CHEN Ping · SHANGHAI HENGYUANXIANG

90rank
+5.4Butler · 10 bds
+0.54per board
±4.4swing
-2.90vs par /bd
+0.87adjusted /bd
by round

vs par split: bidding +0.14 · play +0.71

Strength of schedule: opponents averaged +0.33/bd (a tough draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.87/bd

Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 50.0% · defence 100.0%

Card play by contract type — on target
vs NTvs a suit
Opening leads·100.0% (3)
Declarer play·50.0% (2)
Defence·100.0% (5)

Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (2) · ♣ 100.0% (1)

vs par by strain: a suit +0.86 (7)

vs par by level: part-score +4.20 (5) · game -4.00 (1) · slam -11.00 (1)

By role: declaring -2.42/bd (-9.00 vs par · 5) · defending +3.50/bd (+3.20 vs par · 5)

By vulnerability: vulnerable +1.40/bd (-3.00 vs par · 6) · not vulnerable -0.75/bd (-2.75 vs par · 4)

By round↑ top

RoundPartnerOpponentsRoomBdsButlerAvgvs par
Round 2Z.TianM.Feng – H.HuangClosed10+5.4+0.54-2.90

Every board — best Butler first↑ top

vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.

ButlerRoundOpponentsBdContractLeadResvs par
+6.2Round 2SHANGHAI THINK CLUB133♠♣6-3+10
+5.5Round 2SHANGHAI THINK CLUB123♠♦A-3+4
+3.5Round 2SHANGHAI THINK CLUB175♣♠J-1-4
+3.4Round 2SHANGHAI THINK CLUB192♥♣4-1+5
+3.2Round 2SHANGHAI THINK CLUB182♠♦5+1+1
-1.1Round 2SHANGHAI THINK CLUB162♣♠9=+1
-1.7Round 2SHANGHAI THINK CLUB203N♠6+1-13
-1.9Round 2SHANGHAI THINK CLUB143N♥9+4-17
-2.8Round 2SHANGHAI THINK CLUB113N♥4-1-5
-8.9Round 2SHANGHAI THINK CLUB156♠♣10-2-11