LIU Hua · SHANGHAI YOUTH 2

265rank
+3.5Butler · 20 bds
+0.17per board
±4.7swing
-0.50vs par /bd
+0.10adjusted /bd
Butler per round: 3.1 0.4by round

vs par split: bidding +1.70 · play -2.80

Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.08/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.10/bd

Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 100.0% · defence 50.0%

Card play by contract type — on target
vs NTvs a suit
Opening leads·100.0% (1)
Declarer play·100.0% (3)
Defence·50.0% (6)

Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 100.0% (1)

vs par by strain: a suit -1.10 (10)

vs par by level: part-score +0.20 (5) · game -2.40 (5)

By role: declaring +1.74/bd (+0.30 vs par · 10) · defending -1.39/bd (-1.30 vs par · 10)

By vulnerability: vulnerable +0.19/bd (-2.00 vs par · 10) · not vulnerable +0.16/bd (+1.00 vs par · 10)

By round↑ top

RoundPartnerOpponentsRoomBdsButlerAvgvs par
Round 3Z.ChenQ.Gong – Y.ChanOpen10+3.1+0.31-0.80
Round 4X.ZhangJ.Edelstein – W.RauldOpen10+0.4+0.04-0.20

Every board — best Butler first↑ top

vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.

ButlerRoundOpponentsBdContractLeadResvs par
+9.7Round 3BEIJING-HONGKONG213N♣10=+10
+7.4Round 4RAULD44♠♥J=+0
+6.5Round 3BEIJING-HONGKONG273N♠Q=+7
+6.3Round 3BEIJING-HONGKONG283N♠4+1+5
+5.0Round 4RAULD85♦x♠A-2+4
+2.7Round 4RAULD52♣♣3-2+0
+2.2Round 4RAULD64♣♠Q-2+11
+0.1Round 4RAULD23N♥4+1+0
-0.3Round 3BEIJING-HONGKONG223N♥2=-5
-0.6Round 4RAULD71N♥2+1+1
-1.5Round 4RAULD33N♥5+1+1
-1.7Round 3BEIJING-HONGKONG252♠♦4-3-2
-2.2Round 3BEIJING-HONGKONG242♣♥10-1-3
-2.2Round 3BEIJING-HONGKONG293N♥K+2+0
-2.3Round 3BEIJING-HONGKONG234♠♥K+1+0
-2.7Round 4RAULD92♥♣8-2-5
-3.5Round 4RAULD103N♥5-1-6
-4.2Round 3BEIJING-HONGKONG264♠♦Q=-8
-6.5Round 3BEIJING-HONGKONG303N♦5-1-12
-8.7Round 4RAULD14♠♦8=-8