NISBET Pamela · CANADA WOMEN

709rank
-15.4Butler · 20 bds
-0.77per board
±4.1swing
+1.50vs par /bd
-0.98adjusted /bd
Butler per round: -12.2 -3.2by round

vs par split: bidding +1.71 · play -0.07

Strength of schedule: opponents averaged -0.21/bd (an easy draw) → opponent-adjusted -0.98/bd

Card play — on target: opening leads 100.0% · declarer play 66.7% · defence 87.5%

Card play by contract type — on target
vs NTvs a suit
Opening leads·100.0% (3)
Declarer play·66.7% (3)
Defence·87.5% (8)

Opening leads by suit led: ♠ 100.0% (1) · ♦ 100.0% (1) · ♣ 100.0% (1)

vs par by strain: a suit +1.64 (14)

vs par by level: part-score -0.43 (7) · game +4.80 (5) · slam +1.00 (2)

By role: declaring +0.80/bd (+0.88 vs par · 8) · defending -1.82/bd (+1.92 vs par · 12)

By vulnerability: vulnerable -1.34/bd (+3.50 vs par · 10) · not vulnerable -0.20/bd (-0.50 vs par · 10)

By round↑ top

RoundPartnerOpponentsRoomBdsButlerAvgvs par
Round 1S.Summers-CaleyN.Liu – F.YuClosed10-12.2-1.22+0.10
Round 2S.Summers-CaleyZ.Li – Y.GuClosed10-3.2-0.32+2.90

Every board — best Butler first↑ top

vs par = IMPs this pair scored above (+) or below (−) the board’s double-dummy par — what bidding and play (theirs and the opponents’) added or gave away against perfect play.

ButlerRoundOpponentsBdContractLeadResvs par
+7.5Round 1SHANGHAI KEJU36♣♦A-1+13
+4.6Round 2TONGJI UNIVERSITY145♦♥5+1+18
+3.8Round 2TONGJI UNIVERSITY132♥♣4+1+0
+2.1Round 2TONGJI UNIVERSITY161N♣10+1+0
+1.8Round 1SHANGHAI KEJU54♠♣9-1+5
+1.5Round 2TONGJI UNIVERSITY192N♣4+1+1
+0.8Round 2TONGJI UNIVERSITY173♣♠J+1+8
+0.7Round 1SHANGHAI KEJU104♥♠4+1+4
+0.7Round 2TONGJI UNIVERSITY203N♥6+2+13
+0.2Round 1SHANGHAI KEJU43♠♦Q-1+1
-0.6Round 1SHANGHAI KEJU13♦♣K+2-7
-1.4Round 1SHANGHAI KEJU93N♥10+2+0
-1.8Round 2TONGJI UNIVERSITY122♥♣4+1+0
-1.9Round 2TONGJI UNIVERSITY111N♥4+1+0
-2.1Round 2TONGJI UNIVERSITY184♦♦3-1+0
-3.6Round 1SHANGHAI KEJU24♠♦10-3-4
-4.4Round 1SHANGHAI KEJU62♥♠10=-5
-5.9Round 1SHANGHAI KEJU74♥♠J=+1
-6.5Round 1SHANGHAI KEJU83N♣2=-7
-10.9Round 2TONGJI UNIVERSITY156♥♣J=-11