Round 3 — BAM Day 2
29 matches. → cumulative standings · → board records
Round 3 results↑ top
Every match of the round — teams, board-a-match points and VPs. Click a table number or ‘protocol’ for the full board-by-board scorecard below.
| Table | Home team | Visiting team | BAM (home) | BAM (visit) | VP (home) | VP (visit) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4JACKS | RIAD | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 2 | AUPALETI | INDIA SENIORS | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 3 | POLAND MIXED | CHINA SENIOR | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 4 | 4FUN | PORTO | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 5 | SANTOSHA | KUWAIT | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 6 | CANADA MIXED | PORTUCOLE | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 7 | DRINTEAM | ALICE | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 8 | GILLIS | GERMANY MIXED | 0 | 6 | 0.00 | 6.00 | protocol → |
| 9 | COME TO HK CHINA | AUSTRIA | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 10 | SWEDEN SENIOR | POLAND WOMEN | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 11 | LAWRENZO | ULI | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 12 | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | FRANCE SENIORS | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 13 | USA E GETTA | FRANCE WOMEN | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 14 | PARTYPACK | PIERCE | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 15 | MO ROCCO | OUJDA1 | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
| 16 | INDIA OPEN | NZ OPEN | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 17 | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | INDIA MIXED | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 18 | EL GHRARI | REASON | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 19 | BRENO | RABONO CALAMIS | 3 | 3 | 3.00 | 3.00 | protocol → |
| 20 | MEXICO | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | 0 | 6 | 0.00 | 6.00 | protocol → |
| 21 | MADRID | GEMIGNANI | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 22 | POWERSHARK | NO COKE | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 23 | NZ MIXED | MASARAHLOU | 1 | 5 | 1.00 | 5.00 | protocol → |
| 24 | POLAND OPEN | NORWAY SENIOR | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 25 | TEAM BLACK | CAMELS | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 26 | UAE MIXED | THE DARK KNIGHT | 4 | 2 | 4.00 | 2.00 | protocol → |
| 27 | BV WALDSOLMS | INDIA WOMEN | 5 | 1 | 5.00 | 1.00 | protocol → |
| 28 | FINLAND | DINKIN | 2 | 4 | 2.00 | 4.00 | protocol → |
| 29 | VINCIGUERRA | USA WOMEN | 6 | 0 | 6.00 | 0.00 | protocol → |
Standings after round 3↑ top
Cumulative board-a-match points through round 3 — the league table as it stood after this round. → full standings, every round & players
| Place | Team | Pts | R3 | Pld |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VINCIGUERRA | 74.00 | 6.00 | 3 |
| 2 | NORWAY SENIOR | 69.00 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 2 | POLAND OPEN | 69.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 4 | USA E GETTA | 67.80 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 5 | GERMANY MIXED | 67.00 | 6.00 | 3 |
| 6 | SWEDEN SENIOR | 66.60 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 7 | BV WALDSOLMS | 64.00 | 5.00 | 3 |
| 8 | FRANCE WOMEN | 63.00 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 9 | NZ OPEN | 62.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 10 | EL GHRARI | 60.20 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 11 | SANTOSHA | 59.01 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 12 | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | 58.20 | 6.00 | 3 |
| 12 | MASARAHLOU | 58.20 | 5.00 | 3 |
| 12 | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | 58.20 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 15 | POLAND MIXED | 58.00 | 6.00 | 3 |
| 16 | LAWRENZO | 57.01 | 6.00 | 3 |
| 16 | PORTUCOLE | 57.01 | 5.00 | 3 |
| 18 | GEMIGNANI | 57.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 18 | POLAND WOMEN | 57.00 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 20 | INDIA OPEN | 56.01 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 20 | TEAM BLACK | 56.01 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 22 | ALICE | 55.50 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 23 | DINKIN | 55.01 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 23 | INDIA MIXED | 55.01 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 25 | DRINTEAM | 55.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 25 | THE DARK KNIGHT | 55.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 27 | FRANCE SENIORS | 54.01 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 27 | NO COKE | 54.01 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 29 | INDIA SENIORS | 54.00 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 29 | UAE MIXED | 54.00 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 31 | BRENO | 53.01 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 31 | FINLAND | 53.01 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 31 | GILLIS | 53.01 | 0.00 | 3 |
| 31 | PARTYPACK | 53.01 | 5.00 | 3 |
| 31 | POWERSHARK | 53.01 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 31 | RABONO CALAMIS | 53.01 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 37 | 4FUN | 53.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 37 | NZ MIXED | 53.00 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 39 | AUPALETI | 52.01 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 39 | CAMELS | 52.01 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 39 | REASON | 52.01 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 42 | AUSTRIA | 51.01 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 42 | CHINA SENIOR | 51.01 | 0.00 | 3 |
| 44 | MADRID | 51.00 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 44 | USA WOMEN | 51.00 | 0.00 | 3 |
| 46 | 4JACKS | 50.00 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 47 | CANADA MIXED | 48.00 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 47 | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | 48.00 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 47 | ULI | 48.00 | 0.00 | 3 |
| 50 | PORTO | 47.00 | 4.00 | 3 |
| 51 | MO ROCCO | 46.00 | 6.00 | 3 |
| 52 | COME TO HK CHINA | 42.20 | 3.00 | 3 |
| 53 | INDIA WOMEN | 42.00 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 54 | PIERCE | 41.00 | 1.00 | 3 |
| 55 | KUWAIT | 39.80 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 56 | MEXICO | 38.00 | 0.00 | 3 |
| 57 | RIAD | 36.00 | 2.00 | 3 |
| 58 | OUJDA1 | 35.80 | 0.00 | 3 |
Board-a-match over this round's field — each pair's net boards won per board (2-0 win / 1-1 tie), shown as a board-a-match %.
Round 3 board-a-match standings↑ top
| Place | Player | Team | Boards | R3 | BAM% |
|---|
4JACKS vs RIAD 4 : 2 VP (match 115214) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 4JACKS | RIAD | |
| 2♦ | E | ♠6 | +1 | 110 | 98% | 3♦ | E | ♠6 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | S | ♠7 | = | 110 | 61% | 3♣ | E | ♥K | -1 | 100 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | E | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 84% | 3♥ | E | ♦K | = | 140 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.4 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♦ | E | +1 | 110 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 66% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 58% | ||||
| 3♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | E | = | 140 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
AUPALETI vs INDIA SENIORS 2 : 4 VP (match 115215) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | AUPALETI | INDIA SENIORS | |
| 2♦ | E | ♠3 | = | 90 | 81% | 4♠ | N | ♠4 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | S | ♠7 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2♠ | E | ♠4 | -1 | 100 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | E | ♣Q | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2♥ | E | ♣Q | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♦ | E | = | 90 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 61% | ||||
| 3♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 58% | ||||
| 3♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND MIXED vs CHINA SENIOR 6 : 0 VP (match 115216) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND MIXED | CHINA SENIOR | |
| 1NT | N | ♦6 | = | 90 | 53% | 2♦ | E | ♦4 | = | 90 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | N | ♥7 | +1 | 140 | 78% | 2♥ | S | ♦7 | = | 110 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦x | S | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 70% | 2♥ | E | ♣Q | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.0 | NS-0.4 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | N | = | 90 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | E | = | 90 | 81% | ||||
| 2♥ | N | +1 | 140 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 61% | ||||
| 3♦x | S | -1 | 100 | 70% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.0 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
4FUN vs PORTO 2 : 4 VP (match 115217) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | 4FUN | PORTO | |
| 2♦ | E | ♠3 | = | 90 | 81% | 2♠ | S | ♦10 | = | 110 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | S | ♣A | = | 140 | 78% | 3♦ | E | ♥K | -2 | 200 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♦K | = | 110 | 51% | 3♦x | S | ♥8 | -2 | 300 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.0 | NS+0.5 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♦ | E | = | 90 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 82% | ||||
| 3♥ | S | = | 140 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | E | -2 | 200 | 95% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 3♦x | S | -2 | 300 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.0 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SANTOSHA vs KUWAIT 4 : 2 VP (match 115218) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SANTOSHA | KUWAIT | |
| 1NT | N | ♦6 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 1♠ | S | ♠5 | +2 | 140 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | S | ♠7 | = | 110 | 61% | 3♥x | S | ♥6 | -1 | 200 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 4♥ | E | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2♥ | E | ♦K | +1 | 140 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.6 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | N | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 1♠ | S | +2 | 140 | 94% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 3♥x | S | -1 | 200 | 97% | ||||
| 4♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | +1 | 140 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
CANADA MIXED vs PORTUCOLE 1 : 5 VP (match 115219) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | CANADA MIXED | PORTUCOLE | |
| 2♦ | E | ♦4 | = | 90 | 81% | 2♦ | E | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | S | ♦6 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2♥ | S | ♣A | = | 110 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♦K | +1 | 140 | 78% | 3♥ | E | ♦K | = | 140 | 78% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.7 | NS-0.0 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♦ | E | = | 90 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 66% | ||||
| 3♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 61% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | +1 | 140 | 78% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♥ | E | = | 140 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.7 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
DRINTEAM vs ALICE 2 : 4 VP (match 115220) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | DRINTEAM | ALICE | |
| 2♦ | E | ♦4 | = | 90 | 81% | 4♠ | S | ♦8 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥x | S | ♦6 | -1 | 200 | 97% | 2♥ | S | ♦5 | = | 110 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♣Q | = | 110 | 51% | 2♥ | E | ♥3 | +1 | 140 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.5 | NS-0.6 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♦ | E | = | 90 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 61% | ||||
| 3♥x | S | -1 | 200 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 61% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | +1 | 140 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.5 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
GILLIS vs GERMANY MIXED 0 : 6 VP (match 115221) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | GILLIS | GERMANY MIXED | |
| 1NT | N | ♦6 | = | 90 | 53% | 2♦ | E | ♦4 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | S | ♦6 | = | 110 | 61% | 3♥ | S | ♣A | = | 140 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | E | ♦K | = | 140 | 78% | 3♦ | S | ♥8 | -1 | 50 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.3 | NS+1.4 | 0 | 6 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | N | = | 90 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 66% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | S | = | 140 | 78% | ||||
| 3♥ | E | = | 140 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | S | -1 | 50 | 75% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.3 | 0 | 6 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
COME TO HK CHINA vs AUSTRIA 3 : 3 VP (match 115222) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | COME TO HK CHINA | AUSTRIA | |
| 3♠ | N | ♦A | = | 140 | 94% | 2♠ | S | ♦10 | = | 110 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | N | ♥J | -2 | 200 | 97% | 2♠ | E | ♥K | = | 110 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♣Q | = | 110 | 51% | 2♥ | E | ♣Q | = | 110 | 51% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.1 | NS-0.2 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 3♠ | N | = | 140 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 82% | ||||
| 3♥ | N | -2 | 200 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | = | 110 | 90% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 51% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.1 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
SWEDEN SENIOR vs POLAND WOMEN 2 : 4 VP (match 115223) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | SWEDEN SENIOR | POLAND WOMEN | |
| 2♣ | E | ♠2 | = | 90 | 81% | 1NT | N | ♦2 | = | 90 | 53% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | S | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 3♠ | E | ♥K | -2 | 200 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♣Q | = | 110 | 51% | 3♥ | E | ♦K | = | 140 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♣ | E | = | 90 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | N | = | 90 | 53% | ||||
| 3♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 95% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | E | = | 140 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
LAWRENZO vs ULI 6 : 0 VP (match 115224) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | LAWRENZO | ULI | |
| 1NT | N | ♦2 | = | 90 | 53% | 4♠x | S | ♦10 | -1 | 100 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | S | ♥6 | = | 110 | 61% | 2♠ | E | ♦J | -1 | 100 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♦K | -3 | 150 | 94% | 2♥ | E | ♦Q | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS-1.0 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | N | = | 90 | 53% | 2 | |||
| 4♠x | S | -1 | 100 | 95% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 58% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | -3 | 150 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PIEDS NOIR AND CO vs FRANCE SENIORS 2 : 4 VP (match 115225) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PIEDS NOIR AND CO | FRANCE SENIORS | |
| 2♠ | S | ♣3 | +1 | 140 | 94% | 1♠ | S | ♦10 | +1 | 110 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | W | ♠10 | -1 | 100 | 58% | 2♥ | S | ♦6 | = | 110 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | W | ♠10 | +1 | 140 | 78% | 4♥ | E | ♠6 | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.2 | NS+1.5 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 1♠ | S | +1 | 110 | 82% | ||||
| 2♠ | W | -1 | 100 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 61% | ||||
| 2♥ | W | +1 | 140 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 4♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 84% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.2 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
USA E GETTA vs FRANCE WOMEN 2 : 4 VP (match 115226) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | USA E GETTA | FRANCE WOMEN | |
| 2♥ | N | ♠4 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2♦ | E | ♦4 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | S | ♠7 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 3♥ | S | ♣A | = | 140 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♦K | +1 | 140 | 78% | 2NT | W | ♣J | +1 | 150 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.3 | NS0.0 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♥ | N | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 66% | ||||
| 3♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | S | = | 140 | 78% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | +1 | 140 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 2NT | W | +1 | 150 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.3 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS0.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
PARTYPACK vs PIERCE 5 : 1 VP (match 115227) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | PARTYPACK | PIERCE | |
| 2♦ | E | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 2♦ | E | ♣6 | = | 90 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | S | ♦7 | = | 110 | 61% | 3♣ | E | ♦J | = | 110 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♦K | +1 | 140 | 78% | 3♥ | E | ♦K | = | 140 | 78% | 1 | 1 | |||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.0 | NS-2.0 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | E | = | 90 | 81% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | E | = | 110 | 90% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | +1 | 140 | 78% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♥ | E | = | 140 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.0 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-2.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MO ROCCO vs OUJDA1 6 : 0 VP (match 115426) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MO ROCCO | OUJDA1 | |
| 2♦ | E | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 2♦ | E | ♥A | = | 90 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | S | ♣A | = | 110 | 61% | 3♣ | E | ♥K | -1 | 100 | 58% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | E | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2♥ | E | ♦K | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.2 | NS-0.8 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | E | = | 90 | 81% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 58% | ||||
| 3♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.2 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
INDIA OPEN vs NZ OPEN 4 : 2 VP (match 115427) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | INDIA OPEN | NZ OPEN | |
| 4♠ | S | ♦10 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 4♠ | S | ♦10 | -2 | 100 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | S | ♠7 | +1 | 140 | 78% | 2♥ | S | ♦6 | +2 | 170 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♣Q | = | 110 | 51% | 2♥ | E | ♦K | +1 | 140 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.4 | NS-0.7 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | S | -2 | 100 | 95% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | +1 | 140 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | +2 | 170 | 86% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | +1 | 140 | 78% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.4 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.7 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MATILDAS PLUS 2 vs INDIA MIXED 4 : 2 VP (match 115428) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MATILDAS PLUS 2 | INDIA MIXED | |
| 1NT | E | ♣6 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 2♦ | E | ♦4 | = | 90 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| 4♣ | E | ♥K | -1 | 100 | 58% | 1♥ | S | ♦7 | +2 | 140 | 78% | 2 | ||||
| 2♦x | S | ♥5 | = | 180 | 97% | 2NT | W | ♦8 | -3 | 150 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.1 | NS+0.8 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | E | -1 | 100 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | E | = | 90 | 81% | ||||
| 4♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 1♥ | S | +2 | 140 | 78% | ||||
| 2♦x | S | = | 180 | 97% | 2 | |||
| 2NT | W | -3 | 150 | 94% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.1 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.8 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
EL GHRARI vs REASON 2 : 4 VP (match 115429) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | EL GHRARI | REASON | |
| 2♦x | E | ♠3 | = | 180 | 100% | 2♠ | S | ♦10 | = | 110 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 2♠ | W | ♦K | -2 | 200 | 95% | 2♣ | W | ♦K | = | 90 | 65% | 2 | ||||
| 2NT | W | ♠10 | +1 | 150 | 94% | 2♥ | E | ♣Q | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.0 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♦x | E | = | 180 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 82% | ||||
| 2♠ | W | -2 | 200 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 2♣ | W | = | 90 | 65% | ||||
| 2NT | W | +1 | 150 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.0 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BRENO vs RABONO CALAMIS 3 : 3 VP (match 115430) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BRENO | RABONO CALAMIS | |
| 2♠ | S | ♦10 | = | 110 | 82% | 4♠ | N | ♣A | -2 | 100 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | S | ♦6 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 3♥ | S | ♠7 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♥ | E | ♣Q | = | 110 | 51% | 3♦x | S | ♥5 | = | 470 | 100% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.1 | NS-0.4 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | N | -2 | 100 | 95% | ||||
| 3♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 76% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 3♦x | S | = | 470 | 100% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.1 | 3 | 3 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MEXICO vs CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED 0 : 6 VP (match 115431) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MEXICO | CHINESE TAIPEI MIXED | |
| 1♦ | E | ♠2 | +1 | 90 | 81% | 2♠ | S | ♦10 | +1 | 140 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | S | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2♥ | N | ♥7 | +2 | 170 | 86% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♦K | = | 110 | 51% | 4♠ | W | ♦8 | -4 | 200 | 98% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.1 | NS+2.6 | 0 | 6 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1♦ | E | +1 | 90 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 94% | ||||
| 3♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | N | +2 | 170 | 86% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | |||
| 4♠ | W | -4 | 200 | 98% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.1 | 0 | 6 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+2.6 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
MADRID vs GEMIGNANI 4 : 2 VP (match 115432) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | MADRID | GEMIGNANI | |
| 2♠ | S | ♦10 | = | 110 | 82% | 3♠ | S | ♦10 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 4♠ | E | ♥K | -2 | 200 | 95% | 3♣ | E | ♦J | = | 110 | 90% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | E | ♦K | +2 | 170 | 98% | 2♥ | E | ♦K | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.6 | NS-1.0 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 61% | ||||
| 4♠ | E | -2 | 200 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 3♣ | E | = | 110 | 90% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | +2 | 170 | 98% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.6 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.0 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POWERSHARK vs NO COKE 4 : 2 VP (match 115433) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POWERSHARK | NO COKE | |
| 2♣ | E | ♣6 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 3♠ | N | ♣A | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 4♣ | E | ♥K | -2 | 200 | 95% | 3♥ | S | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | E | ♦K | = | 140 | 78% | 3♦x | S | ♥5 | -1 | 100 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.7 | NS-0.3 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♣ | E | -1 | 100 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 3♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 61% | ||||
| 4♣ | E | -2 | 200 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| 3♥ | E | = | 140 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 3♦x | S | -1 | 100 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.7 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.3 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
NZ MIXED vs MASARAHLOU 1 : 5 VP (match 115434) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | NZ MIXED | MASARAHLOU | |
| 4♠ | S | ♦9 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 4♠ | N | ♦A | -1 | 50 | 61% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 3♠ | E | ♥K | -1 | 100 | 58% | 2♥ | S | ♠7 | = | 110 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 2NT | W | ♣J | +1 | 150 | 94% | 3♦ | S | ♥8 | -1 | 50 | 75% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-1.2 | NS+0.5 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 4♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 61% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 4♠ | N | -1 | 50 | 61% | ||||
| 3♠ | E | -1 | 100 | 58% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 61% | ||||
| 2NT | W | +1 | 150 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 3♦ | S | -1 | 50 | 75% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-1.2 | 1 | 5 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
POLAND OPEN vs NORWAY SENIOR 2 : 4 VP (match 115435) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | POLAND OPEN | NORWAY SENIOR | |
| 1♠ | S | ♦10 | +2 | 140 | 94% | 2♦ | E | ♦5 | = | 90 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| 3♣ | W | ♦K | = | 110 | 90% | 2♥ | S | ♦7 | = | 110 | 61% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | E | ♦K | = | 140 | 78% | 2♥ | E | ♣Q | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.5 | NS-0.4 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1♠ | S | +2 | 140 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | E | = | 90 | 81% | ||||
| 3♣ | W | = | 110 | 90% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 61% | ||||
| 3♥ | E | = | 140 | 78% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.5 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
TEAM BLACK vs CAMELS 4 : 2 VP (match 115436) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | TEAM BLACK | CAMELS | |
| 1NT | E | ♠6 | -2 | 200 | 100% | 1♠ | S | ♠5 | +1 | 110 | 82% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | S | ♠7 | = | 110 | 61% | 4♣ | E | ♥K | -2 | 200 | 95% | 2 | ||||
| 3NT | E | ♦K | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2♥ | E | ♣Q | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+1.9 | NS+1.5 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | E | -2 | 200 | 100% | 2 | |||
| 1♠ | S | +1 | 110 | 82% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 4♣ | E | -2 | 200 | 95% | ||||
| 3NT | E | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+1.9 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+1.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
UAE MIXED vs THE DARK KNIGHT 4 : 2 VP (match 115437) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | UAE MIXED | THE DARK KNIGHT | |
| 2♠ | S | ♥2 | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2♦ | E | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 2 | ||||
| 2♥ | S | ♠7 | = | 110 | 61% | 3♥ | S | ♠7 | -2 | 200 | 97% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | S | ♥5 | -1 | 50 | 75% | 3♦x | S | ♥5 | -1 | 100 | 70% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.5 | NS-0.2 | 4 | 2 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | -1 | 50 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 66% | ||||
| 2♥ | S | = | 110 | 61% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | S | -2 | 200 | 97% | ||||
| 3♦ | S | -1 | 50 | 75% | 2 | |||
| 3♦x | S | -1 | 100 | 70% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.5 | 4 | 2 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.2 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
BV WALDSOLMS vs INDIA WOMEN 5 : 1 VP (match 115438) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | BV WALDSOLMS | INDIA WOMEN | |
| 2♠ | S | ♦10 | = | 110 | 82% | 1NT | N | ♦6 | = | 90 | 53% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | S | ♠7 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 3♥ | S | ♠7 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 1 | 1 | |||
| 2♥ | E | ♣Q | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2♥ | E | ♦K | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+0.8 | NS-0.5 | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♠ | S | = | 110 | 82% | 2 | |||
| 1NT | N | = | 90 | 53% | ||||
| 3♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 76% | 1 | 1 | ||
| 3♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| 2♥ | E | -1 | 50 | 84% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+0.8 | 5 | 1 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-0.5 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
FINLAND vs DINKIN 2 : 4 VP (match 115439) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | FINLAND | DINKIN | |
| 1NT | E | ♣6 | = | 90 | 81% | 2♠ | S | ♦10 | +1 | 140 | 94% | 2 | ||||
| 3♥ | S | ♦6 | +1 | 170 | 86% | 3♥ | S | ♠K | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 2NT | W | ♣4 | +1 | 150 | 94% | 2♥ | E | ♣Q | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS-0.8 | NS+0.4 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 1NT | E | = | 90 | 81% | 2 | |||
| 2♠ | S | +1 | 140 | 94% | ||||
| 3♥ | S | +1 | 170 | 86% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| 2NT | W | +1 | 150 | 94% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS-0.8 | 2 | 4 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS+0.4 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
VINCIGUERRA vs USA WOMEN 6 : 0 VP (match 115440) PBN↑ top
⚠ line-ups not published by EBL for this match — board results only, no per-player Butler.
| Bd | Open room | Closed room | IMPs | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | Contract | By | Lead | Res | NS | EW | BAM | VINCIGUERRA | USA WOMEN | |
| 2♦ | E | ♦5 | -1 | 100 | 66% | 2♦ | E | ♦4 | = | 90 | 81% | 2 | ||||
| 4♣ | E | ♥K | -2 | 200 | 95% | 3♥ | S | ♥6 | -1 | 100 | 76% | 2 | ||||
| 3♦ | N | ♥A | = | 110 | 91% | 2♥ | E | ♣Q | = | 110 | 51% | 2 | ||||
| Σ | BAM / points | NS+2.0 | NS-1.1 | 6 | 0 | |||||||||||
| Bd | Cont | By | Res | NS | EW | Butler | BAM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| home | visit | |||||||
| 2♦ | E | -1 | 100 | 66% | 2 | |||
| 2♦ | E | = | 90 | 81% | ||||
| 4♣ | E | -2 | 200 | 95% | 2 | |||
| 3♥ | S | -1 | 100 | 76% | ||||
| 3♦ | N | = | 110 | 91% | 2 | |||
| 2♥ | E | = | 110 | 51% | ||||
| Σ | BAM Open | NS+2.0 | 6 | 0 | ||||
| BAM Closed | NS-1.1 | |||||||
| Player | Bds | Total | Avg |
|---|
Board 22board records → · view →
| ♠ AKT7 ♥ 8643 ♦ KQ3 ♣ J7 | ||
| ♠ J985 ♥ Q92 ♦ T98 ♣ Q93 | 22 Dlr E E-W | ♠ 4 ♥ KT7 ♦ AJ762 ♣ A542 |
| ♠ Q632 ♥ AJ5 ♦ 54 ♣ KT86 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 7 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 6 |
| S | 7 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 6 |
| E | 6 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 6 |
| W | 6 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 6 |
Minimax (par): NS +110: 2♥♠N= 2♥♠S=
Board 23board records → · view →
| ♠ T96 ♥ A543 ♦ KQ93 ♣ Q5 | ||
| ♠ KJ7 ♥ 6 ♦ T765 ♣ A9763 | 23 Dlr S Both | ♠ AQ52 ♥ JT7 ♦ A82 ♣ J42 |
| ♠ 843 ♥ KQ982 ♦ J4 ♣ KT8 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 7 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| S | 7 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| E | 6 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 8 |
| W | 6 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 8 |
Minimax (par): NS +110: 2♥N= 2♥S=
Board 24board records → · view →
| ♠ QT9 ♥ QT9 ♦ 83 ♣ AJT74 | ||
| ♠ K852 ♥ 865 ♦ A65 ♣ K83 | 24 Dlr W None | ♠ A43 ♥ AKJ42 ♦ JT ♣ 652 |
| ♠ J76 ♥ 73 ♦ KQ9742 ♣ Q9 |
| NT | ♠ | ♥ | ♦ | ♣ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 4 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 7 |
| S | 4 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 7 |
| E | 8 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 6 |
| W | 8 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 6 |
Minimax (par): NS -100: 3♦Nx-1 3♦Sx-1