LEE Linda · CANADA WOMEN

714rank
-15.9Butler · 20 bds
-0.80per board
±4.5swing
-3.25vs par /bd
-0.89adjusted /bd
Butler per round: -6.5 -9.4by round

vs par split: bidding -1.64 · play -2.09

Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.10/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.89/bd

Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 50.0% · defence 80.0%

Card play by contract type — on target
vs NTvs a suit
Opening leads·100.0% (4)
Declarer play·50.0% (2)
Defence·80.0% (5)

Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (3) · ♣ 100.0% (1)

vs par by strain: a suit -3.73 (11)

vs par by level: part-score -1.83 (6) · game -6.00 (5)

By role: declaring -0.20/bd (-4.82 vs par · 11) · defending -1.52/bd (-1.33 vs par · 9)

By vulnerability: vulnerable -0.33/bd (-4.00 vs par · 12) · not vulnerable -1.49/bd (-2.12 vs par · 8)

By round↑ top

RoundPartnerOpponentsRoomBdsButlerAvgvs par
Round 1J.FajgelzonB.Shan – J.WuOpen10-6.5-0.65-2.10
Round 2J.FajgelzonC.Wang – Z.WangOpen10-9.4-0.94-4.40

Every board — best Butler first↑ top

vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.

ButlerRoundOpponentsBdContractLeadResvs par
+6.7Round 2TONGJI UNIVERSITY193N♣K-4+8
+6.5Round 1SHANGHAI KEJU83N♣7=+7
+3.9Round 1SHANGHAI KEJU35♣♠7+1-1
+3.2Round 2TONGJI UNIVERSITY182♠♥A+1+1
+3.1Round 1SHANGHAI KEJU52♠♠2+1+0
+3.0Round 1SHANGHAI KEJU62N♠4-1+4
+1.7Round 2TONGJI UNIVERSITY154♥♦K+1+0
+1.4Round 1SHANGHAI KEJU93N♥3+2+0
+0.2Round 2TONGJI UNIVERSITY203N♥3+3-13
-0.7Round 1SHANGHAI KEJU104♥♠4+1-4
-1.1Round 2TONGJI UNIVERSITY162♣♠3=+1
-1.4Round 2TONGJI UNIVERSITY174♣♠J+1-8
-1.9Round 2TONGJI UNIVERSITY143N♥4+4-17
-2.8Round 2TONGJI UNIVERSITY113N♥4-1-5
-3.0Round 2TONGJI UNIVERSITY132♠♣6=+1
-4.6Round 1SHANGHAI KEJU42♠♥9=-6
-5.4Round 1SHANGHAI KEJU23N♣6=-7
-6.5Round 1SHANGHAI KEJU74♥♠8-1-13
-7.2Round 1SHANGHAI KEJU13N♣3+3-1
-11.0Round 2TONGJI UNIVERSITY124♥x♥5-3-12