SHAN Sheng · HUATIE HAIXING
73rank
+6.1Butler · 10 bds
+0.61per board
±4.4swing
-0.40vs par /bd
+0.24adjusted /bd
by round
vs par split: bidding +0.00 · play +0.75
Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.37/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted +0.24/bd
Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 100.0% · defence 100.0%
| vs NT | vs a suit | |
|---|---|---|
| Opening leads | · | 100.0% (1) |
| Declarer play | · | 100.0% (1) |
| Defence | · | 100.0% (1) |
Opening leads by suit led: ♥ 100.0% (1)
vs par by strain: a suit +0.75 (4)
vs par by level: part-score +0.00 (1) · game +7.50 (2) · slam -12.00 (1)
By role: declaring -0.00/bd (-1.86 vs par · 7) · defending +2.03/bd (+3.00 vs par · 3)
By vulnerability: vulnerable -1.60/bd (-4.40 vs par · 5) · not vulnerable +2.82/bd (+3.60 vs par · 5)
By round↑ top
| Round | Partner | Opponents | Room | Bds | Butler | Avg | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Round 3 | Y.Wei | H.Uman – A.Gonzales Noguera | Closed | 10 | +6.1 | +0.61 | -0.40 |
Every board — best Butler first↑ top
vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.
| Butler | Round | Opponents | Bd | Contract | Lead | Res | vs par |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +10.0 | Round 3 | SOCMA | 26 | 5♠x | ♥3 | -1 | +11 |
| +5.8 | Round 3 | SOCMA | 28 | 3N | ♦6 | = | +5 |
| +1.7 | Round 3 | SOCMA | 22 | 3N | ♠2 | +2 | -4 |
| +1.6 | Round 3 | SOCMA | 23 | 4♥x | ♣A | -2 | +4 |
| +0.4 | Round 3 | SOCMA | 24 | 2♥ | ♥2 | +1 | +0 |
| -0.3 | Round 3 | SOCMA | 21 | 1N | ♣10 | +1 | -1 |
| -0.9 | Round 3 | SOCMA | 25 | 2N | ♠9 | = | -1 |
| -2.7 | Round 3 | SOCMA | 27 | 3N | ♠4 | -1 | -5 |
| -3.0 | Round 3 | SOCMA | 29 | 3N | ♠5 | +3 | -1 |
| -6.5 | Round 3 | SOCMA | 30 | 6♣ | ♥A | -1 | -12 |