N | 0 | 62% | |||||
| Pass | W | 0 | 83% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Pass | N | 0 | 83% | |||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE vs ITALIA 2 2 : 2 VP (match 83306) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE | ITALIA 2 | |
| 2♥ | N | ♠Q | -1 | 100 | 74% | 2♠ | W | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥x | S | ♠A | -2 | 300 | 59% | 4♥x | S | ♠K | -3 | 500 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | W | -1 | 100 | 55% | ||||
| 2♥x | S | -2 | 300 | 59% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | S | -3 | 500 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISRAEL vs AZS WRATISLAVIA 0 : 4 VP (match 83307) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISRAEL | AZS WRATISLAVIA | |
| 1N | W | ♥7 | = | 90 | 67% | 2N | W | ♥7 | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2 | ||||
| 5♣x | N | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 73% | 4♠ | E | ♣8 | -1 | 50 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+0.9 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1N | W | = | 90 | 67% | 2 | |||
| 2N | W | -1 | 100 | 55% | ||||
| 5♣x | N | -1 | 100 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs AUSTRIA 1 : 3 VP (match 83308) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | AUSTRIA | |
| 2♥ | N | ♠Q | -1 | 100 | 74% | 3♣ | W | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2 | ||||
| 4♣x | N | ♦Q | -1 | 100 | 73% | 4♣x | N | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.0 | NS+0.5 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 74% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | W | -1 | 100 | 55% | ||||
| 4♣x | N | -1 | 100 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♣x | N | -1 | 100 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.0 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ ZHIHAOLE vs INDIA-B U26 2 : 2 VP (match 83309) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | INDIA-B U26 | |
| 3♣ | W | ♠K | +1 | 130 | 95% | 3♣ | W | ♥A | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♣J | +2 | 460 | 68% | 5♥x | S | ♠A | -3 | 500 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | W | +1 | 130 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | W | -1 | 100 | 55% | ||||
| 3N | W | +2 | 460 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 5♥x | S | -3 | 500 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY vs PRISM FALCONS 0 : 4 VP (match 83310) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY | PRISM FALCONS | |
| 3N | W | ♥7 | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2♥ | N | ♠Q | = | 110 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♣J | +2 | 460 | 68% | 4♠ | E | ♣8 | = | 420 | 52% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+0.5 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | W | -1 | 100 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | N | = | 110 | 76% | ||||
| 3N | W | +2 | 460 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | E | = | 420 | 52% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ K8 ♥ A98754 ♦ QT3 ♣ QT | ||
| ♠ A95 ♥ K3 ♦ 954 ♣ A7532 | 13 Dlr N Both | ♠ QJT4 ♥ QJ2 ♦ AJ6 ♣ J86 |
| ♠ 7632 ♥ T6 ♦ K872 ♣ K94 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 6 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 5 |
| S | 6 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 5 |
| E | 7 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| W | 7 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| ♠ 2 ♥ 76 ♦ T8 ♣ KJT97642 | ||
| ♠ AK97 ♥ J985 ♦ K73 ♣ A5 | 14 Dlr E None | ♠ Q853 ♥ A ♦ QJ6542 ♣ Q3 |
| ♠ JT64 ♥ KQT432 ♦ A9 ♣ 8 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 2 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| S | 2 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| E | 10 | 12 | 7 | 10 | 5 |
| W | 10 | 12 | 7 | 10 | 5 |