Round 11 — BAM Day 2
29 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 11 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | COME TO HK CHINA | RIAD | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | SWEDEN SENIOR | GILLIS | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | LAWRENZO | DRINTEAM | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | CANADA MIXED | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | USA E GETTA | SANTOSHA | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | PARTYPACK | 4FUN | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | PIERCE | POLAND MIXED | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | FRANCE WOMEN | AUPALETI | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | FRANCE SENIORS | 4JACKS | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | ULI | INDIA SENIORS | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | POLAND WOMEN | CHINA SENIOR | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | AUSTRIA | PORTO | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | GERMANY MIXED | KUWAIT | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | ALICE | PORTUCOLE | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | NZ MIXED | OUJDA1 | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | POLAND OPEN | POWERSHARK | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | TEAM BLACK | MADRID | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | UAE MIXED | MEXICO | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | BV WALDSOLMS | BRENO | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | FINLAND | EL GHRARI | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | VINCIGUERRA | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | USA WOMEN | INDIA OPEN | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | DINKIN | MO ROCCO | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | INDIA WOMEN | NZ OPEN | 0 | 6 | 0.00 | 6.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | THE DARK KNIGHT | INDIA MIXED | 0 | 6 | 0.00 | 6.00 | protocol → |
| 26 | CAMELS | REASON | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 27 | NORWAY SENIOR | RABONO CALAMIS | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 28 | MASARAHLOU | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 29 | NO COKE | GEMIGNANI | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 11↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 11 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R11 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | POLAND OPEN | 102.00 | 4.00 | 11 |
| 2 | VINCIGUERRA | 101.00 | 6.00 | 11 |
| 3 | SWEDEN SENIOR | 100.60 | 4.00 | 11 |
| 4 | GERMANY MIXED | 95.20 | 5.00 | 11 |
| 5 | USA E GETTA | 94.80 | 4.00 | 11 |
| 6 | GEMIGNANI | 93.00 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 7 | NORWAY SENIOR | 90.00 | 6.00 | 11 |
| 8 | FRANCE SENIORS | 89.01 | 6.00 | 11 |
| 9 | BV WALDSOLMS | 89.00 | 1.00 | 11 |
| 10 | FRANCE WOMEN | 88.00 | 3.00 | 11 |
| 10 | POLAND MIXED | 88.00 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 12 | NO COKE | 87.01 | 4.00 | 11 |
| 13 | INDIA MIXED | 86.01 | 6.00 | 11 |
| 14 | ALICE | 85.70 | 4.00 | 11 |
| 15 | EL GHRARI | 85.20 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 16 | GILLIS | 85.01 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 17 | POLAND WOMEN | 85.00 | 5.00 | 11 |
| 18 | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | 84.20 | 4.00 | 11 |
| 19 | REASON | 84.01 | 4.00 | 11 |
| 20 | AUPALETI | 83.01 | 3.00 | 11 |
| 21 | NZ OPEN | 83.00 | 6.00 | 11 |
| 22 | INDIA OPEN | 82.01 | 5.00 | 11 |
| 23 | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | 81.20 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 24 | PORTUCOLE | 81.01 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 24 | TEAM BLACK | 81.01 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 26 | DRINTEAM | 81.00 | 4.00 | 11 |
| 27 | BRENO | 80.51 | 5.00 | 11 |
| 28 | FINLAND | 80.01 | 4.00 | 11 |
| 28 | PARTYPACK | 80.01 | 6.00 | 11 |
| 28 | POWERSHARK | 80.01 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 28 | SANTOSHA | 80.01 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 32 | UAE MIXED | 80.00 | 4.00 | 11 |
| 33 | RABONO CALAMIS | 78.01 | 0.00 | 11 |
| 34 | CAMELS | 77.01 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 34 | LAWRENZO | 77.01 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 36 | THE DARK KNIGHT | 76.00 | 0.00 | 11 |
| 37 | CHINA SENIOR | 75.01 | 1.00 | 11 |
| 37 | DINKIN | 75.01 | 6.00 | 11 |
| 39 | INDIA SENIORS | 75.00 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 40 | AUSTRIA | 74.01 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 41 | MADRID | 74.00 | 4.00 | 11 |
| 42 | MASARAHLOU | 73.20 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 43 | ULI | 73.00 | 4.00 | 11 |
| 44 | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | 72.00 | 0.00 | 11 |
| 45 | NZ MIXED | 71.20 | 1.00 | 11 |
| 46 | 4JACKS | 71.00 | 0.00 | 11 |
| 47 | USA WOMEN | 69.00 | 1.00 | 11 |
| 48 | 4FUN | 68.00 | 0.00 | 11 |
| 49 | CANADA MIXED | 64.00 | 4.00 | 11 |
| 50 | PORTO | 62.00 | 4.00 | 11 |
| 51 | COME TO HK CHINA | 60.20 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 52 | MO ROCCO | 60.00 | 0.00 | 11 |
| 52 | RIAD | 60.00 | 4.00 | 11 |
| 54 | PIERCE | 59.00 | 4.00 | 11 |
| 55 | MEXICO | 57.00 | 2.00 | 11 |
| 56 | INDIA WOMEN | 56.00 | 0.00 | 11 |
| 57 | KUWAIT | 50.80 | 1.00 | 11 |
| 58 | OUJDA1 | 49.80 | 5.00 | 11 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 11 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R11 | BAM% |
|---|
COME TO HK CHINA vs RIAD 2 : 4 VP (match 115326) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | COME TO HK CHINA | RIAD | |
| 5♣x | N | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 77% | 3♠ | W | ♣K | -2 | 200 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| 2♣ | N | ♦A | = | 90 | 54% | 2♥ | W | ♣9 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♠J | = | 620 | 84% | 4♥ | S | ♣4 | +2 | 680 | 99% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS+1.5 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣x | N | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | W | -2 | 200 | 89% | ||||
| 2♣ | N | = | 90 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 65% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 99% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SWEDEN SENIOR vs GILLIS 4 : 2 VP (match 115327) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SWEDEN SENIOR | GILLIS | |
| 4♣ | N | ♦5 | -1 | 50 | 62% | 3♠ | W | ♥J | = | 140 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | W | ♣5 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 3♠ | N | ♥K | -1 | 50 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | N | ♠A | = | 110 | 73% | 4♠x | E | ♣A | -3 | 500 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS-0.9 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♣ | N | -1 | 50 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 85% | ||||
| 2♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 81% | ||||
| 3♦ | N | = | 110 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | E | -3 | 500 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LAWRENZO vs DRINTEAM 2 : 4 VP (match 115328) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LAWRENZO | DRINTEAM | |
| 5♣x | N | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 77% | 4♣ | N | ♠A | = | 130 | 71% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | N | ♥5 | = | 110 | 75% | 2♣ | N | ♦A | = | 90 | 54% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♠7 | = | 620 | 84% | 3♦x | N | ♠K | = | 670 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS+1.3 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣x | N | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 4♣ | N | = | 130 | 71% | ||||
| 2♠ | N | = | 110 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 2♣ | N | = | 90 | 54% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 3♦x | N | = | 670 | 97% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PIEDS NOIR AND CO vs CANADA MIXED 2 : 4 VP (match 115329) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | CANADA MIXED | |
| 3♠ | W | ♥J | -1 | 100 | 51% | 3♣ | N | ♦7 | +1 | 130 | 71% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | N | ♥5 | = | 110 | 75% | 1NT | S | ♥10 | = | 90 | 54% | 2 | ||||
| 4♦ | N | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 86% | 3♦ | N | ♠A | +1 | 130 | 54% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS+0.2 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | W | -1 | 100 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 71% | ||||
| 2♠ | N | = | 110 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | S | = | 90 | 54% | ||||
| 4♦ | N | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | N | +1 | 130 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
USA E GETTA vs SANTOSHA 4 : 2 VP (match 115330) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | USA E GETTA | SANTOSHA | |
| 4♣ | N | ♥K | -1 | 50 | 62% | 4♠x | W | ♣K | -4 | 1100 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥x | E | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2♦ | E | ♦2 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | N | ♠A | +1 | 130 | 54% | 5♦ | N | ♠A | -2 | 200 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.2 | NS-0.2 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♣ | N | -1 | 50 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | W | -4 | 1100 | 100% | ||||
| 3♥x | E | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | E | -1 | 50 | 65% | ||||
| 3♦ | N | +1 | 130 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 5♦ | N | -2 | 200 | 95% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.2 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PARTYPACK vs 4FUN 6 : 0 VP (match 115331) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PARTYPACK | 4FUN | |
| 3♣ | N | ♦7 | +1 | 130 | 71% | 4♣ | N | ♦7 | -1 | 50 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | S | ♥4 | +3 | 180 | 95% | 2♥ | W | ♠4 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♠J | = | 620 | 84% | 3♦ | N | ♠A | = | 110 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+2.0 | NS-1.0 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 4♣ | N | -1 | 50 | 62% | ||||
| 1NT | S | +3 | 180 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 65% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | N | = | 110 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+2.0 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PIERCE vs POLAND MIXED 4 : 2 VP (match 115332) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PIERCE | POLAND MIXED | |
| 4♣ | N | ♦7 | = | 130 | 71% | 2♥ | S | ♠K | -3 | 150 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | W | ♣5 | -2 | 100 | 56% | 2♠ | N | ♥5 | -1 | 50 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠x | E | ♥A | -3 | 500 | 68% | 4♥ | N | ♠A | = | 620 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-0.8 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♣ | N | = | 130 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | -3 | 150 | 91% | ||||
| 3♥ | W | -2 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 81% | ||||
| 4♠x | E | -3 | 500 | 68% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE WOMEN vs AUPALETI 3 : 3 VP (match 115333) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE WOMEN | AUPALETI | |
| 4♣ | N | ♦7 | = | 130 | 71% | 4♠ | W | ♥J | -2 | 200 | 89% | 2 | ||||
| 3♣ | N | ♥5 | = | 110 | 75% | 1♠ | N | ♥5 | +1 | 110 | 75% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♥ | N | ♠A | = | 620 | 84% | 2NT | S | ♠3 | = | 120 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.6 | NS+0.9 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♣ | N | = | 130 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | -2 | 200 | 89% | ||||
| 3♣ | N | = | 110 | 75% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1♠ | N | +1 | 110 | 75% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 2NT | S | = | 120 | 66% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.6 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FRANCE SENIORS vs 4JACKS 6 : 0 VP (match 115334) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FRANCE SENIORS | 4JACKS | |
| 4♣x | N | ♦7 | = | 510 | 98% | 3♣ | N | ♦7 | = | 110 | 55% | 2 | ||||
| 2♣ | N | ♥5 | +1 | 110 | 75% | 3♠ | N | ♥5 | -2 | 100 | 93% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | N | ♠A | +1 | 140 | 58% | 4♥ | S | ♠J | -3 | 300 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.6 | NS-1.7 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♣x | N | = | 510 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | N | = | 110 | 55% | ||||
| 2♣ | N | +1 | 110 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | N | -2 | 100 | 93% | ||||
| 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | -3 | 300 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.6 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ULI vs INDIA SENIORS 4 : 2 VP (match 115335) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ULI | INDIA SENIORS | |
| 5♣x | N | ♦7 | -2 | 300 | 97% | 3♠ | W | ♥J | -3 | 300 | 93% | 2 | ||||
| 2♣ | N | ♥5 | +1 | 110 | 75% | 2♥ | W | ♣2 | -2 | 100 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♣3 | +2 | 680 | 99% | 3♠ | E | ♠2 | -3 | 150 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS+1.2 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣x | N | -2 | 300 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | W | -3 | 300 | 93% | ||||
| 2♣ | N | +1 | 110 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | W | -2 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | +2 | 680 | 99% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | E | -3 | 150 | 61% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND WOMEN vs CHINA SENIOR 5 : 1 VP (match 115336) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND WOMEN | CHINA SENIOR | |
| 4♣ | N | ♦7 | = | 130 | 71% | 4♣ | N | ♦5 | = | 130 | 71% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1NT | S | ♥10 | +2 | 150 | 90% | 2♥ | W | ♣2 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♠A | = | 620 | 84% | 4♦ | N | ♠A | = | 130 | 54% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.9 | NS+0.0 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♣ | N | = | 130 | 71% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♣ | N | = | 130 | 71% | ||||
| 1NT | S | +2 | 150 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 65% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 4♦ | N | = | 130 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.9 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AUSTRIA vs PORTO 2 : 4 VP (match 115337) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AUSTRIA | PORTO | |
| 4♠x | W | ♣K | -1 | 200 | 89% | 5♣ | N | ♦7 | -1 | 50 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| 3♣ | N | ♥5 | -1 | 50 | 81% | 2♠ | N | ♥5 | = | 110 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | N | ♠A | = | 110 | 73% | 4♠x | E | ♣A | -3 | 500 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+0.6 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠x | W | -1 | 200 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 5♣ | N | -1 | 50 | 62% | ||||
| 3♣ | N | -1 | 50 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | N | = | 110 | 75% | ||||
| 3♦ | N | = | 110 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | E | -3 | 500 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GERMANY MIXED vs KUWAIT 5 : 1 VP (match 115338) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GERMANY MIXED | KUWAIT | |
| 3♣ | N | ♦7 | +1 | 130 | 71% | 4♣ | N | ♦7 | -1 | 50 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| 3♣ | S | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 81% | 1NT | E | ♣A | +2 | 150 | 99% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | S | ♠J | = | 620 | 84% | 4♥ | S | ♠J | = | 620 | 84% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.5 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 4♣ | N | -1 | 50 | 62% | ||||
| 3♣ | S | -1 | 50 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | E | +2 | 150 | 99% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 84% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
ALICE vs PORTUCOLE 4 : 2 VP (match 115339) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | ALICE | PORTUCOLE | |
| 4♣ | N | ♦7 | = | 130 | 71% | 5♣x | N | ♦7 | -2 | 300 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | S | ♥10 | +1 | 120 | 86% | 2♠ | N | ♥5 | = | 110 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | S | ♠7 | +1 | 130 | 54% | 4♠x | E | ♣A | -3 | 500 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-0.1 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♣ | N | = | 130 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 5♣x | N | -2 | 300 | 97% | ||||
| 1NT | S | +1 | 120 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | N | = | 110 | 75% | ||||
| 3♦ | S | +1 | 130 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | E | -3 | 500 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NZ MIXED vs OUJDA1 1 : 5 VP (match 115546) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NZ MIXED | OUJDA1 | |
| 4♣ | N | ♦7 | = | 130 | 71% | 2♣x | N | ♦7 | +2 | 380 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 4♣ | N | ♥5 | -1 | 50 | 81% | 3♣ | N | ♥5 | -1 | 50 | 81% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3♦ | N | ♠A | +1 | 130 | 54% | 4♥ | S | ♠J | = | 620 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+1.0 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♣ | N | = | 130 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 2♣x | N | +2 | 380 | 95% | ||||
| 4♣ | N | -1 | 50 | 81% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♣ | N | -1 | 50 | 81% | ||||
| 3♦ | N | +1 | 130 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND OPEN vs POWERSHARK 4 : 2 VP (match 115547) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND OPEN | POWERSHARK | |
| 4♠ | W | ♥J | -2 | 200 | 89% | 5♣ | N | ♦5 | -1 | 50 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | W | ♣9 | -3 | 150 | 90% | 3♣ | N | ♥7 | -1 | 50 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | N | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 86% | 3♦ | N | ♠A | = | 110 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.9 | NS-1.3 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | -2 | 200 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 5♣ | N | -1 | 50 | 62% | ||||
| 1NT | W | -3 | 150 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | N | -1 | 50 | 81% | ||||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | N | = | 110 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.9 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TEAM BLACK vs MADRID 2 : 4 VP (match 115548) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TEAM BLACK | MADRID | |
| 4♣ | N | ♦7 | -1 | 50 | 62% | 3♣ | N | ♦7 | +1 | 130 | 71% | 2 | ||||
| 3♣ | N | ♥5 | -1 | 50 | 81% | 2♥x | W | ♠4 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | N | ♠A | +1 | 130 | 54% | 3♦ | N | ♠A | = | 110 | 73% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.9 | NS+0.1 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♣ | N | -1 | 50 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 71% | ||||
| 3♣ | N | -1 | 50 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 2♥x | W | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 3♦ | N | +1 | 130 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | N | = | 110 | 73% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.9 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
UAE MIXED vs MEXICO 4 : 2 VP (match 115549) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | UAE MIXED | MEXICO | |
| 4♥ | S | ♠K | -5 | 250 | 95% | 5♣x | N | ♦7 | -1 | 100 | 77% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | E | ♥Q | = | 90 | 89% | 4♠x | N | ♥5 | -1 | 100 | 93% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | N | ♠Q | = | 140 | 58% | 2♠ | W | ♣7 | = | 110 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS-2.2 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♥ | S | -5 | 250 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 5♣x | N | -1 | 100 | 77% | ||||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 89% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | N | -1 | 100 | 93% | ||||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | W | = | 110 | 91% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-2.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BV WALDSOLMS vs BRENO 1 : 5 VP (match 115550) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BV WALDSOLMS | BRENO | |
| 2♥ | S | ♠K | -3 | 150 | 91% | 3♠ | W | ♣K | = | 140 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| 3♣ | N | ♥5 | = | 110 | 75% | 3♣ | N | ♥7 | = | 110 | 75% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 1♣ | S | ♠3 | -2 | 200 | 95% | 2♦ | S | ♠J | +2 | 130 | 54% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS-0.3 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | S | -3 | 150 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 85% | ||||
| 3♣ | N | = | 110 | 75% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♣ | N | = | 110 | 75% | ||||
| 1♣ | S | -2 | 200 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | S | +2 | 130 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FINLAND vs EL GHRARI 4 : 2 VP (match 115551) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FINLAND | EL GHRARI | |
| 4♣ | N | ♦7 | = | 130 | 71% | 3♠ | W | ♣K | = | 140 | 85% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | N | ♥5 | = | 110 | 75% | 2♥ | W | ♣2 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| 2♦ | N | ♠K | +1 | 110 | 73% | 4♥ | S | ♣3 | = | 620 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.3 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♣ | N | = | 130 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 85% | ||||
| 2♠ | N | = | 110 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 65% | ||||
| 2♦ | N | +1 | 110 | 73% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VINCIGUERRA vs MATILDAS PLUS 2 6 : 0 VP (match 115552) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VINCIGUERRA | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | |
| 4♣ | N | ♦7 | = | 130 | 71% | 4♣ | N | ♦7 | -1 | 50 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥x | W | ♣2 | -3 | 500 | 100% | 2♠ | N | ♥5 | -1 | 50 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | S | ♠J | +1 | 130 | 54% | 2♠x | E | ♠5 | = | 470 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS-1.9 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♣ | N | = | 130 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 4♣ | N | -1 | 50 | 62% | ||||
| 3♥x | W | -3 | 500 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 81% | ||||
| 3♦ | S | +1 | 130 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 2♠x | E | = | 470 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
USA WOMEN vs INDIA OPEN 1 : 5 VP (match 115553) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | USA WOMEN | INDIA OPEN | |
| 4♣ | N | ♦7 | = | 130 | 71% | 4♣ | N | ♦7 | = | 130 | 71% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♥ | W | ♣2 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 3♥x | W | ♣2 | -2 | 300 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 5♦ | N | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 86% | 4♥ | N | ♠A | = | 620 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.6 | NS+2.1 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♣ | N | = | 130 | 71% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♣ | N | = | 130 | 71% | ||||
| 2♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 3♥x | W | -2 | 300 | 97% | ||||
| 5♦ | N | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | = | 620 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.6 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+2.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DINKIN vs MO ROCCO 6 : 0 VP (match 115554) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DINKIN | MO ROCCO | |
| 4♣ | N | ♦5 | = | 130 | 71% | 4♣ | N | ♦7 | -1 | 50 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥x | W | ♥2 | -2 | 300 | 97% | 2♥ | W | ♦Q | = | 110 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | N | ♠A | +1 | 130 | 54% | 2♠ | E | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 80% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.3 | NS-1.8 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♣ | N | = | 130 | 71% | 2 | |||
| 4♣ | N | -1 | 50 | 62% | ||||
| 3♥x | W | -2 | 300 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | W | = | 110 | 97% | ||||
| 3♦ | N | +1 | 130 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 80% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.3 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA WOMEN vs NZ OPEN 0 : 6 VP (match 115555) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA WOMEN | NZ OPEN | |
| 3♠ | W | ♥J | = | 140 | 85% | 3♠ | W | ♣K | -1 | 100 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | W | ♣8 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2♥x | E | ♠5 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 3♠ | E | ♥A | -1 | 50 | 80% | 3♥ | S | ♠J | +1 | 170 | 63% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.6 | NS+0.4 | 0 | 6 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | W | = | 140 | 85% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | W | -1 | 100 | 51% | ||||
| 2♥ | W | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 2♥x | E | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 3♠ | E | -1 | 50 | 80% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | S | +1 | 170 | 63% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.6 | 0 | 6 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
THE DARK KNIGHT vs INDIA MIXED 0 : 6 VP (match 115556) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | THE DARK KNIGHT | INDIA MIXED | |
| 5♣ | N | ♦7 | -2 | 100 | 77% | 4♠x | W | ♣K | -2 | 500 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | N | ♦A | -3 | 150 | 99% | 3♠ | N | ♥5 | +1 | 170 | 93% | 2 | ||||
| 2NT | S | ♠3 | = | 120 | 66% | 3♥ | N | ♠K | = | 140 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.8 | NS+1.9 | 0 | 6 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣ | N | -2 | 100 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | W | -2 | 500 | 97% | ||||
| 4♠ | N | -3 | 150 | 99% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | N | +1 | 170 | 93% | ||||
| 2NT | S | = | 120 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | N | = | 140 | 58% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.8 | 0 | 6 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CAMELS vs REASON 2 : 4 VP (match 115557) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CAMELS | REASON | |
| 5♣ | N | ♦7 | -2 | 100 | 77% | 4♣ | N | ♦7 | -1 | 50 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | W | ♣9 | -2 | 100 | 56% | 2♥x | W | ♣2 | -1 | 100 | 56% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 4♥ | S | ♠J | = | 620 | 84% | 4♥ | S | ♠J | = | 620 | 84% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.3 | NS+0.6 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 5♣ | N | -2 | 100 | 77% | 2 | |||
| 4♣ | N | -1 | 50 | 62% | ||||
| 3♥ | W | -2 | 100 | 56% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♥x | W | -1 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 84% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♥ | S | = | 620 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.3 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NORWAY SENIOR vs RABONO CALAMIS 6 : 0 VP (match 115558) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NORWAY SENIOR | RABONO CALAMIS | |
| 4♠ | W | ♥J | -1 | 100 | 51% | 2♥ | S | ♠K | -3 | 150 | 91% | 2 | ||||
| 3♣ | N | ♥5 | = | 110 | 75% | 2♥ | W | ♠4 | -2 | 100 | 56% | 2 | ||||
| 4♦ | N | ♠K | = | 130 | 54% | 4♥ | N | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-1.4 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | W | -1 | 100 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | -3 | 150 | 91% | ||||
| 3♣ | N | = | 110 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | W | -2 | 100 | 56% | ||||
| 4♦ | N | = | 130 | 54% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | N | -1 | 100 | 86% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MASARAHLOU vs CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED 2 : 4 VP (match 115559) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MASARAHLOU | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | |
| 3♣ | N | ♦7 | = | 110 | 55% | 4♣ | N | ♦7 | -1 | 50 | 62% | 2 | ||||
| 1NT | W | ♥2 | -1 | 50 | 65% | 3♣ | N | ♥7 | +1 | 130 | 88% | 2 | ||||
| 5♦x | N | ♠K | -1 | 200 | 95% | 4♠x | E | ♣K | -3 | 500 | 68% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS+0.9 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♣ | N | = | 110 | 55% | 2 | |||
| 4♣ | N | -1 | 50 | 62% | ||||
| 1NT | W | -1 | 50 | 65% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | N | +1 | 130 | 88% | ||||
| 5♦x | N | -1 | 200 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | E | -3 | 500 | 68% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NO COKE vs GEMIGNANI 4 : 2 VP (match 115560) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NO COKE | GEMIGNANI | |
| 4♣ | N | ♦7 | -1 | 50 | 62% | 4♥x | S | ♠K | -5 | 1100 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | W | ♠2 | -2 | 100 | 56% | 2♠ | N | ♥5 | -2 | 100 | 93% | 2 | ||||
| 4♦ | N | ♠A | -1 | 100 | 86% | 3♦ | N | ♠A | +1 | 130 | 54% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS-1.9 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♣ | N | -1 | 50 | 62% | 2 | |||
| 4♥x | S | -5 | 1100 | 100% | ||||
| 3♥ | W | -2 | 100 | 56% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | N | -2 | 100 | 93% | ||||
| 4♦ | N | -1 | 100 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | N | +1 | 130 | 54% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.9 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
Board 16board records → · view →
| ♠ 8 ♥ J ♦ JT64 ♣ KQJT983 | ||
| ♠ KQT6 ♥ 4 ♦ A982 ♣ A754 | 16 Dlr W E-W | ♠ A974 ♥ KT983 ♦ 75 ♣ 62 |
| ♠ J532 ♥ AQ7652 ♦ KQ3 ♣ – |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 5 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 9 |
| S | 5 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 9 |
| E | 8 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 3 |
| W | 8 | 9 | 8 | 5 | 3 |
Minimax (par): NS -100: 4♣Nx-1 4♣Sx-1
Board 17board records → · view →
| ♠ QT42 ♥ 2 ♦ QJ3 ♣ J9852 | ||
| ♠ A93 ♥ T9843 ♦ K9 ♣ T76 | 17 Dlr N None | ♠ K86 ♥ K75 ♦ AT864 ♣ Q4 |
| ♠ J75 ♥ AQJ6 ♦ 752 ♣ AK3 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| S | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| E | 4 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 4 |
| W | 4 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 4 |
Minimax (par): NS +120: 2NTN= 2NTS=
Board 18board records → · view →
| ♠ 98 ♥ J876 ♦ QT8642 ♣ 7 | ||
| ♠ JT73 ♥ Q5 ♦ K9 ♣ Q6543 | 18 Dlr E N-S | ♠ AKQ4 ♥ T92 ♦ J75 ♣ T98 |
| ♠ 652 ♥ AK43 ♦ A3 ♣ AKJ2 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 8 | 6 | 10 | 10 | 6 |
| S | 8 | 6 | 10 | 10 | 6 |
| E | 5 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| W | 5 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
Minimax (par): NS +500: 4♠Ex-3 4♠Wx-3