Knockout event — places follow from the bracket: shared places (e.g. 5-8) are teams eliminated in the same phase; an unplayed decider leaves the place shared. Click a team for its players below.

Final placement
Place	Team
1	FRANCE SENIORS
2	MILNER
3-4	ZIMMERMANN
3-4	DUTCH SENIOR TEAM
5-8	BBCX
5-8	VICTORS
5-8	LES MOUSQUETAIRES
5-8	ENGLAND PRYOR

Cumulative Butler by cross-IMPs. Each round's per-board Butler = mean cross-IMP vs that round's full field (raw / (N−1)), rounded to 0.1. Cumulative = sum of a player's per-board Butler over ALL played rounds ÷ total boards played, rounded to 0.01.

Rounds included so far (3 of 3): R1 R2 R3. Columns QF·1… = each player's Butler total in that stanza (each knockout phase is played in segments); they sum to Total.

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	ZIMMERMANN	9	69	protocol →
	Open EWF.Bigdeli – J.Voldoire -35.6 / 14 bdClosed NSY.Chandesais – G.Dauwe -29.9 / 14 bd
1	ZIMMERMANN	25	58	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Voldoire – F.Bigdeli -19.9 / 14 bdClosed NSY.Chandesais – G.Dauwe -20.5 / 14 bd
1	ZIMMERMANN	37	21	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Voldoire – F.Bigdeli +13.6 / 14 bdClosed NSY.Chandesais – G.Dauwe +8.3 / 14 bd
1	ZIMMERMANN	0	0	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Voldoire – F.Bigdeli no board scoredClosed NSY.Chandesais – G.Dauwe no board scored
Total IMP	71

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	ENGLAND PRYOR	14	28	protocol →
	Open NSW.Van Eijck – W.Gosschalk -8.2 / 14 bdClosed EWL.Hofland – B.Van Der Hoek -10.7 / 14 bd
1	ENGLAND PRYOR	25	33	protocol →
	Open NSW.Van Eijck – W.Gosschalk +1.5 / 14 bdClosed EWB.Van Der Hoek – L.Hofland -10.1 / 14 bd
1	ENGLAND PRYOR	48	21	protocol →
	Open NSW.Van Eijck – W.Gosschalk +20.7 / 14 bdClosed EWB.Van Der Hoek – L.Hofland +12.9 / 14 bd
1	ENGLAND PRYOR	20	14	protocol →
	Open NSW.Van Eijck – W.Gosschalk +18.8 / 14 bdClosed EWB.Van Der Hoek – L.Hofland -13.2 / 14 bd
2	FRANCE SENIORS	35	26	protocol →
	Open NSW.Van Eijck – W.Gosschalk +13.6 / 14 bdClosed EWB.Van Der Hoek – L.Hofland +5.0 / 14 bd
2	FRANCE SENIORS	18	39	protocol →
	Open NSW.Van Eijck – W.Gosschalk -20.6 / 14 bdClosed EWB.Van Der Hoek – L.Hofland -6.0 / 14 bd
2	FRANCE SENIORS	13	18	protocol →
	Open NSW.Van Eijck – W.Gosschalk -7.4 / 14 bdClosed EWB.Van Der Hoek – L.Hofland -3.3 / 14 bd
2	FRANCE SENIORS	12	27	protocol →
	Open NSW.Van Eijck – W.Gosschalk -6.6 / 14 bdClosed EWB.Van Der Hoek – L.Hofland -13.7 / 14 bd
Total IMP	185

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	DUTCH SENIOR TEAM	28	14	protocol →
	Open EWD.Kendrick – M.Pryor +8.2 / 14 bdClosed NSP.Shields – R.Chamberlain +10.7 / 14 bd
1	DUTCH SENIOR TEAM	33	25	protocol →
	Open EWD.Kendrick – M.Pryor -1.5 / 14 bdClosed NSP.Shields – R.Chamberlain +10.1 / 14 bd
1	DUTCH SENIOR TEAM	21	48	protocol →
	Open EWD.Kendrick – M.Pryor -20.7 / 14 bdClosed NSP.Shields – R.Chamberlain -12.9 / 14 bd
1	DUTCH SENIOR TEAM	14	20	protocol →
	Open EWP.Shields – R.Chamberlain -18.8 / 14 bdClosed NSM.Pryor – D.Kendrick +13.2 / 14 bd
Total IMP	96

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	LES MOUSQUETAIRES	54	11	protocol →
	Open NSF.Stretz – A.Bitran +23.9 / 14 bdClosed EWJ.Rocafort – M.Claret +27.3 / 14 bd
1	LES MOUSQUETAIRES	17	13	protocol →
	Open NSM.Claret – J.Rocafort +3.4 / 14 bdClosed EWH.Fleury – P.Chottin +0.4 / 14 bd
1	LES MOUSQUETAIRES	58	25	protocol →
	Open NSF.Stretz – A.Bitran +8.0 / 14 bdClosed EWH.Fleury – P.Chottin +23.1 / 14 bd
1	LES MOUSQUETAIRES	33	24	protocol →
	Open NSM.Claret – J.Rocafort -0.4 / 14 bdClosed EWH.Fleury – P.Chottin +9.8 / 14 bd
2	DUTCH SENIOR TEAM	26	35	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Rocafort – M.Claret -13.6 / 14 bdClosed NSF.Stretz – A.Bitran -5.0 / 14 bd
2	DUTCH SENIOR TEAM	39	18	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Rocafort – M.Claret +20.6 / 14 bdClosed NSF.Stretz – A.Bitran +6.0 / 14 bd
2	DUTCH SENIOR TEAM	18	13	protocol →
	Open EWA.Bitran – F.Stretz +7.4 / 14 bdClosed NSP.Chottin – H.Fleury +3.3 / 14 bd
2	DUTCH SENIOR TEAM	27	12	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Rocafort – M.Claret +6.6 / 14 bdClosed NSF.Stretz – A.Bitran +13.7 / 14 bd
3	MILNER	48	4	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Rocafort – M.Claret +44.0 / 14 bdClosed NSF.Stretz – A.Bitran +44.0 / 14 bd
3	MILNER	37	19	protocol →
	Open EWA.Bitran – F.Stretz +18.0 / 14 bdClosed NSM.Claret – J.Rocafort +18.0 / 14 bd
3	MILNER	10	46	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Rocafort – M.Claret -36.0 / 14 bdClosed NSF.Stretz – A.Bitran -36.0 / 14 bd
3	MILNER	56	8	protocol →
	Open EWA.Bitran – F.Stretz +48.0 / 14 bdClosed NSM.Claret – J.Rocafort +48.0 / 14 bd
Total IMP	423

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	FRANCE SENIORS	11	54	protocol →
	Open EWA.Levy – G.Beniada -23.9 / 14 bdClosed NSF.Goded – H.Vincent -27.3 / 14 bd
1	FRANCE SENIORS	13	17	protocol →
	Open EWA.Levy – G.Beniada -3.4 / 14 bdClosed NSF.Goded – H.Vincent -0.4 / 14 bd
1	FRANCE SENIORS	25	58	protocol →
	Open EWA.Levy – G.Beniada -8.0 / 14 bdClosed NSF.Goded – H.Vincent -23.1 / 14 bd
1	FRANCE SENIORS	24	33	protocol →
	Open EWF.Goded – H.Vincent +0.4 / 14 bdClosed NSA.Levy – G.Beniada -9.8 / 14 bd
Total IMP	73

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	VICTORS	16	30	protocol →
	Open NSN.Zorlu – J.Hansen -10.3 / 13 bdClosed EWR.Milner – H.Lall -4.8 / 13 bd
1	VICTORS	41	36	protocol →
	line-up not in the source
1	VICTORS	24	6	protocol →
	Open NSN.Zorlu – Z.Mahmood +21.3 / 8 bdClosed EWS.Schou – J.Hansen +9.2 / 7 bd
1	VICTORS	54	29	protocol →
	Open NSN.Zorlu – Z.Mahmood +3.8 / 14 bdClosed EWJ.Hansen – S.Schou +25.6 / 14 bd
2	ZIMMERMANN	36	12	protocol →
	Open EWR.Milner – H.Lall +20.0 / 14 bdClosed NSN.Zorlu – Z.Mahmood +11.3 / 14 bd
2	ZIMMERMANN	19	59	protocol →
	Open EWN.Zorlu – Z.Mahmood -32.9 / 14 bdClosed NSR.Milner – H.Lall -18.3 / 14 bd
2	ZIMMERMANN	19	6	protocol →
	Open EWZ.Mahmood – N.Zorlu +7.7 / 14 bdClosed NSS.Schou – J.Hansen +11.6 / 14 bd
2	ZIMMERMANN	26	1	protocol →
	Open EWJ.Hansen – S.Schou +19.0 / 14 bdClosed NSN.Zorlu – Z.Mahmood +12.0 / 14 bd
3	FRANCE SENIORS	4	48	protocol →
	Open NSN.Zorlu – Z.Mahmood -44.0 / 14 bdClosed EWR.Milner – H.Lall -44.0 / 14 bd
3	FRANCE SENIORS	19	37	protocol →
	Open NSN.Zorlu – Z.Mahmood -18.0 / 14 bdClosed EWR.Milner – H.Lall -18.0 / 14 bd
3	FRANCE SENIORS	46	10	protocol →
	Open NSN.Zorlu – Z.Mahmood +36.0 / 14 bdClosed EWJ.Hansen – S.Schou +36.0 / 14 bd
3	FRANCE SENIORS	8	56	protocol →
	Open NSN.Zorlu – Z.Mahmood -48.0 / 14 bdClosed EWJ.Hansen – S.Schou -48.0 / 14 bd
Total IMP	312

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	MILNER	30	16	protocol →
	Open EWP.Bizon – M.Blat +10.3 / 13 bdClosed NSV.Melman – S.Zeligman +4.8 / 13 bd
1	MILNER	36	41	protocol →
	line-up not in the source
1	MILNER	6	24	protocol →
	Open EWV.Markowicz – K.Moszczynski -21.3 / 8 bdClosed NSV.Melman – S.Zeligman -9.2 / 7 bd
1	MILNER	29	54	protocol →
	Open EWP.Bizon – M.Blat -3.8 / 14 bdClosed NSV.Melman – S.Zeligman -25.6 / 14 bd
Total IMP	101

Round	Opponent	IMP	opp IMP
1	BBCX	69	9	protocol →
	Open NSW.Starkowski – M.Kwiecien +35.6 / 14 bdClosed EWP.Zimmermann – K.Martens +29.9 / 14 bd
1	BBCX	58	25	protocol →
	Open NSP.Tuszynski – P.Gawrys +19.9 / 14 bdClosed EWP.Zimmermann – K.Martens +20.5 / 14 bd
1	BBCX	21	37	protocol →
	Open NSW.Starkowski – M.Kwiecien -13.6 / 14 bdClosed EWP.Zimmermann – K.Martens -8.3 / 14 bd
1	BBCX	0	0	protocol →
	Open NSP.Tuszynski – P.Gawrys no board scoredClosed EWP.Zimmermann – K.Martens no board scored
2	MILNER	12	36	protocol →
	Open NSP.Tuszynski – P.Gawrys -20.0 / 14 bdClosed EWW.Starkowski – M.Kwiecien -11.3 / 14 bd
2	MILNER	59	19	protocol →
	Open NSW.Starkowski – M.Kwiecien +32.9 / 14 bdClosed EWP.Gawrys – P.Tuszynski +18.3 / 14 bd
2	MILNER	6	19	protocol →
	Open NSW.Starkowski – M.Kwiecien -7.7 / 14 bdClosed EWP.Gawrys – P.Tuszynski -11.6 / 14 bd
2	MILNER	1	26	protocol →
	Open NSP.Tuszynski – P.Gawrys -19.0 / 14 bdClosed EWW.Starkowski – M.Kwiecien -12.0 / 14 bd
Total IMP	226

Cumulative Butler standings — all players↑ top

Place	Player	Team	Boards	Total	Avg/bd	Qual.	QF·1	QF·2	QF·3	QF·4	SF·1	SF·2	SF·3	SF·4	F·1	F·2	F·3	F·4
1	K.Martens	ZIMMERMANN	42	+42.1	+1.00	+24.4	+29.9	+20.5	-8.3	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
1	P.Zimmermann	ZIMMERMANN	42	+42.1	+1.00	+24.4	+29.9	+20.5	-8.3	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
3	A.Bitran	FRANCE SENIORS	140	+128.0	+0.91	+22.1	+23.9	+8.0	·	·	-5.0	+6.0	+7.4	+13.7	+44.0	+18.0	-36.0	+48.0
3	F.Stretz	FRANCE SENIORS	140	+128.0	+0.91	+22.1	+23.9	+8.0	·	·	-5.0	+6.0	+7.4	+13.7	+44.0	+18.0	-36.0	+48.0
5	M.Claret	FRANCE SENIORS	140	+117.9	+0.84	+95.5	+27.3	+3.4	-0.4	·	-13.6	+20.6	+6.6	·	+44.0	+18.0	-36.0	+48.0
5	J.Rocafort	FRANCE SENIORS	140	+117.9	+0.84	+95.5	+27.3	+3.4	-0.4	·	-13.6	+20.6	+6.6	·	+44.0	+18.0	-36.0	+48.0
7	S.Schou	MILNER	77	+53.4	+0.69	-38.7	+9.2	+25.6	·	·	+11.6	+19.0	·	·	+36.0	-48.0	·	·
8	P.Chottin	FRANCE SENIORS	56	+36.6	+0.65	+41.8	+0.4	+23.1	+9.8	·	+3.3	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
8	H.Fleury	FRANCE SENIORS	56	+36.6	+0.65	+41.8	+0.4	+23.1	+9.8	·	+3.3	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
10	J.Hansen	MILNER	90	+43.1	+0.48	-38.7	-10.3	+9.2	+25.6	·	+11.6	+19.0	·	·	+36.0	-48.0	·	·
11	M.Kwiecien	ZIMMERMANN	84	+23.9	+0.28	+88.6	+35.6	-13.6	·	·	-11.3	+32.9	-7.7	-12.0	·	·	·	·
11	W.Starkowski	ZIMMERMANN	84	+23.9	+0.28	+88.6	+35.6	-13.6	·	·	-11.3	+32.9	-7.7	-12.0	·	·	·	·
13	P.Bizon	VICTORS	27	+6.5	+0.24	+110.7	+10.3	-3.8	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
13	M.Blat	VICTORS	27	+6.5	+0.24	+110.7	+10.3	-3.8	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
15	W.Gosschalk	DUTCH SENIOR TEAM	112	+11.8	+0.11	+175.8	-8.2	+1.5	+20.7	+18.8	+13.6	-20.6	-7.4	-6.6	·	·	·	·
15	W.Van Eijck	DUTCH SENIOR TEAM	112	+11.8	+0.11	+175.8	-8.2	+1.5	+20.7	+18.8	+13.6	-20.6	-7.4	-6.6	·	·	·	·
17	D.Kendrick	ENGLAND PRYOR	56	-0.8	-0.01	+32.2	+8.2	-1.5	-20.7	+13.2	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
17	M.Pryor	ENGLAND PRYOR	56	-0.8	-0.01	+32.2	+8.2	-1.5	-20.7	+13.2	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
19	P.Gawrys	ZIMMERMANN	70	-12.4	-0.18	+62.2	+19.9	·	·	·	-20.0	+18.3	-11.6	-19.0	·	·	·	·
19	P.Tuszynski	ZIMMERMANN	70	-12.4	-0.18	+62.2	+19.9	·	·	·	-20.0	+18.3	-11.6	-19.0	·	·	·	·
21	R.Chamberlain	ENGLAND PRYOR	56	-10.9	-0.19	+4.8	+10.7	+10.1	-12.9	-18.8	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
21	P.Shields	ENGLAND PRYOR	56	-10.9	-0.19	+4.8	+10.7	+10.1	-12.9	-18.8	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
23	L.Hofland	DUTCH SENIOR TEAM	112	-39.1	-0.35	+10.1	-10.7	-10.1	+12.9	-13.2	+5.0	-6.0	-3.3	-13.7	·	·	·	·
23	B.Van Der Hoek	DUTCH SENIOR TEAM	112	-39.1	-0.35	+10.1	-10.7	-10.1	+12.9	-13.2	+5.0	-6.0	-3.3	-13.7	·	·	·	·
25	Z.Mahmood	MILNER	134	-50.8	-0.38	+110.6	+21.3	+3.8	·	·	+11.3	-32.9	+7.7	+12.0	-44.0	-18.0	+36.0	-48.0
26	N.Zorlu	MILNER	147	-61.1	-0.42	+110.6	-10.3	+21.3	+3.8	·	+11.3	-32.9	+7.7	+12.0	-44.0	-18.0	+36.0	-48.0
27	G.Beniada	LES MOUSQUETAIRES	56	-45.1	-0.81	+50.7	-23.9	-3.4	-8.0	-9.8	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
27	A.Levy	LES MOUSQUETAIRES	56	-45.1	-0.81	+50.7	-23.9	-3.4	-8.0	-9.8	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
29	V.Melman	VICTORS	34	-30.0	-0.88	+17.2	+4.8	-9.2	-25.6	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
29	S.Zeligman	VICTORS	34	-30.0	-0.88	+17.2	+4.8	-9.2	-25.6	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
31	F.Goded	LES MOUSQUETAIRES	56	-50.4	-0.90	+47.0	-27.3	-0.4	-23.1	+0.4	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
31	H.Vincent	LES MOUSQUETAIRES	56	-50.4	-0.90	+47.0	-27.3	-0.4	-23.1	+0.4	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
33	H.Lall	MILNER	69	-65.1	-0.94	+65.5	-4.8	·	·	·	+20.0	-18.3	·	·	-44.0	-18.0	·	·
33	R.Milner	MILNER	69	-65.1	-0.94	+65.5	-4.8	·	·	·	+20.0	-18.3	·	·	-44.0	-18.0	·	·
35	F.Bigdeli	BBCX	42	-41.9	-1.00	+84.1	-35.6	-19.9	+13.6	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
35	J.Voldoire	BBCX	42	-41.9	-1.00	+48.2	-35.6	-19.9	+13.6	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
37	Y.Chandesais	BBCX	42	-42.1	-1.00	-12.6	-29.9	-20.5	+8.3	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
37	G.Dauwe	BBCX	42	-42.1	-1.00	-12.6	-29.9	-20.5	+8.3	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
39	V.Markowicz	VICTORS	8	-21.3	-2.66	-34.7	-21.3	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·
39	K.Moszczynski	VICTORS	8	-21.3	-2.66	-34.7	-21.3	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·	·

Player statistics — leaders↑ top

Top 12 in each metric — or, with a team picked as ★ My team, that team’s players. Open the full player-statistics page for every player, sortable by any column — including an opponent-adjusted (strength-of-schedule) Butler. Double-dummy is idealised — the true best play needs all four hands — so read these as tendencies, not verdicts.

vs parfull table →

#	Player	vs par
1	A.Bitran	+1.23
1	F.Stretz	+1.23
3	M.Kwiecien	+1.05
3	W.Starkowski	+1.05
5	S.Schou	+0.77
6	J.Hansen	+0.34
7	L.Hofland	+0.04
7	B.Van Der Hoek	+0.04
9	H.Lall	+0.04
9	R.Milner	+0.04
11	M.Claret	-0.19
11	J.Rocafort	-0.19
1	A.Bitran	+1.23
1	F.Stretz	+1.23
3	M.Kwiecien	+1.05
3	W.Starkowski	+1.05
5	S.Schou	+0.77
6	J.Hansen	+0.34
7	L.Hofland	+0.04
7	B.Van Der Hoek	+0.04
9	H.Lall	+0.04
9	R.Milner	+0.04
11	M.Claret	-0.19
11	J.Rocafort	-0.19
13	W.Gosschalk	-0.21
13	W.Van Eijck	-0.21
15	Z.Mahmood	-0.37
16	N.Zorlu	-0.53
17	P.Gawrys	-0.69
17	P.Tuszynski	-0.69
19	P.Bizon	+1.56
19	M.Blat	+1.56
21	K.Martens	+0.86
21	P.Zimmermann	+0.86
23	P.Chottin	+0.23
23	H.Fleury	+0.23
25	R.Chamberlain	+0.14
25	P.Shields	+0.14
27	D.Kendrick	-0.09
27	M.Pryor	-0.09
29	F.Goded	-0.46
29	H.Vincent	-0.46
31	Y.Chandesais	-0.86
31	G.Dauwe	-0.86
33	G.Beniada	-1.05
33	A.Levy	-1.05
35	F.Bigdeli	-1.26
35	J.Voldoire	-1.26
37	V.Melman	-1.41
37	S.Zeligman	-1.41
39	V.Markowicz	-2.75
39	K.Moszczynski	-2.75

Opening leadsfull table →

#	Player	on tgt
1	M.Claret	100.0%
1	P.Gawrys	100.0%
1	N.Zorlu	100.0%
4	R.Milner	94.7%
5	A.Bitran	94.1%
6	W.Starkowski	92.3%
7	P.Tuszynski	85.7%
8	J.Hansen	85.0%
9	L.Hofland	84.0%
10	J.Rocafort	78.6%
11	B.Van Der Hoek	77.8%
12	H.Lall	73.3%
1	M.Claret	100.0%
1	P.Gawrys	100.0%
1	N.Zorlu	100.0%
4	R.Milner	94.7%
5	A.Bitran	94.1%
6	W.Starkowski	92.3%
7	P.Tuszynski	85.7%
8	J.Hansen	85.0%
9	L.Hofland	84.0%
10	J.Rocafort	78.6%
11	B.Van Der Hoek	77.8%
12	H.Lall	73.3%
13	S.Schou	70.6%
14	F.Stretz	66.7%
15	Z.Mahmood	60.0%
16	M.Kwiecien	60.0%
17	D.Kendrick	100.0%
17	M.Pryor	100.0%
17	G.Beniada	100.0%
17	V.Melman	100.0%
21	P.Shields	90.9%
21	G.Dauwe	90.9%
23	Y.Chandesais	90.0%
24	H.Vincent	90.0%
25	H.Fleury	89.5%
26	S.Zeligman	87.5%
27	P.Zimmermann	81.8%
28	K.Martens	80.0%
29	F.Goded	77.8%
30	A.Levy	75.0%
31	P.Chottin	72.7%
32	R.Chamberlain	57.1%

Declarer playfull table →

#	Player	on tgt
1	A.Bitran	84.0%
2	R.Milner	83.3%
3	W.Starkowski	80.0%
4	P.Gawrys	77.8%
5	L.Hofland	75.9%
6	F.Stretz	73.3%
6	S.Schou	73.3%
8	J.Hansen	72.7%
9	Z.Mahmood	69.2%
10	B.Van Der Hoek	66.7%
11	H.Lall	66.7%
12	J.Rocafort	66.7%
1	A.Bitran	84.0%
2	R.Milner	83.3%
3	W.Starkowski	80.0%
4	P.Gawrys	77.8%
5	L.Hofland	75.9%
6	F.Stretz	73.3%
6	S.Schou	73.3%
8	J.Hansen	72.7%
9	Z.Mahmood	69.2%
10	B.Van Der Hoek	66.7%
11	H.Lall	66.7%
12	J.Rocafort	66.7%
13	N.Zorlu	60.0%
14	P.Tuszynski	57.1%
15	M.Claret	55.6%
16	M.Kwiecien	40.0%
17	M.Pryor	100.0%
17	A.Levy	100.0%
19	V.Melman	88.9%
19	F.Goded	88.9%
21	P.Chottin	85.7%
22	D.Kendrick	85.7%
23	P.Shields	83.3%
24	G.Dauwe	72.7%
25	S.Zeligman	71.4%
26	H.Vincent	71.4%
27	Y.Chandesais	70.0%
28	P.Zimmermann	70.0%
29	G.Beniada	66.7%
30	H.Fleury	66.7%
31	K.Martens	63.6%
32	R.Chamberlain	58.3%

Defencefull table →

#	Player	on tgt
1	Z.Mahmood	100.0%
1	N.Zorlu	100.0%
3	P.Gawrys	91.7%
3	P.Tuszynski	91.7%
5	H.Lall	91.2%
5	R.Milner	91.2%
7	M.Kwiecien	88.9%
7	W.Starkowski	88.9%
9	L.Hofland	82.0%
9	B.Van Der Hoek	82.0%
11	S.Schou	81.1%
11	J.Hansen	81.1%
1	Z.Mahmood	100.0%
1	N.Zorlu	100.0%
3	P.Gawrys	91.7%
3	P.Tuszynski	91.7%
5	H.Lall	91.2%
5	R.Milner	91.2%
7	M.Kwiecien	88.9%
7	W.Starkowski	88.9%
9	L.Hofland	82.0%
9	B.Van Der Hoek	82.0%
11	S.Schou	81.1%
11	J.Hansen	81.1%
13	M.Claret	81.0%
13	J.Rocafort	81.0%
15	A.Bitran	75.9%
15	F.Stretz	75.9%
17	R.Chamberlain	94.4%
17	P.Shields	94.4%
19	V.Melman	90.9%
19	S.Zeligman	90.9%
21	P.Chottin	86.7%
21	H.Fleury	86.7%
23	G.Beniada	85.7%
23	A.Levy	85.7%
25	K.Martens	85.7%
25	P.Zimmermann	85.7%
27	D.Kendrick	83.3%
27	M.Pryor	83.3%
29	F.Goded	78.9%
29	H.Vincent	78.9%
31	Y.Chandesais	71.4%
31	G.Dauwe	71.4%

Bidding activityfull table →

#	Player	active
1	Z.Mahmood	51.6%
2	P.Tuszynski	51.4%
3	P.Gawrys	50.5%
4	W.Gosschalk	49.3%
5	N.Zorlu	46.4%
6	A.Bitran	44.4%
7	B.Van Der Hoek	42.4%
8	W.Van Eijck	41.7%
9	F.Stretz	41.6%
10	M.Kwiecien	40.6%
11	J.Hansen	40.5%
12	J.Rocafort	38.4%
1	Z.Mahmood	51.6%
2	P.Tuszynski	51.4%
3	P.Gawrys	50.5%
4	W.Gosschalk	49.3%
5	N.Zorlu	46.4%
6	A.Bitran	44.4%
7	B.Van Der Hoek	42.4%
8	W.Van Eijck	41.7%
9	F.Stretz	41.6%
10	M.Kwiecien	40.6%
11	J.Hansen	40.5%
12	J.Rocafort	38.4%
13	M.Claret	38.4%
14	H.Lall	37.8%
15	L.Hofland	37.3%
16	W.Starkowski	36.1%
17	S.Schou	29.9%
18	R.Milner	25.4%
19	S.Zeligman	57.7%
20	V.Melman	50.0%
21	K.Moszczynski	50.0%
22	D.Kendrick	49.3%
23	F.Bigdeli	48.8%
24	A.Levy	48.1%
25	M.Pryor	45.6%
26	K.Martens	44.5%
27	H.Fleury	44.3%
28	G.Beniada	44.2%
29	V.Markowicz	43.8%
30	F.Goded	42.8%
31	J.Voldoire	42.7%
32	H.Vincent	42.6%
33	G.Dauwe	42.6%
34	P.Shields	41.7%
35	R.Chamberlain	41.4%
36	P.Chottin	40.5%
37	P.Zimmermann	40.5%
38	Y.Chandesais	37.7%
39	P.Bizon	36.6%
40	M.Blat	32.6%

Biggest swings — the wildest boards↑ top

Same deal, opposite fortunes: boards where the field’s cross-IMP Butler split the widest. Swing = the best NS result’s Butler minus the best EW result’s, in IMPs; the two columns show those poles (contract, score and Butler). Click a board for its full record.

Board	Tables	Swing	Best for NS	Best for EW
Semifinal · Bd 7	4	30.0	6♦ +100 DUTCH SENIOR TEAM (+14.0)	6♣x +1740 DUTCH SENIOR TEAM (+16.0)
Semifinal · Bd 28	4	28.6	7♠ +2210 ZIMMERMANN (+14.3)	4♠ -710 FRANCE SENIORS (+14.3)
Quarterfinal · Bd 8	8	28.3	6♥x +1210 FRANCE SENIORS (+15.0)	4♠x +590 ZIMMERMANN (+13.3)
Quarterfinal · Bd 10	8	25.8	6♥ +1430 ZIMMERMANN (+11.7)	6♥ +100 FRANCE SENIORS (+14.1)
Quarterfinal · Bd 13	8	21.8	6♥x +500 FRANCE SENIORS (+9.1)	5♥x +850 FRANCE SENIORS (+12.7)
Quarterfinal · Bd 38	8	20.7	4♥ +100 BBCX (+9.6)	4♠x +800 DUTCH SENIOR TEAM (+11.1)
Quarterfinal · Bd 41	8	20.3	4♠x +1100 DUTCH SENIOR TEAM (+10.3)	4♠ -200 ZIMMERMANN (+10.0)
Quarterfinal · Bd 37	8	20.0	4♥ +300 BBCX (+8.6)	3NT +600 FRANCE SENIORS (+11.4)
Quarterfinal · Bd 36	8	19.0	2♠ -100 MILNER (+10.1)	4♠x +1100 ZIMMERMANN (+8.9)
Quarterfinal · Bd 23	8	17.7	4♠ +650 VICTORS (+9.1)	4♠ +100 ZIMMERMANN (+8.6)
Semifinal · Bd 35	4	17.4	4♠ +100 ZIMMERMANN (+5.7)	4♠ +620 DUTCH SENIOR TEAM (+11.7)
Semifinal · Bd 15	4	17.3	3♦ +200 ZIMMERMANN (+11.0)	4♥ +450 ZIMMERMANN (+6.3)
Semifinal · Bd 43	4	17.3	4♠ +620 FRANCE SENIORS (+11.3)	4♠ +100 MILNER (+6.0)
Quarterfinal · Bd 49	6	17.2	4♠ +650 ENGLAND PRYOR (+10.8)	3NT +200 MILNER (+6.4)

Stages

Tables

Rounds

Strasbourg 2023 — Knockout III

Knockout bracket↑ top

Tournament standings — final placement↑ top

BBCX — results↑ top

DUTCH SENIOR TEAM — results↑ top

ENGLAND PRYOR — results↑ top

FRANCE SENIORS — results↑ top

LES MOUSQUETAIRES — results↑ top

MILNER — results↑ top

VICTORS — results↑ top

ZIMMERMANN — results↑ top

Cumulative Butler standings — all players↑ top

Player statistics — leaders↑ top

Biggest swings — the wildest boards↑ top