Round 3 — U26 BAM Qualification
17 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 3 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | SXNEBULA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | 50 50 | SXSPARK | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | CHINA RDFZ HU | URUGUAY | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | GREISNOR | BELGIUM | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | CHINA RDFZ | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | MAN EATING COBRAS | HONG KONG | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | POLAND KIDS | CS21MSCHOOL | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | INDIA U16 | CONGO | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.80 | protocol → |
| 9 | INDIA-A U26 | ITALIA 2 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | DABROWKA | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | SERBIA | AUSTRIA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CROATIA U16 | INDIA-B U26 | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | CHILE | PRISM FALCONS | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | ISRAEL | INDIA U21 | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | DABROWKA PO | HAPPY BRIDGE | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | CAPRISUN | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | GERMANY | SERBALICIOUS | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 3↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 3 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R3 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ISRAEL | 10.00 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 2 | GREISNOR | 9.60 | 2.40 | 3 |
| 3 | CHINA RDFZ | 9.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 3 | INDIA-B U26 | 9.00 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 3 | PRISM FALCONS | 9.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 6 | CHINA RDFZ HU | 8.40 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 7 | CHILE | 8.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 7 | ITALIA 2 | 8.00 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 7 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 8.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 7 | SXNEBULA | 8.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 11 | 50 50 | 7.40 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 12 | AUSTRIA | 7.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 12 | DABROWKA PO | 7.00 | 0.00 | 3 |
| 12 | URUGUAY | 7.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 15 | INDIA U16 | 6.40 | 2.40 | 3 |
| 15 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 6.40 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 15 | POLAND KIDS | 6.40 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 18 | DABROWKA | 6.00 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 18 | INDIA U21 | 6.00 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 18 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 6.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 21 | INDIA-A U26 | 5.00 | 0.00 | 3 |
| 21 | SERBALICIOUS | 5.00 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 23 | HONG KONG | 4.20 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 24 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 4.00 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 24 | CS21MSCHOOL | 4.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 24 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 4.00 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 24 | SERBIA | 4.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 24 | SXSPARK | 4.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 29 | CAPRISUN | 3.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 30 | CONGO | 2.40 | 0.80 | 3 |
| 31 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 2.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 31 | GERMANY | 2.00 | 0.00 | 3 |
| 33 | CROATIA U16 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 3 |
| 34 | BELGIUM | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 3 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R3 | BAM% |
|---|
TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL vs SXNEBULA 2 : 2 VP (match 83226) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | SXNEBULA | |
| 4♥ | N | ♠7 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 7N | S | ♠4 | -2 | 200 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♠A | +2 | 460 | 82% | 2♣x | W | ♥A | -2 | 500 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.1 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 650 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 7N | S | -2 | 200 | 95% | ||||
| 3N | S | +2 | 460 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 2♣x | W | -2 | 500 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs SXSPARK 2 : 2 VP (match 83227) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | SXSPARK | |
| 3N | S | ♠4 | +3 | 690 | 76% | 6♥ | N | ♠7 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♠A | +1 | 430 | 64% | 2♣x | W | ♥K | -3 | 800 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | S | +3 | 690 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 6♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| 3N | S | +1 | 430 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 2♣x | W | -3 | 800 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HU vs URUGUAY 2 : 2 VP (match 83228) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HU | URUGUAY | |
| 5♥ | N | ♦3 | = | 650 | 55% | 6♥ | N | ♠7 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♣K | = | 400 | 73% | 4♥ | N | ♠6 | = | 420 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♥ | N | = | 650 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 6♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| 3N | S | = | 400 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | = | 420 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GREISNOR vs BELGIUM 2.4 : 0 VP (match 83229) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GREISNOR | BELGIUM | |
| 6♥ | N | ♠7 | = | 1430 | 88% | 6♥ | N | ♠7 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♥6 | -1 | 50 | 97% | 4♥ | N | ♠6 | = | 420 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♥ | N | = | 1430 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 6♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | = | 420 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ vs CHINA RDFZ HOPE 2 : 2 VP (match 83230) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | |
| 6N | S | ♠6 | = | 1440 | 100% | 3N | S | ♠6 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | N | ♣9 | +2 | 200 | 79% | 3N | S | ♣7 | +1 | 430 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6N | S | = | 1440 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +2 | 660 | 65% | ||||
| 3♥ | N | +2 | 200 | 79% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +1 | 430 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAN EATING COBRAS vs HONG KONG 2 : 2 VP (match 83231) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAN EATING COBRAS | HONG KONG | |
| 3N | N | ♦4 | +2 | 660 | 65% | 6♥ | N | ♠7 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♣9 | = | 420 | 56% | 3N | S | ♠A | +1 | 430 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | N | +2 | 660 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 6♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | = | 420 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +1 | 430 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND KIDS vs CS21MSCHOOL 2 : 2 VP (match 83232) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND KIDS | CS21MSCHOOL | |
| 7♣ | N | ♦3 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 4♥ | N | ♣4 | +2 | 680 | 71% | 2 | ||||
| 2♣x | W | ♥A | -4 | 1100 | 100% | 3♥ | N | ♣4 | = | 140 | 83% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7♣ | N | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | +2 | 680 | 71% | ||||
| 2♣x | W | -4 | 1100 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 83% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs CONGO 2.4 : 0.8 VP (match 83233) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | CONGO | |
| Pass | N | ♦3 | 0 | 56% | Pass | — | 0 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Pass | — | 0 | 89% | Pass | — | 0 | 89% | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| Pass | N | 0 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Pass | 0 | 56% | ||||||
| Pass | 0 | 89% | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Pass | 0 | 89% | ||||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA-A U26 vs ITALIA 2 0 : 4 VP (match 83234) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-A U26 | ITALIA 2 | |
| 6♥ | N | ♠7 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 6♥ | N | ♦3 | = | 1430 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♣4 | -1 | 50 | 97% | 4♥ | N | ♠6 | = | 420 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS+0.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 6♥ | N | = | 1430 | 88% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | = | 420 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs AZS WRATISLAVIA 3 : 1 VP (match 83235) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | AZS WRATISLAVIA | |
| 6♥ | N | ♦4 | = | 1430 | 88% | 7N | S | ♠6 | -2 | 200 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♠A | +2 | 460 | 82% | 3N | S | ♠A | +2 | 460 | 82% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.4 | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♥ | N | = | 1430 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 7N | S | -2 | 200 | 95% | ||||
| 3N | S | +2 | 460 | 82% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | S | +2 | 460 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.4 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA vs AUSTRIA 2 : 2 VP (match 83236) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA | AUSTRIA | |
| 6♥ | N | ♠7 | = | 1430 | 88% | 4♥ | N | ♣8 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♣2 | = | 420 | 56% | 3N | S | ♠A | +2 | 460 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+0.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♥ | N | = | 1430 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 650 | 55% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | = | 420 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +2 | 460 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs INDIA-B U26 0 : 4 VP (match 83237) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | INDIA-B U26 | |
| 4♥ | N | ♠7 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 6♥ | N | ♦4 | = | 1430 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | N | ♠6 | = | 140 | 83% | 3N | S | ♠A | +2 | 460 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+1.4 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 650 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 6♥ | N | = | 1430 | 88% | ||||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 83% | 2 | |||
| 3N | S | +2 | 460 | 82% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE vs PRISM FALCONS 2 : 2 VP (match 83238) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE | PRISM FALCONS | |
| 4♥ | N | ♠7 | +1 | 650 | 55% | 6♥ | N | ♠7 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♠A | = | 400 | 73% | 4♥ | N | ♠6 | = | 420 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | N | +1 | 650 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 6♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| 3N | S | = | 400 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | = | 420 | 56% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISRAEL vs INDIA U21 3 : 1 VP (match 83239) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISRAEL | INDIA U21 | |
| 6♥ | N | ♦3 | = | 1430 | 88% | 6♥ | N | ♦4 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♣7 | +1 | 430 | 64% | 3N | S | ♣7 | +1 | 430 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♥ | N | = | 1430 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 6♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| 3N | S | +1 | 430 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | S | +1 | 430 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs HAPPY BRIDGE 0 : 4 VP (match 83240) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 6♥ | N | ♠7 | -3 | 300 | 100% | 6♥ | N | ♠3 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♥6 | = | 420 | 56% | 5♥ | N | ♦6 | = | 450 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS-0.1 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♥ | N | -3 | 300 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 6♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | = | 420 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 5♥ | N | = | 450 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ ZHIHAOLE vs CAPRISUN 2 : 2 VP (match 83241) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | CAPRISUN | |
| 6♥ | N | ♣8 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 4♥ | N | ♠7 | +2 | 680 | 71% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | S | ♣7 | = | 400 | 73% | 4♥ | N | ♠6 | -1 | 50 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | +2 | 680 | 71% | ||||
| 3N | S | = | 400 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY vs SERBALICIOUS 0 : 4 VP (match 83242) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY | SERBALICIOUS | |
| 6♥ | N | ♦3 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 6♥ | N | ♠7 | = | 1430 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♥6 | = | 420 | 56% | 2♣x | W | ♥A | -2 | 500 | 92% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+1.6 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 6♥ | N | = | 1430 | 88% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | = | 420 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 2♣x | W | -2 | 500 | 92% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ AQJ ♥ AT743 ♦ – ♣ AKT62 | ||
| ♠ 96542 ♥ Q ♦ KJ8 ♣ J953 | 5 Dlr N N-S | ♠ 73 ♥ J652 ♦ Q9743 ♣ 84 |
| ♠ KT8 ♥ K98 ♦ AT652 ♣ Q7 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 12 | 10 | 12 | 9 | 12 |
| S | 12 | 10 | 12 | 9 | 12 |
| E | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| W | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| ♠ T543 ♥ AKQJ74 ♦ Q5 ♣ 3 | ||
| ♠ AK2 ♥ 953 ♦ 93 ♣ KQ875 | 6 Dlr E E-W | ♠ J96 ♥ T86 ♦ KT76 ♣ 942 |
| ♠ Q87 ♥ 2 ♦ AJ842 ♣ AJT6 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 9 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 7 |
| S | 9 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 8 |
| E | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| W | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 |