Round 1 — U26 BAM Qualification
17 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 1 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | URUGUAY | 0 | 4 | 0.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | 50 50 | BELGIUM | 0 | 4 | 2.40 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | CHINA RDFZ HU | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | GREISNOR | HONG KONG | 3 | 1 | 3.20 | 1.20 | protocol → |
| 5 | CHINA RDFZ | CS21MSCHOOL | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | MAN EATING COBRAS | CONGO | 2 | 2 | 2.40 | 0.80 | protocol → |
| 7 | POLAND KIDS | ITALIA 2 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | INDIA U16 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | INDIA-A U26 | AUSTRIA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | DABROWKA | INDIA-B U26 | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | SERBIA | PRISM FALCONS | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | CROATIA U16 | INDIA U21 | 1 | 3 | 1.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | CHILE | HAPPY BRIDGE | 4 | 0 | 4.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | ISRAEL | CAPRISUN | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | DABROWKA PO | SERBALICIOUS | 3 | 1 | 3.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | SXNEBULA | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | GERMANY | SXSPARK | 2 | 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 1↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 1 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R1 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CHILE | 4.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 1 | CHINA RDFZ | 4.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 1 | CHINA RDFZ HU | 4.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 1 | URUGUAY | 4.00 | 4.00 | 1 |
| 5 | GREISNOR | 3.20 | 3.20 | 1 |
| 6 | DABROWKA PO | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 6 | INDIA U21 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 6 | ISRAEL | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 6 | PRISM FALCONS | 3.00 | 3.00 | 1 |
| 10 | 50 50 | 2.40 | 2.40 | 1 |
| 10 | MAN EATING COBRAS | 2.40 | 2.40 | 1 |
| 12 | AUSTRIA | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 12 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 12 | DABROWKA | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 12 | GERMANY | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 12 | INDIA U16 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 12 | INDIA-A U26 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 12 | INDIA-B U26 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 12 | ITALIA 2 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 12 | POLAND KIDS | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 12 | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 12 | SXNEBULA | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 12 | SXSPARK | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1 |
| 24 | HONG KONG | 1.20 | 1.20 | 1 |
| 25 | CAPRISUN | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 25 | CROATIA U16 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 25 | SERBALICIOUS | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 25 | SERBIA | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1 |
| 29 | CONGO | 0.80 | 0.80 | 1 |
| 30 | BELGIUM | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 30 | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 30 | CS21MSCHOOL | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 30 | HAPPY BRIDGE | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
| 30 | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 1 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R1 | BAM% |
|---|
TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL vs URUGUAY 0 : 4 VP (match 83192) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TIANJIN BRIDGESCHOOL | URUGUAY | |
| 6N | E | ♥2 | = | 990 | 73% | 1♣ | E | ♠9 | +2 | 110 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 2♦ | W | ♠K | +3 | 150 | 82% | 2♠ | E | ♥Q | = | 110 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+1.3 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6N | E | = | 990 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 1♣ | E | +2 | 110 | 76% | ||||
| 2♦ | W | +3 | 150 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
50 50 vs BELGIUM 2.4 : 0 VP (match 83193) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 50 50 | BELGIUM | |
| 6N | E | ♠T | = | 990 | 73% | 6♥ | W | ♥T | -2 | 100 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♣3 | +2 | 460 | 64% | 3♥ | E | ♣2 | -1 | 50 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS+1.8 | 0 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6N | E | = | 990 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 6♥ | W | -2 | 100 | 95% | ||||
| 3N | E | +2 | 460 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 0 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ HU vs CHINA RDFZ HOPE 4 : 0 VP (match 83194) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ HU | CHINA RDFZ HOPE | |
| 3N | E | ♠T | +3 | 490 | 56% | 6N | E | ♥9 | = | 990 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| 5♦ | W | ♠K | = | 400 | 58% | 3N | E | ♣3 | +4 | 520 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS-1.5 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | +3 | 490 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 6N | E | = | 990 | 73% | ||||
| 5♦ | W | = | 400 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +4 | 520 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GREISNOR vs HONG KONG 3.2 : 1.2 VP (match 83195) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GREISNOR | HONG KONG | |
| 3N | E | ♠T | +3 | 490 | 56% | Adj | E | — | 500 | 52% | 2 | |||||
| 3N | E | ♥Q | +2 | 460 | 64% | 3NT | E | — | +2 | 460 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-0.3 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3N | E | +3 | 490 | 56% | 2 | |||
| Adj | E | 500 | 52% | |||||
| 3N | E | +2 | 460 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3NT | E | +2 | 460 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHINA RDFZ vs CS21MSCHOOL 4 : 0 VP (match 83196) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHINA RDFZ | CS21MSCHOOL | |
| 4♥ | W | ♣2 | +1 | 450 | 70% | 6N | E | ♥3 | = | 990 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | W | ♠K | +2 | 150 | 82% | 3♦ | W | ♠K | +3 | 170 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS-0.1 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 6N | E | = | 990 | 73% | ||||
| 3♦ | W | +2 | 150 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | W | +3 | 170 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MAN EATING COBRAS vs CONGO 2.4 : 0.8 VP (match 83197) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MAN EATING COBRAS | CONGO | |
| Pass | — | 0 | 0 | 80% | Pass | — | 0 | 0 | 80% | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Pass | — | 0 | 0 | 92% | Pass | — | 0 | 0 | 92% | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.5 | NS+1.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| Pass | 0 | 0 | 80% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Pass | 0 | 0 | 80% | |||||
| Pass | 0 | 0 | 92% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Pass | 0 | 0 | 92% | |||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.5 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND KIDS vs ITALIA 2 2 : 2 VP (match 83198) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND KIDS | ITALIA 2 | |
| 7♥ | W | ♣8 | -2 | 100 | 95% | 3N | E | ♠9 | +3 | 490 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♠8 | +3 | 490 | 88% | 2♦ | W | ♠K | +4 | 170 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+0.5 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7♥ | W | -2 | 100 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +3 | 490 | 56% | ||||
| 3N | E | +3 | 490 | 88% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | W | +4 | 170 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA U16 vs AZS WRATISLAVIA 2 : 2 VP (match 83199) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA U16 | AZS WRATISLAVIA | |
| 6N | E | ♠T | = | 990 | 73% | 4♥ | W | ♦Q | +1 | 450 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | W | ♠K | +1 | 450 | 52% | 3N | E | ♠7 | +3 | 490 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6N | E | = | 990 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 70% | ||||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 52% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +3 | 490 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA-A U26 vs AUSTRIA 2 : 2 VP (match 83200) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA-A U26 | AUSTRIA | |
| 6N | E | ♠T | = | 990 | 73% | 6N | E | ♠9 | = | 990 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4N | E | ♠8 | +2 | 490 | 88% | 3N | E | ♠7 | +3 | 490 | 88% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS-1.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6N | E | = | 990 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6N | E | = | 990 | 73% | ||||
| 4N | E | +2 | 490 | 88% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | +3 | 490 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA vs INDIA-B U26 2 : 2 VP (match 83201) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA | INDIA-B U26 | |
| 6♥ | W | ♣8 | -2 | 100 | 95% | 7N | E | ♠T | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♠7 | +2 | 460 | 64% | 6♥ | E | ♠8 | -4 | 200 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+1.7 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♥ | W | -2 | 100 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 7N | E | -1 | 50 | 86% | ||||
| 3N | E | +2 | 460 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 6♥ | E | -4 | 200 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SERBIA vs PRISM FALCONS 1 : 3 VP (match 83202) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SERBIA | PRISM FALCONS | |
| 6N | W | ♣8 | = | 990 | 73% | 6N | E | ♥3 | = | 990 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 5♦ | W | ♠K | +1 | 420 | 55% | 3♦ | W | ♠K | +3 | 170 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.4 | NS-0.1 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6N | W | = | 990 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6N | E | = | 990 | 73% | ||||
| 5♦ | W | +1 | 420 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | W | +3 | 170 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.4 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CROATIA U16 vs INDIA U21 1 : 3 VP (match 83203) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CROATIA U16 | INDIA U21 | |
| 6N | W | ♠4 | +1 | 1020 | 95% | 4N | E | ♥3 | +1 | 460 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | W | ♠K | +3 | 170 | 68% | 4♦ | W | ♠K | +2 | 170 | 68% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS+0.6 | 1 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6N | W | +1 | 1020 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 4N | E | +1 | 460 | 64% | ||||
| 3♦ | W | +3 | 170 | 68% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♦ | W | +2 | 170 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 1 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CHILE vs HAPPY BRIDGE 4 : 0 VP (match 83204) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CHILE | HAPPY BRIDGE | |
| 6♣ | E | ♥8 | -2 | 100 | 95% | 6N | W | ♠7 | +1 | 1020 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | W | ♠K | +3 | 170 | 68% | 3N | E | ♣2 | +2 | 460 | 64% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS-1.2 | 4 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6♣ | E | -2 | 100 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 6N | W | +1 | 1020 | 95% | ||||
| 3♦ | W | +3 | 170 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +2 | 460 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 4 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ISRAEL vs CAPRISUN 3 : 1 VP (match 83205) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ISRAEL | CAPRISUN | |
| 6N | W | ♣8 | = | 990 | 73% | 6N | E | ♥3 | = | 990 | 73% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3♦ | W | ♠K | +2 | 150 | 82% | 3N | E | ♣3 | +3 | 490 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS-1.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6N | W | = | 990 | 73% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 6N | E | = | 990 | 73% | ||||
| 3♦ | W | +2 | 150 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +3 | 490 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DABROWKA PO vs SERBALICIOUS 3 : 1 VP (match 83206) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DABROWKA PO | SERBALICIOUS | |
| 4♥ | W | ♣8 | +1 | 450 | 70% | 3N | E | ♠T | +3 | 490 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♣3 | +2 | 460 | 64% | 3N | E | ♥Q | +2 | 460 | 64% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.2 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | W | +1 | 450 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +3 | 490 | 56% | ||||
| 3N | E | +2 | 460 | 64% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3N | E | +2 | 460 | 64% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 3 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
RDFZ ZHIHAOLE vs SXNEBULA 2 : 2 VP (match 83207) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | RDFZ ZHIHAOLE | SXNEBULA | |
| 7N | W | ♠7 | = | 1520 | 100% | 6N | W | ♥T | = | 990 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | E | ♥Q | +2 | 460 | 64% | 3N | E | ♠2 | +3 | 490 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS-1.2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 7N | W | = | 1520 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 6N | W | = | 990 | 73% | ||||
| 3N | E | +2 | 460 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +3 | 490 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY vs SXSPARK 2 : 2 VP (match 83208) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY | SXSPARK | |
| 6N | E | ♠T | = | 990 | 73% | 7N | W | ♥T | -1 | 50 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 3N | W | ♥J | +2 | 460 | 64% | 3N | E | ♠8 | +3 | 490 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.7 | NS-0.0 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 6N | E | = | 990 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 7N | W | -1 | 50 | 86% | ||||
| 3N | W | +2 | 460 | 64% | 2 | |||
| 3N | E | +3 | 490 | 88% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.7 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
| ♠ KJ874 ♥ T ♦ Q7 ♣ T8752 | ||
| ♠ Q6 ♥ AQJ5 ♦ T543 ♣ J96 | 1 Dlr N None | ♠ A53 ♥ K74 ♦ AKJ6 ♣ AKQ |
| ♠ T92 ♥ 98632 ♦ 982 ♣ 43 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| S | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| E | 12 | 8 | 10 | 12 | 10 |
| W | 12 | 8 | 11 | 12 | 11 |
| ♠ KQT3 ♥ JT92 ♦ Q3 ♣ Q75 | ||
| ♠ 96 ♥ A64 ♦ AKT8764 ♣ 9 | 2 Dlr E N-S | ♠ AJ4 ♥ K873 ♦ 52 ♣ AT86 |
| ♠ 8752 ♥ Q5 ♦ J9 ♣ KJ432 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| S | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| E | 12 | 8 | 9 | 12 | 8 |
| W | 12 | 8 | 9 | 12 | 8 |